Skip to content

SMAC Mimetic LCL161 Alone or With Cyclophosphamide in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Phase II Study of LCL161 Alone and in Combination With Cyclophosphamide in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01955434
Enrollment
25
Registered
2013-10-07
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2016-12-27
Last updated
2019-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Recurrent Plasma Cell Myeloma, Refractory Plasma Cell Myeloma

Brief summary

This phase II trial studies how well second mitochondrial-derived activator of caspases (SMAC) mimetic LCL161 alone or with cyclophosphamide works in treating patients with multiple myeloma that has returned or does not respond to treatment. Biological therapies, such as SMAC mimetic LCL161, may stimulate the immune system in different ways and stop cancer cells from growing. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cyclophosphamide, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known whether giving SMAC mimetic LCL161 alone or with cyclophosphamide is more effective in treating multiple myeloma.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the confirmed overall response rate (\>= partial response \[PR\]) to LCL161 (SMAC mimetic LCL161), used as a single agent, in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To estimate the confirmed overall response rate to LCL161 in combination with cyclophosphamide, when cyclophosphamide is added to LCL161 for lack of response or progression. II. To estimate the overall survival and event-free survival of patients treated with LCL161 in combination with cyclophosphamide, when cyclophosphamide is added to LCL161 for lack of response or progression. III. To evaluate the tolerability of LCL161 alone and in combination with cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsed MM. TERTIARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine degradation of cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein-1 (cIAP1) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), changes in serum cytokines, and changes in immune cell subsets by flow cytometry. II. To correlate the effect of LCL161 with the presence of activating mutations of the nuclear factor kappa beta (NFKB) pathway. III. To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of LCL161 alone, and LCL161 in combination with cyclophosphamide. IV. To describe patient-reported health-related quality of life and symptoms. OUTLINE: Patients receive SMAC mimetic LCL161 orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Patients lacking a minor response by end of course 2 or partial response by end of course 4 may also receive cyclophosphamide PO QD on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 at the discretion of the treating physician. Patients taking cyclophosphamide with less than a 25% interval reduction in paraprotein receive SMAC mimetic LCL161 on days 2, 9, 16, and 23. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days and then every 6 months for 1 year.

Interventions

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Given PO

OTHERLaboratory Biomarker Analysis

Correlative studies

OTHERPharmacological Study

Correlative studies

OTHERQuality-of-Life Assessment

Ancillary studies

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and has already received =\< 4 standard treatment regimens; note: induction, transplant, consolidation, and maintenance is considered one regimen * Have received prior therapy with an immunomodulatory agent, a proteosome inhibitor, and glucocorticoids * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>= 1000/uL * Untransfused platelet count \>= 75,000/uL * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) =\< 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) =\< 3 x ULN * Total bilirubin =\< 1.5 mg/dL * Serum creatinine =\< 2.5 mg/dL * Hemoglobin \>= 8 g/dL * Measurable disease of multiple myeloma as defined by at least ONE of the following: * Serum monoclonal protein \>= 1.0 g/dL * \>= 200 mg of monoclonal protein in the urine on 24 hour electrophoresis * Serum immunoglobulin free light chain \>= 10 mg/dL AND abnormal serum immunoglobulin kappa to lambda free light chain ratio * Monoclonal plasmacytosis \>= 30% (evaluable disease) * Measurable plasmacytoma that has not been radiated * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0, 1, 2 * Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan and laboratory tests * Able to swallow and retain oral medication * Provide informed written consent * Negative serum pregnancy test done =\< 7 days prior to registration, for women of childbearing potential only * Willing to provide all biological specimens as required by the protocol for correlative research purposes * Willing to return to enrolling institution for follow-up (during the active monitoring phase of the study) * Mayo Clinic Arizona only: Willing to participate in associated biobanking study, 919-04; the patient must sign consent to enroll onto the mandatory companion biobanking study in order to participate in this treatment study * Mayo Clinic Rochester and Florida only: Willing to participate in associated biobanking study, 521-93; the patient must sign consent to enroll onto the mandatory companion biobanking study in order to participate in this treatment study

Exclusion criteria

* Prior use of investigational drugs =\< 14 days prior to registration * Prior use of growth factors =\< 14 days prior to registration * Prior radiation therapy =\< 14 days prior to registration * Prior autologous stem cell transplant =\< 12 weeks prior to registration * Any of the following: * Pregnant women * Nursing women * Women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception while receiving treatment on this study and for 4 months after stopping treatment on this study * Men who are unwilling to use a condom (even if they have undergone a prior vasectomy) while having intercourse with any woman, while receiving treatment on this study and for 4 months after stopping treatment on this study NOTE: Postmenopausal women are allowed to participate in this study; women are considered post-menopausal and not of child bearing potential if they have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical profile (e.g. age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms) or have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy) or tubal ligation at least six weeks ago; in the case of oophorectomy alone, a woman is considered to be of not child bearing potential only when her reproductive status has been confirmed by follow-up hormone level assessment * Prior allogeneic transplant of any kind * Known active infection requiring parenteral or oral anti-infective treatment * Serious psychiatric illness, active alcoholism, or drug addiction that may hinder or confuse follow-up evaluation * Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or active hepatitis B or C viral infection * Active autoimmune/inflammatory conditions requiring ongoing immunosuppressive therapy * Use of more than low dose corticosteroids (e.g., prednisone up to but no more than 10 mg PO QD or its equivalent) for symptom management and comorbid conditions, except for the following: * Topical applications (e.g. rash) * Inhaled sprays (e.g. obstructive airways diseases) * Eye drops or local injections (e.g. intra-articular) * Joint injections (e.g. arthritis) Doses of corticosteroid should be stable for at least 7 days prior to registration * Any concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions that could increase the patient's risk for toxicity while in the study or that could confound discrimination between disease- and study treatment-related toxicities * Impaired cardiac function or clinically significant cardiac diseases, including any of the following: * History or presence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia * Presence of unstable atrial fibrillation (ventricular response \> 100 bpm) (NOTE: patients with stable atrial fibrillation are eligible, provided they do not meet any of the other cardiac

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Confirmed Overall Response Rate (Stringent Complete Response [sCR], Complete Response [CR], Very Good Partial Response [VGPR], or Partial Response [PR]) With Single Agent SMAC Mimetic LCL161Up to 1 yearThe primary endpoint of this study is the confirmed overall response rate with single agent LCL161 (prior to initiation of cyclophosphamide). A confirmed overall response is defined as sCR (CR as defined+Normal FLC ratio+Absence of clonal PCs by immunohistochemistry), CR (Negative immunofixation of serum and urine+Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytoma+\<5% PCs in Bone Marrow+a normal FLC ratio), VGPR (Serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis), or PR (If present at baseline, ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein or to \<200 mg/24hrs) noted as the objective status on two consecutive evaluations while receiving single agent LCL161.The rate (percentage) of successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients times 100. 95% confidence intervals for the true success percentage will be calculated by the exact binomial method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Combination Agent Response RateUp to 1 yearThe overall response rate (percentage) with the addition of cyclophosphamide will be estimated by the number of patients who achieve a confirmed overall response at any time (with SMAC mimetic LCL161 plus cyclophosphamide) divided by the number of evaluable patients times 100. 95% confidence intervals for the true confirmed overall response rate will be calculated by the exact binomial method.
Event-free SurvivalFrom registration to disease progression while receiving SMAC mimetic LCL161 and cyclophosphamide, death due to any cause, or subsequent treatment for multiple myeloma, assessed up to 1 yearThe event-free survival time is defined as the time from registration to disease progression while receiving LCL161 and cyclophosphamide, death due to any cause, or subsequent treatment for multiple myeloma. Date of progression will be defined as the date that the criteria for progressive disease were first met after initiation of cyclophosphamide. If a patient goes off study treatment and never received cyclophosphamide, they will be censored on the date they went off study treatment. If a patient initiates cyclophosphamide but later discontinues cyclophosphamide due to toxicity and continues LCL161 alone, disease progression on LCL161 alone will be considered an event in this case. The distribution of event-free survival will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)Up to 30 days after the last day of study drug treatmentThe maximum grade for each type of adverse event, regardless of causality, will be recorded and reported for each patient, and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine adverse event patterns. Additionally, the relationship of the adverse event(s) to the study treatment will be taken into consideration. The percentage of patients with a maximum grade 3 or higher adverse event are reported below.
Overall SurvivalFrom registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 1 yearSurvival time is defined as the time from registration to death due to any cause. The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Activating Mutations of the NFKB PathwayUp to 1 yearContinuous biomarker levels will be explored in a graphical manner including mean plots and plots of change and percent change from baseline and other summary measures. Any potential relationships between the baseline level or change in the level of each biomarker and clinical outcome such as confirmed overall response, 6-month progression-free survival, and adverse event incidence will be further analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests or logistic regression methods, as appropriate. Association between a mutation status and confirmed overall response will be assessed using a chi-squared test.
Change in Patient-reported Outcomes (Quality of Life and Symptoms)Baseline up to 1 yearScale score trajectories over time will be examined using stream plots and mean plots with standard deviation error bars overall. Changes from baseline at each cycle will be statistically tested using paired t-tests, and standardized response means (mean of the change from baseline scores at a given cycle, divided by the standard deviation of the change scores) will be interpreted (after applying Middel's adjustment) using Cohen's cut-offs. Correlation between outcomes will employ Pearson and/or Spearman correlations at individual time points.
Changes in Immune Cell SubsetsBaseline up to 1 yearContinuous biomarker levels will be explored in a graphical manner including mean plots and plots of change and percent change from baseline and other summary measures. Any potential relationships between the baseline level or change in the level of each biomarker and clinical outcome such as confirmed overall response, 6-month progression-free survival, and adverse event incidence will be further analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests or logistic regression methods, as appropriate. Association between a mutation status and confirmed overall response will be assessed using a chi-squared test.
Changes in Serum CytokinesBaseline up to 1 yearContinuous biomarker levels will be explored in a graphical manner including mean plots and plots of change and percent change from baseline and other summary measures. Any potential relationships between the baseline level or change in the level of each biomarker and clinical outcome such as confirmed overall response, 6-month progression-free survival, and adverse event incidence will be further analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests or logistic regression methods, as appropriate. Association between a mutation status and confirmed overall response will be assessed using a chi-squared test.
Degradation of cIAP1 in PBMCBaseline up to 1 yearContinuous biomarker levels will be explored in a graphical manner including mean plots and plots of change and percent change from baseline and other summary measures. Any potential relationships between the baseline level or change in the level of each biomarker and clinical outcome such as confirmed overall response, 6-month progression-free survival, and adverse event incidence will be further analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests or logistic regression methods, as appropriate. Association between a mutation status and confirmed overall response will be assessed using a chi-squared test.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)
Patients receive SMAC mimetic LCL161 (1200 mg) PO QD on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Patients lacking a minor response by end of course 2 or partial response by end of course 4 may also receive cyclophosphamide (500 mg) PO QD on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 at the discretion of the treating physician. Patients taking cyclophosphamide with less than a 25% interval reduction in paraprotein receive SMAC mimetic LCL161 on days 2, 9, 16, and 23. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
25
Total25

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)
Age, Continuous68.0 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 25
other
Total, other adverse events
25 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Confirmed Overall Response Rate (Stringent Complete Response [sCR], Complete Response [CR], Very Good Partial Response [VGPR], or Partial Response [PR]) With Single Agent SMAC Mimetic LCL161

The primary endpoint of this study is the confirmed overall response rate with single agent LCL161 (prior to initiation of cyclophosphamide). A confirmed overall response is defined as sCR (CR as defined+Normal FLC ratio+Absence of clonal PCs by immunohistochemistry), CR (Negative immunofixation of serum and urine+Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytoma+\<5% PCs in Bone Marrow+a normal FLC ratio), VGPR (Serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis), or PR (If present at baseline, ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein or to \<200 mg/24hrs) noted as the objective status on two consecutive evaluations while receiving single agent LCL161.The rate (percentage) of successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients times 100. 95% confidence intervals for the true success percentage will be calculated by the exact binomial method.

Time frame: Up to 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Confirmed Overall Response Rate (Stringent Complete Response [sCR], Complete Response [CR], Very Good Partial Response [VGPR], or Partial Response [PR]) With Single Agent SMAC Mimetic LCL1610 percentage of patients
Secondary

Combination Agent Response Rate

The overall response rate (percentage) with the addition of cyclophosphamide will be estimated by the number of patients who achieve a confirmed overall response at any time (with SMAC mimetic LCL161 plus cyclophosphamide) divided by the number of evaluable patients times 100. 95% confidence intervals for the true confirmed overall response rate will be calculated by the exact binomial method.

Time frame: Up to 1 year

Population: Patients treated with combination of LCL161 and cyclophosphamide were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Combination Agent Response Rate17.4 percentage of patients
Secondary

Event-free Survival

The event-free survival time is defined as the time from registration to disease progression while receiving LCL161 and cyclophosphamide, death due to any cause, or subsequent treatment for multiple myeloma. Date of progression will be defined as the date that the criteria for progressive disease were first met after initiation of cyclophosphamide. If a patient goes off study treatment and never received cyclophosphamide, they will be censored on the date they went off study treatment. If a patient initiates cyclophosphamide but later discontinues cyclophosphamide due to toxicity and continues LCL161 alone, disease progression on LCL161 alone will be considered an event in this case. The distribution of event-free survival will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.

Time frame: From registration to disease progression while receiving SMAC mimetic LCL161 and cyclophosphamide, death due to any cause, or subsequent treatment for multiple myeloma, assessed up to 1 year

Population: Patients treated with combination of LCL161 and cyclophosphamide were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Event-free Survival10.0 months
Secondary

Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)

The maximum grade for each type of adverse event, regardless of causality, will be recorded and reported for each patient, and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine adverse event patterns. Additionally, the relationship of the adverse event(s) to the study treatment will be taken into consideration. The percentage of patients with a maximum grade 3 or higher adverse event are reported below.

Time frame: Up to 30 days after the last day of study drug treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)Vomiting4.0 percentage of patients
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)Anemia24 percentage of patients
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)Fatigue16 percentage of patients
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)Nausea4.0 percentage of patients
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)Platelet count decreased12.0 percentage of patients
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)Neutrophil count decreased36.0 percentage of patients
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)Lymphocyte count decreased52.0 percentage of patients
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)White blood cell decreased20.0 percentage of patients
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)Diarrhea4.0 percentage of patients
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)Rash maculo-papular4.0 percentage of patients
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)Hyperglycemia12.0 percentage of patients
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)Lymphocyte count increased8 percentage of patients
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)Syncope12.0 percentage of patients
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)Hyperuricemia4.0 percentage of patients
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)Hypotension4.0 percentage of patients
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)Lung infection4.0 percentage of patients
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)Pain in extremity4.0 percentage of patients
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)Sepsis4.0 percentage of patients
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Incidence of Toxicities Graded Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (All Treatment)Uriticaria4.0 percentage of patients
Secondary

Overall Survival

Survival time is defined as the time from registration to death due to any cause. The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.

Time frame: From registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Treatment (SMAC Mimetic LCL161 and Cyclophosphamide)Overall SurvivalNA months
Other Pre-specified

Activating Mutations of the NFKB Pathway

Continuous biomarker levels will be explored in a graphical manner including mean plots and plots of change and percent change from baseline and other summary measures. Any potential relationships between the baseline level or change in the level of each biomarker and clinical outcome such as confirmed overall response, 6-month progression-free survival, and adverse event incidence will be further analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests or logistic regression methods, as appropriate. Association between a mutation status and confirmed overall response will be assessed using a chi-squared test.

Time frame: Up to 1 year

Other Pre-specified

Change in Patient-reported Outcomes (Quality of Life and Symptoms)

Scale score trajectories over time will be examined using stream plots and mean plots with standard deviation error bars overall. Changes from baseline at each cycle will be statistically tested using paired t-tests, and standardized response means (mean of the change from baseline scores at a given cycle, divided by the standard deviation of the change scores) will be interpreted (after applying Middel's adjustment) using Cohen's cut-offs. Correlation between outcomes will employ Pearson and/or Spearman correlations at individual time points.

Time frame: Baseline up to 1 year

Other Pre-specified

Changes in Immune Cell Subsets

Continuous biomarker levels will be explored in a graphical manner including mean plots and plots of change and percent change from baseline and other summary measures. Any potential relationships between the baseline level or change in the level of each biomarker and clinical outcome such as confirmed overall response, 6-month progression-free survival, and adverse event incidence will be further analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests or logistic regression methods, as appropriate. Association between a mutation status and confirmed overall response will be assessed using a chi-squared test.

Time frame: Baseline up to 1 year

Other Pre-specified

Changes in Serum Cytokines

Continuous biomarker levels will be explored in a graphical manner including mean plots and plots of change and percent change from baseline and other summary measures. Any potential relationships between the baseline level or change in the level of each biomarker and clinical outcome such as confirmed overall response, 6-month progression-free survival, and adverse event incidence will be further analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests or logistic regression methods, as appropriate. Association between a mutation status and confirmed overall response will be assessed using a chi-squared test.

Time frame: Baseline up to 1 year

Other Pre-specified

Degradation of cIAP1 in PBMC

Continuous biomarker levels will be explored in a graphical manner including mean plots and plots of change and percent change from baseline and other summary measures. Any potential relationships between the baseline level or change in the level of each biomarker and clinical outcome such as confirmed overall response, 6-month progression-free survival, and adverse event incidence will be further analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests or logistic regression methods, as appropriate. Association between a mutation status and confirmed overall response will be assessed using a chi-squared test.

Time frame: Baseline up to 1 year

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026