Skip to content

A Golimumab Phase 3b, Multicenter, Assessment of Intravenous Efficacy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Subjects Who Have Diminished Disease Control Despite Treatment With Infliximab (REMICADE®)

A Golimumab Phase 3b, Multicenter, Assessment of Intravenous Efficacy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Subjects Who Have Diminished Disease Control Despite Treatment With Infliximab (REMICADE®)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01962974
Acronym
REGAIN
Enrollment
7
Registered
2013-10-16
Start date
2013-10-31
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2017-04-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Keywords

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Brief summary

This is a Phase 3b, multicenter study of the efficacy of golimumab 2 mg/kg IV in subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis who are receiving methotrexate and have inadequate disease control (defined as an erythrocyte sedimentation rate \[ESR\]-based Disease Activity Score in 28 joints \[DAS28\] ≥ 3.2 and ≥ 4 swollen and ≥ 4 tender joints) despite current anti-TNFα therapy with infliximab 2 - 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks, 2 - 5 mg/kg every 5 weeks, 3 - 6 mg/kg every 6 weeks, 3 - 7mg/kg every 7 weeks, or 4 - 8 mg/kg every 8 weeks. To be eligible for participation, subjects must have previously demonstrated initial and/or temporary improvement in disease signs and symptoms, who have since exhibited a diminished response despite continued treatment. It is estimated that 200 subjects will be enrolled in the study at approximately 85 global sites.

Detailed description

The study employs an open-label active switch design that moves subjects from infliximab to golimumab 2 mg/kg IV. In general, subjects eligible for the study include men or women who are currently receiving infliximab in actual clinical practice who are at least 18 years of age with active rheumatoid arthritis, and have previously demonstrated initial and/or temporary improvement in disease signs and symptoms, but now exhibit a diminished response and inadequate disease control despite continued treatment. Subjects must have received infliximab in combination with methotrexate for a minimum of 9 months prior to the first screening visit. The screening visit will occur sometime between Week -12 and Week -10. Consenting subjects who meet screening criteria will receive their final dose of infliximab at Week -8 as part of actual clinical practice. Golimumab IV treatment, which will be supplied by the sponsor, will be received at Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, and 28. The primary endpoint is at Week 24, the final efficacy assessment is at Week 32, and a follow-up safety assessment by telephone is at Week 44. There will be a maximum of 36 weeks between the last infliximab infusion at Week -8 and the last infusion of golimumab at Week 28. The duration of study participation is expected to be a maximum of 56 weeks (including the Screening Period, 32 weeks of golimumab treatment and assessment, and a 12-week safety follow-up).

Interventions

Study drug (golimumab 2 mg/kg IV) will be administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20 and 28.

Sponsors

Janssen Biotech, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 76 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Major Inclusion Criteria include (but not limited to): * Have a diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis (according to the revised 1987 criteria of the American Rheumatism Association). * Treatment with infliximab and methotrexate for \>= 9 months, (with stable doses of methotrexate over last 16 weeks of 7.5 mg/week to 25 mg/week) and (anti-TNFα therapy with infliximab 2 - 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks, 2 - 5 mg/kg every 5 weeks, 3 - 6 mg/kg every 6 weeks, 3 - 7mg/kg every 7 weeks, or 4 - 8 mg/kg every 8 weeks). * Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) ≥ 3.2 based on Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week -8 and Week 0. * Swollen joint count (SJC) ≥ 4 and tender joint count (TJC) ≥ 4 at Week - 8 and at Week 0. * Prior response confirmed by physician. Major

Exclusion criteria

include (but not limited to): * Have a history of latent or active granulomatous infection, including histoplasmosis, or Have a history of latent or active granulomatous infection, including histoplasmosis, or coccidioidomycosis, prior to the first screening visit or during the Screening Period. * Have had a Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination within 12 months of screening. * Have a chest radiograph within 3 months prior to the first administration of study agent that shows an abnormality suggestive of a malignancy or current active infection, including tuberculosis (TB), histoplasmosis, or coccidioidomycosis. * Have previously received more than 1 of the currently approved subcutaneous (SC) administered anti-TNFα agents, etanercept, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, or adalimumab. * Are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy or fathering a child within 6 months after receiving the last administration of the study agent. * Weight less than 35 kg or greater than 110 kg (less than 77 pounds or greater than 242 pounds).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 24Week 24The ACR 20 Response is defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and \>=20 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-10 millimeter \[mm\], 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (the scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, \[0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain\]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas. The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an ACR 20 Response at Week 24 With Confirmed Presence of Antibodies to InfliximabWeek 24The ACR 20 Response is defined as \>= 20 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and \>=20 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using VAS (010 millimeter \[mm\], 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (the scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, \[0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain\]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas. The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and ESR.
Percentage of Participants Who Acheived ACR 20 Response at Week 24 With Trough Infliximab Levels Below the Lower Limit of Quantification (LLOQ)Week 24The ACR 20 Response is defined as \>= 20 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and \>=20 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using VAS (010 millimeter \[mm\], 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (the scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, \[0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain\]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas. The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and ESR.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The study was terminated early due to low recruitment; only 7 participants were enrolled.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Golimumab
Participants received golimumab 2 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) intravenously (IV) at Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, and 28.
7
Total7

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyStudy termination7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGolimumab
Age, Continuous60.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.06
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 24

The ACR 20 Response is defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and \>=20 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-10 millimeter \[mm\], 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (the scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, \[0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain\]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas. The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Due to early study termination, data for this outcome measure was not collected and therefore the analyses could not be conducted.

Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Acheived ACR 20 Response at Week 24 With Trough Infliximab Levels Below the Lower Limit of Quantification (LLOQ)

The ACR 20 Response is defined as \>= 20 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and \>=20 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using VAS (010 millimeter \[mm\], 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (the scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, \[0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain\]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas. The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and ESR.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Due to early study termination, data for this outcome measure was not collected and therefore the analyses could not be conducted.

Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an ACR 20 Response at Week 24 With Confirmed Presence of Antibodies to Infliximab

The ACR 20 Response is defined as \>= 20 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and \>=20 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using VAS (010 millimeter \[mm\], 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (the scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, \[0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain\]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas. The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and ESR.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Due to early study termination, data for this outcome measure was not collected and therefore the analyses could not be conducted.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026