Colorectal Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
To compare the effects of TAS-102 with placebo in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory or intolerable to standard chemotherapies.
Detailed description
This is a multinational, double-blind, two-arm, parallel, randomized Phase 3 comparison study evaluating the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 versus placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients will be randomly assigned (2:1) to TAS-102 (experimental arm) or placebo (control arm).
Interventions
TAS-102 (35 mg/m2/dose) orally, twice daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 of each 28-day cycle. Number of cycles: until at least one of the discontinuation criteria is met.
Placebo orally, twice daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 of each 28-day cycle. Number of cycles: until at least one of the discontinuation criteria is met.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Has provided written informed consent * Has adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum * Has failed at least 2 prior regimens of standard chemotherapies for metastatic colorectal cancer * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 * Is able to take medication orally * Has adequate organ function (bone marrow, kidney and liver) * Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test and must agree to adequate birth control if conception is possible. Males must agree to adequate birth control.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival(OS) | Every 8 weeks. Survival status should be collected for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met, whichever is later. | The primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS), which was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death or for patients alive at the OS cutoff date, survival time was censored at the date of last trial follow-up or the cutoff date, whichever was earlier. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) | From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months. | Time to treatment failure was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause. Censoring for TTF was also applied for those patients who were given non-study cancer treatment, with censoring at the time when the patient began the non-study cancer treatment. |
| Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Mutant Type KRAS) | Every 8 weeks. Tumor assessments will be performed until radiologic progression develops or the start of new anticancer treatment, for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met. | Progression-free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the Investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Patients who received non-study cancer treatment before radiologic evidence of disease progression were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment before initiation of non-study cancer treatment. The PFS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by mutant type KRAS. |
| Overall Response Rate (ORR; Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR] Using RECIST Criteria) | From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months. | The assessment of ORR was based on Investigator review of the images according to RECIST Version 1.1. Overall response rate was defined as the proportion of patients with objective evidence of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). At the analysis stage, the best overall response was assigned for each patient as the best response recorded from all responses recorded after study randomization. If applicable, responses recorded after disease progression or initiation of non-study cancer treatment was excluded. A patient's best response assignment of stable disease (SD) needed to be maintained for at least 6 weeks after study randomization. If a patient didn't meet this condition, best response was assigned Not evaluable. |
| Disease Control Rate (DCR; CR, PR, or Stable Disease) | From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months. | The assessment of DCR paralleled that of ORR, with DCR defined as the proportion of patients with objective evidence of CR, PR, or SD. |
| Duration of Response | From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months. | Duration of response was derived for those patients with objective evidence of PR or CR. Duration of response was defined as the time from the first documentation of response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. Patients alive and progression free as of the analysis cut-off date were censored at their last evaluable tumor response assessment prior to initiation of any non-study cancer treatment. |
| Progression-free Survival (PFS) | Every 8 weeks. Tumor assessments will be performed until radiologic progression develops or the start of new anticancer treatment, for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met. | Tumor assessments were performed throughout the study period and analyzed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria (Version 1.1, 2009). Progression-free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the Investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Patients who received non-study cancer treatment before radiologic evidence of disease progression were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment before initiation of non-study cancer treatment. |
| Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | From the time a patient signed informed until 30 day safety follow-up visit or until initiation of new anticancer treatment, or assessed up to 30 months. | All laboratory values that were out of the normal range were to be evaluated for their clinical significance before exposing the patient to the next dose of study medication. Any laboratory abnormality that was clinically significant, e.g., results in delay of study medication dosing, study discontinuation, required treatment due to abnormal values, or was considered by the Investigator to be medical important, were to be reported as an AE, unless it was considered part of clinical manifestations to a clinical diagnosis that has already been reported as an AE. |
| Overall Survival(OS)(Wild Type KRAS) | Every 8 weeks. Survival status should be collected for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met, whichever is later. | The primary end point was OS, which was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death or for patients alive at the OS cutoff date, survival time was censored at the date of last trial follow-up or the cutoff date, whichever was earlier. The OS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by wild type KRAS. |
| Overall Survival(OS)(Mutant Type KRAS) | Every 8 weeks. Survival status should be collected for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met, whichever is later. | The primary end point was OS, which was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death or for patients alive at the OS cutoff date, survival time was censored at the date of last trial follow-up or the cutoff date, whichever was earlier. The OS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by mutant type KRAS. |
| Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Wild Type KRAS) | Every 8 weeks. Tumor assessments will be performed until radiologic progression develops or the start of new anticancer treatment, for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met. | Progression-free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the Investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Patients who received non-study cancer treatment before radiologic evidence of disease progression were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment before initiation of non-study cancer treatment. The PFS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by wild type KRAS. |
| Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | From the time a patient signed informed until 30 day safety follow-up visit or until initiation of new anticancer treatment, or assessed up to 30 months. | An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-related AEs were events between administration of study drug and up to 30 Days that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability /incapacity; congenital anomaly. The AEs were graded for severity using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs. |
Countries
China, South Korea, Thailand
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants were enrolled at 406 centers in China, the Republic of Korea and Thailand from 16 October 2013 to 15 June 2015.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) TAS-102 (35 mg/m2/dose) was administered orally in continuous 28-day treatment cycles until a discontinuation criterion was met. One treatment cycle of TAS-102 (35mg/m2/dose) involved administration of dose twice per day, after morning and evening meals, for 5 days a week, with 2 rest days, for 2 weeks, followed by a 14-day rest period. Survival follow-up could be extended until the target number of events (288 deaths) was reached. | 271 |
| Placebo placebo was administered orally in continuous 28-day treatment cycles until a discontinuation criterion was met. One treatment cycle of placebo involved administration of dose twice per day, after morning and evening meals, for 5 days a week, with 2 rest days, for 2 weeks, followed by a 14-day rest period. Survival follow-up could be extended until the target number of events (288 deaths) was reached. | 135 |
| Total | 406 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 65 Participants | 32 Participants | 97 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 206 Participants | 103 Participants | 309 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 58 years | 56 years | 57 years |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 271 Participants | 134 Participants | 405 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 271 Participants | 135 Participants | 406 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment China | 204 Participants | 101 Participants | 305 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment South Korea | 55 Participants | 26 Participants | 81 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Thailand | 12 Participants | 8 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 101 Participants | 51 Participants | 152 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 170 Participants | 84 Participants | 254 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 205 / 271 | 111 / 135 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 269 / 271 | 120 / 135 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 63 / 271 | 32 / 135 |
Outcome results
Overall Survival(OS)
The primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS), which was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death or for patients alive at the OS cutoff date, survival time was censored at the date of last trial follow-up or the cutoff date, whichever was earlier.
Time frame: Every 8 weeks. Survival status should be collected for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met, whichever is later.
Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population: the ITT population was comprised of all patients who were randomized to study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Overall Survival(OS) | 7.8 Months |
| Placebo | Overall Survival(OS) | 7.1 Months |
Disease Control Rate (DCR; CR, PR, or Stable Disease)
The assessment of DCR paralleled that of ORR, with DCR defined as the proportion of patients with objective evidence of CR, PR, or SD.
Time frame: From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months.
Population: The tumor response evaluable (TR) population: the TR population included all patients in the ITT population who had measurable disease (at least 1 target lesion) at baseline and with at least 1 tumor evaluation while on treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Disease Control Rate (DCR; CR, PR, or Stable Disease) | 44.1 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Disease Control Rate (DCR; CR, PR, or Stable Disease) | 14.6 percentage of participants |
Duration of Response
Duration of response was derived for those patients with objective evidence of PR or CR. Duration of response was defined as the time from the first documentation of response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. Patients alive and progression free as of the analysis cut-off date were censored at their last evaluable tumor response assessment prior to initiation of any non-study cancer treatment.
Time frame: From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months.
Population: The tumor response evaluable (TR) population: the TR population included all patients in the ITT population who had measurable disease (at least 1 target lesion) at baseline and with at least 1 tumor evaluation while on treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Duration of Response | 6.6 Months |
| Placebo | Duration of Response | 0 Months |
Overall Response Rate (ORR; Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR] Using RECIST Criteria)
The assessment of ORR was based on Investigator review of the images according to RECIST Version 1.1. Overall response rate was defined as the proportion of patients with objective evidence of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). At the analysis stage, the best overall response was assigned for each patient as the best response recorded from all responses recorded after study randomization. If applicable, responses recorded after disease progression or initiation of non-study cancer treatment was excluded. A patient's best response assignment of stable disease (SD) needed to be maintained for at least 6 weeks after study randomization. If a patient didn't meet this condition, best response was assigned Not evaluable.
Time frame: From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months.
Population: The tumor response evaluable (TR) population: the TR population included all patients in the ITT population who had measurable disease (at least 1 target lesion) at baseline and with at least 1 tumor evaluation while on treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Overall Response Rate (ORR; Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR] Using RECIST Criteria) | 1.1 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Overall Response Rate (ORR; Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR] Using RECIST Criteria) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
Overall Survival(OS)(Mutant Type KRAS)
The primary end point was OS, which was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death or for patients alive at the OS cutoff date, survival time was censored at the date of last trial follow-up or the cutoff date, whichever was earlier. The OS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by mutant type KRAS.
Time frame: Every 8 weeks. Survival status should be collected for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met, whichever is later.
Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population: the ITT population was comprised of all patients who were randomized to study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Overall Survival(OS)(Mutant Type KRAS) | 7.0 months |
| Placebo | Overall Survival(OS)(Mutant Type KRAS) | 6.5 months |
Overall Survival(OS)(Wild Type KRAS)
The primary end point was OS, which was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death or for patients alive at the OS cutoff date, survival time was censored at the date of last trial follow-up or the cutoff date, whichever was earlier. The OS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by wild type KRAS.
Time frame: Every 8 weeks. Survival status should be collected for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met, whichever is later.
Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population: the ITT population was comprised of all patients who were randomized to study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Overall Survival(OS)(Wild Type KRAS) | 8.6 months |
| Placebo | Overall Survival(OS)(Wild Type KRAS) | 7.4 months |
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Tumor assessments were performed throughout the study period and analyzed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria (Version 1.1, 2009). Progression-free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the Investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Patients who received non-study cancer treatment before radiologic evidence of disease progression were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment before initiation of non-study cancer treatment.
Time frame: Every 8 weeks. Tumor assessments will be performed until radiologic progression develops or the start of new anticancer treatment, for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met.
Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population: the ITT population was comprised of all patients who were randomized to study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Progression-free Survival (PFS) | 2.0 Months |
| Placebo | Progression-free Survival (PFS) | 1.8 Months |
Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Mutant Type KRAS)
Progression-free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the Investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Patients who received non-study cancer treatment before radiologic evidence of disease progression were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment before initiation of non-study cancer treatment. The PFS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by mutant type KRAS.
Time frame: Every 8 weeks. Tumor assessments will be performed until radiologic progression develops or the start of new anticancer treatment, for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met.
Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population: the ITT population was comprised of all patients who were randomized to study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Mutant Type KRAS) | 2.2 Months |
| Placebo | Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Mutant Type KRAS) | 1.8 Months |
Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Wild Type KRAS)
Progression-free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the Investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Patients who received non-study cancer treatment before radiologic evidence of disease progression were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment before initiation of non-study cancer treatment. The PFS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by wild type KRAS.
Time frame: Every 8 weeks. Tumor assessments will be performed until radiologic progression develops or the start of new anticancer treatment, for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met.
Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population: the ITT population was comprised of all patients who were randomized to study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Wild Type KRAS) | 2.0 months |
| Placebo | Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Wild Type KRAS) | 1.8 months |
Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-related AEs were events between administration of study drug and up to 30 Days that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability /incapacity; congenital anomaly. The AEs were graded for severity using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs.
Time frame: From the time a patient signed informed until 30 day safety follow-up visit or until initiation of new anticancer treatment, or assessed up to 30 months.
Population: The as-treated (AT) population: the AT population contained all patients in the ITT population who received at least 1 dose of study medication and patients were analyzed according to treatment actually received.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade3 | 127 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | No AEs | 2 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | One or more AEs | 269 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | One or more TEAEs | 269 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade1 | 23 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade2 | 84 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade4 | 30 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade5 | 5 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | TEAE causality(Related) | 244 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | TEAE causality(Not Related) | 25 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | One or more TEAEs leading to discontinuation | 27 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | One or more SAEs | 63 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | One or more TESAEs | 63 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | One or more TEAEs leading to death | 5 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | One or more TEAEs leading to discontinuation | 13 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade5 | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | No AEs | 15 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | One or more TESAEs | 31 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | One or more AEs | 120 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | TEAE causality(Related) | 70 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | One or more TEAEs | 118 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | One or more SAEs | 32 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade1 | 32 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | TEAE causality(Not Related) | 48 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade2 | 41 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade3 | 33 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | One or more TEAEs leading to death | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events) | TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade4 | 11 Participants |
Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)
All laboratory values that were out of the normal range were to be evaluated for their clinical significance before exposing the patient to the next dose of study medication. Any laboratory abnormality that was clinically significant, e.g., results in delay of study medication dosing, study discontinuation, required treatment due to abnormal values, or was considered by the Investigator to be medical important, were to be reported as an AE, unless it was considered part of clinical manifestations to a clinical diagnosis that has already been reported as an AE.
Time frame: From the time a patient signed informed until 30 day safety follow-up visit or until initiation of new anticancer treatment, or assessed up to 30 months.
Population: The as-treated (AT) population: the AT population contained all patients in the ITT population who received at least 1 dose of study medication and patients were analyzed according to treatment actually received.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Neutropenia:Any Grade | 182 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Increase in total bilirubin level:Grade >=3 | 19 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Thrombocytopenia:Grade >=3 | 8 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hypoalbuminemia:Grade >=3 | 8 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Leukopenia:Any Grade | 190 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hyponatremia:Any Grade | 81 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Lymphocytosis:Any Grade | 4 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hyponatremia:Grade >=3 | 12 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Neutropenia:Grade >=3 | 90 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hypocalcemia:Any Grade | 77 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Lymphocytosis:Grade >=3 | 1 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hypocalcemia:Grade >=3 | 3 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Increase in AST level:Any Grade | 63 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Anemia:Grade >=3 | 48 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Increase in AST level:Grade >=3 | 10 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Increase in alkaline phosphatase level:Any Grade | 91 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Increase in ALT level:Any Grade | 48 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Lymphopenia:Any Grade | 146 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Increase in ALT level:Grade >=3 | 3 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Increase in alkaline phosphatase level:Grade >=3 | 11 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hypokalemia:Any Grade | 31 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Leukopenia:Grade >=3 | 56 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hypokalemia:Grade >=3 | 2 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Lymphopenia:Grade >=3 | 39 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Increase in creatinine level:Any Grade | 13 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hyperglycemia:Any Grade | 98 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Increase in creatinine level:Grade >=3 | 3 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Anemia:Any Grade | 209 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hyperkalemia:Any Grade | 11 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hyperglycemia:Grade >=3 | 7 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hyperkalemia:Grade >=3 | 1 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Thrombocytopenia:Any Grade | 96 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hypercalcemia:Any Grade | 8 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Increase in total bilirubin level:Any Grade | 99 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hypercalcemia:Grade >=3 | 0 Participants |
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hypoalbuminemia:Any Grade | 78 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hypercalcemia:Grade >=3 | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hypoalbuminemia:Any Grade | 44 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Anemia:Any Grade | 52 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Anemia:Grade >=3 | 8 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Leukopenia:Any Grade | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Leukopenia:Grade >=3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Neutropenia:Any Grade | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Neutropenia:Grade >=3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Lymphopenia:Any Grade | 34 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Lymphopenia:Grade >=3 | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Thrombocytopenia:Any Grade | 10 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Thrombocytopenia:Grade >=3 | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Lymphocytosis:Any Grade | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Lymphocytosis:Grade >=3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Increase in alkaline phosphatase level:Any Grade | 58 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hypocalcemia:Grade >=3 | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Increase in alkaline phosphatase level:Grade >=3 | 5 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hyperglycemia:Any Grade | 50 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hyperglycemia:Grade >=3 | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Increase in total bilirubin level:Any Grade | 28 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Increase in total bilirubin level:Grade >=3 | 10 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hypoalbuminemia:Grade >=3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hyponatremia:Any Grade | 38 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hyponatremia:Grade >=3 | 6 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hypocalcemia:Any Grade | 33 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Increase in AST level:Any Grade | 40 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Increase in AST level:Grade >=3 | 7 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Increase in ALT level:Any Grade | 29 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Increase in ALT level:Grade >=3 | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hypokalemia:Any Grade | 11 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hypokalemia:Grade >=3 | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Increase in creatinine level:Any Grade | 10 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Increase in creatinine level:Grade >=3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hyperkalemia:Any Grade | 10 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hyperkalemia:Grade >=3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments) | Hypercalcemia:Any Grade | 1 Participants |
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
Time to treatment failure was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause. Censoring for TTF was also applied for those patients who were given non-study cancer treatment, with censoring at the time when the patient began the non-study cancer treatment.
Time frame: From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months.
Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population: the ITT population was comprised of all patients who were randomized to study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) | 1.9 months |
| Placebo | Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) | 1.8 months |