Skip to content

Family Health History in Diverse Care Settings (FHH)

Family Health History in Diverse Care Settings

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01956773
Acronym
FHH
Enrollment
2620
Registered
2013-10-08
Start date
2014-04-11
Completion date
2017-10-31
Last updated
2023-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer, Diabetes, Heart Disease

Keywords

family health history, prevention, genetic risk, clinical decision support

Brief summary

The outcome of this research will be a demonstration that family health history (FHH) risk data can be used efficiently to deliver more effective healthcare in geographically and ethnically diverse clinical care environments. Although FHH is a standard component of the medical interview its widespread adoption is hindered by three major barriers: (1) a dearth of standard collection methods; (2) the absence of health care provider access to complete FHH information; and (3) the need for clinical guidance for the interpretation and use of FHH. In addition, the time constraints of the busy provider and poor integration of FHH with paper medical records or electronic medical records (EMR) impede its widespread use. The investigators hypothesize that patient-driven and electronic collection of FHH for risk stratification will promote more informed decision-making by patients and providers, and improves adherence to risk-stratified preventive care guidelines. The study team will use an implementation sciences approach to integrate an innovative FHH system that collects FHH from patients. Intermountain Healthcare will provide the information technology expertise with EMR design to develop an innovative solution to a storage model standard for FHH data as well as a centralized standards-compliant open clinical decision support (OpenCDS) rule development architecture to analyze FHH and to generate evidence-based, individualized, disease risk, preventive care recommendations for both patients and providers.

Detailed description

Five health care delivery organizations will participate in this demonstration project: Duke University, the Medical College of Wisconsin, the Air Force, Essentia Health, and the University of North Texas Health Science Center. The study will take place in 'real world' clinical, socio-cultural, and demographically diverse (rural, underserved, academic, family medicine) care clinics (n=34) in 5 states (CA, MN, NC, WI, TX) that include genomic medicine 'early adopter' and 'naïve' sites, as well as those that are EMR-enabled and others that are not. The study team will recruit a minimum of 7000 English or Spanish speaking adults over a 3-year period and will capture process metrics and outcomes that are measured in the course of usual care. The goals are: 1) To optimize the collection of patient entered FHH in diverse clinical environments for coronary heart disease, thrombosis, and selected cancers, 2) to export FHH data to an OpenCDS platform and return CDS results to providers and patients (and to EMRs where relevant) and to explore the integration of genetic risk and FHH data at selected sites, 3) to assess the clinical and personal utility of FHH using a pragmatic observational study design to assess reach, adoption, integrity, exposure, and sustainability, and to capture, analyze, and report effectiveness outcomes at each stakeholder level: patient, provider, and clinic/system, and 4) to take a leadership role in the dissemination of guidelines for FHH intervention across in diverse practice settings.

Interventions

OTHERMeTree

Software program collecting family health history and generating clinical decision support for risk-based preventive care

Sponsors

Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adults 18 years of age * Scheduled for a well visit appointment in selected clinics * English and Spanish speaking * Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Uptake of Genetic Counseling for Those at Risk of Hereditary Conditions at 1 YearBaseline, 3 and 12 monthsHow many patients identified as meeting criteria for genetic counseling, how many providers ordered genetic counseling, and how many patients adhere to the provider recommendation at 1 year.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Reporting Comfort When Using the MeTree Tool3 monthsThe study will assess comfort associated with using the MeTree tool via 3 months survey after completing the family health history collection. The participant were asked if the MeTree program was easy to use
Number of Participants Reporting Anxiety When Using the MeTree Tool3 monthsThe study will assess anxiety associated with using the MeTree tool via 3 months survey after completing the family health history collection. The participant were asked if answering the questions made them anxious
Number of Participants Reporting Satisfaction When Using the MeTree Tool3 monthsThe study will assess satisfaction associated with using the MeTree tool via 3 months survey after completing the family health history collection. The participant were asked their level of satisfaction with their experience using the web-based portal to enter information for their provider before their appointment
Number of Physicians Who Gave Their Perceptions of Satisfaction and the MeTree Tool's Impact on Work Load3 monthsEvaluate physicians' perceptions of satisfaction, the MeTree tool's impact on work load and its effectiveness via survey and informal interviews at 3 months.
Number of Providers Who Were Successfully Using MeTree in Their Clinical Work Flow1 yearEvaluate which providers were successfully using MeTree in their clinical work flow and which patients are successfully using MeTree for their care. (surveys, monitoring of clinical workflow, patient recruitment reflects underlying clinic population)
Number of Participants Reporting Preparedness When Using the MeTree Tool3 monthsThe study will assess preparedness associated with using the MeTree tool via 3 months survey after completing the family health history collection. The participants were asked if they had enough information about some people in their family when completing MeTree

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MeTree - Patients
MeTree collects family health history data and generates risk scores and specific risk-based recommendation for preventive care to patients as clinical decision support. MeTree: Software program collecting family health history and generating clinical decision support for risk-based preventive care
2,520
MeTree - Providers
MeTree collects family health history data and generates risk scores and specific risk-based recommendation for preventive care to Providers as clinical decision support. MeTree: Software program collecting family health history and generating clinical decision support for risk-based preventive care
100
Total2,620

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up6281

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMeTree - PatientsMeTree - ProvidersTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
854 Participants1 Participants855 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1666 Participants99 Participants1765 Participants
Age, Continuous59 years41 years59 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
42 Participants0 Participants42 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
1578 Participants0 Participants1578 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
900 Participants100 Participants1000 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
30 Participants12 Participants42 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
165 Participants1 Participants166 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
48 Participants1 Participants49 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
495 Participants3 Participants498 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1779 Participants81 Participants1860 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
2520 participants100 participants2620 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1725 Participants61 Participants1786 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
795 Participants39 Participants834 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2,5200 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Uptake of Genetic Counseling for Those at Risk of Hereditary Conditions at 1 Year

How many patients identified as meeting criteria for genetic counseling, how many providers ordered genetic counseling, and how many patients adhere to the provider recommendation at 1 year.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 and 12 months

Population: Patients who completed intervention and meeting criteria for genetic counseling

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants With Uptake of Genetic Counseling for Those at Risk of Hereditary Conditions at 1 YearPatients who met genetic counseling criteria571 Participants
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants With Uptake of Genetic Counseling for Those at Risk of Hereditary Conditions at 1 YearPatients who received Genetic Counseling Order49 Participants
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants With Uptake of Genetic Counseling for Those at Risk of Hereditary Conditions at 1 YearPatients adhered to provider's recommendation-1yr32 Participants
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants With Uptake of Genetic Counseling for Those at Risk of Hereditary Conditions at 1 YearProviders who placed Genetic counseling order31 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Anxiety When Using the MeTree Tool

The study will assess anxiety associated with using the MeTree tool via 3 months survey after completing the family health history collection. The participant were asked if answering the questions made them anxious

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Patients who completed 3 months post survey and reported on anxiety with answering the questions

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants Reporting Anxiety When Using the MeTree ToolDo not know14 Participants
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants Reporting Anxiety When Using the MeTree ToolNo1032 Participants
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants Reporting Anxiety When Using the MeTree ToolYes43 Participants
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants Reporting Anxiety When Using the MeTree ToolDid not answer13 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Comfort When Using the MeTree Tool

The study will assess comfort associated with using the MeTree tool via 3 months survey after completing the family health history collection. The participant were asked if the MeTree program was easy to use

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Patients who completed 3 months post survey and reported on their level of comfort

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants Reporting Comfort When Using the MeTree ToolDo not know20 Participants
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants Reporting Comfort When Using the MeTree ToolNo78 Participants
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants Reporting Comfort When Using the MeTree ToolYes988 Participants
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants Reporting Comfort When Using the MeTree Tooldid not answer16 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Preparedness When Using the MeTree Tool

The study will assess preparedness associated with using the MeTree tool via 3 months survey after completing the family health history collection. The participants were asked if they had enough information about some people in their family when completing MeTree

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Patients who completed 3 months post survey and reported on preparedness

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants Reporting Preparedness When Using the MeTree ToolDo not know59 Participants
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants Reporting Preparedness When Using the MeTree ToolNo377 Participants
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants Reporting Preparedness When Using the MeTree ToolYes646 Participants
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants Reporting Preparedness When Using the MeTree ToolDid not answer20 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Satisfaction When Using the MeTree Tool

The study will assess satisfaction associated with using the MeTree tool via 3 months survey after completing the family health history collection. The participant were asked their level of satisfaction with their experience using the web-based portal to enter information for their provider before their appointment

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Patients who completed 3 months post survey and reported their level of satisfaction

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants Reporting Satisfaction When Using the MeTree ToolSuperior69 Participants
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants Reporting Satisfaction When Using the MeTree ToolAbove Average459 Participants
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants Reporting Satisfaction When Using the MeTree ToolVery Satisfactory474 Participants
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants Reporting Satisfaction When Using the MeTree ToolSomewhat unsatisfactory59 Participants
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants Reporting Satisfaction When Using the MeTree ToolVery Poor23 Participants
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Participants Reporting Satisfaction When Using the MeTree ToolNot Answered18 Participants
Secondary

Number of Physicians Who Gave Their Perceptions of Satisfaction and the MeTree Tool's Impact on Work Load

Evaluate physicians' perceptions of satisfaction, the MeTree tool's impact on work load and its effectiveness via survey and informal interviews at 3 months.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Consented providers who completed provider post implementation survey

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Physicians Who Gave Their Perceptions of Satisfaction and the MeTree Tool's Impact on Work LoadAcceptable Tool - Yes34 Participants
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Physicians Who Gave Their Perceptions of Satisfaction and the MeTree Tool's Impact on Work LoadAcceptable Tool - No9 Participants
Secondary

Number of Providers Who Were Successfully Using MeTree in Their Clinical Work Flow

Evaluate which providers were successfully using MeTree in their clinical work flow and which patients are successfully using MeTree for their care. (surveys, monitoring of clinical workflow, patient recruitment reflects underlying clinic population)

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MeTree - PatientsNumber of Providers Who Were Successfully Using MeTree in Their Clinical Work Flow100 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026