Skip to content

Evaluation of Health Costs and Resource Utilization

A Randomized Evaluation of Health Costs and Resource Utilization Comparing Testing-Based Therapy to Empiric Dose Intensification for the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01960426
Acronym
Test-NoTest
Enrollment
51
Registered
2013-10-10
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2015-05-31
Last updated
2016-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crohn's Disease, Ulcerative Colitis

Keywords

Harvey Bradshaw score, Partial Mayo Clinical Score, Infliximab, Adalimumab

Brief summary

Utilization of health resources in a testing based strategy versus an empiric dose escalation strategy to manage Crohn's disease and Ulcerative Colitis in subjects with loss of response to infliximab or adalimumab.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utilization of health resources in a testing based strategy versus an empiric dose escalation strategy to manage Crohn's disease and Ulcerative Colitis in subjects with loss of response to infliximab or adalimumab.

Interventions

OTHERMeasurement of drug (Adalimumab/Infliximab)

Measurement of drug (adalimumab/infliximab) and ADAs in the presence of drug.

OTHERIntensify treatment with the existing drug

Intensify treatment with the existing drug and if this fails empirically switch to another TNF antagonist

Sponsors

Prometheus Laboratories
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Western Ontario, Canada
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males 18 years of age or older who are not receiving azathioprine or 6 mercaptopurine. * Non-pregnant, non-lactating females, 18 years of age or older. * Females of child bearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test prior to randomization, and must use a hormonal (oral, implantable or injectable) or barrier method of birth control throughout the study. \[defined as a minimum of one year since the last menstrual period\]). * Documented diagnosis of CD or UC. * Active disease symptoms at visit 1 defined by: a. CD subjects: HBS \ 6 UC subjects: PMCS \ 4. * Current infliximab therapy (naive to adalimumab) or current adalimumab therapy (naive to infliximab ). * A minimum of 13 weeks of infliximab or adalimumab treatment prior to visit 1 at the following dose: * Stable dose of azathioprine, 6 mercaptopurine, methotrexate, and/or 5-aminosalicylates in the 4 weeks prior to visit 1.

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication to the use of either infliximab or adalimumab. * Current infliximab treatment but not naive to adalimumab or * Current adalimumab treatment but not naive to infliximab. * Infliximab dosing prior to visit 1 was not 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2 and 6 and then q8w. * Adalimumab dosing prior to visit 1 was not 160 mg at week 0, 80 mg at week 2, and then 40 mg q2w. * Received any investigational drug within 30 days prior to visit 1. * Serious underlying disease other than CD or UC which in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the subject's ability to participate fully in the study. * History of alcohol or drug abuse which in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the subject's ability to comply with the study procedures. * Stools positive for clostridium difficile. * Pregnant or lactating women. * Change in dose of azathioprine, 6 mercaptopurine, methotrexate, and/or 5-aminosalicylates in the 4 weeks prior to visit 1. * Males 22 years of age or less who are receiving azathioprine or 6 mercaptopurine.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the mean difference in cumulative costs (Visit I to Week 3 1) between the two treatment arms31 weeksAnalysis of costs and outcomes will be made on an intention-to-treat basis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The efficacy of the testing-based strategy compared to empiric dose intensification31 weeksThe proportion of subjects achieving clinical remission

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026