Skip to content

Evidence-based Stimulation Trial With Human rFSH in Europe and Rest of World 1

A Randomised, Controlled, Assessor-blind, Parallel Groups, Multicentre, Multinational Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of FE 999049 With Follitropin Alfa (GONAL-F) in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Women Undergoing an Assisted Reproductive Technology Programme

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01956110
Acronym
ESTHER-1
Enrollment
1329
Registered
2013-10-08
Start date
2013-10-31
Completion date
2017-01-03
Last updated
2022-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Brief summary

This trial investigates the effects of FE 999049 compared to GONAL-F.

Interventions

Sponsors

Ferring Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed Consent Documents signed prior to screening evaluations * In good physical and mental health * Pre-menopausal females between the ages of 18 and 40 years * Infertile women diagnosed with tubal infertility, unexplained infertility, endometriosis stage I/II or with partners diagnosed with male factor infertility, eligible for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and/or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using fresh or frozen ejaculated sperm from male partner or sperm donor * Infertility for at least one year before randomisation for subjects ≤37 years or for at least 6 months for subjects ≥38 years (not applicable in case of tubal or severe male factor infertility) * The trial cycle will be the subject's first controlled ovarian stimulation cycle for IVF/ICSI * Hysterosalpingography, hysteroscopy, saline infusion sonography, or transvaginal ultrasound documenting a uterus consistent with expected normal function (e.g. no evidence of clinically interfering uterine fibroids defined as submucous or intramural fibroids larger than 3 cm in diameter, no polyps and no congenital structural abnormalities which are associated with a reduced chance of pregnancy) within 1 year prior to randomisation * Transvaginal ultrasound documenting presence and adequate visualisation of both ovaries, without evidence of significant abnormality (e.g. no endometrioma greater than 3 cm or enlarged ovaries which would contraindicate the use of gonadotropins) and normal adnexa (e.g. no hydrosalpinx) within 1 year prior to randomisation. Both ovaries must be accessible for oocyte retrieval. * Early follicular phase (cycle day 2-4) serum levels of FSH between 1 and 15 IU/L (results obtained within 3 months prior to randomisation) * Body mass index (BMI) between 17.5 and 32.0 kg/m2 (both inclusive) at screening

Exclusion criteria

* Known endometriosis stage III-IV * One or more follicles ≥10 mm observed on the transvaginal ultrasound prior to randomisation on stimulation day 1 * Known history of recurrent miscarriage (defined as three consecutive losses after ultrasound confirmation of pregnancy (excl. ectopic pregnancy) and before week 24 of pregnancy) * Known abnormal karyotype of subject or of her partner/sperm donor, as applicable, depending on source of sperm used for insemination in this trial. * Any known clinically significant systemic disease (e.g. insulin-dependent diabetes) * Any known endocrine or metabolic abnormalities (pituitary, adrenal, pancreas, liver or kidney) which can compromise participation in the trial with the exception of controlled thyroid function disease * Known tumours of the ovary, breast, uterus, adrenal gland, pituitary or hypothalamus which would contraindicate the use of gonadotropins.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ongoing Pregnancy Rate10-11 weeks after blastocyst transferOngoing pregnancy was defined as at least one intrauterine viable fetus 10-11 weeks after blastocyst transfer.
Ongoing Implantation Rate10-11 weeks after blastocyst transferOngoing implantation rate was defined as the number of intrauterine viable fetuses 10-11 weeks after transfer divided by number of blastocysts transferred.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Subjects With Extreme Ovarian Responses, Defined as <4, ≥15 or ≥20 Oocytes RetrievedDay of oocyte retrieval
Proportion of Subjects With Early OHSS (Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome) and/or Preventive Interventions for Early OHSS≤9 days after triggering of final follicular maturationThe proportion of subjects with early OHSS, early OHSS of moderate or severe grade, preventive interventions for early OHSS, early OHSS and/or preventive interventions for early OHSS, and early OHSS of moderate or severe grade and/or preventive interventions for early OHSS are presented.
Proportion of Subjects With Cycle Cancellation Due to Poor Ovarian Response or Excessive Ovarian ResponseEnd-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)Proportion of subjects with cycle cancellation due to poor ovarian response, excessive ovarian response, and triggering with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist are presented.
Number of Oocytes RetrievedDay of oocyte retrieval
Proportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes RetrievedDay of oocyte retrieval
Percentage of Metaphase II Oocytes (Oocytes Inseminated Using ICSI [Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection])Prior to inseminationNumber of oocytes in metaphase II prior to ICSI insemination is presented.
Fertilisation RateDay 1 after inseminationFertilisation rate was defined as the number of oocytes with 2 pronuclei divided by the number of oocytes retrieved.
Number and Quality of Embryos on Day 3On day 3 after oocyte retrievalNumber of embryos (total and good-quality) on Day 3 are presented. A good-quality embryo was defined as an embryo with ≥6 blastomeres and fragmentation ≤20% on Day 3.
Number and Quality of Blastocysts on Day 5On day 5 after oocyte retrievalNumber of blastocysts (total and good-quality) on Day 5 are presented. A good-quality blastocyst was defined as a blastocyst of grade 3BB or higher.
Vital Pregnancy Rate5-6 weeks after blastocyst transferVital pregnancy was defined as at least one intrauterine gestational sac with fetal heart beat 5-6 weeks after blastocyst transfer.
Number of Stimulation DaysEnd-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)
Proportion of Subjects With Investigator-requested Gonadotropin Dose AdjustmentsEnd-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)
Frequency of Injection Site Reactions (Redness, Pain, Itching, Swelling and Bruising) Assessed by the Subject During the Stimulation PeriodEnd-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)Subjects self-assessed injection site reactions (redness, itching, pain, swelling and bruising) immediately, 30 minutes and 24 hours after each injection. The injection site reactions were assessed as none, mild, moderate and severe. The frequency of injection site reactions (mild, moderate or severe) based on all assessments performed is presented.
Abdominal Discomfort Related to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)End-of-stimulation and day of blastocyst transferThe subject self-assessed abdominal discomfort related to controlled ovarian stimulation using a VAS going from 0 mm (no abdominal discomfort) to 100 mm (worst imaginable abdominal discomfort).
Changes in Body WeightEnd-of-stimulation and day of blastocyst transferChange in body weight from baseline to end-of-stimulation and from baseline to day of blastocyst transfer.
Changes in Maximum Abdominal CircumferenceEnd-of-stimulation and day of blastocyst transferChange in maximum abdominal circumference from baseline to end-of-stimulation and from baseline to day of blastocyst transfer.
Proportion of Subjects With Treatment-induced Anti-follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH) AntibodiesStimulation day 1, 7-10 days after last FE 999049 or GONAL-F dose and 21-28 days after last FE 999049 or GONAL-F doseThe proportion of subjects with at least one treatment-induced anti-FSH antibody response at any time point.
Proportion of Subjects With Late OHSS>9 days after triggering of final follicular maturationLate OHSS was defined as OHSS with onset \>9 days after triggering of final follicular maturation.The proportion of subjects with late OHSS, and late OHSS of moderate or severe grade are presented.
Technical Malfunctions of the Administration PenEnd-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)Confirmed technical malfunction of administration pen.
Total Gonadotropin DoseEnd-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)The total gonadotropin dose was recorded.
Implantation Rate5-6 weeks after blastocyst transferImplantation rate was defined as the number of gestational sacs 5-6 weeks after transfer divided by number of blastocysts transferred.

Countries

Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, France, Italy, Poland, Russia, Spain, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 37 sites randomised subjects into the trial : 3 in Belgium, 3 in Brazil, 3 in Canada, 4 in the Czech Republic, 2 in Denmark, 2 in France, 2 in Italy, 2 in Poland, 4 in Russia, 10 in Spain and 2 in United Kingdom.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 1501 subjects were screened in the trial, of whom 1329 subjects were randomised: 666 subjects to FE 999049 and 663 subjects to GONAL-F. Three subjects were randomisation failures and did not receive investigational medicinal product (IMP); 1 in the FE 999049 group and 2 in the GONAL-F group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
FE 999049
FE 999049 was administered as single daily subcutaneous injections in the abdomen. Subjects randomised to FE 999049 had their individual dose determined on the basis of their AMH level at screening and their body weight at randomisation. The daily FE 999049 dose was fixed throughout the stimulation period and maximum allowed daily dose was 12 μg. Dosing continued until the criterion for triggering of final follicular maturation was met. Subjects could be treated for a maximum of 20 days.
665
GONAL-F
GONAL-F was administered as single daily subcutaneous injections in the abdomen. The starting dose of GONAL-F was 150 IU and fixed for the first five stimulation days, after which it could be adjusted by 75 IU based on the individual response. The maximum allowed daily dose was 450 IU. Dosing continued until the criterion for triggering of final follicular maturation was met. Subjects could be treated for a maximum of 20 days.
661
Total1,326

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event910
Overall StudyPersonal reasons11
Overall StudyProtocol Violation2511

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFE 999049GONAL-FTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
665 Participants661 Participants1326 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
665 Participants661 Participants1326 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
168 / 665159 / 661
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 66510 / 661

Outcome results

Primary

Ongoing Implantation Rate

Ongoing implantation rate was defined as the number of intrauterine viable fetuses 10-11 weeks after transfer divided by number of blastocysts transferred.

Time frame: 10-11 weeks after blastocyst transfer

Population: Subjects with blastocyst transfer (a total of 585 and 584 blastocysts were transferred in the FE999049 and GONAL-F groups, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049Ongoing Implantation Rate35.2 Percentage
GONAL-FOngoing Implantation Rate35.8 Percentage
Comparison: The pre-specified non-inferiority margin was -8.0% (absolute). Non-inferiority was evaluated based on a two-sided 95% CI derived based on the asymptotic normal distribution. The treatment comparison was adjusted for age (\<35, 35-37 and 38-40 years) by using the Mantel-Haenszel method to combine results across age-strata.95% CI: [-6.1, 4.8]
Primary

Ongoing Pregnancy Rate

Ongoing pregnancy was defined as at least one intrauterine viable fetus 10-11 weeks after blastocyst transfer.

Time frame: 10-11 weeks after blastocyst transfer

Population: Modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis set (all randomised and exposed subjects). This is equivalent to full analysis set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049Ongoing Pregnancy Rate30.7 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FOngoing Pregnancy Rate31.6 Percentage of subjects
Comparison: The pre-specified non-inferiority margin was -8.0% (absolute). Non-inferiority was evaluated based on a two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) derived based on the asymptotic normal distribution. The treatment comparison was adjusted for age (\<35, 35-37 and 38-40 years) by using the Mantel-Haenszel method to combine results across age-strata.95% CI: [-5.9, 4.1]
Secondary

Abdominal Discomfort Related to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

The subject self-assessed abdominal discomfort related to controlled ovarian stimulation using a VAS going from 0 mm (no abdominal discomfort) to 100 mm (worst imaginable abdominal discomfort).

Time frame: End-of-stimulation and day of blastocyst transfer

Population: Safety analysis set (all randomised and exposed subjects). This is equivalent to the mITT (FAS).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049Abdominal Discomfort Related to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)End of stimulation visit16.1 MillimeterStandard Deviation 18.14
FE 999049Abdominal Discomfort Related to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Transfer visit17.2 MillimeterStandard Deviation 20.02
GONAL-FAbdominal Discomfort Related to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)End of stimulation visit15.9 MillimeterStandard Deviation 17.36
GONAL-FAbdominal Discomfort Related to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Transfer visit16.1 MillimeterStandard Deviation 19.37
Secondary

Changes in Body Weight

Change in body weight from baseline to end-of-stimulation and from baseline to day of blastocyst transfer.

Time frame: End-of-stimulation and day of blastocyst transfer

Population: Safety analysis set (all randomised and exposed subjects). This is equivalent to the mITT (FAS).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049Changes in Body WeightTransfer visit0.0 KgStandard Deviation 1.03
FE 999049Changes in Body WeightEnd of stimulation visit0.3 KgStandard Deviation 1.11
GONAL-FChanges in Body WeightTransfer visit0.0 KgStandard Deviation 0.98
GONAL-FChanges in Body WeightEnd of stimulation visit0.2 KgStandard Deviation 0.78
Secondary

Changes in Maximum Abdominal Circumference

Change in maximum abdominal circumference from baseline to end-of-stimulation and from baseline to day of blastocyst transfer.

Time frame: End-of-stimulation and day of blastocyst transfer

Population: Safety analysis set (all randomised and exposed subjects). This is equivalent to the mITT (FAS).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049Changes in Maximum Abdominal CircumferenceTransfer visit0.6 CentimeterStandard Deviation 4.79
FE 999049Changes in Maximum Abdominal CircumferenceEnd of stimulation visit0.3 CentimeterStandard Deviation 4.41
GONAL-FChanges in Maximum Abdominal CircumferenceTransfer visit-0.1 CentimeterStandard Deviation 5.23
GONAL-FChanges in Maximum Abdominal CircumferenceEnd of stimulation visit0.1 CentimeterStandard Deviation 5.03
Secondary

Fertilisation Rate

Fertilisation rate was defined as the number of oocytes with 2 pronuclei divided by the number of oocytes retrieved.

Time frame: Day 1 after insemination

Population: Subjects with oocytes retrieved.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049Fertilisation Rate56 Percentage of oocytesStandard Deviation 24.5
GONAL-FFertilisation Rate57 Percentage of oocytesStandard Deviation 23.8
Comparison: Treatment comparison: Fertilisation ratep-value: 0.53van Elteren
Secondary

Frequency of Injection Site Reactions (Redness, Pain, Itching, Swelling and Bruising) Assessed by the Subject During the Stimulation Period

Subjects self-assessed injection site reactions (redness, itching, pain, swelling and bruising) immediately, 30 minutes and 24 hours after each injection. The injection site reactions were assessed as none, mild, moderate and severe. The frequency of injection site reactions (mild, moderate or severe) based on all assessments performed is presented.

Time frame: End-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)

Population: Safety analysis set (all randomised and exposed subjects). This is equivalent to the mITT (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049Frequency of Injection Site Reactions (Redness, Pain, Itching, Swelling and Bruising) Assessed by the Subject During the Stimulation Period3.4 Percentage of events
GONAL-FFrequency of Injection Site Reactions (Redness, Pain, Itching, Swelling and Bruising) Assessed by the Subject During the Stimulation Period3.5 Percentage of events
Secondary

Implantation Rate

Implantation rate was defined as the number of gestational sacs 5-6 weeks after transfer divided by number of blastocysts transferred.

Time frame: 5-6 weeks after blastocyst transfer

Population: Subjects with blastocyst transfer (a total of 585 and 584 blastocysts were transferred in the FE999049 and GONAL-F groups, respectively).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049Implantation Rate39.8 Percentage
GONAL-FImplantation Rate41.3 Percentage
Comparison: Treatment groups were compared using a two-sided 95% CI derived based on the asymptotic normal distribution. The treatment comparison was adjusted for age (\<35, 35-37 and 38-40 years) by using the Mantel-Haenszel method to combine results across age-strata.95% CI: [-7, 4.2]
Secondary

Number and Quality of Blastocysts on Day 5

Number of blastocysts (total and good-quality) on Day 5 are presented. A good-quality blastocyst was defined as a blastocyst of grade 3BB or higher.

Time frame: On day 5 after oocyte retrieval

Population: Subjects with oocytes retrieved.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049Number and Quality of Blastocysts on Day 5Number of blastocysts3.3 Number of blastocytssStandard Deviation 2.8
FE 999049Number and Quality of Blastocysts on Day 5Number of good-quality blastocysts2.0 Number of blastocytssStandard Deviation 2.2
GONAL-FNumber and Quality of Blastocysts on Day 5Number of blastocysts3.5 Number of blastocytssStandard Deviation 3.2
GONAL-FNumber and Quality of Blastocysts on Day 5Number of good-quality blastocysts2.1 Number of blastocytssStandard Deviation 2.4
Comparison: Treatment comparison: Number of blastocystsp-value: =0.344van Elteren
Comparison: Treatment comparison: Good-quality blastocystsp-value: =0.58van Elteren
Secondary

Number and Quality of Embryos on Day 3

Number of embryos (total and good-quality) on Day 3 are presented. A good-quality embryo was defined as an embryo with ≥6 blastomeres and fragmentation ≤20% on Day 3.

Time frame: On day 3 after oocyte retrieval

Population: Subjects with oocytes retrieved.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049Number and Quality of Embryos on Day 3Number of good-quality embryos4.2 Number of embryosStandard Deviation 3.3
FE 999049Number and Quality of Embryos on Day 3Number of embryos5.4 Number of embryosStandard Deviation 3.7
GONAL-FNumber and Quality of Embryos on Day 3Number of good-quality embryos4.5 Number of embryosStandard Deviation 3.7
GONAL-FNumber and Quality of Embryos on Day 3Number of embryos5.7 Number of embryosStandard Deviation 4.3
Comparison: Treatment comparison: Good quality embryosp-value: =0.414van Elteren
Comparison: Treatment comparison: Number of embryosp-value: =0.59van Elteren
Secondary

Number of Oocytes Retrieved

Time frame: Day of oocyte retrieval

Population: Subjects who underwent triggering of final follicular maturation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049Number of Oocytes Retrieved10.0 Oocytes retrievedStandard Deviation 5.6
GONAL-FNumber of Oocytes Retrieved10.4 Oocytes retrievedStandard Deviation 6.5
Comparison: Treatment comparison: Number of oocytes retrievedp-value: =0.692van Elteren
Secondary

Number of Stimulation Days

Time frame: End-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)

Population: mITT analysis set (all randomised and exposed subjects). This is equivalent to the FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049Number of Stimulation Days8.9 DaysStandard Deviation 1.9
GONAL-FNumber of Stimulation Days8.6 DaysStandard Deviation 1.7
Comparison: Treatment comparison: Number of stimulation daysp-value: =0.062van Elteren
Secondary

Percentage of Metaphase II Oocytes (Oocytes Inseminated Using ICSI [Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection])

Number of oocytes in metaphase II prior to ICSI insemination is presented.

Time frame: Prior to insemination

Population: Subjects with all oocytes inseminated using ICSI.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049Percentage of Metaphase II Oocytes (Oocytes Inseminated Using ICSI [Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection])7.4 Number of oocytesStandard Deviation 4.3
GONAL-FPercentage of Metaphase II Oocytes (Oocytes Inseminated Using ICSI [Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection])7.7 Number of oocytesStandard Deviation 5.2
Comparison: Treatment comparison: Number of metaphase II oocytesp-value: =0.909van Elteren
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes Retrieved

Time frame: Day of oocyte retrieval

Population: Subjects who underwent triggering of final follicular maturation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049Proportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes RetrievedModerate response (4-7 oocytes)30.1 Percentage of subjects
FE 999049Proportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes RetrievedHyperresponse (15-19 oocytes)12.1 Percentage of subjects
FE 999049Proportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes RetrievedTargeted response (8-14 oocytes)43.3 Percentage of subjects
FE 999049Proportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes RetrievedSevere hyperresponse (≥ 20 oocytes)6.5 Percentage of subjects
FE 999049Proportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes RetrievedLow response (<4 oocytes)8.0 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FProportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes RetrievedSevere hyperresponse (≥ 20 oocytes)8.7 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FProportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes RetrievedLow response (<4 oocytes)9.6 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FProportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes RetrievedModerate response (4-7 oocytes)30.3 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FProportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes RetrievedTargeted response (8-14 oocytes)38.4 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FProportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes RetrievedHyperresponse (15-19 oocytes)12.9 Percentage of subjects
Comparison: The relation between ovarian response potential (AMH at screening) and probability of achieving the targeted response was modelled using logistic regression models.p-value: =0.019Likelihood ratio test
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With Cycle Cancellation Due to Poor Ovarian Response or Excessive Ovarian Response

Proportion of subjects with cycle cancellation due to poor ovarian response, excessive ovarian response, and triggering with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist are presented.

Time frame: End-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)

Population: mITT analysis set (all randomised and exposed subjects). This is equivalent to the FAS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049Proportion of Subjects With Cycle Cancellation Due to Poor Ovarian Response or Excessive Ovarian ResponseCycle cancelled due to excessive ovarian response0 Percentage of subjects
FE 999049Proportion of Subjects With Cycle Cancellation Due to Poor Ovarian Response or Excessive Ovarian ResponseTriggering with GnRH agonist1.5 Percentage of subjects
FE 999049Proportion of Subjects With Cycle Cancellation Due to Poor Ovarian Response or Excessive Ovarian ResponseCycle cancelled due to poor ovarian response3.8 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FProportion of Subjects With Cycle Cancellation Due to Poor Ovarian Response or Excessive Ovarian ResponseCycle cancelled due to poor ovarian response2.7 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FProportion of Subjects With Cycle Cancellation Due to Poor Ovarian Response or Excessive Ovarian ResponseCycle cancelled due to excessive ovarian response0 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FProportion of Subjects With Cycle Cancellation Due to Poor Ovarian Response or Excessive Ovarian ResponseTriggering with GnRH agonist3.5 Percentage of subjects
Comparison: Treatment comparison: Cycle cancelled due to poor responsep-value: =0.30295% CI: [0.74, 2.57]Likelihood ratio test
Comparison: Treatment comparison:Triggering with GnRH agonistp-value: 0.01995% CI: [0.2, 0.9]Likelihood ratio test
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With Early OHSS (Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome) and/or Preventive Interventions for Early OHSS

The proportion of subjects with early OHSS, early OHSS of moderate or severe grade, preventive interventions for early OHSS, early OHSS and/or preventive interventions for early OHSS, and early OHSS of moderate or severe grade and/or preventive interventions for early OHSS are presented.

Time frame: ≤9 days after triggering of final follicular maturation

Population: mITT analysis set (all randomised and exposed subjects). This is equivalent to the FAS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049Proportion of Subjects With Early OHSS (Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome) and/or Preventive Interventions for Early OHSSEarly OHSS (any grade)2.6 Percentage of subjects
FE 999049Proportion of Subjects With Early OHSS (Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome) and/or Preventive Interventions for Early OHSSEarly OHSS (any grade) / preventive interventions4.7 Percentage of subjects
FE 999049Proportion of Subjects With Early OHSS (Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome) and/or Preventive Interventions for Early OHSSAny preventive intervention2.3 Percentage of subjects
FE 999049Proportion of Subjects With Early OHSS (Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome) and/or Preventive Interventions for Early OHSSEarly OHSS (moderate/severe)1.4 Percentage of subjects
FE 999049Proportion of Subjects With Early OHSS (Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome) and/or Preventive Interventions for Early OHSSEarly OHSS (mod/severe) / preventive interventions3.6 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FProportion of Subjects With Early OHSS (Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome) and/or Preventive Interventions for Early OHSSEarly OHSS (mod/severe) / preventive interventions5.1 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FProportion of Subjects With Early OHSS (Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome) and/or Preventive Interventions for Early OHSSEarly OHSS (any grade) / preventive interventions6.2 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FProportion of Subjects With Early OHSS (Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome) and/or Preventive Interventions for Early OHSSEarly OHSS (moderate/severe)1.4 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FProportion of Subjects With Early OHSS (Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome) and/or Preventive Interventions for Early OHSSAny preventive intervention4.5 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FProportion of Subjects With Early OHSS (Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome) and/or Preventive Interventions for Early OHSSEarly OHSS (any grade)3.0 Percentage of subjects
Comparison: Treatment comparison: Early OHSS (any grade)p-value: =0.291Likelihood ratio test
Comparison: Treatment comparison: Early OHSS (moderate/severe)p-value: =0.644Likelihood ratio test
Comparison: Treatment comparison: Preventive interventionsp-value: =0.005Likelihood ratio test
Comparison: Treatment comparison: Early OHSS (any grade) and/or preventive interventionsp-value: =0.046Likelihood ratio test
Comparison: Treatment comparison: Early OHSS (moderate/severe) and/or preventive interventionsp-value: =0.019Likelihood ratio test
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With Extreme Ovarian Responses, Defined as <4, ≥15 or ≥20 Oocytes Retrieved

Time frame: Day of oocyte retrieval

Population: Subjects who underwent triggering of final follicular maturation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049Proportion of Subjects With Extreme Ovarian Responses, Defined as <4, ≥15 or ≥20 Oocytes Retrieved<4 or >=15 oocytes retrieved26.6 Percentage of subjects
FE 999049Proportion of Subjects With Extreme Ovarian Responses, Defined as <4, ≥15 or ≥20 Oocytes Retrieved<4 or >=20 oocytes retrieved14.5 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FProportion of Subjects With Extreme Ovarian Responses, Defined as <4, ≥15 or ≥20 Oocytes Retrieved<4 or >=15 oocytes retrieved31.3 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FProportion of Subjects With Extreme Ovarian Responses, Defined as <4, ≥15 or ≥20 Oocytes Retrieved<4 or >=20 oocytes retrieved18.4 Percentage of subjects
Comparison: Treatment comparison: \<4 or \>=15 oocytes retrievedp-value: =0.001Likelihood ratio test
Comparison: Treatment comparison: \<4 or \>=20 oocytes retrievedp-value: =0.002Likelihood ratio test
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With Investigator-requested Gonadotropin Dose Adjustments

Time frame: End-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)

Population: mITT analysis set (all randomised and exposed subjects). This is equivalent to the FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049Proportion of Subjects With Investigator-requested Gonadotropin Dose Adjustments33.2 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FProportion of Subjects With Investigator-requested Gonadotropin Dose Adjustments36.8 Percentage of subjects
Comparison: Treatment comparison: Investigator-requested gonadotropin dose adjustmentsp-value: =0.178Chi-squared
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With Late OHSS

Late OHSS was defined as OHSS with onset \>9 days after triggering of final follicular maturation.The proportion of subjects with late OHSS, and late OHSS of moderate or severe grade are presented.

Time frame: >9 days after triggering of final follicular maturation

Population: Safety analysis set (all randomised and exposed subjects). This is equivalent to the mITT (FAS).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049Proportion of Subjects With Late OHSSLate OHSS (any grade)0.9 Percentage of subjects
FE 999049Proportion of Subjects With Late OHSSLate OHSS (moderate/severe)0.8 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FProportion of Subjects With Late OHSSLate OHSS (any grade)1.8 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FProportion of Subjects With Late OHSSLate OHSS (moderate/severe)1.5 Percentage of subjects
Comparison: Treatment comparison: Late OHSS (any grade)p-value: 0.32Likelihood ratio test
Comparison: Treatment comparison: Late OHSS (moderate/severe)p-value: 0.39Likelihood ratio test
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With Treatment-induced Anti-follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH) Antibodies

The proportion of subjects with at least one treatment-induced anti-FSH antibody response at any time point.

Time frame: Stimulation day 1, 7-10 days after last FE 999049 or GONAL-F dose and 21-28 days after last FE 999049 or GONAL-F dose

Population: Safety analysis set (all randomised and exposed subjects). This is equivalent to the mITT (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049Proportion of Subjects With Treatment-induced Anti-follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH) Antibodies1.05 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FProportion of Subjects With Treatment-induced Anti-follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH) Antibodies0.76 Percentage of subjects
Secondary

Technical Malfunctions of the Administration Pen

Confirmed technical malfunction of administration pen.

Time frame: End-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)

Population: Safety analysis set (all randomised and exposed subjects). This is equivalent to the mITT (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049Technical Malfunctions of the Administration Pen0.15 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FTechnical Malfunctions of the Administration Pen0.00 Percentage of subjects
Secondary

Total Gonadotropin Dose

The total gonadotropin dose was recorded.

Time frame: End-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)

Population: mITT analysis set (all randomised and exposed subjects). This is equivalent to the FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049Total Gonadotropin Dose90 µg of doseStandard Deviation 25.3
GONAL-FTotal Gonadotropin Dose103.7 µg of doseStandard Deviation 33.6
Comparison: Treatment comparison: Total gonadotropin dosep-value: <0.001van Elteren
Secondary

Vital Pregnancy Rate

Vital pregnancy was defined as at least one intrauterine gestational sac with fetal heart beat 5-6 weeks after blastocyst transfer.

Time frame: 5-6 weeks after blastocyst transfer

Population: mITT analysis set (all randomised and exposed subjects). This is equivalent to the FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049Vital Pregnancy Rate31.7 Percentage of subjects
GONAL-FVital Pregnancy Rate33.4 Percentage of subjects
Comparison: Treatment groups were compared using a two-sided 95% CI derived based on the asymptotic normal distribution. The treatment comparison was adjusted for age (\<35, 35-37 and 38-40 years) by using the Mantel-Haenszel method to combine results across age-strata.95% CI: [-6.7, 3.4]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026