Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate a Mid Add Multi-Focal Soft Contact Lens

A Study to Evaluate a Mid Add Multi-Focal Soft Contact Lens

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01959178
Enrollment
146
Registered
2013-10-09
Start date
2013-06-30
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2020-09-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Presbyopia

Brief summary

This study is to evaluate the product performance of the investigational LD127025 MF mid add soft contact lens compared to CIBA Vision's Air Optix Aqua MF MED add soft contact lenses when used among currently adapted soft contact lens wearers.

Interventions

DEVICELD127025 MF

At Visit 1, one-half of the subjects will be randomized to receive the investigational soft contact lens, after approximately one week of wearing the first lens type, the subjects will return for the 1-Week Crossover Visit (Visit 2) for an exam, and to determine if the subject remains eligible to continue in the next phase of the study with the control soft contact lens.

DEVICEAir Optix Aqua MF

At Visit 1, one-half of the subjects will be randomized to receive the control soft contact lens, after approximately one week of wearing the first lens type, the subjects will return for the 1-Week Crossover Visit (Visit 2) for an exam, and to determine if the subject remains eligible to continue in the next phase of the study with the investigational soft contact lens.

Sponsors

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have physiologically normal anterior segments not exhibiting biomicroscopy findings Grade 2 or greater and/or presence of infiltrates. * Be adapted wearers of soft contact lenses, wear a lens in each eye, and each lens must be of the same manufacture and brand. * Be correctable through spherocylindrical refraction to 42 letters (0.1 logMAR) or better (distance, high contrast) in each eye. * Require contact lens correction from -5.00 D to +3.00 D in each eye. * Be Presbyopic and require near add correction from +1.00 D to +1.75 D in each eye. * Be an adapted monovision soft contact lens wearer or multifocal soft contact lens wearer or an adapted spherical soft contact lens wearer who also uses spectacles for near vision correction. * Be willing to use a lens care system as required by the lens replacement schedule. * Has a distance spherical equivalent refraction between -5.50 D and +3.00 D.

Exclusion criteria

* Not correctable to 32 letters (0.3 logMAR) in each eye with soft spherical contact lenses. * Participated in any drug or device clinical investigation (within 14 days) prior to entry into this study and/or during the period of study participation. * Women of childbearing potential if one of the following: pregnant, plans to become pregnant during study, is breast-feeding. * Any Grade 2 or greater finding during the slit lamp examination. Subjects with corneal infiltrates of ANY GRADE are not eligible. * Any scar or neovascularization within the central 4mm of the cornea. Subjects with minor peripheral corneal scarring (that does not extend into the central area), that in the Investigator's judgment, does not interfere with contact lens wear, are eligible for this study. * Any Present finding during the slit lamp examination that, in the Investigator's judgment, interferes with contact lens wear. * Anisometropia (spherical equivalent) of greater than 2.00 D. * Aphakic. * Amblyopic. * Allergic to any component in the study care products. * Meet any of the following criteria: * Ophthalmologist, OD, Optician, Ophthalmologist's Assistant/Technician * employee of a market research firm * employee of manufacturer of contact lens or contact lens care products * Ocular astigmatism of greater than 1.00 D in either eye. * Have had any corneal surgery (ie, refractive surgery). * Toric contact lens wearer. * Have worn gas permeable (GP) contact lenses within the last 30 days or PMMA lenses within the last 3 months. * Have an active ocular disease or are using any ocular medication. * Have any systemic disease currently affecting ocular health or which, in the Investigator's opinion, may have an effect on ocular health during the course of the study. * Using any systemic medications that will, in the Investigator's opinion, affect ocular physiology or lens performance.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Visual AcuityAt 1 Week follow upVisual acuity was assessed by distance high contrast logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symptoms/ComplaintsAt 1 Week follow upSymptoms/complaints were assessed on a scale from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting unfavorable symptoms/complaints.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

There were 146 participants (292 eyes) were enrolled in this study. One-half of the participants were randomized to receive the investigational lens, and the other half to the control lens. After one week, the participant crossed over to the second lens type for one week.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Enrolled
Overall participants enrolled.
145
Total145

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Enrolled
Age, Continuous48.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
Sex: Female, Male
Female
110 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
35 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1450 / 145
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1450 / 145

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Visual Acuity

Visual acuity was assessed by distance high contrast logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR).

Time frame: At 1 Week follow up

Population: Eligible, dispensed eyes assessed for visual acuity are included in the analysis population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LD127025 MFMean Visual Acuity-0.026 logMARStandard Deviation 0.07
Air Optix Aqua MFMean Visual Acuity0.008 logMARStandard Deviation 0.078
Secondary

Symptoms/Complaints

Symptoms/complaints were assessed on a scale from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting unfavorable symptoms/complaints.

Time frame: At 1 Week follow up

Population: Eligible, dispensed eyes assessed for symptoms/complaints are included in the analysis population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LD127025 MFSymptoms/ComplaintsBurning/stinging upon insertion96.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
LD127025 MFSymptoms/ComplaintsEase of handling/removal89.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.5
LD127025 MFSymptoms/ComplaintsDryness86.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.2
LD127025 MFSymptoms/ComplaintsComfort upon insertion95.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
LD127025 MFSymptoms/ComplaintsComfort at end of day83.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.5
LD127025 MFSymptoms/ComplaintsOverall comfort88.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
LD127025 MFSymptoms/ComplaintsEase of handling/insertion92.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.3
LD127025 MFSymptoms/ComplaintsItchiness94.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
LD127025 MFSymptoms/ComplaintsRedness95.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
LD127025 MFSymptoms/ComplaintsOverall impression84.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7
LD127025 MFSymptoms/ComplaintsDistance vision91.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
LD127025 MFSymptoms/ComplaintsVision at intermediate distance80.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.8
LD127025 MFSymptoms/ComplaintsVision at near distance60.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.6
LD127025 MFSymptoms/ComplaintsOverall vision74.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
Air Optix Aqua MFSymptoms/ComplaintsDistance vision82.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.1
Air Optix Aqua MFSymptoms/ComplaintsBurning/stinging upon insertion93.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8
Air Optix Aqua MFSymptoms/ComplaintsItchiness90.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
Air Optix Aqua MFSymptoms/ComplaintsEase of handling/removal93.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7
Air Optix Aqua MFSymptoms/ComplaintsVision at near distance76.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.6
Air Optix Aqua MFSymptoms/ComplaintsRedness91.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
Air Optix Aqua MFSymptoms/ComplaintsComfort upon insertion91.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6
Air Optix Aqua MFSymptoms/ComplaintsVision at intermediate distance84.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.3
Air Optix Aqua MFSymptoms/ComplaintsComfort at end of day79.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.7
Air Optix Aqua MFSymptoms/ComplaintsOverall impression83.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.9
Air Optix Aqua MFSymptoms/ComplaintsOverall comfort84.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.4
Air Optix Aqua MFSymptoms/ComplaintsOverall vision79.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.9
Air Optix Aqua MFSymptoms/ComplaintsEase of handling/insertion93.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6
Air Optix Aqua MFSymptoms/ComplaintsDryness85.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026