Skip to content

Buttonhole Versus Step Ladder Cannulation in High Dose Hemodialysis

Vanguard Multi-Centre Feasibility Trial to Determine if Buttonhole Versus Step Ladder Cannulation for High Dose Hemodialysis is Associated With Reduced Overall Cost

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01962025
Enrollment
14
Registered
2013-10-14
Start date
2013-10-31
Completion date
2019-02-11
Last updated
2020-09-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Failure

Keywords

Renal failure, Hemodialysis, Canulation technique, Training time, Cost, Patient discomfort with cannulation technique

Brief summary

The purpose of the pilot study is to determine: 1) Will patients agree to be randomized to two different methods of putting needles in their arteriovenous fistula and, 2) if we can adequately coordinate all of the sites to get useful multicentre trial data

Detailed description

To determine the feasibility of 1) randomizing patients to step-ladder versus buttonhole cannulation techniques, and 2) coordinating the multiple Canadian sites that are required for the definitive study. Secondary Objectives: To determine 1) if buttonhole cannulation, compared to step-ladder cannulation is associated with reduced training time for high dose home hemodialysis patients, 2) if buttonhole cannulation, compared to step-ladder cannulation is associated with reduced overall cost, 3) if buttonhole cannulation, compared to step-ladder cannulation is associated with reduced complications (infection - local and systemic, radiologic/surgical interventions, re-trains for needle insertion difficulties, hematoma formation, aneurysm formation, missed insertions), and 4) if buttonhole cannulation, compared to step-ladder cannulation is associated with reduced patient discomfort with needling for intensive home hemodialysis patients

Interventions

PROCEDUREButtonhole needling technique

the intervention is the type of needling used for home hemodialysis patients. They will be randomized to either buttonhole cannulation or stepladder cannulation

Sponsors

Baxter Healthcare Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult patients \> 18 years old, 2. Training for home hemodialysis 3. Able to give informed consent, 4. Arteriovenous fistula 5. Life expectancy of greater than 12 months.

Exclusion criteria

1. Potential to be lost from the program within 12 months of training (planned living donor transplant, transfer to peritoneal dialysis (PD) or move from training centre catchment area), 2. Allergy to mupirocin, 3. Short segments or aneurysms within the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) that the attending nephrologist believes require buttonhole cannulation., 4. Mechanical heart valves, 5. Patients who require intradermal lidocaine for needle insertion -

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of Participant Recruitment and Site Coordination2 yearsThe percent of qualified patients enrolled in the study for the pilot study to be successful will be ≥70%. If we can not reach this target we will not move forward with the definitive study. The pilot study will also allow us to see if we can coordinate multiple sites in needling techniques and determine if we can move forward with the definitive study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant Training TimeUp to 90 daysTime in Days that it takes to train participants to perform home hemodialysis (document time in days from start of training until discharge home to do self-care). Unit of measure is number of days required to independently perform home hemodialysis
Cost12 MonthsWill incorporate the cost of training and complications
Number of Participants With Complications12 MonthsTo determine whether buttonhole cannulation, compared to step-ladder cannulation, is associated with reduced complications (infection - local and systemic, radiologic/surgical interventions, re-trains for needle insertion difficulties, hematoma formation, aneurysm formation, missed insertions).
Pain With Needlingbaseline, end of training (2 months), and 2 months after graduating training (4 months)Pain/discomfort during cannulation will be measured using a 10cm (0 mm to 100 mm) visual analogue scale, which ranges from No Pain (0 mm) on the left side to Extreme Pain (100 mm) on the right. The participant is instructed to place a mark on the scale according to the amount of pain felt during needling the fistula that day. The visual analogue scale with be completed at baseline, end of training, and 2 months after graduating training. The mean of these three assessments will be calculated.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Buttonhole Needling Technique
The intervention is the Buttonhole needling technique for home hemodialysis. Buttonhole needling technique: the intervention is the type of needling used for home hemodialysis patients. They will be randomized to either buttonhole cannulation or stepladder cannulation. In the buttonhole technique, a constant site is used for needle placement that ultimately results in a fibrous tract. Once the tract has formed blunt needles can be used instead of sharp needles for each treatment. The presence of a tract may simplify the needle insertion technique and lead to enhanced patient confidence with needle placement.
8
Step Ladder Group
Patients will use step ladder needling technique (i.e., sites will be rotated with needles placed at least 2-3 cms between needle tips).
6
Total14

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicButtonhole Needling TechniqueStep Ladder GroupTotal
Age, Continuous50.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
50.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
50.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Vintage8.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
6.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
6.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
Etiology renal disease
Diabetes mellitus
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Etiology renal disease
Glomerulonephritis
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Etiology renal disease
Other
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Etiology renal disease
Polycystic kidney disease
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Previous access
Had 1 Arteriovenous Fistula or Graft (AVF/AVG)
2 participants0 participants2 participants
Previous access
Had 1+ AVF/AVG
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Previous access
Had 1 Central Venous Catheter (CVC)
2 participants1 participants3 participants
Previous access
Had >1 CVC
4 participants3 participants7 participants
Previous access
No AVF/AVG
5 participants5 participants10 participants
Previous access
No CVC
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
8 participants6 participants14 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants3 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 80 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Feasibility of Participant Recruitment and Site Coordination

The percent of qualified patients enrolled in the study for the pilot study to be successful will be ≥70%. If we can not reach this target we will not move forward with the definitive study. The pilot study will also allow us to see if we can coordinate multiple sites in needling techniques and determine if we can move forward with the definitive study.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Buttonhole Needling TechniqueFeasibility of Participant Recruitment and Site Coordination8 Participants
Step Ladder GroupFeasibility of Participant Recruitment and Site Coordination6 Participants
Secondary

Cost

Will incorporate the cost of training and complications

Time frame: 12 Months

Population: No formal costing information was collected as the data linkages were not established for the feasibility trial period.

Secondary

Number of Participants With Complications

To determine whether buttonhole cannulation, compared to step-ladder cannulation, is associated with reduced complications (infection - local and systemic, radiologic/surgical interventions, re-trains for needle insertion difficulties, hematoma formation, aneurysm formation, missed insertions).

Time frame: 12 Months

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Buttonhole Needling TechniqueNumber of Participants With ComplicationsAneurysm3 Participants
Buttonhole Needling TechniqueNumber of Participants With ComplicationsInfection - local and systemic0 Participants
Buttonhole Needling TechniqueNumber of Participants With ComplicationsStenosis Requiring Angioplasty4 Participants
Buttonhole Needling TechniqueNumber of Participants With ComplicationsRadiologic/surgical interventions2 Participants
Buttonhole Needling TechniqueNumber of Participants With ComplicationsHematoma1 Participants
Buttonhole Needling TechniqueNumber of Participants With ComplicationsRe-training for needle insertion difficulties0 Participants
Buttonhole Needling TechniqueNumber of Participants With ComplicationsMissed insertions8 Participants
Buttonhole Needling TechniqueNumber of Participants With ComplicationsContact dermatitis3 Participants
Step Ladder GroupNumber of Participants With ComplicationsMissed insertions6 Participants
Step Ladder GroupNumber of Participants With ComplicationsRe-training for needle insertion difficulties0 Participants
Step Ladder GroupNumber of Participants With ComplicationsContact dermatitis1 Participants
Step Ladder GroupNumber of Participants With ComplicationsStenosis Requiring Angioplasty3 Participants
Step Ladder GroupNumber of Participants With ComplicationsAneurysm0 Participants
Step Ladder GroupNumber of Participants With ComplicationsHematoma5 Participants
Step Ladder GroupNumber of Participants With ComplicationsInfection - local and systemic0 Participants
Step Ladder GroupNumber of Participants With ComplicationsRadiologic/surgical interventions0 Participants
Secondary

Pain With Needling

Pain/discomfort during cannulation will be measured using a 10cm (0 mm to 100 mm) visual analogue scale, which ranges from No Pain (0 mm) on the left side to Extreme Pain (100 mm) on the right. The participant is instructed to place a mark on the scale according to the amount of pain felt during needling the fistula that day. The visual analogue scale with be completed at baseline, end of training, and 2 months after graduating training. The mean of these three assessments will be calculated.

Time frame: baseline, end of training (2 months), and 2 months after graduating training (4 months)

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Buttonhole Needling TechniquePain With Needling17.4 mmStandard Deviation 25.1
Step Ladder GroupPain With Needling10.7 mmStandard Deviation 7.9
Secondary

Participant Training Time

Time in Days that it takes to train participants to perform home hemodialysis (document time in days from start of training until discharge home to do self-care). Unit of measure is number of days required to independently perform home hemodialysis

Time frame: Up to 90 days

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Buttonhole Needling TechniqueParticipant Training Time19 daysStandard Deviation 5
Step Ladder GroupParticipant Training Time29 daysStandard Deviation 14

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026