Cancer, Diabetes, Heart Disease
Conditions
Keywords
family health history, prevention, genetic risk, clinical decision support
Brief summary
The outcome of this research will be a demonstration that family health history (FHH) risk data can be used efficiently to deliver more effective healthcare in geographically and ethnically diverse clinical care environments. Although FHH is a standard component of the medical interview its widespread adoption is hindered by three major barriers: (1) a dearth of standard collection methods; (2) the absence of health care provider access to complete FHH information; and (3) the need for clinical guidance for the interpretation and use of FHH. In addition, the time constraints of the busy provider and poor integration of FHH with paper medical records or electronic medical records (EMR) impede its widespread use. The investigators hypothesize that patient-driven and electronic collection of FHH for risk stratification will promote more informed decision-making by patients and providers, and improves adherence to risk-stratified preventive care guidelines. The study team will use an implementation sciences approach to integrate an innovative FHH system that collects FHH from patients. Intermountain Healthcare will provide the information technology expertise with EMR design to develop an innovative solution to a storage model standard for FHH data as well as a centralized standards-compliant open clinical decision support (OpenCDS) rule development architecture to analyze FHH and to generate evidence-based, individualized, disease risk, preventive care recommendations for both patients and providers.
Detailed description
Five health care delivery organizations will participate in this demonstration project: Duke University, the Medical College of Wisconsin, the Air Force, Essentia Health, and the University of North Texas Health Science Center. The study will take place in 'real world' clinical, socio-cultural, and demographically diverse (rural, underserved, academic, family medicine) care clinics (n=34) in 5 states (CA, MN, NC, WI, TX) that include genomic medicine 'early adopter' and 'naïve' sites, as well as those that are EMR-enabled and others that are not. The study team will recruit a minimum of 7000 English or Spanish speaking adults over a 3-year period and will capture process metrics and outcomes that are measured in the course of usual care. The goals are: 1) To optimize the collection of patient entered FHH in diverse clinical environments for coronary heart disease, thrombosis, and selected cancers, 2) to export FHH data to an OpenCDS platform and return CDS results to providers and patients (and to EMRs where relevant) and to explore the integration of genetic risk and FHH data at selected sites, 3) to assess the clinical and personal utility of FHH using a pragmatic observational study design to assess reach, adoption, integrity, exposure, and sustainability, and to capture, analyze, and report effectiveness outcomes at each stakeholder level: patient, provider, and clinic/system, and 4) to take a leadership role in the dissemination of guidelines for FHH intervention across in diverse practice settings.
Interventions
Software program collecting family health history and generating clinical decision support for risk-based preventive care
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adults 18 years of age * Scheduled for a well visit appointment in selected clinics * English and Spanish speaking * Able to provide informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* None
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Uptake of Genetic Counseling for Those at Risk of Hereditary Conditions at 1 Year | Baseline, 3 and 12 months | How many patients identified as meeting criteria for genetic counseling, how many providers ordered genetic counseling, and how many patients adhere to the provider recommendation at 1 year. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Reporting Comfort When Using the MeTree Tool | 3 months | The study will assess comfort associated with using the MeTree tool via 3 months survey after completing the family health history collection. The participant were asked if the MeTree program was easy to use |
| Number of Participants Reporting Anxiety When Using the MeTree Tool | 3 months | The study will assess anxiety associated with using the MeTree tool via 3 months survey after completing the family health history collection. The participant were asked if answering the questions made them anxious |
| Number of Participants Reporting Satisfaction When Using the MeTree Tool | 3 months | The study will assess satisfaction associated with using the MeTree tool via 3 months survey after completing the family health history collection. The participant were asked their level of satisfaction with their experience using the web-based portal to enter information for their provider before their appointment |
| Number of Physicians Who Gave Their Perceptions of Satisfaction and the MeTree Tool's Impact on Work Load | 3 months | Evaluate physicians' perceptions of satisfaction, the MeTree tool's impact on work load and its effectiveness via survey and informal interviews at 3 months. |
| Number of Providers Who Were Successfully Using MeTree in Their Clinical Work Flow | 1 year | Evaluate which providers were successfully using MeTree in their clinical work flow and which patients are successfully using MeTree for their care. (surveys, monitoring of clinical workflow, patient recruitment reflects underlying clinic population) |
| Number of Participants Reporting Preparedness When Using the MeTree Tool | 3 months | The study will assess preparedness associated with using the MeTree tool via 3 months survey after completing the family health history collection. The participants were asked if they had enough information about some people in their family when completing MeTree |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| MeTree - Patients MeTree collects family health history data and generates risk scores and specific risk-based recommendation for preventive care to patients as clinical decision support.
MeTree: Software program collecting family health history and generating clinical decision support for risk-based preventive care | 2,520 |
| MeTree - Providers MeTree collects family health history data and generates risk scores and specific risk-based recommendation for preventive care to Providers as clinical decision support.
MeTree: Software program collecting family health history and generating clinical decision support for risk-based preventive care | 100 |
| Total | 2,620 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 628 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | MeTree - Patients | MeTree - Providers | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 854 Participants | 1 Participants | 855 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 1666 Participants | 99 Participants | 1765 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 59 years | 41 years | 59 years |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 42 Participants | 0 Participants | 42 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 1578 Participants | 0 Participants | 1578 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 900 Participants | 100 Participants | 1000 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 30 Participants | 12 Participants | 42 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 165 Participants | 1 Participants | 166 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 48 Participants | 1 Participants | 49 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 495 Participants | 3 Participants | 498 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 1779 Participants | 81 Participants | 1860 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 2520 participants | 100 participants | 2620 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 1725 Participants | 61 Participants | 1786 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 795 Participants | 39 Participants | 834 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 2,520 | 0 / 100 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants With Uptake of Genetic Counseling for Those at Risk of Hereditary Conditions at 1 Year
How many patients identified as meeting criteria for genetic counseling, how many providers ordered genetic counseling, and how many patients adhere to the provider recommendation at 1 year.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 and 12 months
Population: Patients who completed intervention and meeting criteria for genetic counseling
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants With Uptake of Genetic Counseling for Those at Risk of Hereditary Conditions at 1 Year | Patients who met genetic counseling criteria | 571 Participants |
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants With Uptake of Genetic Counseling for Those at Risk of Hereditary Conditions at 1 Year | Patients who received Genetic Counseling Order | 49 Participants |
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants With Uptake of Genetic Counseling for Those at Risk of Hereditary Conditions at 1 Year | Patients adhered to provider's recommendation-1yr | 32 Participants |
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants With Uptake of Genetic Counseling for Those at Risk of Hereditary Conditions at 1 Year | Providers who placed Genetic counseling order | 31 Participants |
Number of Participants Reporting Anxiety When Using the MeTree Tool
The study will assess anxiety associated with using the MeTree tool via 3 months survey after completing the family health history collection. The participant were asked if answering the questions made them anxious
Time frame: 3 months
Population: Patients who completed 3 months post survey and reported on anxiety with answering the questions
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants Reporting Anxiety When Using the MeTree Tool | Do not know | 14 Participants |
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants Reporting Anxiety When Using the MeTree Tool | No | 1032 Participants |
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants Reporting Anxiety When Using the MeTree Tool | Yes | 43 Participants |
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants Reporting Anxiety When Using the MeTree Tool | Did not answer | 13 Participants |
Number of Participants Reporting Comfort When Using the MeTree Tool
The study will assess comfort associated with using the MeTree tool via 3 months survey after completing the family health history collection. The participant were asked if the MeTree program was easy to use
Time frame: 3 months
Population: Patients who completed 3 months post survey and reported on their level of comfort
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants Reporting Comfort When Using the MeTree Tool | Do not know | 20 Participants |
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants Reporting Comfort When Using the MeTree Tool | No | 78 Participants |
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants Reporting Comfort When Using the MeTree Tool | Yes | 988 Participants |
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants Reporting Comfort When Using the MeTree Tool | did not answer | 16 Participants |
Number of Participants Reporting Preparedness When Using the MeTree Tool
The study will assess preparedness associated with using the MeTree tool via 3 months survey after completing the family health history collection. The participants were asked if they had enough information about some people in their family when completing MeTree
Time frame: 3 months
Population: Patients who completed 3 months post survey and reported on preparedness
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants Reporting Preparedness When Using the MeTree Tool | Do not know | 59 Participants |
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants Reporting Preparedness When Using the MeTree Tool | No | 377 Participants |
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants Reporting Preparedness When Using the MeTree Tool | Yes | 646 Participants |
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants Reporting Preparedness When Using the MeTree Tool | Did not answer | 20 Participants |
Number of Participants Reporting Satisfaction When Using the MeTree Tool
The study will assess satisfaction associated with using the MeTree tool via 3 months survey after completing the family health history collection. The participant were asked their level of satisfaction with their experience using the web-based portal to enter information for their provider before their appointment
Time frame: 3 months
Population: Patients who completed 3 months post survey and reported their level of satisfaction
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants Reporting Satisfaction When Using the MeTree Tool | Superior | 69 Participants |
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants Reporting Satisfaction When Using the MeTree Tool | Above Average | 459 Participants |
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants Reporting Satisfaction When Using the MeTree Tool | Very Satisfactory | 474 Participants |
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants Reporting Satisfaction When Using the MeTree Tool | Somewhat unsatisfactory | 59 Participants |
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants Reporting Satisfaction When Using the MeTree Tool | Very Poor | 23 Participants |
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Participants Reporting Satisfaction When Using the MeTree Tool | Not Answered | 18 Participants |
Number of Physicians Who Gave Their Perceptions of Satisfaction and the MeTree Tool's Impact on Work Load
Evaluate physicians' perceptions of satisfaction, the MeTree tool's impact on work load and its effectiveness via survey and informal interviews at 3 months.
Time frame: 3 months
Population: Consented providers who completed provider post implementation survey
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Physicians Who Gave Their Perceptions of Satisfaction and the MeTree Tool's Impact on Work Load | Acceptable Tool - Yes | 34 Participants |
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Physicians Who Gave Their Perceptions of Satisfaction and the MeTree Tool's Impact on Work Load | Acceptable Tool - No | 9 Participants |
Number of Providers Who Were Successfully Using MeTree in Their Clinical Work Flow
Evaluate which providers were successfully using MeTree in their clinical work flow and which patients are successfully using MeTree for their care. (surveys, monitoring of clinical workflow, patient recruitment reflects underlying clinic population)
Time frame: 1 year
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| MeTree - Patients | Number of Providers Who Were Successfully Using MeTree in Their Clinical Work Flow | 100 Participants |