Skip to content

Proof of Concept (Design Validation) in Patient With Hard to Heal Wounds Such as Pressure Ulcer, Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Leg Ulcer, Leia

An Open Randomised, Prospective, Crossover, Proof of Concept (Design Validation) Clinical Investigation to Caompare the Performance and Safety of Wound Dressing(Leia) Compared to and Hydroactive Surgical Dressing on Low to Highly Exuding Wounds

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01966380
Enrollment
6
Registered
2013-10-21
Start date
2013-09-30
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2015-12-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Foot Ulcer, Leg Ulcer, Pressure Ulcer

Brief summary

The purpose of this reseach study is to determine Mölnlycke Health Care´s Leia dressing performance properties is fulfilled and that the dressing is safe when used on wound types such as pressure ulcer, leg ulcer, and diabetic foot ulcer.

Interventions

DEVICELeia

Sponsors

Molnlycke Health Care AB
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Low to highly exuding chronic wound(wound history \> 2 months) such as Leg Ulcer, Pressure Ulcer Category III to IV or Diabetic Foot Ulcer * Male of female, 18 years and above * Signed Informed Consent Form

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy or lactation * Wound size not suitable for the wound dressing size * Known allergy/hypersensitivity to any of the components in the dressing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absorption of Wound Exudates.2-3 weeksAbsorption capacity measured subjectively: NA/POOR/GOOD/VERY GOOD/EXCELLENT

Countries

Sweden

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Leia and Hydroactive Surgical Dressing
In the case of this study, participants served as their own control.
6
Total6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLeia and Hydroactive Surgical Dressing
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1 Participants
Age, Continuous71 years
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 60 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Absorption of Wound Exudates.

Absorption capacity measured subjectively: NA/POOR/GOOD/VERY GOOD/EXCELLENT

Time frame: 2-3 weeks

Population: Participants served as their own controll, those the total amount of participants is reflekted in both of the outcome measurements.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LeiaAbsorption of Wound Exudates.Poor0 Total no. assess. in each wounddressing
LeiaAbsorption of Wound Exudates.Excellent0 Total no. assess. in each wounddressing
LeiaAbsorption of Wound Exudates.Very good5 Total no. assess. in each wounddressing
LeiaAbsorption of Wound Exudates.NA7 Total no. assess. in each wounddressing
LeiaAbsorption of Wound Exudates.Good8 Total no. assess. in each wounddressing
Hydroactivate Surgical DressingAbsorption of Wound Exudates.NA8 Total no. assess. in each wounddressing
Hydroactivate Surgical DressingAbsorption of Wound Exudates.Poor0 Total no. assess. in each wounddressing
Hydroactivate Surgical DressingAbsorption of Wound Exudates.Good7 Total no. assess. in each wounddressing
Hydroactivate Surgical DressingAbsorption of Wound Exudates.Very good5 Total no. assess. in each wounddressing
Hydroactivate Surgical DressingAbsorption of Wound Exudates.Excellent1 Total no. assess. in each wounddressing

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026