Skip to content

Alogliptin Tablets Special Drug Use Surveillance Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Combination Therapy With Sulfonylurea

Nesina Tablets Special Drug Use Surveillance Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Combination Therapy With Sulfonylurea

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01964950
Enrollment
1101
Registered
2013-10-17
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2017-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surveillance

Keywords

drug therapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of long-term combination therapy with alogliptin (Nesina) and sulfonylurea in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who responded inadequately to treatment with sulfonylurea in addition to diet therapy and exercise therapy.

Detailed description

This is a special drug use surveillance on long-term use of alogliptin with a 1-year (12-month) observational period, designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of long-term combination therapy with alogliptin and sulfonylurea in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a routine clinical setting. Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who responded inadequately to treatment with sulfonylurea in addition to diet therapy and exercise therapy will be enrolled in this study. The planned sample size is 1,000. The usual adult dosage for oral use is 1 alogliptin tablet (25 mg) once daily.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Takeda
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants who did not adequately respond to the following treatment • Treatment with sulfonylurea in addition to diet therapy and exercise therapy

Exclusion criteria

1. Participants with severe ketosis, diabetic coma or precoma, or type 1 diabetes mellitus (these participants require prompt adjustment of hyperglycemia by fluid infusion and insulin, and hence use of Nesina is not appropriate). 2. Participants with severe infection, pre- or post-operative participants, or participants with serious traumatic injury (blood glucose control by insulin injection is desirable for these participants, and hence use of Nesina is not appropriate). 3. Participants with a history of hypersensitivity to any ingredient of Nesina.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Drug ReactionsBaseline up to 12 monthsAdverse drug reactions are defined as adverse events (AEs) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug. The safety analysis was planned to be assessed in alogliptin + SU and alogliptin + other arm separately.
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Serious Adverse Drug ReactionBaseline up to 12 monthsSerious adverse drug reactions are defined as serious adverse events (SAEs) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The safety analysis was planned to be assessed in alogliptin + SU and alogliptin + other arm separately.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 12, and final assessment (up to Month 12)The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months or final visit (last visit for a participant in the study, up to Month 12) relative to baseline. The efficacy analysis was planned to be assessed in the total alogliptin arm irrespective of SU treatment.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Objective Glycemic ControlBaseline and final assessment (up to Month 12)The rate of achieving objective glycemic control in HbA1c level was calculated at baseline and final visit (last visit for a participant in the study, up to Month 12). Glycemic control was measured as \<8.0%, \<7.0%, and \<6.0% of glycosylated hemoglobin. The efficacy analysis was planned to be assessed in the total alogliptin arm irrespective of SU treatment.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood GlucoseBaseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 12, and final assessment (up to Month 12)The change between the fasting blood glucose value collected at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months or final visit (last visit for a participant in the study, up to Month 12) relative to baseline. The efficacy analysis was planned to be assessed in the total alogliptin arm irrespective of the SU treatment.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin LevelMonths 1, 3, 6, 12, and final assessment (up to Month 12)The change between the fasting insulin value collected at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months or final visit (last visit for a participant in the study, up to Month 12) relative to baseline. The efficacy analysis was planned to be assessed in the total alogliptin arm irrespective of SU treatment.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 221 investigative sites in Japan from 1-Jul-11 to 31-Dec-14.

Pre-assignment details

Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus started treatment with alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed. As per protocol, participants we enrolled in 1 observational group at the start and were divided into 2 groups based on Sulfonylurea (SU) use for analysis of safety endpoints. Participant data was collected for overall arm.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Alogliptin + SU
Alogliptin (Nesina) 25 milligram (mg), tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months in participants who received an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin and during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
916
Alogliptin + Other
Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months in participants who did not receive an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin or during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
160
Total1,076

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyProtocol Violation25

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalAlogliptin + SUAlogliptin + Other
Age, Customized
Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 65 Years
627 participants536 participants91 participants
Age, Customized
Less Than (<) 65 Years
449 participants380 participants
11.67
69 participants
12.19
Body Mass Index (BMI)
>=25 kg/m^2
378 participants318 participants60 participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)
<25 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
389 participants326 participants63 participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Unknown
309 participants272 participants37 participants
Breakdown of Complications of Heart Disease
Angina pectoris
77 participants70 participants7 participants
Breakdown of Complications of Heart Disease
Cardiac failure
28 participants25 participants3 participants
Breakdown of Complications of Heart Disease
Myocardial infarction
30 participants26 participants4 participants
Breakdown of Complications of Heart Disease
Other
30 participants26 participants4 participants
Breakdown of Complications of Liver Damage
Chronic hepatitis
36 participants31 participants5 participants
Breakdown of Complications of Liver Damage
Hepatic cirrhosis
3 participants2 participants1 participants
Breakdown of Complications of Liver Damage
Hepatic steatosis
146 participants122 participants24 participants
Breakdown of Complications of Liver Damage
Hepatitis alcoholic
39 participants30 participants9 participants
Breakdown of Complications of Liver Damage
Other
4 participants4 participants0 participants
Breakdown of Complications of Renal Damage
Glomerulonephritis
3 participants2 participants1 participants
Breakdown of Complications of Renal Damage
Nephrotic syndrome
4 participants3 participants1 participants
Breakdown of Complications of Renal Damage
Other
138 participants113 participants25 participants
Breakdown of Complications of Renal Damage
Renal failure chronic
9 participants9 participants0 participants
Breakdown of Complications of Stroke-related Disease
Cerebral haemorrhage
1 participants1 participants0 participants
Breakdown of Complications of Stroke-related Disease
Cerebral infarction
71 participants64 participants7 participants
Breakdown of Diabetic Complications
Diabetic nephropathy
137 participants114 participants23 participants
Breakdown of Diabetic Complications
Diabetic neuropathy
81 participants61 participants20 participants
Breakdown of Diabetic Complications
Diabetic retinopathy
97 participants76 participants21 participants
Complications of Allergic Disease
Had complications
58 participants51 participants7 participants
Complications of Allergic Disease
Had no complications
1018 participants865 participants153 participants
Complications of Dyslipidemia
Had complications
681 participants582 participants99 participants
Complications of Dyslipidemia
Had no complications
395 participants334 participants61 participants
Complications of Heart Disease
Had complications
147 participants129 participants18 participants
Complications of Heart Disease
Had no complications
929 participants787 participants142 participants
Complications of Heart Failure
Had complications
28 participants25 participants3 participants
Complications of Heart Failure
Had no complications
1048 participants891 participants157 participants
Complications of Hypertension
Had complications
690 participants593 participants97 participants
Complications of Hypertension
Had no complications
386 participants323 participants63 participants
Complications of Hyperuricemia
Had complications
82 participants74 participants8 participants
Complications of Hyperuricemia
Had no complications
994 participants842 participants152 participants
Complications of Liver Damage
Had complications
216 participants181 participants35 participants
Complications of Liver Damage
Had no complications
860 participants735 participants125 participants
Complications of Malignant Tumor
Had complications
22 participants19 participants3 participants
Complications of Malignant Tumor
Had no complications
1054 participants897 participants157 participants
Complications of Renal Damage
Had complications
153 participants126 participants27 participants
Complications of Renal Damage
Had no complications
923 participants790 participants133 participants
Complications of Stroke-related Disease
Had complications
72 participants65 participants7 participants
Complications of Stroke-related Disease
Had no complications
1004 participants851 participants153 participants
Degree of Hepatic Dysfunction
Grade 1
86 participants75 participants11 participants
Degree of Hepatic Dysfunction
Grade 2
12 participants10 participants2 participants
Degree of Hepatic Dysfunction
Normal
710 participants599 participants111 participants
Degree of Hepatic Dysfunction
Unknown
268 participants232 participants36 participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction
Mild
412 participants351 participants61 participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction
Moderate
171 participants146 participants25 participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction
Normal
176 participants151 participants25 participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction
Severe
12 participants12 participants0 participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction
Unknown
305 participants256 participants49 participants
Diabetic Complications
Had complications
230 participants187 participants43 participants
Diabetic Complications
Had no complications
846 participants729 participants117 participants
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level
HbA1c <6.0 percent (%)
18 participants14 participants4 participants
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level
HbA1c >=6.0% to <7.0%
174 participants149 participants25 participants
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level
HbA1c >=7.0% to <8.0%
373 participants312 participants61 participants
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level
HbA1c >=8.0%
435 participants374 participants61 participants
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level
Unknown
76 participants67 participants9 participants
Healthcare Category
Inpatient
4 participants3 participants1 participants
Healthcare Category
Outpatient
1047 participants891 participants156 participants
Healthcare Category
Outpatient and Inpatient
25 participants22 participants3 participants
Health-related Complications
Had complications
982 participants837 participants145 participants
Health-related Complications
Had no complications
94 participants79 participants15 participants
History of Alcohol Consumption
No
611 participants527 participants84 participants
History of Alcohol Consumption
Unknown
193 participants161 participants32 participants
History of Alcohol Consumption
Yes
272 participants228 participants44 participants
History of Allergy
Did not have allergy
873 participants742 participants131 participants
History of Allergy
Had allergy
86 participants78 participants8 participants
History of Allergy
Unknown
117 participants96 participants21 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Heart Failure Classification
NYHA Class I
18 participants16 participants2 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Heart Failure Classification
NYHA Class II
5 participants5 participants0 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Heart Failure Classification
NYHA Class III
1 participants1 participants0 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Heart Failure Classification
NYHA Class IV
1 participants1 participants0 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Heart Failure Classification
Unknown
3 participants2 participants1 participants
Pregnancy Status
Not pregnant
430 participants378 participants52 participants
Pregnancy Status
Pregnant
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Presence of Medical History
Did not have medical history
765 participants652 participants113 participants
Presence of Medical History
Had medical history
196 participants165 participants31 participants
Presence of Medical History
Unknown
115 participants99 participants16 participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
1076 participants916 participants160 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
430 Participants378 Participants52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
646 Participants538 Participants108 Participants
Smoking Classification
Current smoker
175 participants145 participants30 participants
Smoking Classification
Ex-smoker
228 participants189 participants39 participants
Smoking Classification
Never smoked
423 participants372 participants51 participants
Smoking Classification
Unknown
250 participants210 participants40 participants
Time From Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes
>=10 years
287 participants232 participants55 participants
Time From Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes
>=5 to <10 years
241 participants216 participants25 participants
Time From Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes
Greater than or equal to (>=)2 to <5 years
160 participants138 participants22 participants
Time From Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes
Less than (<)2 years
123 participants102 participants21 participants
Time From Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes
Unknown
265 participants228 participants37 participants
Waist circumference
<85 centimeter (cm) (Male)
59 participants52 participants7 participants
Waist circumference
>=85 cm (Male)
124 participants102 participants22 participants
Waist circumference
<90 cm (Female)
59 participants52 participants7 participants
Waist circumference
>=90 cm (Female)
43 participants39 participants4 participants
Waist circumference
Unknown (Female)
328 participants287 participants41 participants
Waist circumference
Unknown (Male)
463 participants384 participants79 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 9161 / 160
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 9160 / 160

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Drug Reactions

Adverse drug reactions are defined as adverse events (AEs) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug. The safety analysis was planned to be assessed in alogliptin + SU and alogliptin + other arm separately.

Time frame: Baseline up to 12 months

Population: The safety analysis set was defined as all participants who completed the study and had safety data available.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Alogliptin + SUNumber of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Drug Reactions19 participants
Alogliptin + OtherNumber of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Drug Reactions1 participants
Primary

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Serious Adverse Drug Reaction

Serious adverse drug reactions are defined as serious adverse events (SAEs) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The safety analysis was planned to be assessed in alogliptin + SU and alogliptin + other arm separately.

Time frame: Baseline up to 12 months

Population: The safety analysis set was defined as all participants who completed the study and had safety data available.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Alogliptin + SUNumber of Participants Reporting One or More Serious Adverse Drug Reaction5 participants
Alogliptin + OtherNumber of Participants Reporting One or More Serious Adverse Drug Reaction0 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose

The change between the fasting blood glucose value collected at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months or final visit (last visit for a participant in the study, up to Month 12) relative to baseline. The efficacy analysis was planned to be assessed in the total alogliptin arm irrespective of the SU treatment.

Time frame: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 12, and final assessment (up to Month 12)

Population: The efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed the study and had fasting blood glucose data at baseline and post-baseline time points available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alogliptin + SUChange From Baseline in Fasting Blood GlucoseBaseline (n = 250)151.1 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 43.07
Alogliptin + SUChange From Baseline in Fasting Blood GlucoseChange at Month 1 (n = 159)-14.6 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 42.91
Alogliptin + SUChange From Baseline in Fasting Blood GlucoseChange at Month 3 (n = 175)-13.8 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 40.08
Alogliptin + SUChange From Baseline in Fasting Blood GlucoseChange at Month 6 (n = 185)-13.1 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 47.37
Alogliptin + SUChange From Baseline in Fasting Blood GlucoseChange at Month 12 (n = 168)-16.4 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 43.97
Alogliptin + SUChange From Baseline in Fasting Blood GlucoseChange at Final Assessment (n = 250)-13.7 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 49.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin Level

The change between the fasting insulin value collected at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months or final visit (last visit for a participant in the study, up to Month 12) relative to baseline. The efficacy analysis was planned to be assessed in the total alogliptin arm irrespective of SU treatment.

Time frame: Months 1, 3, 6, 12, and final assessment (up to Month 12)

Population: The efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed the study and had fasting insulin data at baseline and post-baseline time points available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alogliptin + SUChange From Baseline in Fasting Insulin LevelBaseline (n = 33)7.88 micro units per milliliter (mcU/mL)Standard Deviation 5.674
Alogliptin + SUChange From Baseline in Fasting Insulin LevelChange at Month 1 (n = 15)1.27 micro units per milliliter (mcU/mL)Standard Deviation 12.138
Alogliptin + SUChange From Baseline in Fasting Insulin LevelChange at Month 3 (n = 17)0.21 micro units per milliliter (mcU/mL)Standard Deviation 3.474
Alogliptin + SUChange From Baseline in Fasting Insulin LevelChange at Month 6 (n = 20)0.69 micro units per milliliter (mcU/mL)Standard Deviation 5.629
Alogliptin + SUChange From Baseline in Fasting Insulin LevelChange at Month 12 (n = 22)1.17 micro units per milliliter (mcU/mL)Standard Deviation 3.521
Alogliptin + SUChange From Baseline in Fasting Insulin LevelChange at Final Assessment (n = 33)1.86 micro units per milliliter (mcU/mL)Standard Deviation 5.455
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months or final visit (last visit for a participant in the study, up to Month 12) relative to baseline. The efficacy analysis was planned to be assessed in the total alogliptin arm irrespective of SU treatment.

Time frame: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 12, and final assessment (up to Month 12)

Population: The efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed the study and had efficacy data at baseline and post-baseline time points available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alogliptin + SUChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)Baseline (n=830)8.03 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.348
Alogliptin + SUChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)Change at Month 1 (n = 655)-0.40 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.708
Alogliptin + SUChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)Change at Month 3 (n = 710)-0.66 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.117
Alogliptin + SUChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)Change at Month 6 (n = 725)-0.72 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.117
Alogliptin + SUChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)Change at Month 12 (n = 670)-0.64 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.106
Alogliptin + SUChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)Change at Final Assessment (n = 830)-0.65 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.145
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Objective Glycemic Control

The rate of achieving objective glycemic control in HbA1c level was calculated at baseline and final visit (last visit for a participant in the study, up to Month 12). Glycemic control was measured as \<8.0%, \<7.0%, and \<6.0% of glycosylated hemoglobin. The efficacy analysis was planned to be assessed in the total alogliptin arm irrespective of SU treatment.

Time frame: Baseline and final assessment (up to Month 12)

Population: The efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed the study and had efficacy data at baseline and post-baseline time points available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Alogliptin + SUPercentage of Participants Achieving Objective Glycemic Control<8.0 percent: Baseline56.3 percentage of participants
Alogliptin + SUPercentage of Participants Achieving Objective Glycemic Control<8.0%: Final Assessment75.4 percentage of participants
Alogliptin + SUPercentage of Participants Achieving Objective Glycemic Control<7.0%: Baseline19.3 percentage of participants
Alogliptin + SUPercentage of Participants Achieving Objective Glycemic Control<7.0%: Final Assessment43.0 percentage of participants
Alogliptin + SUPercentage of Participants Achieving Objective Glycemic Control<6.0%: Baseline1.7 percentage of participants
Alogliptin + SUPercentage of Participants Achieving Objective Glycemic Control<6.0%: Final Assessment4.6 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026