Head and Neck Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
Head and Neck Cancer, Radiotherapy, IMRT, Stem cell, Parotid gland
Brief summary
Rationale: Radiation-induced parotid gland dysfunction, often leading to xerostomia is the most-frequently occurring side-effect with a major impact on patient-reported quality of life after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC). Therefore, treatments for HNC are currently optimized to minimize the mean dose to the parotid glands. Though this resulted in a significant reduction of toxicity, 30%-40% of the patients still develop sustained parotid gland dysfunction and xerostomia. However, in animal studies the investigators found that the dose to the sub-volume of the gland containing the parotid gland stem cells is a better predictor for dysfunction than the mean dose to the whole gland. Subsequently, this finding was confirmed in a retrospective analysis in patients. Therefore, a reduction of dose specifically in this sub-volume of the parotid glands of patients is expected to further reduce the risk of parotid gland dysfunction and xerostomia. Objective: To test the hypothesis that parotid gland stem cell sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy in HNC patients reduces the risk of parotid gland dysfunction and xerostomia as compared to conventional parotid gland sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy. Study design: Double-blind prospective randomized trial (51 patients per arm). Study population: Patients treated for tumours in the head-and-neck region with curative radiotherapy, with or without the addition of chemotherapy or cetuximab. Intervention: Patients randomized into the experimental arm will receive a treatment in which the radiation dose to the parotid gland is re-distributed to minimize dose to the sub-volume containing the stem cells, while keeping the same mean dose to the parotid gland as a whole. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary endpoint is parotid gland salivary secretion. Secondary endpoints are patient- and physician-rated xerostomia.
Interventions
RADIATIONIntensity-modulated Radiotherapy
Sponsors
University Medical Center Groningen
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Squamous cell carcinoma originating from the mucosa of the head and neck area or nasopharyngeal carcinoma originating from the nasopharynx; * The radiotherapy includes prophylactic or therapeutic irradiation of both sides of the neck (at least level II to IV); * Age ≥ 18 years; * WHO performance 0-2; * To reduce the uncertainty in the assessment of relative flow after treatment, pre-treatment parotid gland saliva production stimulated with 5% citric acid should exceed \>0.1 ml/min
Exclusion criteria
* Postoperative radiotherapy; * Previous radiotherapy of the head and neck region (re-irradiation); * Unilateral radiotherapy; * Primary salivary gland tumours
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Salivary flow | 12 months after radiotherapy |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Patient-rated Xerostomia | 12 months after radiotherapy |
Countries
Netherlands
Outcome results
None listed