Skip to content

Multicenter Randomized Double-blind Study Evaluating the Effects of Botulinum Toxin A Associated With ropivacaïne Versus ropivacaïne Alone in the Treatment of the Myofascial Pelviperineal Pain

Multicenter Randomized Double-blind Study Evaluating the Effects of Botulinum Toxin A Associated With ropivacaïne Versus ropivacaïne Alone in the Treatment of the Myofascial Pelviperineal Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01967524
Acronym
MYOTOX
Enrollment
80
Registered
2013-10-23
Start date
2013-09-01
Completion date
2016-08-01
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myofascial Pelviperineal Pain

Keywords

Myofascial pain, Perineal pain, Chronic pelvic pain, Botulinum toxin type A, Ropivacaïne

Brief summary

Myofascial pains are frequently found during the clinical examination of the patients presenting a painful chronic syndrome of the pelvis or the perineum. If the physiopathology of this component of the pain characterized by triggerpoints found in the clinical examination, remains uncertain; its coverage contributes to the improvement of the global pain of the patient. The physiotherapy can be useful but when it is not useful, we proposed injections of triggerpoints by local anesthetics. The injections of botulinum toxin on these triggerpoints have a legitimacy (action on the muscular cramp and action on the afferent fibers) but are they superior to the injections of local anesthetics of triggerpoints? The literature remains poor on the subject, justifying this randomized double-blind protocol comparing the efficacy of the botulinum toxin associated with a local anesthetic versus local anesthetic alone with a main criterion of evaluation in 2 months and a monthly follow-up as long as the patient remains improved and maximum in 6 months.

Interventions

DRUGbotulinum toxin A + ropivacaïne

D0 : * Calcul of the average of EN (digital scale) (EN completed from D-8 to D-1) * QDSA (Saint-Antoine pain questionnaire) * QCD (Pain questionnaire) * MPI (Multidimensional Pain Inventory) * Beck scale * HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale) * SF36 (Short Form 36) * injection of botulinum toxin A associated with ropivacaïne D30, D90, D120 and D150 (phone call): Calcul of the average of EN D60 and D180 (on site visits): adverse events reporting, calcul of the average of EN, PGI-I (Patient Global Impression of Improvement), questionnaires (QDSA, QCD, MPI, treatment satisfaction, Beck scale, HAD and SF36).

D0 : * Calcul of the average of EN (digital scale) (EN completed from D-8 to D-1) * QDSA (Saint-Antoine pain questionnaire) * QCD (Pain Questionnaire) * MPI (Multidimensional Pain Inventory) * Beck scale * HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale) * SF36 (Short Form 36) * injection of ropivacaïne alone D30, D90, D120 and D150 (phone call): Calcul of the average of EN D60 and D180 (on site visits): adverse events reporting, calcul of the average of EN, PGI-I (Patient Global Impression of Improvement), questionnaires (QDSA, QCD, MPI, treatment satisfaction, Beck scale, HAD and SF36).

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 18 years * Patient presenting a "dysfunctional" pain of the pelvis or the perineum (without lesional pathology justifying a specific treatment) by an endopelvic touch * Pain evolving since at least 6 months and persisting in spite of the analgesic treatments and the physiotherapy * Patient presenting to the clinical examination one or several active triggerpoints found on the internal obturating muscles and/or elevators of the anus, with a maximum of 10 triggerpoints on the whole body. * Patient presenting an average of the maximal pains of the week before the inclusion superior or equal to 4 and inferior or equal to 9/10 (evaluation of the daily maximal pain on a digital scale from 0 to 10) * Signed informed consent * Subjects affiliated with an appropriate social security system

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with bleeding risk and anticoagulant therapy * Intolerance of botulinum toxin A, ropivacaïne and nitrous oxide * Injection of botulinum toxin in any place whatsoever in the previous 3 months * Pregnancy and breast feeding * Antibiotic treatment by aminoglycosides * Recent anti-inflammatory treatment * Severe myasthenia * Lambert-Eaton syndrome * Patients with neurological disorders, dysphagia, food choking or inhalation pneumonia * Beck score \> 16 * Patients having an average of the maximal pains of the previous week lower than 4

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evolution of the PGI-I (Patient Global Impression of Improvement)2 monthThe main objective is to evaluate the efficacy of injection of botulinum toxin A associated with ropivacaïne versus ropivacaïne alone on the global suffering of chronic myofascial pelviperineal syndromes two month after the injection. The success will be defined as an improvement of the PGI-I corresponding to the first 2 levels.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of pain on digital scale (EN)6 monthEvaluation of pain on digital scale (EN), each month after the injection
To assess the changing parameters of quality of life: global improvement score / treatment satisfaction assessed by digital scale, international pain scales (MPI, QDSA, QCD) / Beck and HAD score6 month
To assess the evolution of analgesics consumption (score MQS)6 month

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJean-Jacques LABAT, Dr

Nantes University Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 15, 2026