Skip to content

Clinical Outcomes Following Treatment With Systane® Balance in Dry Eye Subjects

Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes Following Treatment With Systane® Balance in Dry Eye Subjects With Lipid Deficiency

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01967147
Enrollment
279
Registered
2013-10-22
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2016-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye

Keywords

Dry eye, Lipid deficiency, Tear film break-up time

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the superior efficacy of Systane® Balance over Preservative-Free 0.9% Saline following 35 days of QID (4 times a day) dosing in treating dry eye subjects with lipid deficiency.

Detailed description

This study consisted of 4 visits conducted during 3 sequential phases: the Run-in Phase (which included a screening visit and run-in period), Treatment Phase I and Treatment Phase II. In Phase I, subjects were randomized to either Systane® Balance or Saline and dosed 4 times a day for 35 days. In Phase II (Day 35-90) subjects continued to dose with their assigned product on an as-needed basis.

Interventions

Commercially available eye drops used during Treatment Phase

DRUGPreservative-free 0.9% Saline solution

Commercially available solution used as Run-in (1 drop in each eye 4 times a day for 15 days) and during Treatment Phase

Sponsors

Alcon Research
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Must have all of the following in at least 1 eye at Screening: 1. Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) grading for Expressibility ≤ 2 and Meibum Quality ≤ 2, 2. The average of 3 measures of TFBUT ≤ 5 seconds, and 3. Unanesthetized Schirmer I test of ≥ 3 mm. * Must have an Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score ≥ 18 at Visit 1 prior to randomization (ie, after 2 weeks of run-in with Preservative-Free 0.9% Saline administered 4 times a day). * Must have best-corrected visual acuity of 55 letters or better in each eye as assessed using an early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart (letter read method). * Physician diagnosis of dry eye at least 6 months prior to Screening visit. * Willing and able to attend all study visits. * Must sign a written informed consent form. * Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects on topical ocular treatments containing benzalkonium chloride (BAK), or other products with known toxicity to the corneal surface, within 30 days of Screening. * Subjects who have started, stopped, or changed a lid hygiene regimen within 30 days of Screening. * Use of any artificial tears/lubricants/gels/rewetting drops within 4 hours of Screening. * Women of childbearing potential are excluded from participating in this study if they met any of the following conditions: * Currently pregnant, or * Test positive for pregnancy at Screening visit, or * Currently breast feeding, or * Are not in agreement to use adequate birth control methods to prevent pregnancy throughout the study. * Hypersensitivity to the use of any of the study products or allergy to any ingredient in the study products. * Has an active ocular allergy. * Any ocular abnormalities that could adversely affect the safety or efficacy outcome, including eyelid anomalies, corneal disorders, history of herpes simplex, etc. * Subjects taking any systemic medication known to cause dry eye unless they have been on stable therapy/dosage for at least 30 days prior to Screening and will remain on a stable dosage for the duration of the study. * History of any ocular or intraocular surgery (including periocular Botox injections), eyelid surgery, keratorefractive procedure, corneal transplant and its variants, or serious ocular trauma within 1 year of Screening. * Active ocular infection (bacterial, viral or fungal), active inflammation not associated with dry eye such as uveitis, iritis, active blepharitis, active allergic conjunctivitis, etc. * Subjects with punctal plug insertion or diathermy procedure initiated within 30 days of Screening. * Any significant illnesses that could be expected to interfere with the study parameters. * Subjects with active oculodermal rosacea with meibomian gland dysfunction. * Participation in an investigational drug or device trial within 30 days of Screening. * Contact lens use within 30 days prior to Screening, or unwilling to avoid contact lens use during the course of the study. * Unwilling to avoid the use of additional artificial tears/lubricants/gels/rewetting drops (other than the assigned study medication) throughout the course of the study. * Other protocol-defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in TFBUT at Day 35Baseline (Day 0), Day 35TFBUT (the time required for dry spots to appear on the corneal surface after blinking) was assessed by the investigator using ophthalmic dye and a biomicroscope and measured in seconds. Subjects were dosed in the office 1 hour ±10 minutes prior to TFBUT assessment. A shorter TFBUT indicates a higher likelihood of dry eye symptoms. A positive change indicates an improvement in TFBUT. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in TOSS Score at Day 35Baseline (Day 0), Day 35The TOSS score (a cumulative cornea and conjunctival staining score) was assessed by the investigator using ophthalmic dye and a biomicroscope. Three areas of the ocular surface were graded for dryness on a 0-5 scale (0=Absent, 5=Severe), with a resultant overall score of 0-15. A negative change indicates an improvement in dry eye-related staining. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Change From Baseline in OSDI Score at Day 35Baseline (Day 0), Day 35The OSDI is a 12-item quality of life questionnaire designed to assess ocular surface symptoms, their severity, and their impact on the subject's ability to function. Each item was scored by the subject on a 0-4 Likert-type scale (0=None, 4=All of the Time), with a resultant overall score of 0-100 (0=no disability, 100=complete disability). A negative change number represents a perceived improvement in ocular health.
Change From Baseline in IDEEL Treatment Effectiveness Score at Day 35Baseline (Day 0), Day 35The IDEEL is a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess the subject's general satisfaction with treatment use. The subject responded to treatment effectiveness questions (Questions 2-5) using a 0-4 Likert-type scale, where 0=None of the time and 4=All of the time. The IDEEL treatment effectiveness score was calculated as the sum of the responses from Questions 2-5 divided by the number of questions (2-5) answered, multiplied by 25, for a resultant overall score of 0-100. A positive change number represents perceived improvement.
Change From Baseline in IDEEL Treatment Inconvenience Score at Day 35Baseline (Day 0), Day 35The IDEEL is a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess the subject's general satisfaction with treatment use. The subject responded to treatment inconvenience questions (Questions 6, 8-10) using a 0-4 Likert-type scale, where 0=All of the time and 4=None of the time. The IDEEL treatment inconvenience score was calculated as the sum of the responses from Questions 6, 8-10 divided by the number of questions (6, 8-10) answered, multiplied by 25, for a resultant overall score of 0-100. A positive change number represents perceived improvement.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from 14 study centers located in France, 4 study centers located in Germany, 3 study centers located in Spain, 3 study centers located in the Netherlands, 4 study centers located in the UK, 4 study centers located in Italy, and 3 study centers located in Poland.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 279 subjects enrolled, 40 were exited as screen failures prior to randomization. An additional 25 were discontinued prior to randomization, following the outcome of the interim analysis. This reporting group includes all randomized subjects (214).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Systane Balance
Propylene Glycol, 1 drop in each eye, 4 times per day, during Phase I, followed by 1 drop in each eye as needed during Phase II
112
Saline
Saline solution, 1 drop in each eye, 4 times/day, during Phase I, followed by 1 drop in each eye as needed during Phase II
102
Total214

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event52
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy14
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12
Overall StudyNon-compliance with Study Drug03
Overall StudyOther45
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalSystane BalanceSaline
Age, Continuous59.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
59.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
58.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
IDEEL Treatment Inconvenience75.60 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.4
76.61 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.08
74.48 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.85
Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Treatment Effectiveness Score45.35 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.52
44.63 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.32
46.15 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.86
Ocular surface disease index (OSDI)39.30 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.42
40.24 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.48
38.27 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.39
Sex: Female, Male
Female
163 Participants91 Participants72 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
51 Participants21 Participants30 Participants
Tear Film Break-up Time (TFBUT)3.72 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.48
3.73 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.37
3.71 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.59
Total Ocular Surface Staining (TOSS) Score3.40 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.25
3.45 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.14
3.35 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.38

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2796 / 1101 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2792 / 1102 / 100

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in TFBUT at Day 35

TFBUT (the time required for dry spots to appear on the corneal surface after blinking) was assessed by the investigator using ophthalmic dye and a biomicroscope and measured in seconds. Subjects were dosed in the office 1 hour ±10 minutes prior to TFBUT assessment. A shorter TFBUT indicates a higher likelihood of dry eye symptoms. A positive change indicates an improvement in TFBUT. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 35

Population: This analysis population includes all randomized subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Systane BalanceChange From Baseline in TFBUT at Day 351.5 secondsStandard Error 0.2
SalineChange From Baseline in TFBUT at Day 350.5 secondsStandard Error 0.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in IDEEL Treatment Effectiveness Score at Day 35

The IDEEL is a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess the subject's general satisfaction with treatment use. The subject responded to treatment effectiveness questions (Questions 2-5) using a 0-4 Likert-type scale, where 0=None of the time and 4=All of the time. The IDEEL treatment effectiveness score was calculated as the sum of the responses from Questions 2-5 divided by the number of questions (2-5) answered, multiplied by 25, for a resultant overall score of 0-100. A positive change number represents perceived improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 35

Population: This analysis population includes all randomized subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Systane BalanceChange From Baseline in IDEEL Treatment Effectiveness Score at Day 3521.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.43
SalineChange From Baseline in IDEEL Treatment Effectiveness Score at Day 355.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.65
Secondary

Change From Baseline in IDEEL Treatment Inconvenience Score at Day 35

The IDEEL is a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess the subject's general satisfaction with treatment use. The subject responded to treatment inconvenience questions (Questions 6, 8-10) using a 0-4 Likert-type scale, where 0=All of the time and 4=None of the time. The IDEEL treatment inconvenience score was calculated as the sum of the responses from Questions 6, 8-10 divided by the number of questions (6, 8-10) answered, multiplied by 25, for a resultant overall score of 0-100. A positive change number represents perceived improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 35

Population: This analysis population includes all randomized subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Systane BalanceChange From Baseline in IDEEL Treatment Inconvenience Score at Day 351.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.56
SalineChange From Baseline in IDEEL Treatment Inconvenience Score at Day 350.77 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in OSDI Score at Day 35

The OSDI is a 12-item quality of life questionnaire designed to assess ocular surface symptoms, their severity, and their impact on the subject's ability to function. Each item was scored by the subject on a 0-4 Likert-type scale (0=None, 4=All of the Time), with a resultant overall score of 0-100 (0=no disability, 100=complete disability). A negative change number represents a perceived improvement in ocular health.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 35

Population: This analysis population includes all randomized subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Systane BalanceChange From Baseline in OSDI Score at Day 35-13.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.44
SalineChange From Baseline in OSDI Score at Day 35-8.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.56
Secondary

Change From Baseline in TOSS Score at Day 35

The TOSS score (a cumulative cornea and conjunctival staining score) was assessed by the investigator using ophthalmic dye and a biomicroscope. Three areas of the ocular surface were graded for dryness on a 0-5 scale (0=Absent, 5=Severe), with a resultant overall score of 0-15. A negative change indicates an improvement in dry eye-related staining. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 35

Population: This analysis population includes all randomized subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Systane BalanceChange From Baseline in TOSS Score at Day 35-0.81 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
SalineChange From Baseline in TOSS Score at Day 35-0.64 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026