Skip to content

Leukotriene D4 Nasal Provocation Test in Allergic Rhinitis

Leukotriene D4 Nasal Provocation Test: Rationale, Methodology, Diagnostic Value and Its Impact on Airway Inflammation in Allergic Rhinitis With or Without Asthma

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01963741
Enrollment
60
Registered
2013-10-16
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2014-04-30
Last updated
2015-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allergic Rhinitis, Asthma

Keywords

Leukotriene D4, allergic rhinitis, nasal airway resistance, nasal provocation test, nasal hyperreactivity, airway inflammation, asthma

Brief summary

Leukotrienes play critical roles in the inflammatory process in allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma, therefore, anti-leukotriene therapy is part of treatment for asthma. However, not all allergic rhinitis accompanied with or without asthma treated with anti-leukotriene were effective. So it is critical to develop a method to identify the response subgroup. In this study, it is assumed that nasal physiological responsiveness to leukotriene nasal provocation test (NPT) is able to gain evidence on the effect of leukotriene on the development of allergic rhinitis and asthma, and is helpful to the use of anti-leukotriene agent. The purpose of the study is to establish the methodology and diagnostic value of leukotriene D4 (LTD4) nasal provocation.

Detailed description

Nasal provocation test induced by LTD4 will be conducted by measuring nasal airway resistance and airway symptoms in a stepwise concentration of LTD4 by nasal spray. Inflammation biomarkers, such as eosinophilic granulocyte in sputum and nasal lavage, fractional exhaled nitric oxide(FeNO), and lung function before and after nasal provocation will be studied to explore the impact of LTD4 nasal provocation test on airway inflammation.

Interventions

Nasal challenge using 16% ethanol diluent, the concentration of which corresponded to the highest concentration of LTD4, was undertaken for exclusion of subjects hypersensitive to ethanol or saline. The LTD4 challenge could be initiated provided that NAR increase was \<30%. Ranges of 4 to 16 mcg.mL-1 LTD4 diluents were applied for a double-fold increment approach at intervals of 6 minutes.

DRUGhistamine

Nasal challenge using 0.9% saline, was undertaken for exclusion of subjects hypersensitive to saline. The histamine nasal challenge could be initiated provided that NAR increase was \<30%. Ranges of 0.4 to 3.2 mg.mL-1 histamine diluents were applied for a double-fold increment approach at intervals of 3 minutes.

Sponsors

Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with allergic rhinitis accompanied with or without asthma * positive skin prick test (SPT) * had no acute upper or lower airway infection 2 weeks prior to study * no oral or nasal anti-histamines * no leukotriene receptor antagonists for 1 week * no oral or nasal and inhaled corticosteroids for 2 weeks

Exclusion criteria

* smokers * a past confirmed history of chronic respiratory disease other than asthma * other severe systemic diseases (myocardial infarction, malignant tumor, etc.) * under immunotherapy * unable to complete the test or had limited understanding * pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of participants positive response to leukotriene D4 or histamine nasal provocation testUntil 1 hour after the nasal provocation testNasal airway resistance measured by positive anterior rhinomanometry. Concentration induced 60% increase of nasal airway resistance (PC60-NAR) will be measured and reported; Composite symptoms score defined by reichmann H and his colleagues showed as follows:3-5 sneezes = 1 point (pt), \>5 sneezes = 2 points (pts); rhinorrhoea \< 1 milliliter (mL) = 1 pt, rhinorrhoea \> 1 milliliter = 2 pts; pruritus of the palate or ear or eye= 1 pt, conjunctivitis or cough or urticaria or difficult breathing= 2 pts. Total score ranges from 0 to 6 pts. Positive response to LTD4 nasal provocation test was defined as PC60-NAR less than 16mcg/mL or the symptom score higher than 3.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline of eosinophils in sputum and nasal lavage and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO)4 and 24 hours after the nasal provocation testBiomarkers in upper and lower airways such as eosinophils in sputum and nasal lavage and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) will be studied.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline of cumulative dosage of methacholine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PD20FEV1-MCH)Half an hour after nasal provocation testThe increase of brochial hyperresponsiveness induced by nasal provocation test was assessed by the decrease of cumulative dosage of methacholine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PD20FEV1-MCH).
Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)3 minutes after each concentration of provocation agent administrated into the nostrilsThe peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) is measured by PNIF meter (in-check dial, Clement Clarke International Ltd.); Change from baseline of peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) at the end of nasal provocation test will be reported.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026