Skip to content

Best African American Response to Asthma Drugs

Best African American Response to Asthma Drugs

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01967173
Acronym
BARD
Enrollment
574
Registered
2013-10-22
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2017-07-01
Last updated
2018-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

Asthma, Fluticasone, Salmeterol

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to find the best asthma treatment to add for Blacks who have asthma that is not well controlled on a low dose of inhaled steroid. This study will also try to find out if Black adults and children differ in how they respond to the medications used in this study.

Detailed description

BARD is a 66 week prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial in Blacks (individuals who self-report Black ancestry) who have inadequately controlled asthma while taking low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). BARD will examine the efficacy of increasing the dose of ICS with or without the addition of a long-acting beta agonist (LABA) to determine whether individual patients respond better to one treatment than another and, if so, whether the responses are different for children and adults or if they are related to genetic ancestry.

Interventions

DRUGFlovent Diskus® 100 mcg

Flovent is an ICS

DRUGFlovent Diskus® 250 mcg

Flovent is an ICS

DRUGFlovent Diskus® 500 mcg

Flovent is an ICS

DRUGAdvair Diskus® 100/50 mcg

Advair is an ICS/LABA combination

DRUGAdvair Diskus® 250/50 mcg

Advair is an ICS/LABA combination

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Individuals who self-report Black ancestry (with at least 1 Black grandparent). 2. Able to perform reproducible spirometry according to ATS criteria. 3. Clinical history consistent with asthma. 4. Baseline FEV1≥40% of predicted and/or post-bronchodilator FEV1≥40% of predicted. 5. Asthma confirmed either by: (1) Beta-agonist reversibility to 4 puffs albuterol ≥ 12% OR (2) PC20FEV1 ≤ 16 mg/ml OR (3) an absolute relative change in %predicted FEV1 of ≥ 12% over two measurements documented by repeat spirogram over the previous year 6. Either: A) inadequately controlled on low-, medium- or high-dose ICS monotherapy, or low- or medium-dose ICS/LABA, or B) well-controlled on medium- or high-dose ICS monotherapy, or low-, medium- or high-dose ICS/LABA. Inadequate asthma control will be defined as an ACT/c-ACT score \<20; well-controlled asthma will be defined as an ACT/c-ACT score ≥20. 7. Stable asthma controller therapy dose (ICS or ICS/LABA) for the 2 weeks prior to enrollment. 8. Non-smoker (total lifetime smoking history \< 5 pack-years if \<18, or \<10 pack-years if ≥18 years of age; no smoking for at least 1 year). 9. For participants ≥18 years of age: Ability to provide informed consent. For participants under 18 years of age: Ability to provide verbal or written assent and ability of parent to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Medical contraindication to LABA or history of adverse reactions to ICS or LABA preparations or any of their ingredients. 2. Current or prior use of medications known to significantly interact with corticosteroid disposition within the two-week period preceding enrollment. 3. Unwilling to provide a blood sample for DNA extraction and genetic analysis. 4. Major medical problems prohibiting study participation, i.e. presence of chronic or active lung disease other than asthma or history of unstable significant medical illness other than asthma, including thyroid disease, diabetes mellitus, Cushing's disease, Addison's disease, hepatic disease, or concurrent medical problems that could require oral corticosteroids during the study or that would place the participant at increased risk. 5. Systemic corticosteroid treatment for any condition within 4 weeks of enrollment or more than five courses of systemic corticosteroids in the past year. 6. History of a life-threatening asthma exacerbation requiring intubation, mechanical ventilation, or resulting in a hypoxic seizure within the last 2 years. 7. History of a respiratory tract infection within 4 weeks of enrollment. 8. If a female of child-bearing potential, failure to practice abstinence or use an acceptable birth control method. 9. Pregnancy or lactation or planning to get pregnant during the course of the trial. 10. Receiving hyposensitization therapy other than an established maintenance regimen defined as a continuous regimen for ≥ 3 months prior to enrollment. 11. Participation in an intervention trial or use of investigative drugs in the past 30 days or plans to enroll in such a trial during the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.The last 12 weeks of each 14-week treatment periodThis composite outcome uses a hierarchical method to ascertain differences in asthma control. For each participant, treatments are first compared to see if they differ in terms of exacerbations. If one treatment results in fewer exacerbations than another, it is deemed the superior treatment and no further comparisons are made. If treatment superiority cannot be assigned by exacerbations, then they are compared by asthma control days (ACDs). If one treatment yields at least 31 annualized ACDs more than another, it is deemed the superior treatment. If treatment superiority still cannot be assigned by ACDs, then they are compared by percent predicted FEV1 at the end of a treatment period. If one treatment yields at least 5% greater FEV1 than another, it is deemed the superior treatment. If treatment superiority cannot be assigned by exacerbations, ACDs or FEV1, then that participant is classified as having no differential response.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Crossover Sequence 1
Flovent Diskus® 250 mcg,followed by Advair Diskus® 250/50 mcg, followed by Flovent Diskus® 100 mcg, followed by Advair Diskus® 100/50 mcg Flovent Diskus® 100 mcg: Flovent is an ICS Flovent Diskus® 250 mcg: Flovent is an ICS Advair Diskus® 100/50 mcg: Advair is an ICS/LABA combination Advair Diskus® 250/50 mcg: Advair is an ICS/LABA combination
69
Crossover Sequence 2
Advair Diskus® 250/50 mcg, followed by Advair Diskus® 100/50 mcg, followed by Flovent Diskus® 250 mcg, followed by Flovent Diskus® 100 mcg Flovent Diskus® 100 mcg: Flovent is an ICS Flovent Diskus® 250 mcg: Flovent is an ICS Advair Diskus® 100/50 mcg: Advair is an ICS/LABA combination Advair Diskus® 250/50 mcg: Advair is an ICS/LABA combination
69
Crossover Sequence 3
Flovent Diskus® 100 mcg, followed by Flovent Diskus® 250 mcg, followed by Advair Diskus® 100/50 mcg, followed by Advair Diskus® 250/50 mcg Flovent Diskus® 100 mcg: Flovent is an ICS Flovent Diskus® 250 mcg: Flovent is an ICS Advair Diskus® 100/50 mcg: Advair is an ICS/LABA combination Advair Diskus® 250/50 mcg: Advair is an ICS/LABA combination
71
Crossover Sequence 4
Advair Diskus® 100/50 mcg, followed by Flovent Diskus® 100 mcg, followed by Advair Diskus® 250/50 mcg, followed by Flovent Diskus® 250 mcg Flovent Diskus® 100 mcg: Flovent is an ICS Flovent Diskus® 250 mcg: Flovent is an ICS Advair Diskus® 100/50 mcg: Advair is an ICS/LABA combination Advair Diskus® 250/50 mcg: Advair is an ICS/LABA combination
71
Crossover Sequence 5
Flovent Diskus® 500 mcg, followed by Advair Diskus® 250/50 mcg, followed by Flovent Diskus® 250 mcg, followed by Advair Diskus® 100/50 mcg Flovent Diskus® 250 mcg: Flovent is an ICS Flovent Diskus® 500 mcg: Flovent is an ICS Advair Diskus® 100/50 mcg: Advair is an ICS/LABA combination Advair Diskus® 250/50 mcg: Advair is an ICS/LABA combination
73
Crossover Sequence 6
Advair Diskus® 250/50 mcg, followed by Advair Diskus® 100/50 mcg, followed by Flovent Diskus® 500 mcg, followed by Flovent Diskus® 250 mcg Flovent Diskus® 250 mcg: Flovent is an ICS Flovent Diskus® 500 mcg: Flovent is an ICS Advair Diskus® 100/50 mcg: Advair is an ICS/LABA combination Advair Diskus® 250/50 mcg: Advair is an ICS/LABA combination
72
Crossover Sequence 7
Flovent Diskus® 250 mcg, followed by Flovent Diskus® 500 mcg, followed by Advair Diskus® 100/50 mcg, followed by Advair Diskus® 250/50 mcg Flovent Diskus® 250 mcg: Flovent is an ICS Flovent Diskus® 500 mcg: Flovent is an ICS Advair Diskus® 100/50 mcg: Advair is an ICS/LABA combination Advair Diskus® 250/50 mcg: Advair is an ICS/LABA combination
75
Crossover Sequence 8
Advair Diskus® 100/50 mcg, followed by Flovent Diskus® 250 mcg, followed by Advair Diskus® 250/50 mcg, followed by Flovent Diskus® 500 mcg Flovent Diskus® 250 mcg: Flovent is an ICS Flovent Diskus® 500 mcg: Flovent is an ICS Advair Diskus® 100/50 mcg: Advair is an ICS/LABA combination Advair Diskus® 250/50 mcg: Advair is an ICS/LABA combination
74
Total574

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007
Overall StudyAdverse Event00000001
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy20220102
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up532481268
Overall StudyPhysician Decision20211110
Overall StudyPregnancy00000011
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1514107891012

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCrossover Sequence 1Crossover Sequence 2Crossover Sequence 3Crossover Sequence 4Crossover Sequence 5Crossover Sequence 6Crossover Sequence 7Crossover Sequence 8Total
Age, Continuous8.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
8.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
8.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
8.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
38.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.5
38.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.9
39.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
35.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
23.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.5
Asthma Control Test18.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
18.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
19.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
18.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
18.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
Childhood Asthma Control Test21.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
21.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
20.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
22.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
21.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants4 Participants7 Participants6 Participants2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants3 Participants33 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
62 Participants65 Participants64 Participants65 Participants71 Participants70 Participants73 Participants71 Participants541 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) Percent of Predicted98.1 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4
92.6 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.9
95 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
96.2 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.1
83.8 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.1
82.9 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
83.7 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.3
83.4 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18
89.3 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.1
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
63 Participants65 Participants68 Participants66 Participants69 Participants71 Participants74 Participants73 Participants549 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
6 Participants4 Participants3 Participants5 Participants4 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants25 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
69 participants69 participants71 participants71 participants73 participants72 participants75 participants74 participants574 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
29 Participants27 Participants26 Participants28 Participants52 Participants48 Participants47 Participants52 Participants309 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
40 Participants42 Participants45 Participants43 Participants21 Participants24 Participants28 Participants22 Participants265 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2800 / 2800 / 2800 / 2800 / 2940 / 2940 / 2940 / 294
other
Total, other adverse events
64 / 28052 / 28043 / 28027 / 28053 / 29447 / 29435 / 29434 / 294
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 2801 / 2802 / 2804 / 28010 / 2947 / 2947 / 2948 / 294

Outcome results

Primary

The Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.

This composite outcome uses a hierarchical method to ascertain differences in asthma control. For each participant, treatments are first compared to see if they differ in terms of exacerbations. If one treatment results in fewer exacerbations than another, it is deemed the superior treatment and no further comparisons are made. If treatment superiority cannot be assigned by exacerbations, then they are compared by asthma control days (ACDs). If one treatment yields at least 31 annualized ACDs more than another, it is deemed the superior treatment. If treatment superiority still cannot be assigned by ACDs, then they are compared by percent predicted FEV1 at the end of a treatment period. If one treatment yields at least 5% greater FEV1 than another, it is deemed the superior treatment. If treatment superiority cannot be assigned by exacerbations, ACDs or FEV1, then that participant is classified as having no differential response.

Time frame: The last 12 weeks of each 14-week treatment period

Population: Not all treatments were used in all participants. Flovent 500 was not used in children and Flovent 100 was not used in adolescents and adults

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Adolescents and AdultsThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Advair 250/50 superior to Flovent 250.46 probability
Adolescents and AdultsThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Advair 100/50 inferior to Flovent 250.28 probability
Adolescents and AdultsThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Advair 250/50 inferior to Flovent 250.33 probability
Adolescents and AdultsThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Advair 100/50 inferior to Advair 250/50.36 probability
Adolescents and AdultsThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Advair 250/50 superior to Flovent 500.49 probability
Adolescents and AdultsThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Advair 250/50 inferior to Flovent 500.31 probability
Adolescents and AdultsThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Flovent 500 superior to Flovent 250.35 probability
Adolescents and AdultsThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Flovent 500 inferior to Flovent 250.40 probability
Adolescents and AdultsThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Advair 100/50 superior to Flovent 500.53 probability
Adolescents and AdultsThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Advair 100/50 superior to Flovent 250.49 probability
Adolescents and AdultsThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Advair 100/50 inferior to Flovent 500.27 probability
Adolescents and AdultsThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Advair 100/50 superior to Advair 250/50.42 probability
ChildrenThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Flovent 250 inferior to Flovent 100.37 probability
ChildrenThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Advair 100/50 superior to Flovent 250.46 probability
ChildrenThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Advair 100/50 inferior to Flovent 250.46 probability
ChildrenThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Advair 100/50 superior to Advair 250/50.47 probability
ChildrenThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Advair 100/50 inferior to Advair 250/50.49 probability
ChildrenThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Advair 100/50 superior to Flovent 100.53 probability
ChildrenThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Advair 100/50 inferior to Flovent 100.41 probability
ChildrenThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Advair 250/50 superior to Flovent 250.43 probability
ChildrenThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Advair 250/50 inferior to Flovent 250.47 probability
ChildrenThe Primary Outcome is a Composite Measure That Uses Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days During the Last 12 of 14 Weeks of a Treatment Regimen, and Percent Predicted FEV1 at the End of a Treatment Regimen.Flovent 250 superior to Flovent 100.51 probability
Comparison: Test of the null hypothesis that the superiority of Advair 100/50 compared to Fluticasone 250 is equal to the inferiority of Advair 100/50 compared to Fluticasone 250p-value: 0.003Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Test of the null hypothesis that the superiority of Advair 100/50 compared to Fluticasone 250 is equal to the inferiority of Advair 100/50 compared to Fluticasone 250p-value: 0.9Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Test of the null hypothesis that the superiority of Advair 100/50 compared to Fluticasone 500 is equal to the inferiority of Advair 100/50 compared to Fluticasone 500p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Test of the null hypothesis that the superiority of Advair 100/50 compared to Advair 250/50 is equal to the inferiority of Advair 100/50 compared to Advair 250/50p-value: 0.42Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Test of the null hypothesis that the superiority of Advair 100/50 compared to Advair 250/50 is equal to the inferiority of Advair 100/50 compared to Advair 250/50p-value: 0.84Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Test of the null hypothesis that the superiority of Advair 250/50 compared to Fluticasone 500 is equal to the inferiority of Advair 250/50 compared to Fluticasone 500p-value: 0.015Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Test of the null hypothesis that the superiority of Advair 250/50 compared to Fluticasone 250 is equal to the inferiority of Advair 250/50 compared to Fluticasone 250p-value: 0.085Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Test of the null hypothesis that the superiority of Advair 250/50 compared to Fluticasone 250 is equal to the inferiority of Advair 250/50 compared to Fluticasone 250p-value: 0.62Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Test of the null hypothesis that the superiority of Fluticasone 500 compared to Fluticasone 250 is equal to the inferiority of Fluticasone 500 compared to Fluticasone 250p-value: 0.48Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Test of the null hypothesis that the superiority of Advair 100/50 compared to Fluticasone 100 is equal to the inferiority of Advair 100/50 compared to Fluticasone 100p-value: 0.14Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Test of the null hypothesis that the superiority of Fluticasone 250 compared to Fluticasone 100 is equal to the inferiority of Fluticasone 250 compared to Fluticasone 100p-value: 0.096Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026