Skip to content

Medial vs Lateral Approach for Total Knee Replacement on Valgus Knee: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Medial vs Lateral Approach for Total Knee Replacement on Valgus Knee: Prospective and Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01965886
Acronym
ValgusKnee
Enrollment
126
Registered
2013-10-18
Start date
2013-10-31
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2015-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Keywords

osteoarthritis, knee, arthroplasty, replacement

Brief summary

The most common surgical approach to perform a total knee replacement is called medial parapatellar approach. It's effective and can be applied virtually to all types of knee deformities. The Keblish approach is an alternative approach which uses the lateral side of the patella to enter the joint. Some orthopaedic surgeons consider the latter approach a better option when facing a valgus deformity of the osteoarthritic knee but there is no convincing evidence on the literature supporting one or another approach. The objective of this study is to compare the medial vs lateral approach for total knee replacement on valgus knee.

Detailed description

Total knee replacement is a procedure for the treatment of advanced knee osteoarthritis. The most common surgical approach to perform a total knee replacement is called medial parapatellar approach, or simply medial approach. It's effective and can be applied virtually to all types of knee deformities. The Keblish approach is an alternative approach which uses the lateral side of the patella to enter the joint. It's also called lateral parapatellar approach. Some orthopaedic surgeons consider the latter approach a better option when facing a valgus deformity of the osteoarthritic knee. Theoretically, the Keblish approach can promote better soft tissue balance and patellar tracking, but there is no convincing evidence on the literature supporting one or another approach for a total knee replacement on valgus knee. The objective of this prospective and randomized clinical trial is to compare the medial vs lateral approach for total knee replacement on valgus knee.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMedial approach

Total knee replacement performed through a longitudinal incision medial to the patella

PROCEDUREKeblish approach

Total knee replacement performed through a longitudinal incision lateral to the patella

Sponsors

University of Campinas, Brazil
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Severe osteoarthritis (Kellgren & Lawrence grade 4) * Valgus deformity of the knee * Read and sign the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Severe pain in other joint (VAS\>6) * Comorbidities or any condition that contraindicate the procedure * Previous arthroplasty on the index knee

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee Score1 yearEvaluation of patient's pain and function using the Knee Society questionnaire

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
WOMAC2 yearsEvaluation of patient's symptoms using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
VAS2 yearsEvaluation of patient's symptoms using the VAS (Visual Analogic Scale of pain)
Knee alignment6 monthsRadiographic analysis of the knee alignment
Hemoglobin3 daysAnalysis of patient's hemoglobin to estimate blood loss

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Primary ContactGustavo C Campos, MD
gustavoccampos@terra.com.br+551983318000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026