Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of the PrePex Device Circumcision When Performed by Nurses

Phase III of Study of Safety and Efficacy of the PrePex Device for MC Programs in Zimbabwe (Nurses Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01956383
Enrollment
603
Registered
2013-10-08
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2013-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Circumcision Adult, HIV CDC Category B2

Keywords

male circumcision, HIV, Zimbabwe

Brief summary

The protocol, approved by the Medical Research Council, was issued to assess the safety and efficacy of the non-surgical device for applying it to the national scale up of adult male circumcision in Zimbabwe

Detailed description

Models show that to have the highest impact on the HIV epidemic, circumcision of up to 80% of men in high prevalence countries, where MC rates are low, needs to be achieved (UNAIDS 2009; Manicaland HIV/STD Prevention Project, 2008; Bollinger, et al, 2009). Hallett and colleagues in 2008 showed that for Zimbabwe specifically, HIV incidence could be reduced between 25% to 35% if about 50% of men are circumcised. All modelings conducted show that MC programs must be part of a comprehensive HIV prevention package as MC alone will not tip the HIV epidemic into a terminal decline. The PrePex Device offers hope for rapid scale up of adult male circumcision in resource limited settings. Once the safety and efficacy have been established, it is important to conduct operations research to determine how best to implement both device and surgical circumcisions in the national program. Thus, the Zimbabwe MOHCW is planning a three phase trial in order to determine the safety of the PrePexTM device, its performance and the ease of use in an implementation roll out.

Interventions

PrePex™ device for adult male circumcision. The PrePex™ device facilitates adult male circumcision that is bloodless with no anesthesia and no sutures

Sponsors

Ministry of Health and Child Welfare, Zimbabwe
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Ages 18 - 30 years * Uncircumcised * Wants to be circumcised * Agrees to be circumcised by any of the study methods ,PrePex or Surgical as appropriate * HIV sero-negative * Able to understand the study procedures and requirements * Agrees to abstain from sexual intercourse and to keep caution not to directly rub the cut area if masturbating, for 8 weeks post removal (9 weeks total) * Agrees to return to the health care facility for follow-up visits (or as instructed) after his circumcision for a period of 8 weeks post removal (9 weeks total) * Subject able to comprehend and freely give informed consent for participation in this study and is considered by the investigator to have good compliance for the study * Subject agrees to anonymous video and photographs of the procedure and follow up visits * Agrees to stay overnight at the Hospital in order to follow pain measurements in the first 16 hours

Exclusion criteria

* Active genital infection, anatomic abnormality or other condition, which in the opinion of the investigator prevents the subject from undergoing a circumcision * HIV sero-positive * Subject with the following diseases/conditions: phimosis, paraphimosis, warts under the prepuce, torn or tight frenulum, narrow prepuce, hypospadias, epispadias * Known bleeding / coagulation abnormality * Uncontrolled diabetes * Subject that to the opinion of the investigator is not a good candidate * Subject does not agree to anonymous video and photographs of the procedure and follow up visits * Refusal to take HIV test.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To assess the safety of the PrePex device when circumcision is performed by nurses9 weeksTo assess the safety of the PrePex device by means of the following parameters: Clinical significant adverse event rate when circumcision is performed by nurses

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Observation of in-field usability of device9 weeksObservation of in-field usability of device using questionnaires
Obtain user feedback from nurses9 weeksObtain user feedback from nurses by questionnaires
Assess safety compared to physician deployment9 weeks1\. To assess the safety of the PrePex device by means of the following parameters: Clinical significant adverse event rate, when circumcision is performed by nurses comparing to Physicians.
Evaluate the training needs of PrePexTM deployment using nurses9 weeks1. PrePex Procedure time and the resulting cost of provider's time 2. Cost Effectiveness • Cost of device 3. Evaluation of the PrePex training needs and efficacy 4. Acceptability of the PrePex procedure by the patients
Assess satisfaction of procedure among nurses and patients9 weeksAssess satisfaction of procedure among nurses and patients using questionnaires.
Determine cost-effectiveness compared to surgical procedure9 weeks1\. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness when taking into account the following parameters: i. PrePex Procedure time and the resulting cost of provider's time compared to surgical procedure ii. Cost of device compared to surgical procedure iii. Cost of device training compared to surgical procedure training iv. Cost of staff time for follow-up visits compared to compared to surgical procedure staff time v. Cost of equipment and supplies needed for the circumcision procedure for both PrePex and surgical circumcision.
Assess practicality and acceptability among nurses and patients9 weeksAssess practicality and acceptability among nurses and patients using questionnaires.

Countries

Zimbabwe

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026