Skip to content

Progel Vascular Sealant

A Prospective, Randomized Study to Compare Progel Vascular Sealant to Gelfoam Plus as an Adjunct for the Control of Bleeding in Subjects Undergoing Thoracic Aortic Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01959503
Enrollment
158
Registered
2013-10-10
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2017-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aneurysm of Ascending Aorta, Aortic Valve Disorder, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Bicuspid Valve Disorder

Keywords

Aorta, Aortic, Reconstruction, CABG, Bypass

Brief summary

This study is being conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Progel Vascular Sealant for use in vascular reconstructions to achieve adjunctive hemostasis by mechanically sealing areas of leakage.

Detailed description

The primary objective of this clinical study is to compare the time to hemostasis at the aortic anastomotic suture line in subjects receiving Progel (Test group) to that in subjects receiving Gelfoam Plus (Control group) on anastomotic suture lines involving the aortic valve, ascending aorta, or aortic arch while on cardiopulmonary bypass. The primary endpoint of this study is the time to achieve hemostasis at the aortic anastomotic suture line from the time surgical clamps are released to cessation of leakage at the treated anastomotic site with either Progel (Test) or Gelfoam Plus (Control).

Interventions

DEVICEProgel Vascular Sealant

Sponsors

C. R. Bard
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 1\. Subject must be ≥ 18 years of age. * 2\. Subject is scheduled for elective, primary thoracic surgery involving the aortic valve, ascending aorta, or aortic arch on cardiopulmonary bypass. * 3\. Subject has an expected life expectancy\> 6 months. * 4\. Subject is willing and able to comply with all aspects of the study including follow-up schedule. * 5\. Subject or authorized representative, has the ability to provide voluntary written informed consent. Intra-operative Inclusion Criteria: * 1\. Subject is able to undergo an antegrade cardioplegia injection for evaluation of a leak at the aortic anastomotic site(s) during the procedure. * 2\. Following this injection, subject has a leaking site where a topical sealant/hemostatic agent may be used to control bleeding.

Exclusion criteria

* 1\. Subject has Type A or other acute thoracic aortic dissection. * 2\. Subject has undergone prior thoracic surgery (open thoracotomy not including interventional cardiology procedures). * 3\. Subject is undergoing a planned concomitant procedure other than coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). * 4\. Subject has a previous organ transplant. * 5\. Subject has known or suspected preoperative coagulation disorder. * 6\. Subject is allergic to human thrombin or has a history of allergic reactions after application of human thrombin. * 7\. Subject is allergic to protamine. * 8\. Subject has a Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) or planned to receive an LVAD. * 9\. Subject is undergoing emergency surgery. * 10\. Subject is in chronic renal failure. * 11\. Subject has a hematocrit \< 21% pre-operatively. * 12\. Subject has a serum creatinine ≥2.5 mg/dl at baseline or is currently on dialysis. * 13\. Subject has a cardiac ejection fraction \<25%. * 14\. Subject is scheduled for another cardiac surgery within 30 days of enrollment. * 15\. Subject has an active or latent infection which is systemic or at the intended surgery site. * 16\. Subject is immuno-compromised such as that resulting from chronic oral steroid use, chemotherapeutic agents, or immune deficiency disorders. * 17\. Subject is pregnant by a positive pregnancy test or has plans to become pregnant during the study period or is currently breast-feeding. * 18\. Subject is unwilling to receive blood products. * 19\. Subject has participated in another investigational research study within 30 days of enrollment. * 20\. In the opinion of the investigator, the subject has a clinical condition that would preclude the use of the study device, preclude the subject from completing the follow-up requirements, or would complicate the evaluation of this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time to Achieve Hemostasis at the Aortic Anastomotic Suture Line From the Time Surgical Clamps Are Released to Cessation of Leakage at the Treated Anastomotic Site With Either Progel or Gelfoam.0 seconds to 600 seconds

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of Subjects Who Achieve Immediate Hemostasis, Defined as 0 Seconds, at All Treated Aortic Anastomotic Suture Lines Following Assigned Treatment.0 seconds to 10 minutes
Chest Tube Drainage Volume Following Surgery.24 hours post procedure
Proportion of Subjects Who Received Transfusion Within 24 Hours Following Surgery24 hours post procedure
Proportion of Subjects Who Achieve Successful Hemostasis at All Treated Aortic Anastomotic Suture Lines Following Assigned Treatment.5 minutes after application
Incidence of Reoperations for Aortic Bleeding Complications Following Treatment.30 days post procedure
Proportion of Subjects With Device-Related Serious Adverse Events Following Assigned Treatment Through 30 Days30 days post procedure
Time Between Cross Clamp Removal and Request of Surgical Wires for Sternal Closure.Intra-procedurally

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Progel Vascular Sealant
Progel Vascular Sealant after confirmation of anastomotic leakage during intra-procedure leak test. Progel Vascular Sealant
106
Gelfoam Plus
Gelfoam Plus Sealant after confirmation of anastomotic leakage during intra-procedure leak test. Gelfoam Plus
50
Total156

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath21
Overall StudyRandomized but not treated11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicProgel Vascular SealantGelfoam PlusTotal
Age, Continuous61.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.42
62.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.34
Region of Enrollment
United States
106 participants50 participants156 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants15 Participants47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
74 Participants35 Participants109 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
51 / 10629 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
51 / 10629 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Time to Achieve Hemostasis at the Aortic Anastomotic Suture Line From the Time Surgical Clamps Are Released to Cessation of Leakage at the Treated Anastomotic Site With Either Progel or Gelfoam.

Time frame: 0 seconds to 600 seconds

Population: In the Progel group one subject was not evaluable as information was not collected for the primary end-point changing the number from 106 to 105, compare to baseline characteristics.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Progel Vascular SealantTime to Achieve Hemostasis at the Aortic Anastomotic Suture Line From the Time Surgical Clamps Are Released to Cessation of Leakage at the Treated Anastomotic Site With Either Progel or Gelfoam.124.3 secondsStandard Deviation 202.09
Gelfoam PlusTime to Achieve Hemostasis at the Aortic Anastomotic Suture Line From the Time Surgical Clamps Are Released to Cessation of Leakage at the Treated Anastomotic Site With Either Progel or Gelfoam.377.8 secondsStandard Deviation 252.4
p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test
Secondary

Chest Tube Drainage Volume Following Surgery.

Time frame: 24 hours post procedure

Population: In the Gelfoam Plus group one subject was not evaluable as information was not collected for this endpoint, which change the number from 50 to 49, compare to baseline characteristics.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Progel Vascular SealantChest Tube Drainage Volume Following Surgery.701.6 mLStandard Deviation 499.83
Gelfoam PlusChest Tube Drainage Volume Following Surgery.589.6 mLStandard Deviation 359.41
Secondary

Incidence of Reoperations for Aortic Bleeding Complications Following Treatment.

Time frame: 30 days post procedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Progel Vascular SealantIncidence of Reoperations for Aortic Bleeding Complications Following Treatment.0 participants
Gelfoam PlusIncidence of Reoperations for Aortic Bleeding Complications Following Treatment.1 participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects Who Achieve Immediate Hemostasis, Defined as 0 Seconds, at All Treated Aortic Anastomotic Suture Lines Following Assigned Treatment.

Time frame: 0 seconds to 10 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Progel Vascular SealantProportion of Subjects Who Achieve Immediate Hemostasis, Defined as 0 Seconds, at All Treated Aortic Anastomotic Suture Lines Following Assigned Treatment.59.4 percentage of participants
Gelfoam PlusProportion of Subjects Who Achieve Immediate Hemostasis, Defined as 0 Seconds, at All Treated Aortic Anastomotic Suture Lines Following Assigned Treatment.16.0 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.27, 18.11]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects Who Achieve Successful Hemostasis at All Treated Aortic Anastomotic Suture Lines Following Assigned Treatment.

Time frame: 5 minutes after application

Population: In the Progel group one subject was not evaluable as information was not collected for this endpoint, which change the number from 106 to 105, compare to baseline characteristics.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Progel Vascular SealantProportion of Subjects Who Achieve Successful Hemostasis at All Treated Aortic Anastomotic Suture Lines Following Assigned Treatment.85.7 percentage of participants
Gelfoam PlusProportion of Subjects Who Achieve Successful Hemostasis at All Treated Aortic Anastomotic Suture Lines Following Assigned Treatment.40.0 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [4.07, 19.89]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects Who Received Transfusion Within 24 Hours Following Surgery

Time frame: 24 hours post procedure

Population: In the Gelfoam Plus group one subject was not evaluable as information was not collected for this endpoint, which change the number from 50 to 49, compare to baseline characteristics.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Progel Vascular SealantProportion of Subjects Who Received Transfusion Within 24 Hours Following Surgery46 participants
Gelfoam PlusProportion of Subjects Who Received Transfusion Within 24 Hours Following Surgery19 participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With Device-Related Serious Adverse Events Following Assigned Treatment Through 30 Days

Time frame: 30 days post procedure

Population: One subject in Progel Vascular Sealant and one subject in Gelfoam Plus discontinue before 30days and do not have device-related SAE. They are considered as not evaluable and are not included in this analysis, thus makes the difference compared to population in baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Progel Vascular SealantProportion of Subjects With Device-Related Serious Adverse Events Following Assigned Treatment Through 30 Days3 participants
Gelfoam PlusProportion of Subjects With Device-Related Serious Adverse Events Following Assigned Treatment Through 30 Days4 participants
Secondary

Time Between Cross Clamp Removal and Request of Surgical Wires for Sternal Closure.

Time frame: Intra-procedurally

Population: In the Vascular group two subjects were not evaluable as information was not collected for this endpoint, which changes the number from 106 to 104, compare to baseline characteristics.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Progel Vascular SealantTime Between Cross Clamp Removal and Request of Surgical Wires for Sternal Closure.59.4 minutesStandard Deviation 30.96
Gelfoam PlusTime Between Cross Clamp Removal and Request of Surgical Wires for Sternal Closure.58.5 minutesStandard Deviation 24.74

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026