Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Reparixin in Pancreatic Islet Auto-transplantation

A Phase 2/3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Assignment Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Reparixin in Pancreatic Islet Auto-transplantation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01967888
Enrollment
104
Registered
2013-10-23
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2018-01-31
Last updated
2023-11-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatectomy for Chronic Pancreatitis

Keywords

Pancreatic islet auto-transplantation

Brief summary

The study is a phase 2/3, multicenter, double-blind, parallel assignment study. It involves 100 adult recipients of an intra-hepatic pancreatic Islet Auto-Transplantation (IAT). The objective of this clinical trial is to assess whether reparixin leads to improved transplant outcome as measured by the proportion of insulin-independent patients following IAT. The safety of reparixin in the specific clinical setting will be also evaluated.

Detailed description

In contrast to allo-transplantation in type 1 diabetes patients, where immunological mechanisms involving allo- and auto-antibodies affect long-term graft function, outcome in IAT (Islet Auto-Transplantation) is independent from immunological processes and does not require immunosuppression management. On the other hand, early inflammatory events intrinsic to the intra-portal islet infusion have been demonstrated to impact islet engraftment. Among possible mechanisms, PMNs have been found to be the predominant cell types infiltrating the liver in a syngeneic model of islet transplantation in mice. Data obtained in experimental models of islet transplantation in mice demonstrate a clear effect of reparixin in improving graft survival and function. Protection from the loss and/or deterioration of transplanted islets was evident regardless of the immunological mechanisms involved in islet damage, suggesting that the ability of reparixin to modulate early inflammatory responses readily impact graft outcome. Thus, the use of reparixin may emerge as a potential useful medication in the control of non specific inflammatory events surrounding the early phases of IAT. The goal of this study is to reach a total of 100 adult patients who are randomized and receive IAT after total or completion pancreatectomy. Patients will be randomly (1:1) assigned to receive either reparixin \[continuous i.v. infusion for 7 days (168hrs)\], or matched placebo (control group),starting approximately 12hrs before islet infusion. The two groups will be balanced within each centre. All patients who are randomized and receive the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo) will be included in the ITT analysis. Patients will be in the ITT analysis whether or not they receive IAT, because exclusions cannot be made for events occurring after randomization that could be influenced by the randomized assignment. Recruitment will be competitive among the study sites, until the planned number of patients is enrolled. Competitive recruitment has been chosen to increase the speed of recruitment and to account for any difference in transplant rate among study sites. Each centre will enroll patients as rapidly as possible, up to a maximum of 40 patients (as per the randomization list). A maximum of 48 patients is allowed for the site of the Primary Investigator. Each patient will be involved in the study for 7 day hospital stay during pancreatectomy followed by islet transplantation, for all required measurements up to hospital discharge and for 2 post-transplant visits scheduled @ day 75+14 and 365+14 after the transplant.

Interventions

Solution for intravenous (IV) infusion; 2.772 mg/kg body weight/hour administered at 0.25 mL/kg/hour

DRUGPlacebo

Physiologic solution administered at 0.25 mL/kg/hour

Sponsors

Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients eligible for an IAT following total (or completion) pancreatectomy. * Ages \> 18 years. * Patients willing and able to comply with the protocol procedures for the duration of the study, including scheduled follow-up visits and examinations. * Patients who have given written informed consent, prior to any study-related procedure not part of normal medical care, with the understanding that consent may be withdrawn by the patient at any time without prejudice to their future medical care.

Exclusion criteria

* Recipients of a previous IAT (if completion pancreatectomy). * Patients undergoing total pancreatectomy due to either pancreatic cancer or pancreatic benign diseases other than chronic pancreatitis, including insulinomas, etc. * Patients with inadequate renal reserve as per calculated creatinine clearance (CLcr) \< 60 mL/min according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula (1976). * Patients with hepatic dysfunction as defined by increased ALT/AST \> 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) or increased total bilirubin above the upper limit at local laboratory). Patients with Gilbert's syndrome (elevated unconjugated bilirubin levels in the absence of any evidence of hepatic or biliary tract disease) are not excluded. * Patients with a preoperative International Normalized Ratio (INR) \> 1.5 or any known coagulopathy. * Hypersensitivity to: 1. ibuprofen or to more than one non steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). 2. medications belonging to the class of sulfonamides, such as sulfamethazine, sulfamethoxazole, sulfasalazine, nimesulide or celecoxib. * Concurrent sepsis (as per positive blood culture(s) and/or fever associated with other signs of systemic sepsis syndrome). * Treatment with systemic steroids in the 2 weeks prior to enrolment (except for the use of \<5mg prednisone daily or equivalent dose of hydrocortisone, for physiological replacement only) or with any immune modulators in the 4 weeks prior to enrolment. * Patients with pre-existing diabetes or evidence of impaired β-cells function, based on pre-operative fasting blood glucose \>115 mg/dL and/or a HbA1c \> 6.5%, or requiring treatment with any anti-diabetic medication (e.g. insulin, metformin, etc) within the 2 weeks prior to enrolment. * Use of any investigational agent in the 4 weeks prior to enrolment, including any anti-cytokine/chemokine agents. * Pregnant or breast-feeding women; unwillingness to use effective contraceptive measures (females and males). (NB: pregnancy should be avoided in patients or partners during the first month after completing the treatment with the Investigational Product; no other specific warnings are described, considering the treatment course of the Investigational Product, its PK profile, and the lack of significant adverse effects on mating performance and fertility in animal studies). * Patients with past or current history of alcohol abuse based on clinical history and/or past treatment for alcohol addiction. * Patients with evidence of pre-operative portal hypertension as per clinical history and abdominal/liver imaging by ultrasound techniques. Sites will comply with any additional or more restrictive

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients Who Were Insulin Independent After Islet Autotransplantation (IAT) at Day 365±14 Days After Transplant.day 365±14 after the transplantInsulin-independence is defined as freedom from the need to take exogenous insulin for 14 or more consecutive days, with adequate glycemic control, as defined by: * a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level \<6.5%; * fingerstick fasting blood glucose not exceeding 126 mg/dL more than three times in the past week (based on a minimum of one daily measurement; * a 2 hour post-prandial blood glucose not exceeding 180 mg/dL more than four times in the past week (based on a minimum of one daily measurement); * a laboratory fasting glucose in the non-diabetic range (\<126 mg/dL).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Serum C-peptide Level at Day 365±14 After the Transplantday 365±14 after the transplantAUC for the serum C-peptide level is calculated during the first 4 hours of a mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT), normalized by the number of Islet Equivalent (IEQ)/kg
Average Daily Insulin Requirements at Day 75±14 After the Transplantday 75±14 after the transplantDaily insulin is reported as IU/kg and intake averaged over the previous week.
Average Daily Insulin Requirements at Day 365±14 After the Transplantday 365±14 after the transplantDaily insulin is reported as IU/kg and intake averaged over the previous week.
Time Course From Basal to 240 Min of Glucose Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 75±14 After the Transplantday 75±14 after the transplantData of this outcome are reported as model estimates over all timepoints. This parameter was assessed at the following timepoints on the following numbers of patients for Reparixin and placebo, respectively: * basal; N=43; 48 (Basal is: 2 basal samples taken separately between -20 to 0 minutes before the meal followed by samples through 240 minutes after the meal). * 15 min; N=42; 46 * 30 min; N=40; 46 * 60 min; N=40; 46 * 90 min; N=40; 46 * 120 min; N=41; 46 * 180 min; N=40; 46 * 240 min; N=39; 44
Time Course From Basal to 240 Min of Glucose Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 365±14 After the Transplantday 365±14 after the transplantData are reported as model estimates over all timepoints This parameters was assessed at the following timepoints on the following numbers of patients for Reparixin and placebo, respectively: * basal; N=34; 42 (Basal is: 2 basal samples taken separately between -20 to 0 minutes before the meal followed by samples through 240 minutes after the meal). * 15 min; N=34; 41 * 30 min; N=34; 41 * 60 min; N=34; 41 * 90 min; N=34; 41 * 120 min; N=34; 41 * 180 min; N=33; 41 * 240 min; N=33; 41
Time Course From Basal to 240 Min of C-peptide Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 75±14 After the Transplantday 75±14 after the transplantData are reported as model estimates over all timepoints. This parameters was assessed at the following timepoints on the following numbers of patients for Reparixin and placebo, respectively: * basal; N=44; 48 (Basal is: 2 basal samples taken separately between -20 to 0 minutes before the meal followed by samples through 240 minutes after the meal). * 15 min; N=43; 47 * 30 min; N=41; 47 * 60 min; N=42; 47 * 90 min; N=42; 47 * 120 min; N=42; 47 * 180 min; N=41; 47 * 240 min; N=40; 44
Time Course From Basal to 240 Min of C-peptide Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 365±14 After the Transplantday 365±14 after the transplantData are reported as model estimates over all timepoints. This parameters was assessed at the following timepoints on the following numbers of patients for Reparixin and placebo, respectively: * basal; N=33; 41 (Basal is: 2 basal samples taken separately between -20 to 0 minutes before the meal followed by samples through 240 minutes after the meal). * 15 min; N=34; 41 * 30 min; N=34; 41 * 60 min; N=33; 41 * 90 min; N=34; 41 * 120 min; N=34; 41 * 180 min; N=33; 40 * 240 min; N=33; 41
Time Course From Basal to 240 Min of Insulin Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 75±14 After the Transplantday 75±14 after the transplantData are reported as model estimates over all timepoints. This parameter was assessed at the following timepoints on the following numbers of patients for Reparixin and placebo, respectively: * basal; N=43; 48 (Basal is: 2 basal samples taken separately between -20 to 0 minutes before the meal followed by samples through 240 minutes after the meal). * 15 min; N=43; 47 * 30 min; N=41; 47 * 60 min; N=41; 47 * 90 min; N=41; 47 * 120 min; N=42; 47 * 180 min; N=41; 47 * 240 min; N=40; 44
Time Course From Basal to 240 Min of Insulin Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 365±14 After the Transplantday 365±14 after the transplantData are reported as model estimates over all timepoints. This parameter was assessed at the following timepoints on the following numbers of patients for Reparixin and placebo, respectively: * basal; N=34; 41 (Basal is: 2 basal samples taken separately between -20 to 0 minutes before the meal followed by samples through 240 minutes after the meal) * 15 min; N=34; 41 * 30 min; N=34; 41 * 60 min; N=34; 41 * 90 min; N=34; 41 * 120 min; N=34; 41 * 180 min; N=33; 41 * 240 min; N=33; 40
β-cell Function at Day 75±14 After the Transplantday 75±14 after the transplantThis variable is assessed by β-score (assessment of β-cell function after islet transplantation). The total score is calculated on a 0-8 scoring system (higher is a better outcome) that gives 0-2 points each for: * fasting plasma glucose, * HbA1c, * stimulated C-peptide * insulin requirement subscales. The higher the total score, the better the outcome. * Fasting (or before breakfast) plasma glucose (mg/dL) : ≤99, Score 2; 100-124, Score 1; ≥ 125, Score 0 (the higher the subscore the better the outcome) * HbA1c (%): ≤6.1, Score 2; 6.2-6.9, Score 1; ≥ 7.0, Score 0 (the higher the subscore the better the outcome) * Daily average (previous week) insulin (IU/kg/day): ---, Score 2; 0.01-0.24, Score 1; ≥ 0.25, Score 0 (the higher the subscore the better the outcome) * Stimulated C-peptide (ng/mL): ≥ 0.9, Score 2; 0.3-0.89, Score 1; ≤0.3, Score 0 (the higher the subscore the better the outcome)
β-cell Function at Day 365±14 After the Transplantday 365±14 after the transplantThis variable is assessed by β-score (assessment of β-cell function after islet transplantation). The total score is calculated on a 0-8 scoring system (higher is a better outcome) that gives 0-2 points each for glucose, HbA1c, stimulated C-peptide and insulin requirement subscales. The higher the total score the better the outcome. * Fasting (or before breakfast) plasma glucose (mg/dL) : ≤99, Score 2; 100-124, Score 1; ≥ 125, Score 0 (the higher the subscore the better the outcome) * HbA1c (%): ≤6.1, Score 2; 6.2-6.9, Score 1; ≥ 7.0, Score 0 (the higher the subscore the better the outcome) * Daily average (previous week) insulin (IU/kg/day): ---, Score 2; 0.01-0.24, Score 1; ≥ 0.25, Score 0 (the higher the subscore the better the outcome) * Stimulated C-peptide (ng/mL): ≥ 0.9, Score 2; 0.3-0.89, Score 1; ≤0.3, Score 0 (the higher the subscore the better the outcome)
Proportion of Patients With an HbA1c <6.5% at Day 365±14 After the Transplantday 365±14 after the transplantPercentage of patients with a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) \<6.5% at day 365±14 after the transplant.
Cumulative Number of Severe Hypoglycemic Events From Day 75±14 to Day 365±14 After the Transplantfrom day 75±14 to day 365±14 after the transplantA severe hypoglycemic event is defined as an event with one of the following symptoms: memory loss, confusion, uncontrollable behavior, irrational behavior, unusual difficulty in awakening, suspected seizure, seizure, loss of consciousness, or visual symptoms, in which the subject was unable to treat him/herself and which was associated with either a blood glucose level \<54mg/dL or prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, i.v. glucose, or glucagon administration.
Proportion of Patients With an HbA1c <6.5% at Day 365±14 After the Transplant AND Free of Severe Hypoglycemic Events From Day 75±14 to Day 365±14 After the Transplant Inclusivefrom day 75±14 to day 365±14 after the transplantPercentage of patients with an HbA1c \<6.5% at day 365±14 after the transplant AND free of severe hypoglycemic events from day 75±14 to day 365±14 after the transplant inclusive.A severe hypoglycemic event is defined as an event with one of the following symptoms: memory loss, confusion, uncontrollable behavior, irrational behavior, unusual difficulty in awakening, suspected seizure, seizure, loss of consciousness, or visual symptoms, in which the subject was unable to treat him/herself and which was associated with either a blood glucose level \<54mg/dL or prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, i.v. glucose, or glucagon administration.
Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Throughout the Studyup to day 365±14 after the transplantThe percentages of patients with any treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE, serious and non serious) and with serious TEAE by severity are presented. Patients with multiple events within a particular system organ class or preferred term were counted only under the category of their most severe event within that system organ class or preferred term. A serious AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: * Resulted in death * Was life-threatening (ie, the patient was at risk of death at the time of the event) * Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect * Was an important medical event that, based upon appropriate medical judgment, may have jeopardized the patient and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above
Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Serum C-peptide Level at Day 75±14 After the Transplantday 75±14 after the transplantAUC for the serum C-peptide level is calculated during the first 4 hours of an MMTT, normalized by the number of Islet Equivalent (IEQ)/kg
Proportion of Patients Falling Into One of the Following Malnutrition Risk Levels (Poor Prognosis, Significant Risk, Increased Risk, Normal) According to Pre-albumin Level at Day 365±14 After the Transplantday 365±14 after the transplantMalnutrition risk levels are defined as: * Poor prognosis = pre-albumin level \<5.0 mg/dL * Significant risk = pre-albumin level 5.0 to 10.9 mg/dL * Increased risk = pre-albumin level 11.0 to 15.0 mg/dL * Normal = pre-albumin level \> 15.0 (up to 35.0) mg/dL
Proportion of Patients by Steatorrhea Severity at Day 75±14 After the Transplantday 75±14 after the transplantLevels of steatorrhea severity (evaluated in the 4 weeks prior to day 75±14 and 365±14), are defined as: * No steatorrhea; * Steatorrhea few times per week; * Steatorrhea daily; * Stool incontinence.
Proportion of Patients by Steatorrhea Severity at Day 365±14 After the Transplantday 365±14 after the transplantLevels of steatorrhea severity (evaluated in the 4 weeks prior to day 75±14 and 365±14), are defined as: * No steatorrhea; * Steatorrhea few times per week; * Steatorrhea daily; * Stool incontinence.
Cumulative Number of Episodes of Documented Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia From Day 75±14 to Day 365±14 After the Transplantfrom day 75±14 to day 365±14 after the transplantThe following definition applies: \- Asymptomatic hypoglycemia = An event not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose concentration \<70mg/dL.
Cumulative Number of Episodes of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia From Day 75±14 to Day 365±14 After the Transplantfrom day 75±14 to day 365±14 after the transplantThe following definition applies: \- Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia = An event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia are accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration \<70mg/dL.
Cumulative Number of Diabetic Ketoacidosis-related Eventsfrom day 75±14 to day 365±14 after the transplantA diabetic ketoacidosis event is defined as the presence of: * hyperglycemia (blood glucose \>200 mg/dL); * pH \<7.3 or HCO3 \<15; * ketones positive in the serum or urine.
Peak C-peptide at Day 75 After the TransplantDay 75±14 after the transplantPeak C-peptide (C-P) is a known predictor of Type 1 Diabetes.
Peak C-peptide at Day 365 After the TransplantDay 365±14 after the transplantPeak C-peptide (C-P) is a known predictor of Type 1 Diabetes.
Time-to-peak C-peptide at Day 75 After the Transplantday 75±14 and day 365±14 after the transplantThe time-to-peak value in minutes was computed as the time of the peak value (HH:MM on a 24-hour clock) minus the end time of the mixed meal (HH:MM on a 24-hour clock) as recorded on the mixed meal tolerance test Case Report Form.
Time-to-peak C-peptide at Day 365 After the TransplantDay 365±14 after the transplantThe time to peak value in minutes will be computed as the time of the peak value (HH:MM on a 24-hour clock) minus the end time of the mixed meal (HH:MM on a 24-hour clock) as recorded on the mixed meal tolerance test CRF.
Change From Baseline in Post-transplant Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)Baseline, Days 2, 3, 7, 75 ±14 after the transplantData are reported as model estimates over all timepoints. This safety parameter was assessed at the following timepoints on the following numbers of patients for Reparixin and placebo, respectively: * baseline; N=50; 52 * Day 2 post-transplant; N=49; 51 * Day 3 post-transplant; N=47; 50 * Day 7 post-transplant; N=47; 50 * Day 75 post-transplant; N=44; 47
Change From Baseline in Post-transplant Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)Baseline, Days 2, 3, 7, 75±14 after the transplantData are reported as model estimates over all timepoints. This safety parameter was assessed at the following timepoints on the following numbers of patients for Reparixin and placebo, respectively: * baseline; N=50; 52 * Day 2 post-transplant; N=49; 51 * Day 3 post-transplant; N=47; 50 * Day 7 post-transplant; N=47; 50 * Day 75 post-transplant; N=44; 47
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Related to Investigational ProductThroughout the study From Day -1 to hospital dischargeTreatment emergent adverse events - possibly, probably and highly probably - related to investigational product are called Adverse reactions (ADR). An adverse reaction is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation patient, which has a causal relationship with the administered medicinal product.
Number of Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Related to Investigational ProductThroughout the study From Day -1 to hospital discharge for all adverse events, and from then to day 365 post-transplantation only for serious adverse eventsSerious Treatment emergent adverse events - possibly, probably and highly probably - related to investigational product are called serious Adverse reactions. A serious adverse reaction is defined as any untoward medical occurrence with a causal relationship with the administered medicinal product, that at any dose: * Resulted in death * Was life-threatening (ie, the patient was at risk of death at the time of the event; it does not refer to an event that hypothetically might have caused death if it were more severe.) * Required patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * Was an important medical event that, based upon appropriate medical judgment, may have jeopardized the patient and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above
Proportion of Patients Falling Into One of the Following Malnutrition Risk Levels (Poor Prognosis, Significant Risk, Increased Risk, Normal) According to Pre-albumin Level at Day 75±14 After the Transplantday 75±14 after the transplantMalnutrition risk levels are defined as: * Poor prognosis = pre-albumin level \<5.0 mg/dL * Significant risk = pre-albumin level 5.0 to 10.9 mg/dL * Increased risk = pre-albumin level 11.0 to 15.0 mg/dL * Normal = pre-albumin level \> 15.0 (up to 35.0) mg/dL

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Reparixin
Solution for intravenous (IV) infusion with active compound Reparixin: Solution for intravenous (IV) infusion; 2.772 mg/kg body weight/hour administered at 0.25 mL/kg/hour
50
Placebo
Physiologic solution Placebo: Physiologic solution administered at 0.25 mL/kg/hour
52
Total102

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDid Not Have Transplant10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up64
Overall StudyPatient didn't proceed to pancreatectomy01
Overall StudyResearch visit not done, data recorded10
Overall StudySubject excluded after randomization10
Overall StudySubject Unable To Comply With Final Day01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicReparixinPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
46 Participants52 Participants98 Participants
Age, Continuous40.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
39.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
39.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
49 Participants49 Participants98 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
4 participants3 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
46 participants49 participants95 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants38 Participants71 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants14 Participants31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 500 / 52
other
Total, other adverse events
46 / 5048 / 52
serious
Total, serious adverse events
29 / 5030 / 52

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Patients Who Were Insulin Independent After Islet Autotransplantation (IAT) at Day 365±14 Days After Transplant.

Insulin-independence is defined as freedom from the need to take exogenous insulin for 14 or more consecutive days, with adequate glycemic control, as defined by: * a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level \<6.5%; * fingerstick fasting blood glucose not exceeding 126 mg/dL more than three times in the past week (based on a minimum of one daily measurement; * a 2 hour post-prandial blood glucose not exceeding 180 mg/dL more than four times in the past week (based on a minimum of one daily measurement); * a laboratory fasting glucose in the non-diabetic range (\<126 mg/dL).

Time frame: day 365±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.~Eligible patients are included in this population whether or not they receive IAT.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ReparixinPercentage of Patients Who Were Insulin Independent After Islet Autotransplantation (IAT) at Day 365±14 Days After Transplant.20.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients Who Were Insulin Independent After Islet Autotransplantation (IAT) at Day 365±14 Days After Transplant.21.2 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.54295% CI: [-14.3, 0]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Serum C-peptide Level at Day 365±14 After the Transplant

AUC for the serum C-peptide level is calculated during the first 4 hours of a mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT), normalized by the number of Islet Equivalent (IEQ)/kg

Time frame: day 365±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.~Eligible patients are included in this population whether or not they receive IAT

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ReparixinArea Under the Curve (AUC) for the Serum C-peptide Level at Day 365±14 After the Transplant0.5563432 (ng/mL)/(IEQ/kg)*1000Standard Deviation 0.3133415
PlaceboArea Under the Curve (AUC) for the Serum C-peptide Level at Day 365±14 After the Transplant0.6865954 (ng/mL)/(IEQ/kg)*1000Standard Deviation 0.446446
p-value: 0.16195% CI: [-0.287431, 0.0517825]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Serum C-peptide Level at Day 75±14 After the Transplant

AUC for the serum C-peptide level is calculated during the first 4 hours of an MMTT, normalized by the number of Islet Equivalent (IEQ)/kg

Time frame: day 75±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.~Eligible patients are included in this population whether or not they receive IAT.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ReparixinArea Under the Curve (AUC) for the Serum C-peptide Level at Day 75±14 After the Transplant0.5314796 (ng/mL)/(IEQ/kg)*1000Standard Deviation 0.3520819
PlaceboArea Under the Curve (AUC) for the Serum C-peptide Level at Day 75±14 After the Transplant0.6827533 (ng/mL)/(IEQ/kg)*1000Standard Deviation 0.4769178
p-value: 0.09295% CI: [-0.317803, -0.0025525]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Average Daily Insulin Requirements at Day 365±14 After the Transplant

Daily insulin is reported as IU/kg and intake averaged over the previous week.

Time frame: day 365±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.~Eligible patients are included in this population whether or not they receive IAT.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ReparixinAverage Daily Insulin Requirements at Day 365±14 After the Transplant0.1723 IU/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.1893
PlaceboAverage Daily Insulin Requirements at Day 365±14 After the Transplant0.1823 IU/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.1994
p-value: 0.81795% CI: [-0.0939, 0.0689]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Average Daily Insulin Requirements at Day 75±14 After the Transplant

Daily insulin is reported as IU/kg and intake averaged over the previous week.

Time frame: day 75±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.~Eligible patients are included in this population whether or not they receive IAT.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ReparixinAverage Daily Insulin Requirements at Day 75±14 After the Transplant0.2125 IU/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.1643
PlaceboAverage Daily Insulin Requirements at Day 75±14 After the Transplant0.2190 IU/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.1589
p-value: 0.84695% CI: [-0.0508, 0.0781]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Post-transplant Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)

Data are reported as model estimates over all timepoints. This safety parameter was assessed at the following timepoints on the following numbers of patients for Reparixin and placebo, respectively: * baseline; N=50; 52 * Day 2 post-transplant; N=49; 51 * Day 3 post-transplant; N=47; 50 * Day 7 post-transplant; N=47; 50 * Day 75 post-transplant; N=44; 47

Time frame: Baseline, Days 2, 3, 7, 75 ±14 after the transplant

Population: Safety Population: Safety Population consists of all randomized patients. Summarization and analysis of this population was based on treatment actually received. Patients randomized but not treated.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ReparixinChange From Baseline in Post-transplant Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)60.4105 U/LStandard Error 40.9699
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Post-transplant Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)29.0615 U/LStandard Error 40.2724
p-value: =0.501895% CI: [-60.998, 123.7]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Post-transplant Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)

Data are reported as model estimates over all timepoints. This safety parameter was assessed at the following timepoints on the following numbers of patients for Reparixin and placebo, respectively: * baseline; N=50; 52 * Day 2 post-transplant; N=49; 51 * Day 3 post-transplant; N=47; 50 * Day 7 post-transplant; N=47; 50 * Day 75 post-transplant; N=44; 47

Time frame: Baseline, Days 2, 3, 7, 75±14 after the transplant

Population: Safety population: Safety Population consists of all randomized patients. Summarization and analysis of this population was based on treatment actually received. Patients randomized but not treated.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ReparixinChange From Baseline in Post-transplant Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)46.8755 U/LStandard Error 27.8248
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Post-transplant Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)23.3301 U/LStandard Error 26.6545
p-value: =0.453795% CI: [-38.6619, 85.7528]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Cumulative Number of Diabetic Ketoacidosis-related Events

A diabetic ketoacidosis event is defined as the presence of: * hyperglycemia (blood glucose \>200 mg/dL); * pH \<7.3 or HCO3 \<15; * ketones positive in the serum or urine.

Time frame: from day 75±14 to day 365±14 after the transplant

Population: Safety Population consists of all randomized patients. Summarization and analysis of this population was based on treatment actually received. Patients randomized but not treated were analyzed in the total summary statistics only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ReparixinCumulative Number of Diabetic Ketoacidosis-related Events0.0 number of eventsStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboCumulative Number of Diabetic Ketoacidosis-related Events0.0 number of eventsStandard Deviation 0
p-value: 1Wilcoxon rank-sum test
Secondary

Cumulative Number of Episodes of Documented Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia From Day 75±14 to Day 365±14 After the Transplant

The following definition applies: \- Asymptomatic hypoglycemia = An event not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose concentration \<70mg/dL.

Time frame: from day 75±14 to day 365±14 after the transplant

Population: Safety Population consists of all randomized patients. Summarization and analysis of this population was based on treatment actually received. Patients randomized but not treated were analyzed in the total summary statistics only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ReparixinCumulative Number of Episodes of Documented Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia From Day 75±14 to Day 365±14 After the Transplant1.5 number of episodesStandard Deviation 4.3
PlaceboCumulative Number of Episodes of Documented Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia From Day 75±14 to Day 365±14 After the Transplant4.4 number of episodesStandard Deviation 25.6
p-value: 0.448Wilcoxon rank-sum test
Secondary

Cumulative Number of Episodes of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia From Day 75±14 to Day 365±14 After the Transplant

The following definition applies: \- Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia = An event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia are accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration \<70mg/dL.

Time frame: from day 75±14 to day 365±14 after the transplant

Population: Safety Population consists of all randomized patients. Summarization and analysis of this population was based on treatment actually received. Patients randomized but not treated were analyzed in the total summary statistics only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ReparixinCumulative Number of Episodes of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia From Day 75±14 to Day 365±14 After the Transplant4.6 number of episodesStandard Deviation 13.9
PlaceboCumulative Number of Episodes of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia From Day 75±14 to Day 365±14 After the Transplant4.8 number of episodesStandard Deviation 17.8
p-value: 0.91Wilcoxon rank-sum test
Secondary

Cumulative Number of Severe Hypoglycemic Events From Day 75±14 to Day 365±14 After the Transplant

A severe hypoglycemic event is defined as an event with one of the following symptoms: memory loss, confusion, uncontrollable behavior, irrational behavior, unusual difficulty in awakening, suspected seizure, seizure, loss of consciousness, or visual symptoms, in which the subject was unable to treat him/herself and which was associated with either a blood glucose level \<54mg/dL or prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, i.v. glucose, or glucagon administration.

Time frame: from day 75±14 to day 365±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.~Eligible patients are included in this population whether or not they receive IAT.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ReparixinCumulative Number of Severe Hypoglycemic Events From Day 75±14 to Day 365±14 After the Transplant0.1 number of eventsStandard Deviation 0.94
PlaceboCumulative Number of Severe Hypoglycemic Events From Day 75±14 to Day 365±14 After the Transplant0.0 number of eventsStandard Deviation 0.21
p-value: 0.33995% CI: [0.29, 34.97]Anderson-Gill model
Secondary

Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Throughout the Study

The percentages of patients with any treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE, serious and non serious) and with serious TEAE by severity are presented. Patients with multiple events within a particular system organ class or preferred term were counted only under the category of their most severe event within that system organ class or preferred term. A serious AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: * Resulted in death * Was life-threatening (ie, the patient was at risk of death at the time of the event) * Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect * Was an important medical event that, based upon appropriate medical judgment, may have jeopardized the patient and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above

Time frame: up to day 365±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.~Eligible patients are included in this population whether or not they receive IAT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ReparixinIncidence and Severity of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Throughout the StudyTEAE- Mild events90.0 percentage of patients
ReparixinIncidence and Severity of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Throughout the StudyTEAE - Moderate events90.0 percentage of patients
ReparixinIncidence and Severity of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Throughout the StudyTEAE - Severe events64.0 percentage of patients
ReparixinIncidence and Severity of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Throughout the Studyserious TEAE- Mild events18.0 percentage of patients
ReparixinIncidence and Severity of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Throughout the Studyserious TEAE- Moderate events22.0 percentage of patients
ReparixinIncidence and Severity of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Throughout the Studyserious TEAE- Severe events42.0 percentage of patients
PlaceboIncidence and Severity of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Throughout the Studyserious TEAE- Moderate events13.5 percentage of patients
PlaceboIncidence and Severity of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Throughout the StudyTEAE- Mild events92.3 percentage of patients
PlaceboIncidence and Severity of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Throughout the Studyserious TEAE- Mild events23.1 percentage of patients
PlaceboIncidence and Severity of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Throughout the StudyTEAE - Moderate events80.8 percentage of patients
PlaceboIncidence and Severity of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Throughout the Studyserious TEAE- Severe events32.7 percentage of patients
PlaceboIncidence and Severity of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Throughout the StudyTEAE - Severe events53.8 percentage of patients
Secondary

Number of Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Related to Investigational Product

Serious Treatment emergent adverse events - possibly, probably and highly probably - related to investigational product are called serious Adverse reactions. A serious adverse reaction is defined as any untoward medical occurrence with a causal relationship with the administered medicinal product, that at any dose: * Resulted in death * Was life-threatening (ie, the patient was at risk of death at the time of the event; it does not refer to an event that hypothetically might have caused death if it were more severe.) * Required patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * Was an important medical event that, based upon appropriate medical judgment, may have jeopardized the patient and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above

Time frame: Throughout the study From Day -1 to hospital discharge for all adverse events, and from then to day 365 post-transplantation only for serious adverse events

Population: Safety population: Safety Population consists of all randomized patients. Summarization and analysis of this population were based on treatment received. Patients randomized but not treated were analyzed in the total summary statistics only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ReparixinNumber of Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Related to Investigational Productpossibly related4 Number of events
ReparixinNumber of Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Related to Investigational Productprobably related0 Number of events
ReparixinNumber of Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Related to Investigational Producthighly probably related0 Number of events
PlaceboNumber of Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Related to Investigational Productpossibly related1 Number of events
PlaceboNumber of Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Related to Investigational Productprobably related0 Number of events
PlaceboNumber of Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Related to Investigational Producthighly probably related0 Number of events
Secondary

Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Related to Investigational Product

Treatment emergent adverse events - possibly, probably and highly probably - related to investigational product are called Adverse reactions (ADR). An adverse reaction is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation patient, which has a causal relationship with the administered medicinal product.

Time frame: Throughout the study From Day -1 to hospital discharge

Population: Safety Population:Safety Population consists of all randomized patients. Summarization and analysis of this population was based on treatment actually received. Patients randomized but not treated were analyzed in the total summary statistics only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ReparixinNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Related to Investigational Producthighly probably related0 Number of events
ReparixinNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Related to Investigational Productpossibly related20 Number of events
ReparixinNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Related to Investigational Productprobably related0 Number of events
PlaceboNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Related to Investigational Producthighly probably related0 Number of events
PlaceboNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Related to Investigational Productpossibly related28 Number of events
PlaceboNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Related to Investigational Productprobably related0 Number of events
Secondary

Peak C-peptide at Day 365 After the Transplant

Peak C-peptide (C-P) is a known predictor of Type 1 Diabetes.

Time frame: Day 365±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT Population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ReparixinPeak C-peptide at Day 365 After the Transplant2.630 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1.467
PlaceboPeak C-peptide at Day 365 After the Transplant3.170 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1.843
Secondary

Peak C-peptide at Day 75 After the Transplant

Peak C-peptide (C-P) is a known predictor of Type 1 Diabetes.

Time frame: Day 75±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ReparixinPeak C-peptide at Day 75 After the Transplant2.640 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1.529
PlaceboPeak C-peptide at Day 75 After the Transplant2.900 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1.753
Secondary

Proportion of Patients by Steatorrhea Severity at Day 365±14 After the Transplant

Levels of steatorrhea severity (evaluated in the 4 weeks prior to day 75±14 and 365±14), are defined as: * No steatorrhea; * Steatorrhea few times per week; * Steatorrhea daily; * Stool incontinence.

Time frame: day 365±14 after the transplant

Population: Safety Population consists of all randomized patients. Summarization and analysis of this population was based on treatment actually received. Patients randomized but not treated were analyzed in the total summary statistics only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ReparixinProportion of Patients by Steatorrhea Severity at Day 365±14 After the Transplantno steatorrhea52.4 percentage of participants
ReparixinProportion of Patients by Steatorrhea Severity at Day 365±14 After the Transplantsteatorrhea few times per week26.2 percentage of participants
ReparixinProportion of Patients by Steatorrhea Severity at Day 365±14 After the Transplantsteatorrhea daily21.4 percentage of participants
ReparixinProportion of Patients by Steatorrhea Severity at Day 365±14 After the Transplantstool incontinence0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients by Steatorrhea Severity at Day 365±14 After the Transplantstool incontinence0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients by Steatorrhea Severity at Day 365±14 After the Transplantno steatorrhea58.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients by Steatorrhea Severity at Day 365±14 After the Transplantsteatorrhea daily21.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients by Steatorrhea Severity at Day 365±14 After the Transplantsteatorrhea few times per week19.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Patients by Steatorrhea Severity at Day 75±14 After the Transplant

Levels of steatorrhea severity (evaluated in the 4 weeks prior to day 75±14 and 365±14), are defined as: * No steatorrhea; * Steatorrhea few times per week; * Steatorrhea daily; * Stool incontinence.

Time frame: day 75±14 after the transplant

Population: Safety Population consists of all randomized patients. Summarization and analysis of this population was based on treatment actually received. Patients randomized but not treated were analyzed in the total summary statistics only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ReparixinProportion of Patients by Steatorrhea Severity at Day 75±14 After the Transplantno steatorrhea54.5 percentage of participants
ReparixinProportion of Patients by Steatorrhea Severity at Day 75±14 After the Transplantsteatorrhea few times per week29.5 percentage of participants
ReparixinProportion of Patients by Steatorrhea Severity at Day 75±14 After the Transplantsteatorrhea daily11.4 percentage of participants
ReparixinProportion of Patients by Steatorrhea Severity at Day 75±14 After the Transplantstool incontinence4.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients by Steatorrhea Severity at Day 75±14 After the Transplantstool incontinence4.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients by Steatorrhea Severity at Day 75±14 After the Transplantno steatorrhea64.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients by Steatorrhea Severity at Day 75±14 After the Transplantsteatorrhea daily6.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients by Steatorrhea Severity at Day 75±14 After the Transplantsteatorrhea few times per week25.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Falling Into One of the Following Malnutrition Risk Levels (Poor Prognosis, Significant Risk, Increased Risk, Normal) According to Pre-albumin Level at Day 365±14 After the Transplant

Malnutrition risk levels are defined as: * Poor prognosis = pre-albumin level \<5.0 mg/dL * Significant risk = pre-albumin level 5.0 to 10.9 mg/dL * Increased risk = pre-albumin level 11.0 to 15.0 mg/dL * Normal = pre-albumin level \> 15.0 (up to 35.0) mg/dL

Time frame: day 365±14 after the transplant

Population: Safety Population consists of all randomized patients. Summarization and analysis of this population was based on treatment actually received. Patients randomized but not treated were analyzed in the total summary statistics only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ReparixinProportion of Patients Falling Into One of the Following Malnutrition Risk Levels (Poor Prognosis, Significant Risk, Increased Risk, Normal) According to Pre-albumin Level at Day 365±14 After the TransplantPoor prognosis5.0 percentage of participants
ReparixinProportion of Patients Falling Into One of the Following Malnutrition Risk Levels (Poor Prognosis, Significant Risk, Increased Risk, Normal) According to Pre-albumin Level at Day 365±14 After the TransplantSignificant risk2.5 percentage of participants
ReparixinProportion of Patients Falling Into One of the Following Malnutrition Risk Levels (Poor Prognosis, Significant Risk, Increased Risk, Normal) According to Pre-albumin Level at Day 365±14 After the TransplantIncreased risk27.5 percentage of participants
ReparixinProportion of Patients Falling Into One of the Following Malnutrition Risk Levels (Poor Prognosis, Significant Risk, Increased Risk, Normal) According to Pre-albumin Level at Day 365±14 After the TransplantNormal65.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Falling Into One of the Following Malnutrition Risk Levels (Poor Prognosis, Significant Risk, Increased Risk, Normal) According to Pre-albumin Level at Day 365±14 After the TransplantNormal84.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Falling Into One of the Following Malnutrition Risk Levels (Poor Prognosis, Significant Risk, Increased Risk, Normal) According to Pre-albumin Level at Day 365±14 After the TransplantPoor prognosis0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Falling Into One of the Following Malnutrition Risk Levels (Poor Prognosis, Significant Risk, Increased Risk, Normal) According to Pre-albumin Level at Day 365±14 After the TransplantIncreased risk9.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients Falling Into One of the Following Malnutrition Risk Levels (Poor Prognosis, Significant Risk, Increased Risk, Normal) According to Pre-albumin Level at Day 365±14 After the TransplantSignificant risk6.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Falling Into One of the Following Malnutrition Risk Levels (Poor Prognosis, Significant Risk, Increased Risk, Normal) According to Pre-albumin Level at Day 75±14 After the Transplant

Malnutrition risk levels are defined as: * Poor prognosis = pre-albumin level \<5.0 mg/dL * Significant risk = pre-albumin level 5.0 to 10.9 mg/dL * Increased risk = pre-albumin level 11.0 to 15.0 mg/dL * Normal = pre-albumin level \> 15.0 (up to 35.0) mg/dL

Time frame: day 75±14 after the transplant

Population: Safety Population consists of all randomized patients. Summarization and analysis of this population was based on treatment actually received. Patients randomized but not treated were analyzed in the total summary statistics only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ReparixinProportion of Patients Falling Into One of the Following Malnutrition Risk Levels (Poor Prognosis, Significant Risk, Increased Risk, Normal) According to Pre-albumin Level at Day 75±14 After the Transplantpoor prognosis0 percentage of patients
ReparixinProportion of Patients Falling Into One of the Following Malnutrition Risk Levels (Poor Prognosis, Significant Risk, Increased Risk, Normal) According to Pre-albumin Level at Day 75±14 After the Transplantsignificant risk9.5 percentage of patients
ReparixinProportion of Patients Falling Into One of the Following Malnutrition Risk Levels (Poor Prognosis, Significant Risk, Increased Risk, Normal) According to Pre-albumin Level at Day 75±14 After the Transplantincreased risk45.2 percentage of patients
ReparixinProportion of Patients Falling Into One of the Following Malnutrition Risk Levels (Poor Prognosis, Significant Risk, Increased Risk, Normal) According to Pre-albumin Level at Day 75±14 After the Transplantnormal45.2 percentage of patients
PlaceboProportion of Patients Falling Into One of the Following Malnutrition Risk Levels (Poor Prognosis, Significant Risk, Increased Risk, Normal) According to Pre-albumin Level at Day 75±14 After the Transplantnormal67.4 percentage of patients
PlaceboProportion of Patients Falling Into One of the Following Malnutrition Risk Levels (Poor Prognosis, Significant Risk, Increased Risk, Normal) According to Pre-albumin Level at Day 75±14 After the Transplantpoor prognosis0 percentage of patients
PlaceboProportion of Patients Falling Into One of the Following Malnutrition Risk Levels (Poor Prognosis, Significant Risk, Increased Risk, Normal) According to Pre-albumin Level at Day 75±14 After the Transplantincreased risk28.3 percentage of patients
PlaceboProportion of Patients Falling Into One of the Following Malnutrition Risk Levels (Poor Prognosis, Significant Risk, Increased Risk, Normal) According to Pre-albumin Level at Day 75±14 After the Transplantsignificant risk4.3 percentage of patients
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With an HbA1c <6.5% at Day 365±14 After the Transplant

Percentage of patients with a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) \<6.5% at day 365±14 after the transplant.

Time frame: day 365±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.~Eligible patients are included in this population whether or not they receive IAT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ReparixinProportion of Patients With an HbA1c <6.5% at Day 365±14 After the Transplant64.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients With an HbA1c <6.5% at Day 365±14 After the Transplant62.2 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.84295% CI: [-18.2, 22.33]Chi-squared
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With an HbA1c <6.5% at Day 365±14 After the Transplant AND Free of Severe Hypoglycemic Events From Day 75±14 to Day 365±14 After the Transplant Inclusive

Percentage of patients with an HbA1c \<6.5% at day 365±14 after the transplant AND free of severe hypoglycemic events from day 75±14 to day 365±14 after the transplant inclusive.A severe hypoglycemic event is defined as an event with one of the following symptoms: memory loss, confusion, uncontrollable behavior, irrational behavior, unusual difficulty in awakening, suspected seizure, seizure, loss of consciousness, or visual symptoms, in which the subject was unable to treat him/herself and which was associated with either a blood glucose level \<54mg/dL or prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, i.v. glucose, or glucagon administration.

Time frame: from day 75±14 to day 365±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.~Eligible patients are included in this population whether or not they receive IAT.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ReparixinProportion of Patients With an HbA1c <6.5% at Day 365±14 After the Transplant AND Free of Severe Hypoglycemic Events From Day 75±14 to Day 365±14 After the Transplant Inclusive64.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Patients With an HbA1c <6.5% at Day 365±14 After the Transplant AND Free of Severe Hypoglycemic Events From Day 75±14 to Day 365±14 After the Transplant Inclusive59.1 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.6495% CI: [-15.91, 25.93]Chi-squared
Secondary

Time Course From Basal to 240 Min of C-peptide Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 365±14 After the Transplant

Data are reported as model estimates over all timepoints. This parameters was assessed at the following timepoints on the following numbers of patients for Reparixin and placebo, respectively: * basal; N=33; 41 (Basal is: 2 basal samples taken separately between -20 to 0 minutes before the meal followed by samples through 240 minutes after the meal). * 15 min; N=34; 41 * 30 min; N=34; 41 * 60 min; N=33; 41 * 90 min; N=34; 41 * 120 min; N=34; 41 * 180 min; N=33; 40 * 240 min; N=33; 41

Time frame: day 365±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ReparixinTime Course From Basal to 240 Min of C-peptide Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 365±14 After the Transplant1.6052 ng/mLStandard Error 0.24507
PlaceboTime Course From Basal to 240 Min of C-peptide Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 365±14 After the Transplant1.8822 ng/mLStandard Error 0.24763
p-value: =0.28895% CI: [-0.7936, 0.2396]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Time Course From Basal to 240 Min of C-peptide Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 75±14 After the Transplant

Data are reported as model estimates over all timepoints. This parameters was assessed at the following timepoints on the following numbers of patients for Reparixin and placebo, respectively: * basal; N=44; 48 (Basal is: 2 basal samples taken separately between -20 to 0 minutes before the meal followed by samples through 240 minutes after the meal). * 15 min; N=43; 47 * 30 min; N=41; 47 * 60 min; N=42; 47 * 90 min; N=42; 47 * 120 min; N=42; 47 * 180 min; N=41; 47 * 240 min; N=40; 44

Time frame: day 75±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ReparixinTime Course From Basal to 240 Min of C-peptide Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 75±14 After the Transplant1.8976 ng/mLStandard Error 0.20787
PlaceboTime Course From Basal to 240 Min of C-peptide Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 75±14 After the Transplant2.1051 ng/mLStandard Error 0.20104
p-value: =0.35895% CI: [-0.6538, 0.2389]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Time Course From Basal to 240 Min of Glucose Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 365±14 After the Transplant

Data are reported as model estimates over all timepoints This parameters was assessed at the following timepoints on the following numbers of patients for Reparixin and placebo, respectively: * basal; N=34; 42 (Basal is: 2 basal samples taken separately between -20 to 0 minutes before the meal followed by samples through 240 minutes after the meal). * 15 min; N=34; 41 * 30 min; N=34; 41 * 60 min; N=34; 41 * 90 min; N=34; 41 * 120 min; N=34; 41 * 180 min; N=33; 41 * 240 min; N=33; 41

Time frame: day 365±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ReparixinTime Course From Basal to 240 Min of Glucose Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 365±14 After the Transplant157.9988 mg/dLStandard Error 12.00455
PlaceboTime Course From Basal to 240 Min of Glucose Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 365±14 After the Transplant180.9442 mg/dLStandard Error 12.08647
p-value: =0.07495% CI: [-48.1826, 2.2918]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Time Course From Basal to 240 Min of Glucose Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 75±14 After the Transplant

Data of this outcome are reported as model estimates over all timepoints. This parameter was assessed at the following timepoints on the following numbers of patients for Reparixin and placebo, respectively: * basal; N=43; 48 (Basal is: 2 basal samples taken separately between -20 to 0 minutes before the meal followed by samples through 240 minutes after the meal). * 15 min; N=42; 46 * 30 min; N=40; 46 * 60 min; N=40; 46 * 90 min; N=40; 46 * 120 min; N=41; 46 * 180 min; N=40; 46 * 240 min; N=39; 44

Time frame: day 75±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.~Eligible patients are included in this population whether or not they receive IAT

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ReparixinTime Course From Basal to 240 Min of Glucose Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 75±14 After the Transplant157.0894 mg/dLStandard Error 11.9816
PlaceboTime Course From Basal to 240 Min of Glucose Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 75±14 After the Transplant166.5535 mg/dLStandard Error 11.45706
p-value: 0.5795% CI: [-42.49, 23.5618]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Time Course From Basal to 240 Min of Insulin Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 365±14 After the Transplant

Data are reported as model estimates over all timepoints. This parameter was assessed at the following timepoints on the following numbers of patients for Reparixin and placebo, respectively: * basal; N=34; 41 (Basal is: 2 basal samples taken separately between -20 to 0 minutes before the meal followed by samples through 240 minutes after the meal) * 15 min; N=34; 41 * 30 min; N=34; 41 * 60 min; N=34; 41 * 90 min; N=34; 41 * 120 min; N=34; 41 * 180 min; N=33; 41 * 240 min; N=33; 40

Time frame: day 365±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ReparixinTime Course From Basal to 240 Min of Insulin Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 365±14 After the Transplant22.85522 UIU/mLStandard Error 3.718512
PlaceboTime Course From Basal to 240 Min of Insulin Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 365±14 After the Transplant21.77905 UIU/mLStandard Error 3.757573
p-value: =0.78595% CI: [-6.76562, 8.91796]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Time Course From Basal to 240 Min of Insulin Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 75±14 After the Transplant

Data are reported as model estimates over all timepoints. This parameter was assessed at the following timepoints on the following numbers of patients for Reparixin and placebo, respectively: * basal; N=43; 48 (Basal is: 2 basal samples taken separately between -20 to 0 minutes before the meal followed by samples through 240 minutes after the meal). * 15 min; N=43; 47 * 30 min; N=41; 47 * 60 min; N=41; 47 * 90 min; N=41; 47 * 120 min; N=42; 47 * 180 min; N=41; 47 * 240 min; N=40; 44

Time frame: day 75±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ReparixinTime Course From Basal to 240 Min of Insulin Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 75±14 After the Transplant23.67209 UIU/mLStandard Error 3.497499
PlaceboTime Course From Basal to 240 Min of Insulin Derived From the Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 75±14 After the Transplant23.57493 UIU/mLStandard Error 3.378854
p-value: =0.9895% CI: [-7.41834, 7.61266]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Time-to-peak C-peptide at Day 365 After the Transplant

The time to peak value in minutes will be computed as the time of the peak value (HH:MM on a 24-hour clock) minus the end time of the mixed meal (HH:MM on a 24-hour clock) as recorded on the mixed meal tolerance test CRF.

Time frame: Day 365±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT Population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ReparixinTime-to-peak C-peptide at Day 365 After the Transplant97.8 minutesStandard Deviation 90.9
PlaceboTime-to-peak C-peptide at Day 365 After the Transplant102.0 minutesStandard Deviation 56.2
Secondary

Time-to-peak C-peptide at Day 75 After the Transplant

The time-to-peak value in minutes was computed as the time of the peak value (HH:MM on a 24-hour clock) minus the end time of the mixed meal (HH:MM on a 24-hour clock) as recorded on the mixed meal tolerance test Case Report Form.

Time frame: day 75±14 and day 365±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT Population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ReparixinTime-to-peak C-peptide at Day 75 After the Transplant104.2 minutesStandard Deviation 93.6
PlaceboTime-to-peak C-peptide at Day 75 After the Transplant108.7 minutesStandard Deviation 59.4
Secondary

β-cell Function at Day 365±14 After the Transplant

This variable is assessed by β-score (assessment of β-cell function after islet transplantation). The total score is calculated on a 0-8 scoring system (higher is a better outcome) that gives 0-2 points each for glucose, HbA1c, stimulated C-peptide and insulin requirement subscales. The higher the total score the better the outcome. * Fasting (or before breakfast) plasma glucose (mg/dL) : ≤99, Score 2; 100-124, Score 1; ≥ 125, Score 0 (the higher the subscore the better the outcome) * HbA1c (%): ≤6.1, Score 2; 6.2-6.9, Score 1; ≥ 7.0, Score 0 (the higher the subscore the better the outcome) * Daily average (previous week) insulin (IU/kg/day): ---, Score 2; 0.01-0.24, Score 1; ≥ 0.25, Score 0 (the higher the subscore the better the outcome) * Stimulated C-peptide (ng/mL): ≥ 0.9, Score 2; 0.3-0.89, Score 1; ≤0.3, Score 0 (the higher the subscore the better the outcome)

Time frame: day 365±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.~Eligible patients are included in this population whether or not they receive IAT.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Reparixinβ-cell Function at Day 365±14 After the Transplant5.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Placeboβ-cell Function at Day 365±14 After the Transplant5.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
p-value: 0.403Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

β-cell Function at Day 75±14 After the Transplant

This variable is assessed by β-score (assessment of β-cell function after islet transplantation). The total score is calculated on a 0-8 scoring system (higher is a better outcome) that gives 0-2 points each for: * fasting plasma glucose, * HbA1c, * stimulated C-peptide * insulin requirement subscales. The higher the total score, the better the outcome. * Fasting (or before breakfast) plasma glucose (mg/dL) : ≤99, Score 2; 100-124, Score 1; ≥ 125, Score 0 (the higher the subscore the better the outcome) * HbA1c (%): ≤6.1, Score 2; 6.2-6.9, Score 1; ≥ 7.0, Score 0 (the higher the subscore the better the outcome) * Daily average (previous week) insulin (IU/kg/day): ---, Score 2; 0.01-0.24, Score 1; ≥ 0.25, Score 0 (the higher the subscore the better the outcome) * Stimulated C-peptide (ng/mL): ≥ 0.9, Score 2; 0.3-0.89, Score 1; ≤0.3, Score 0 (the higher the subscore the better the outcome)

Time frame: day 75±14 after the transplant

Population: ITT Population consists of all patients who were randomized and received the Investigational Product (either reparixin or placebo). Summarization and analysis of this population is based on randomized treatment, regardless of treatment actually received.~Eligible patients are included in this population whether or not they receive IAT.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Reparixinβ-cell Function at Day 75±14 After the Transplant5.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Placeboβ-cell Function at Day 75±14 After the Transplant5.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
p-value: 0.176Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026