Skip to content

Drug-eluting Stents vs. Drug-coated Balloon for Preventing Recurrent In-stent Restenosis

Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent REstenosis Using Drug-Eluting STents vs. Drug-COated Balloon for Preventing REcurrent In-Stent Restenosis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01967199
Acronym
RESTORE
Enrollment
175
Registered
2013-10-22
Start date
2013-04-18
Completion date
2017-02-14
Last updated
2017-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Restenosis

Keywords

drug-eluting stent, drug-coated Balloon, recurrent In-Stent restenosis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to establish the safety and effectiveness of paclitaxel eluting balloon (SeQuent Please) compared to coronary stenting with the Everolimus-eluting balloon expandable stent (Xience Prime or Xience Xpedition or Xience Alpine) in the treatment of drug eluting stent restenosis.

Interventions

DEVICEEverolimus-eluting balloon expandable stent

Everolimus-eluting balloon expandable stent (Xience Prime or Xience Xpedition or Xience Alpine)

paclitaxel eluting balloon (SeQuent Please)

Sponsors

CardioVascular Research Foundation, Korea
CollaboratorOTHER
Seung-Jung Park
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patient must be more than or equal to 20 years of age * Restenosis after drug-eluting stents (\>50% by visual estimate) * Any Lesion length including focal in stent restenosis or diffuse in stent restenosis * The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical and angiographic follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.

Exclusion criteria

* The patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications: * Heparin * Aspirin * Both Clopidogrel and TIclopidine * Sirolimus eluting stent * Stainless steel and/or * Contrast media (patients with documented sensitivity to contrast which can be effectively pre-medicated with steroids and diphenhydramine \[e.g. rash\] may be enrolled. Patients with true anaphylaxis to prior contrast media, however, should not be enrolled) * Systemic (intravenous) Everolimus use within 12 months. * Female of childbearing potential, unless a recent pregnancy test is negative, who possibly plan to become pregnant any time after enrollment into this study * Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy \<1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment) * Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow-up period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Late luminal loss9monthsLate luminal loss at 9 months angiographic follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Myocardial infarction1 year
Target lesion revascularization1 year
Target vessel revascularization1 year
Death1 year
In-segment or in-stent restenosis at 9 month angiographic follow-up1 year
Procedural success3daydefined as achievement of a final diameter stenosis of \<30% by QCA(Quantitative Coronary Angiography) using any percutaneous method, without the occurrence of death, Q wave Myocardial Infarction, or repeat revascularization of the target lesion during the hospital stay. participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3days.
Stent thrombosis1 year

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026