Skip to content

Study of Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Asia

Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of TAS-102 Versus Placebo in Asian Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory or Intolerable to Standard Chemotherapies

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01955837
Acronym
TERRA
Enrollment
406
Registered
2013-10-08
Start date
2013-09-30
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2020-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Brief summary

To compare the effects of TAS-102 with placebo in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory or intolerable to standard chemotherapies.

Detailed description

This is a multinational, double-blind, two-arm, parallel, randomized Phase 3 comparison study evaluating the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 versus placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients will be randomly assigned (2:1) to TAS-102 (experimental arm) or placebo (control arm).

Interventions

DRUGTAS-102

TAS-102 (35 mg/m2/dose) orally, twice daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 of each 28-day cycle. Number of cycles: until at least one of the discontinuation criteria is met.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo orally, twice daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 of each 28-day cycle. Number of cycles: until at least one of the discontinuation criteria is met.

Sponsors

Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Has provided written informed consent * Has adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum * Has failed at least 2 prior regimens of standard chemotherapies for metastatic colorectal cancer * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 * Is able to take medication orally * Has adequate organ function (bone marrow, kidney and liver) * Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test and must agree to adequate birth control if conception is possible. Males must agree to adequate birth control.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival(OS)Every 8 weeks. Survival status should be collected for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met, whichever is later.The primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS), which was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death or for patients alive at the OS cutoff date, survival time was censored at the date of last trial follow-up or the cutoff date, whichever was earlier.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months.Time to treatment failure was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause. Censoring for TTF was also applied for those patients who were given non-study cancer treatment, with censoring at the time when the patient began the non-study cancer treatment.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Mutant Type KRAS)Every 8 weeks. Tumor assessments will be performed until radiologic progression develops or the start of new anticancer treatment, for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met.Progression-free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the Investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Patients who received non-study cancer treatment before radiologic evidence of disease progression were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment before initiation of non-study cancer treatment. The PFS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by mutant type KRAS.
Overall Response Rate (ORR; Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR] Using RECIST Criteria)From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months.The assessment of ORR was based on Investigator review of the images according to RECIST Version 1.1. Overall response rate was defined as the proportion of patients with objective evidence of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). At the analysis stage, the best overall response was assigned for each patient as the best response recorded from all responses recorded after study randomization. If applicable, responses recorded after disease progression or initiation of non-study cancer treatment was excluded. A patient's best response assignment of stable disease (SD) needed to be maintained for at least 6 weeks after study randomization. If a patient didn't meet this condition, best response was assigned Not evaluable.
Disease Control Rate (DCR; CR, PR, or Stable Disease)From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months.The assessment of DCR paralleled that of ORR, with DCR defined as the proportion of patients with objective evidence of CR, PR, or SD.
Duration of ResponseFrom randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months.Duration of response was derived for those patients with objective evidence of PR or CR. Duration of response was defined as the time from the first documentation of response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. Patients alive and progression free as of the analysis cut-off date were censored at their last evaluable tumor response assessment prior to initiation of any non-study cancer treatment.
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Every 8 weeks. Tumor assessments will be performed until radiologic progression develops or the start of new anticancer treatment, for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met.Tumor assessments were performed throughout the study period and analyzed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria (Version 1.1, 2009). Progression-free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the Investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Patients who received non-study cancer treatment before radiologic evidence of disease progression were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment before initiation of non-study cancer treatment.
Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)From the time a patient signed informed until 30 day safety follow-up visit or until initiation of new anticancer treatment, or assessed up to 30 months.All laboratory values that were out of the normal range were to be evaluated for their clinical significance before exposing the patient to the next dose of study medication. Any laboratory abnormality that was clinically significant, e.g., results in delay of study medication dosing, study discontinuation, required treatment due to abnormal values, or was considered by the Investigator to be medical important, were to be reported as an AE, unless it was considered part of clinical manifestations to a clinical diagnosis that has already been reported as an AE.
Overall Survival(OS)(Wild Type KRAS)Every 8 weeks. Survival status should be collected for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met, whichever is later.The primary end point was OS, which was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death or for patients alive at the OS cutoff date, survival time was censored at the date of last trial follow-up or the cutoff date, whichever was earlier. The OS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by wild type KRAS.
Overall Survival(OS)(Mutant Type KRAS)Every 8 weeks. Survival status should be collected for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met, whichever is later.The primary end point was OS, which was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death or for patients alive at the OS cutoff date, survival time was censored at the date of last trial follow-up or the cutoff date, whichever was earlier. The OS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by mutant type KRAS.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Wild Type KRAS)Every 8 weeks. Tumor assessments will be performed until radiologic progression develops or the start of new anticancer treatment, for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met.Progression-free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the Investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Patients who received non-study cancer treatment before radiologic evidence of disease progression were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment before initiation of non-study cancer treatment. The PFS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by wild type KRAS.
Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)From the time a patient signed informed until 30 day safety follow-up visit or until initiation of new anticancer treatment, or assessed up to 30 months.An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-related AEs were events between administration of study drug and up to 30 Days that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability /incapacity; congenital anomaly. The AEs were graded for severity using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs.

Countries

China, South Korea, Thailand

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at 406 centers in China, the Republic of Korea and Thailand from 16 October 2013 to 15 June 2015.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)
TAS-102 (35 mg/m2/dose) was administered orally in continuous 28-day treatment cycles until a discontinuation criterion was met. One treatment cycle of TAS-102 (35mg/m2/dose) involved administration of dose twice per day, after morning and evening meals, for 5 days a week, with 2 rest days, for 2 weeks, followed by a 14-day rest period. Survival follow-up could be extended until the target number of events (288 deaths) was reached.
271
Placebo
placebo was administered orally in continuous 28-day treatment cycles until a discontinuation criterion was met. One treatment cycle of placebo involved administration of dose twice per day, after morning and evening meals, for 5 days a week, with 2 rest days, for 2 weeks, followed by a 14-day rest period. Survival follow-up could be extended until the target number of events (288 deaths) was reached.
135
Total406

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)PlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
65 Participants32 Participants97 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
206 Participants103 Participants309 Participants
Age, Continuous58 years56 years57 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
271 Participants134 Participants405 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
271 Participants135 Participants406 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
China
204 Participants101 Participants305 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
55 Participants26 Participants81 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Thailand
12 Participants8 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
101 Participants51 Participants152 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
170 Participants84 Participants254 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
205 / 271111 / 135
other
Total, other adverse events
269 / 271120 / 135
serious
Total, serious adverse events
63 / 27132 / 135

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival(OS)

The primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS), which was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death or for patients alive at the OS cutoff date, survival time was censored at the date of last trial follow-up or the cutoff date, whichever was earlier.

Time frame: Every 8 weeks. Survival status should be collected for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met, whichever is later.

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population: the ITT population was comprised of all patients who were randomized to study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Overall Survival(OS)7.8 Months
PlaceboOverall Survival(OS)7.1 Months
p-value: 0.03595% CI: [0.62, 0.99]Log Rank
Secondary

Disease Control Rate (DCR; CR, PR, or Stable Disease)

The assessment of DCR paralleled that of ORR, with DCR defined as the proportion of patients with objective evidence of CR, PR, or SD.

Time frame: From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months.

Population: The tumor response evaluable (TR) population: the TR population included all patients in the ITT population who had measurable disease (at least 1 target lesion) at baseline and with at least 1 tumor evaluation while on treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Disease Control Rate (DCR; CR, PR, or Stable Disease)44.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboDisease Control Rate (DCR; CR, PR, or Stable Disease)14.6 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [20.9, 38]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Duration of Response

Duration of response was derived for those patients with objective evidence of PR or CR. Duration of response was defined as the time from the first documentation of response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. Patients alive and progression free as of the analysis cut-off date were censored at their last evaluable tumor response assessment prior to initiation of any non-study cancer treatment.

Time frame: From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months.

Population: The tumor response evaluable (TR) population: the TR population included all patients in the ITT population who had measurable disease (at least 1 target lesion) at baseline and with at least 1 tumor evaluation while on treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Duration of Response6.6 Months
PlaceboDuration of Response0 Months
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [20.9, 38]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Overall Response Rate (ORR; Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR] Using RECIST Criteria)

The assessment of ORR was based on Investigator review of the images according to RECIST Version 1.1. Overall response rate was defined as the proportion of patients with objective evidence of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). At the analysis stage, the best overall response was assigned for each patient as the best response recorded from all responses recorded after study randomization. If applicable, responses recorded after disease progression or initiation of non-study cancer treatment was excluded. A patient's best response assignment of stable disease (SD) needed to be maintained for at least 6 weeks after study randomization. If a patient didn't meet this condition, best response was assigned Not evaluable.

Time frame: From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months.

Population: The tumor response evaluable (TR) population: the TR population included all patients in the ITT population who had measurable disease (at least 1 target lesion) at baseline and with at least 1 tumor evaluation while on treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Overall Response Rate (ORR; Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR] Using RECIST Criteria)1.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboOverall Response Rate (ORR; Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR] Using RECIST Criteria)0.0 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.55495% CI: [-0.1, 2.4]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Overall Survival(OS)(Mutant Type KRAS)

The primary end point was OS, which was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death or for patients alive at the OS cutoff date, survival time was censored at the date of last trial follow-up or the cutoff date, whichever was earlier. The OS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by mutant type KRAS.

Time frame: Every 8 weeks. Survival status should be collected for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met, whichever is later.

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population: the ITT population was comprised of all patients who were randomized to study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Overall Survival(OS)(Mutant Type KRAS)7.0 months
PlaceboOverall Survival(OS)(Mutant Type KRAS)6.5 months
p-value: 0.22895% CI: [0.57, 1.2]Log Rank
Secondary

Overall Survival(OS)(Wild Type KRAS)

The primary end point was OS, which was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death or for patients alive at the OS cutoff date, survival time was censored at the date of last trial follow-up or the cutoff date, whichever was earlier. The OS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by wild type KRAS.

Time frame: Every 8 weeks. Survival status should be collected for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met, whichever is later.

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population: the ITT population was comprised of all patients who were randomized to study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Overall Survival(OS)(Wild Type KRAS)8.6 months
PlaceboOverall Survival(OS)(Wild Type KRAS)7.4 months
p-value: 0.08395% CI: [0.57, 1.04]Log Rank
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Tumor assessments were performed throughout the study period and analyzed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria (Version 1.1, 2009). Progression-free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the Investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Patients who received non-study cancer treatment before radiologic evidence of disease progression were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment before initiation of non-study cancer treatment.

Time frame: Every 8 weeks. Tumor assessments will be performed until radiologic progression develops or the start of new anticancer treatment, for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met.

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population: the ITT population was comprised of all patients who were randomized to study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Progression-free Survival (PFS)2.0 Months
PlaceboProgression-free Survival (PFS)1.8 Months
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.34, 0.54]Log Rank
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Mutant Type KRAS)

Progression-free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the Investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Patients who received non-study cancer treatment before radiologic evidence of disease progression were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment before initiation of non-study cancer treatment. The PFS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by mutant type KRAS.

Time frame: Every 8 weeks. Tumor assessments will be performed until radiologic progression develops or the start of new anticancer treatment, for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met.

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population: the ITT population was comprised of all patients who were randomized to study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Mutant Type KRAS)2.2 Months
PlaceboProgression-free Survival (PFS) (Mutant Type KRAS)1.8 Months
95% CI: [0.31, 0.65]
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Wild Type KRAS)

Progression-free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the Investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Patients who received non-study cancer treatment before radiologic evidence of disease progression were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment before initiation of non-study cancer treatment. The PFS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by wild type KRAS.

Time frame: Every 8 weeks. Tumor assessments will be performed until radiologic progression develops or the start of new anticancer treatment, for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met.

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population: the ITT population was comprised of all patients who were randomized to study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Wild Type KRAS)2.0 months
PlaceboProgression-free Survival (PFS) (Wild Type KRAS)1.8 months
95% CI: [0.32, 0.59]
Secondary

Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-related AEs were events between administration of study drug and up to 30 Days that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability /incapacity; congenital anomaly. The AEs were graded for severity using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs.

Time frame: From the time a patient signed informed until 30 day safety follow-up visit or until initiation of new anticancer treatment, or assessed up to 30 months.

Population: The as-treated (AT) population: the AT population contained all patients in the ITT population who received at least 1 dose of study medication and patients were analyzed according to treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade3127 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)No AEs2 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)One or more AEs269 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)One or more TEAEs269 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade123 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade284 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade430 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade55 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)TEAE causality(Related)244 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)TEAE causality(Not Related)25 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)One or more TEAEs leading to discontinuation27 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)One or more SAEs63 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)One or more TESAEs63 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)One or more TEAEs leading to death5 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)One or more TEAEs leading to discontinuation13 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade51 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)No AEs15 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)One or more TESAEs31 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)One or more AEs120 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)TEAE causality(Related)70 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)One or more TEAEs118 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)One or more SAEs32 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade132 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)TEAE causality(Not Related)48 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade241 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade333 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)One or more TEAEs leading to death1 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade411 Participants
Secondary

Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)

All laboratory values that were out of the normal range were to be evaluated for their clinical significance before exposing the patient to the next dose of study medication. Any laboratory abnormality that was clinically significant, e.g., results in delay of study medication dosing, study discontinuation, required treatment due to abnormal values, or was considered by the Investigator to be medical important, were to be reported as an AE, unless it was considered part of clinical manifestations to a clinical diagnosis that has already been reported as an AE.

Time frame: From the time a patient signed informed until 30 day safety follow-up visit or until initiation of new anticancer treatment, or assessed up to 30 months.

Population: The as-treated (AT) population: the AT population contained all patients in the ITT population who received at least 1 dose of study medication and patients were analyzed according to treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Neutropenia:Any Grade182 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Increase in total bilirubin level:Grade >=319 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Thrombocytopenia:Grade >=38 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hypoalbuminemia:Grade >=38 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Leukopenia:Any Grade190 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hyponatremia:Any Grade81 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Lymphocytosis:Any Grade4 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hyponatremia:Grade >=312 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Neutropenia:Grade >=390 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hypocalcemia:Any Grade77 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Lymphocytosis:Grade >=31 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hypocalcemia:Grade >=33 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Increase in AST level:Any Grade63 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Anemia:Grade >=348 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Increase in AST level:Grade >=310 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Increase in alkaline phosphatase level:Any Grade91 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Increase in ALT level:Any Grade48 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Lymphopenia:Any Grade146 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Increase in ALT level:Grade >=33 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Increase in alkaline phosphatase level:Grade >=311 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hypokalemia:Any Grade31 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Leukopenia:Grade >=356 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hypokalemia:Grade >=32 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Lymphopenia:Grade >=339 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Increase in creatinine level:Any Grade13 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hyperglycemia:Any Grade98 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Increase in creatinine level:Grade >=33 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Anemia:Any Grade209 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hyperkalemia:Any Grade11 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hyperglycemia:Grade >=37 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hyperkalemia:Grade >=31 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Thrombocytopenia:Any Grade96 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hypercalcemia:Any Grade8 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Increase in total bilirubin level:Any Grade99 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hypercalcemia:Grade >=30 Participants
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hypoalbuminemia:Any Grade78 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hypercalcemia:Grade >=31 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hypoalbuminemia:Any Grade44 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Anemia:Any Grade52 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Anemia:Grade >=38 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Leukopenia:Any Grade4 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Leukopenia:Grade >=30 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Neutropenia:Any Grade1 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Neutropenia:Grade >=30 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Lymphopenia:Any Grade34 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Lymphopenia:Grade >=33 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Thrombocytopenia:Any Grade10 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Thrombocytopenia:Grade >=32 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Lymphocytosis:Any Grade1 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Lymphocytosis:Grade >=30 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Increase in alkaline phosphatase level:Any Grade58 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hypocalcemia:Grade >=31 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Increase in alkaline phosphatase level:Grade >=35 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hyperglycemia:Any Grade50 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hyperglycemia:Grade >=33 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Increase in total bilirubin level:Any Grade28 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Increase in total bilirubin level:Grade >=310 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hypoalbuminemia:Grade >=30 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hyponatremia:Any Grade38 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hyponatremia:Grade >=36 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hypocalcemia:Any Grade33 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Increase in AST level:Any Grade40 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Increase in AST level:Grade >=37 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Increase in ALT level:Any Grade29 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Increase in ALT level:Grade >=34 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hypokalemia:Any Grade11 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hypokalemia:Grade >=31 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Increase in creatinine level:Any Grade10 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Increase in creatinine level:Grade >=30 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hyperkalemia:Any Grade10 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hyperkalemia:Grade >=30 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)Hypercalcemia:Any Grade1 Participants
Secondary

Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

Time to treatment failure was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause. Censoring for TTF was also applied for those patients who were given non-study cancer treatment, with censoring at the time when the patient began the non-study cancer treatment.

Time frame: From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months.

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population: the ITT population was comprised of all patients who were randomized to study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)1.9 months
PlaceboTime to Treatment Failure (TTF)1.8 months
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.37, 0.58]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026