Skip to content

Evaluation of Housing Adaptations and Mobility Devices

Housing Adaptations and Mobility Devices - Evaluation of a New Practice Strategy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01960582
Acronym
FORMASEvid
Enrollment
340
Registered
2013-10-10
Start date
2013-01-11
Completion date
2020-04-30
Last updated
2020-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Activities of Daily Living, Cost Effectiveness, Housing

Keywords

Housing adaptation, Independence, Costs

Brief summary

The rationale underlying this project is the fact that HA is a very common compensatory interven¬tion within municipality health care, undertaken to support an independent living in the own home. In addition, MD are frequently prescribed and used among HA clients in order to compensate for declined body functions. In spite of this, knowledge of their effects for the individual and the society is still scarce. In particular, systematic, evidence-based strategies based on clear-cut conceptual definitions and descriptions of procedures are lacking. Such strategies are crucial in order to evaluate the effects of HA and MD. In addition, longterm cost-effectiveness evaluations are crucial for policy implementation. The overarching aim is to investigate outcomes of HA on aspects of home and health for sub-groups of persons with disabilities. The specific aims are to: * Investigate the effects of HA on home and health related outcomes, i.e. usability, fear of falling, activity/participation and health-related quality of life for different subgroups of persons, e.g. MD users and non MD-users * Investigate the use of a new practice strategy for HA on home and health related outcomes for subgroups of persons with disabilities in terms of differences between municipalities * Investigate societal level outcomes of HA and MD, i.e. costs and quality adjusted life years * Gain a deeper understanding of the processes behind changes in outcomes We hypothesise that using a structure strategy for housing adaptation and mobility devices case management in ordinary practice in Swedish municipalities increase activity, participation, the usability of the home, and reduces societal costs.

Detailed description

The ultimate goal of the project is to improve the housing situation of older people and people with disabilities, by determining the long term effects of housing adaptations (HA) for clients and society, and transferring this knowledge into guidelines for practitioners in the housing and building planning sector. Specific research questions are: RQ1. What are the long-term effects of HA for clients (individual goals achievement, activity, participation, health-related quality of life, usability, falls, functional capacity and use of mobility devices (MD), mortality, health care and social services consumption, and relocation)? RQ2. What are the long-term effects of HA for society (costs and cost- effectiveness)? RQ3. What are the barriers and facilitators to knowledge transfer in the area of HA? RQ4. How can evidence based knowledge be transferred into practical guidelines for housing and building planning in Sweden?

Interventions

BEHAVIORALNew Practice Strategy

Application of a structured case management strategy on housing adaptation cases

Sponsors

Lund University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Persons receiving housing adaptation * Above 20 years

Exclusion criteria

* Persons with language deficits and/or cognitive decline

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ADL StaircaseDifferences in changes between intervention and control sites at baseline and 3, 6,12, 24 and 36 months afterThe ADL Staircase measures dependence on other persons in daily activities. Combined interview and observation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Falls Efficacy Scale- FES-IDifferences in changes between intervention and control sites at baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months afterFES-I measures perceived fear of falling

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Usability of the home, UIMHDifferences in changes between intervention and control sites between baseline and 3, 6,12,24 and 36 months afterSelf-rated assessment measuring the extent to which the person can perform Daily activities in the housing
Costs of housing adaptations3,6, 12, 24 and 36 months after, for the whole sampleThe actual costs for the housing adaptation, including costs for travel, work hours, and material will be calculated based on invoices benefit
Cost-benefit for client and societyAt 24 and 36 months after the housing adaptation, for the whole sampleThe cost-benefit of the housing adaptation will be calculated based on health economic models utilising data from EQ-5D instrument

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026