Skip to content

Efficacy of Ranibizumab Prn Treatment Compared to Aflibercept Bimonthly Intravitreal Injections on Retinal Thickness Stability in Patients With Wet AMD

A 12-month, Phase IV, Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter Study to Compare Efficacy of 0.5 mg Ranibizumab Pro re Nata (PRN) Versus 2 mg Aflibercept Bimonthly Intravitreal Injections on Retinal Thickness Stability Till Month 6 of Treatment and Explore Functional Outcomes up to Month 12 in Patients With Neovascular (Wet) Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01958918
Acronym
SALT
Enrollment
712
Registered
2013-10-09
Start date
2013-10-23
Completion date
2017-05-29
Last updated
2019-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

Keywords

wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD), ranibizumab, aflibercept, Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of 0.5 mg ranibizumab versus 2 mg aflibercept bimonthly intravitreal injections on retinal thickness stability.

Detailed description

Patients attended 14 scheduled study visits during 12 months.

Interventions

DRUGRanibizumab

0.5 mg intravitreal injection

DRUGAflibercept

2 mg intravitreal injection

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The reading center was masked for treatment assignment in order to ensure unbiased evaluation of the primary, secondary and exploratory objectives that were determined by SDOCT, autofluorescence imaging, and microperimetry and multifocal ERG (where available). When communicating with the reading center study centers had to be vigilant not to unblind the reading center to the treatment. Site staff performing the assessments of BCVA, contrast sensitivity (where possible), VFQ25 and IReST (reading speed) were also masked to the identity of the treatment. The central laboratory used for analysis of all specimens collected for biomarker assessment were blinded to the identity of the treatment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Visual impairment predominantly due to neovascular AMD Active * Newly diagnosed, untreated, angiographically documented choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesion Key

Exclusion criteria

* Stroke or myocardial infarction less than 3 Months prior to study entry * Active injection or inflammation of either eye at the time of study entry * Any type of systemic disease (or received treatment for it), including any medical condition (controlled or uncontrolled) that were to be expected to progress, recur, or change to an extent which could bias the assessment of the clinical status of the patient to a significant degree or put the patient at special risk

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean of the Absolute Values of CSRT Difference Month 3 to Month 6Month 3, Month 4, Month 5, Month 6The thickness of the retina was measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Topography (SD-OCT). The mean of the absolute values of the CSRT difference between Month 3 and 4, Month 4 and 5, and Month 5 and 6 was calculated (ie, CSRT fluctuation). A lower average CSRT fluctuation demonstrates greater retinal stability. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Measured in ETDRS Letters at Month 12Month 12Visual acuity was assessed in a sitting position with refraction using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. A higher score indicates better visual acuity. ETDRS scale ranges from 0-100 letters. A score of 65 to 70 letters represents a low to moderate visual acuity
IREST at Month 12Month 12Number of incorrectly read words (IREST) was assessed using International Reading Speed Texts (IResT) and measured in words per minute.
National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire Composite Score (VFQ-25) at Month 12Month 12Vision-related quality of life was assessed by the patient using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. The scores of 12 subscales (general health, general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social function, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision) were added together for a total (composite) score, which ranged from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates poorer function.
Correlations Between CSRT Fluctuation (Month 3 to 6) and Functional Outcomes at Month 12 (Full Analysis Set)Month 3 to Month 6, Month 12Correlation coefficient calculated based on Pearson's correlation between each corresponding parameter and CSRT stability.

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were recruited from 6 sites in Austria, 2 sites in Belgium, 2 sites in Denmark and 5 sites from France.

Pre-assignment details

This reporting group included all patients randomized to one of the treatment arms (Randomized Set) The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients who received at least one application of study treatment and had at least one post-baseline assessment for SD-OCT.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ranibizumab
0.5 mg intravitreal injections of ranibizumab monthly until maximum stable BCVA with retreatment based on BCVA loss and/or SD-OCT signs of wet AMD disease activity.
353
Aflibercept
2 mg intravitreal injections of aflibercept monthly for the first 3 months, followed by 2 mg intravitreal injections once every 2 months (current EU SmPC label)
354
Total707

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studyadministrative problems02
Overall StudyAdverse Event1212
Overall StudyDeath13
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1310
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up47
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject138

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRanibizumabAfliberceptTotal
Age, Continuous77.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.53
78.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.21
77.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.38
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
350 Participants352 Participants702 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
210 Participants218 Participants428 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
143 Participants136 Participants279 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 3563 / 356
other
Total, other adverse events
156 / 356156 / 356
serious
Total, serious adverse events
67 / 35674 / 356

Outcome results

Primary

Mean of the Absolute Values of CSRT Difference Month 3 to Month 6

The thickness of the retina was measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Topography (SD-OCT). The mean of the absolute values of the CSRT difference between Month 3 and 4, Month 4 and 5, and Month 5 and 6 was calculated (ie, CSRT fluctuation). A lower average CSRT fluctuation demonstrates greater retinal stability. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Time frame: Month 3, Month 4, Month 5, Month 6

Population: FAS. Number analyzed is the number of patients with a measurement

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RanibizumabMean of the Absolute Values of CSRT Difference Month 3 to Month 625.16 micrometersStandard Error 2.584
AfliberceptMean of the Absolute Values of CSRT Difference Month 3 to Month 629.28 micrometersStandard Error 2.62
p-value: 0.185ANOVA
Secondary

Correlations Between CSRT Fluctuation (Month 3 to 6) and Functional Outcomes at Month 12 (Full Analysis Set)

Correlation coefficient calculated based on Pearson's correlation between each corresponding parameter and CSRT stability.

Time frame: Month 3 to Month 6, Month 12

Population: Full Analysis Set with measure. No statistical analysis was performed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RanibizumabCorrelations Between CSRT Fluctuation (Month 3 to 6) and Functional Outcomes at Month 12 (Full Analysis Set)Total BCVA Score-0.2194 correlation coefficient
RanibizumabCorrelations Between CSRT Fluctuation (Month 3 to 6) and Functional Outcomes at Month 12 (Full Analysis Set)IREST reading speed (words/minute)0.0889 correlation coefficient
RanibizumabCorrelations Between CSRT Fluctuation (Month 3 to 6) and Functional Outcomes at Month 12 (Full Analysis Set)VFQ-25 composite score0.1064 correlation coefficient
AfliberceptCorrelations Between CSRT Fluctuation (Month 3 to 6) and Functional Outcomes at Month 12 (Full Analysis Set)Total BCVA Score0.0155 correlation coefficient
AfliberceptCorrelations Between CSRT Fluctuation (Month 3 to 6) and Functional Outcomes at Month 12 (Full Analysis Set)IREST reading speed (words/minute)0.0450 correlation coefficient
AfliberceptCorrelations Between CSRT Fluctuation (Month 3 to 6) and Functional Outcomes at Month 12 (Full Analysis Set)VFQ-25 composite score0.0847 correlation coefficient
Secondary

IREST at Month 12

Number of incorrectly read words (IREST) was assessed using International Reading Speed Texts (IResT) and measured in words per minute.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: FAS with measurement at Month 12. No statistical analysis was performed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RanibizumabIREST at Month 125.7 incorrect words per minuteStandard Deviation 21.19
AfliberceptIREST at Month 126.1 incorrect words per minuteStandard Deviation 21.86
Secondary

National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire Composite Score (VFQ-25) at Month 12

Vision-related quality of life was assessed by the patient using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. The scores of 12 subscales (general health, general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social function, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision) were added together for a total (composite) score, which ranged from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates poorer function.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: FAS with measurement at Month 12. No statistical analysis was performed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RanibizumabNational Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire Composite Score (VFQ-25) at Month 1280.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.43
AfliberceptNational Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire Composite Score (VFQ-25) at Month 1279.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.95
Secondary

Total Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Measured in ETDRS Letters at Month 12

Visual acuity was assessed in a sitting position with refraction using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. A higher score indicates better visual acuity. ETDRS scale ranges from 0-100 letters. A score of 65 to 70 letters represents a low to moderate visual acuity

Time frame: Month 12

Population: FAS with measurement at visit Month 12. No statistical analysis was performed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RanibizumabTotal Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Measured in ETDRS Letters at Month 1266.4 lettersStandard Deviation 18.1
AfliberceptTotal Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Measured in ETDRS Letters at Month 1268 lettersStandard Deviation 17.62

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026