Skip to content

Study of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Reduction Using Evolocumab (AMG 145) in Japanese Patients With Advanced Cardiovascular Risk

A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Evolocumab (AMG 145) on LDL-C in Combination With Statin Therapy in Japanese Subjects With High Cardiovascular Risk and With Hyperlipidemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01953328
Acronym
AMG145
Enrollment
409
Registered
2013-09-30
Start date
2013-10-31
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2015-12-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperlipidemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia at High Risk for Cardiovascular Events

Keywords

Japanese, high cholesterol, LDL-C, High Cardiovascular Risk

Brief summary

The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of 12 weeks of subcutaneous evolocumab administered every 2 weeks and once a month, compared with placebo, on percent change from baseline in LDL-C when used in combination with statin therapy in adults with high cardiovascular risk and with hyperlipidemia or mixed dyslipidemia.

Detailed description

After a screening and placebo run-in period, eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 1 of 2 open-label background statin treatments (atorvastatin 5 mg or 20 mg daily \[QD\]) and entered a 4-week lipid stabilization period. After the lipid stabilization period, eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to investigational product (evolocumab or placebo) for the 12-week treatment period. Both randomizations were stratified by subject diagnosis and lipid-lowering therapy as follows: * current or prior diagnosis of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) * no diagnosis of HeFH and receiving intensive lipid-lowering therapy * no diagnosis of HeFH and receiving non-intensive lipid-lowering therapy. A participant was considered randomized into the study after successfully completing the screening period, meeting all inclusion/exclusion criteria including meeting final laboratory safety criteria, and undergoing both randomization procedures.

Interventions

DRUGAtorvastatin

Administered orally once a day

BIOLOGICALEvolocumab

Administered by subcutaneous injection

Administered by subcutaneous injection

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Male or female, Japanese adult, 20-85 years of age; Subjects on stable dose of statin for greater than equal to 4 weeks; Fasting LDL-C greater than equal to 100 mg/dL; Fasting triglycerides less than equal to 400 mg/dL; Subject is at high risk for cardiovascular events.

Exclusion criteria

New York heart Association (NYHA) III or IV - heart failure; Uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia; Uncontrolled hypertension; Type 1 diabetes, poorly controlled type 2 diabetes; Uncontrolled hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12Baseline and Week 12

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in the Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Mean LDL-C at Weeks 10 and 12 of Less Than 70 mg/dLWeeks 10 and 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved LDL-C < 70 mg/dL at Week 12Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in LDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12
Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at Week 12Baseline and Week 12

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Japanese men and women ≥ 20 to ≤ 85 years of age, with fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L), fasting triglycerides ≤ 400 mg/dL (4.5 mmol/L), and at high risk for cardiovascular events were eligible to participate. First patient enrolled on 07 October 2013 and last patient enrolled on 17 February 2014.

Pre-assignment details

409 participants were randomized to 1 of 2 open-label atorvastatin cohorts (5 mg or 20 mg) for the lipid stabilization period; 404 were then randomized to blinded investigational product. Both randomizations were stratified by heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) diagnosis and lipid-lowering therapy.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
A5 Placebo Q2W
Participants received atorvastatin 5 mg (A5) daily during the 4 week lipid stabilization period and then in combination with placebo subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 12 weeks.
49
A5 Placebo QM
Participants received atorvastatin 5 mg daily during the 4-week lipid stabilization period and then in combination with placebo subcutaneous injection once every month (QM) for 12 weeks.
50
A5 Evolocumab Q2W
Participants received atorvastatin 5 mg daily during the 4-week lipid stabilization period and then in combination with 140 mg evolocumab by subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks for 12 weeks.
50
A5 Evolocumab QM
Participants received atorvastatin 5 mg daily during the 4-week lipid stabilization period and then in combination with 420 mg evolocumab by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 weeks.
50
A20 Placebo Q2W
Participants received atorvastatin 20 mg (A20) daily during the 4 week lipid stabilization period and then in combination with placebo subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks for 12 weeks.
52
A20 Placebo QM
Participants received atorvastatin 20 mg daily during the 4-week lipid stabilization period and then in combination with placebo subcutaneous injection once every month for 12 weeks.
51
A20 Evolocumab Q2W
Participants received atorvastatin 20 mg daily during the 4-week lipid stabilization period and then in combination with 140 mg evolocumab by subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks for 12 weeks.
51
A20 Evolocumab QM
Participants received atorvastatin 20 mg daily during the 4-week lipid stabilization period and then in combination with 420 mg evolocumab by subcutaneous injection once a month for 12 weeks.
51
Total404

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up00001000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject00001000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicA5 Placebo Q2WTotalA20 Evolocumab QMA20 Evolocumab Q2WA20 Placebo QMA20 Placebo Q2WA5 Evolocumab QMA5 Evolocumab Q2WA5 Placebo QM
Age, Continuous62.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
60.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
60.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
65.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
60.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio0.633 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.16
0.595 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.179
0.576 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.176
0.575 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.177
0.524 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.108
0.529 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.118
0.658 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.235
0.643 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.223
0.628 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.152
Apolipoprotein B Concentration99.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20
93.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.8
87.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.6
87.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.1
82.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
85.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.4
102.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.7
105.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.2
100.6 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20
HDL-C Concentration57.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
57.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
56.3 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7
55.9 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
56.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
59.6 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4
54.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
58.6 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
58.3 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
LDL-C Concentration115.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26
105.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32
98.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.6
95.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.6
90.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.8
90.9 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.5
118.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.6
121.9 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 44.6
114.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.2
Lipoprotein(a) Concentration35.0 nmol/L33.0 nmol/L28.0 nmol/L33.0 nmol/L35.0 nmol/L30.0 nmol/L36.5 nmol/L36.0 nmol/L29.5 nmol/L
Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (non-HDL-C) Concentration142.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.4
132.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 35.9
122.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.5
121.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.8
117.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.1
118.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.6
147.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 39.6
151.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 48.8
141.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.8
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
49 participants404 participants51 participants51 participants51 participants52 participants50 participants50 participants50 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants160 Participants24 Participants16 Participants18 Participants24 Participants18 Participants23 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants244 Participants27 Participants35 Participants33 Participants28 Participants32 Participants27 Participants35 Participants
Stratification Factor
Diagnosis of HeFH
3 participants21 participants3 participants3 participants2 participants3 participants3 participants2 participants2 participants
Stratification Factor
Non-HeFH and Intensive Statin Use
10 participants85 participants11 participants11 participants11 participants11 participants10 participants11 participants10 participants
Stratification Factor
Non-HeFH and Non-Intensive Statin Use
36 participants298 participants37 participants37 participants38 participants38 participants37 participants37 participants38 participants
Total Cholesterol Concentration199.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.7
189.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.3
179.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.4
177.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.2
173.6 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.2
177.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33
202.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.4
210.4 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 47.9
199.4 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.2
Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio3.618 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.891
3.491 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.018
3.400 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.071
3.392 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.112
3.170 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.612
3.116 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.76
3.933 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.295
3.743 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.186
3.579 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.827
Triglyceride Concentration125.0 mg/dL121.5 mg/dL113.0 mg/dL109.0 mg/dL120.0 mg/dL120.0 mg/dL132.0 mg/dL125.0 mg/dL128.5 mg/dL
Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) Concentration26.3 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
26.6 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
24.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
24.3 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
25.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
27.4 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
29.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
29.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
26.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 4911 / 5013 / 509 / 506 / 5214 / 517 / 5112 / 51
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 492 / 500 / 501 / 501 / 521 / 510 / 510 / 51

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 120.27 percent changeStandard Error 2.21
A5 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 123.91 percent changeStandard Error 2.09
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-73.70 percent changeStandard Error 2.26
A5 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-69.98 percent changeStandard Error 2.02
A20 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-0.42 percent changeStandard Error 3.26
A20 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-2.67 percent changeStandard Error 2.31
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-74.82 percent changeStandard Error 3.26
A20 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-76.93 percent changeStandard Error 2.24
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in the percent change from baseline at the mean of Weeks 10 and 12 in LDL-C between evolocumab and placebo, and the alternative hypothesis was that a mean difference did exist.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-78.54, -69.41]Repeated measures linear effects model
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in the percent change from baseline at the mean of Weeks 10 and 12 in LDL-C between evolocumab and placebo, and the alternative hypothesis was that a mean difference did exist.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-77.22, -68.57]Repeated measures linear effects model
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in the percent change from baseline at the mean of Weeks 10 and 12 in LDL-C between evolocumab and placebo, and the alternative hypothesis was that a mean difference did exist.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-81.21, -67.61]Repeated measures linear effects model
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in the percent change from baseline at the mean of Weeks 10 and 12 in LDL-C between evolocumab and placebo, and the alternative hypothesis was that a mean difference did exist.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-78.93, -69.6]Repeated measures linear effects model
Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 121.28 percent changeStandard Error 2.43
A5 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 125.29 percent changeStandard Error 2.19
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12-73.57 percent changeStandard Error 2.48
A5 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12-64.62 percent changeStandard Error 2.12
A20 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 121.39 percent changeStandard Error 3.51
A20 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12-3.49 percent changeStandard Error 2.67
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12-74.46 percent changeStandard Error 3.5
A20 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12-70.36 percent changeStandard Error 2.61
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in the percent change from baseline at Week 12 in LDL-C between evolocumab and placebo, and the alternative hypothesis was that a mean difference did exist.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-80.22, -69.47]Repeated measures linear effects model
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in the percent change from baseline at Week 12 in LDL-C between evolocumab and placebo, and the alternative hypothesis was that a mean difference did exist.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-74.6, -65.23]Repeated measures linear effects model
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in the percent change from baseline at Week 12 in LDL-C between evolocumab and placebo, and the alternative hypothesis was that a mean difference did exist.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-83.55, -68.15]Repeated measures linear effects model
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in the percent change from baseline at Week 12 in LDL-C between evolocumab and placebo, and the alternative hypothesis was that a mean difference did exist.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-72.88, -60.87]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in LDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WChange From Baseline in LDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-14.8 mg/dLStandard Error 4.3
A5 Placebo QMChange From Baseline in LDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-2.6 mg/dLStandard Error 4.3
A5 Evolocumab Q2WChange From Baseline in LDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-104.1 mg/dLStandard Error 4.4
A5 Evolocumab QMChange From Baseline in LDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-88.9 mg/dLStandard Error 4.1
A20 Placebo Q2WChange From Baseline in LDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-8.9 mg/dLStandard Error 3.2
A20 Placebo QMChange From Baseline in LDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-5.7 mg/dLStandard Error 3.7
A20 Evolocumab Q2WChange From Baseline in LDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-77.6 mg/dLStandard Error 3.2
A20 Evolocumab QMChange From Baseline in LDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-77.7 mg/dLStandard Error 3.6
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-98.4, -80.2]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-95.1, -77.5]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-75.3, -62.1]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-79.5, -64.6]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WChange From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12-13.7 mg/dLStandard Error 4.6
A5 Placebo QMChange From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12-0.4 mg/dLStandard Error 4.3
A5 Evolocumab Q2WChange From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12-104.5 mg/dLStandard Error 4.6
A5 Evolocumab QMChange From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12-84.0 mg/dLStandard Error 4.2
A20 Placebo Q2WChange From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12-7.7 mg/dLStandard Error 3.3
A20 Placebo QMChange From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12-6.2 mg/dLStandard Error 4
A20 Evolocumab Q2WChange From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12-77.2 mg/dLStandard Error 3.3
A20 Evolocumab QMChange From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12-71.7 mg/dLStandard Error 3.9
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-100.9, -80.7]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-92.5, -74.8]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-76.5, -62.6]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-73.8, -57.1]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Mean LDL-C at Weeks 10 and 12 of Less Than 70 mg/dL

Time frame: Weeks 10 and 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Mean LDL-C at Weeks 10 and 12 of Less Than 70 mg/dL0.0 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 2.02
A5 Placebo QMPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Mean LDL-C at Weeks 10 and 12 of Less Than 70 mg/dL0.0 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 2.37
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Mean LDL-C at Weeks 10 and 12 of Less Than 70 mg/dL98.0 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 2.07
A5 Evolocumab QMPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Mean LDL-C at Weeks 10 and 12 of Less Than 70 mg/dL96.0 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 2.29
A20 Placebo Q2WPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Mean LDL-C at Weeks 10 and 12 of Less Than 70 mg/dL22.4 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 2.3
A20 Placebo QMPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Mean LDL-C at Weeks 10 and 12 of Less Than 70 mg/dL15.7 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 2.09
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Mean LDL-C at Weeks 10 and 12 of Less Than 70 mg/dL96.0 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 2.3
A20 Evolocumab QMPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Mean LDL-C at Weeks 10 and 12 of Less Than 70 mg/dL98.0 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 2.02
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [86.8, 99.6]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [84.1, 98.9]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [57.1, 83.4]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [67.5, 90]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved LDL-C < 70 mg/dL at Week 12

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercentage of Participants Who Achieved LDL-C < 70 mg/dL at Week 120.0 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 2.02
A5 Placebo QMPercentage of Participants Who Achieved LDL-C < 70 mg/dL at Week 124.2 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 2.37
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Who Achieved LDL-C < 70 mg/dL at Week 1298.0 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 2.07
A5 Evolocumab QMPercentage of Participants Who Achieved LDL-C < 70 mg/dL at Week 1296.0 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 2.29
A20 Placebo Q2WPercentage of Participants Who Achieved LDL-C < 70 mg/dL at Week 1220.4 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 2.3
A20 Placebo QMPercentage of Participants Who Achieved LDL-C < 70 mg/dL at Week 1220.0 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 2.09
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Who Achieved LDL-C < 70 mg/dL at Week 1296.0 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 2.3
A20 Evolocumab QMPercentage of Participants Who Achieved LDL-C < 70 mg/dL at Week 1298.0 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 2.02
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [86.7, 99.6]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [78.2, 96]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [59.3, 85]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [62.6, 86.9]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 120.06 percent changeStandard Error 2.02
A5 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 122.79 percent changeStandard Error 2.37
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-66.41 percent changeStandard Error 2.07
A5 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-61.55 percent changeStandard Error 2.29
A20 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-1.92 percent changeStandard Error 2.3
A20 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 121.54 percent changeStandard Error 2.09
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-65.97 percent changeStandard Error 2.3
A20 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-65.72 percent changeStandard Error 2.02
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-70.58, -62.36]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-69.01, -59.66]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-68.9, -59.2]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-71.36, -63.15]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-0.32 percent changeStandard Error 1.98
A5 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 120.76 percent changeStandard Error 2.06
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-64.76 percent changeStandard Error 2.03
A5 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-58.47 percent changeStandard Error 1.99
A20 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-4.32 percent changeStandard Error 2.27
A20 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-0.85 percent changeStandard Error 1.9
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-64.38 percent changeStandard Error 2.27
A20 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-64.24 percent changeStandard Error 1.84
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-68.49, -60.39]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-63.3, -55.17]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-64.87, -55.25]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-67.15, -59.62]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 120.74 percent changeStandard Error 2.17
A5 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 122.42 percent changeStandard Error 2.26
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 12-64.83 percent changeStandard Error 2.22
A5 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 12-54.80 percent changeStandard Error 2.19
A20 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 12-2.47 percent changeStandard Error 2.48
A20 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 12-1.89 percent changeStandard Error 2.17
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 12-62.83 percent changeStandard Error 2.47
A20 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 12-58.04 percent changeStandard Error 2.11
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-70.34, -60.79]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-62.05, -52.4]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-65.91, -54.83]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-60.92, -51.39]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-4.83 percent changeStandard Error 2.25
A5 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-1.57 percent changeStandard Error 2.29
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 127.50 percent changeStandard Error 2.3
A5 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 1213.05 percent changeStandard Error 2.22
A20 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-4.03 percent changeStandard Error 2.34
A20 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-3.06 percent changeStandard Error 2.13
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 1211.34 percent changeStandard Error 2.33
A20 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 126.09 percent changeStandard Error 2.07
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [7.39, 17.27]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [9.93, 19.3]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [10.12, 20.6]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [4.67, 13.62]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 12-4.59 percent changeStandard Error 2.58
A5 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 12-0.40 percent changeStandard Error 2.47
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 128.88 percent changeStandard Error 2.62
A5 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 1214.80 percent changeStandard Error 2.39
A20 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 12-3.57 percent changeStandard Error 2.59
A20 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 12-2.36 percent changeStandard Error 2.38
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 1213.28 percent changeStandard Error 2.58
A20 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 127.84 percent changeStandard Error 2.32
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [7.4, 19.53]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [9.87, 20.52]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [10.74, 22.95]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [4.85, 15.55]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 125.23 percent changeStandard Error 6.18
A5 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 124.07 percent changeStandard Error 4.95
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-45.97 percent changeStandard Error 6.27
A5 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-45.01 percent changeStandard Error 4.78
A20 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 126.52 percent changeStandard Error 4.81
A20 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-5.62 percent changeStandard Error 5
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-43.03 percent changeStandard Error 4.81
A20 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-49.55 percent changeStandard Error 4.85
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-63.88, -38.52]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-58.89, -39.27]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-59.74, -39.35]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-53.75, -34.12]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 124.35 percent changeStandard Error 6.86
A5 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 127.03 percent changeStandard Error 5.47
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12-45.72 percent changeStandard Error 6.93
A5 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12-41.74 percent changeStandard Error 5.29
A20 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 1210.75 percent changeStandard Error 5.15
A20 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12-5.73 percent changeStandard Error 5.18
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12-41.93 percent changeStandard Error 5.13
A20 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12-45.70 percent changeStandard Error 5.02
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-65.25, -34.9]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-60.49, -37.05]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-64.06, -41.3]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-50.46, -29.48]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 120.18 percent changeStandard Error 2.13
A5 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 124.26 percent changeStandard Error 1.86
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-68.48 percent changeStandard Error 2.18
A5 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-61.69 percent changeStandard Error 1.8
A20 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-1.57 percent changeStandard Error 2.45
A20 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-1.79 percent changeStandard Error 1.94
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-69.72 percent changeStandard Error 2.45
A20 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-69.07 percent changeStandard Error 1.88
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-73.06, -64.27]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-69.74, -62.16]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-73.3, -62.99]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-71.14, -63.42]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 121.12 percent changeStandard Error 2.3
A5 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 125.55 percent changeStandard Error 2.02
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12-67.81 percent changeStandard Error 2.35
A5 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12-58.03 percent changeStandard Error 1.96
A20 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12-0.07 percent changeStandard Error 2.68
A20 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12-2.38 percent changeStandard Error 2.22
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12-68.89 percent changeStandard Error 2.67
A20 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12-63.27 percent changeStandard Error 2.16
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-73.96, -63.89]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-67.96, -59.21]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-74.79, -62.86]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-65.78, -55.99]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in the Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in the Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at Week 120.71 percent changeStandard Error 2.11
A5 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in the Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at Week 124.08 percent changeStandard Error 2.62
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in the Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at Week 12-67.59 percent changeStandard Error 2.16
A5 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in the Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at Week 12-58.45 percent changeStandard Error 2.53
A20 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in the Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at Week 12-1.15 percent changeStandard Error 2.47
A20 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in the Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at Week 120.06 percent changeStandard Error 2.3
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in the Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at Week 12-65.11 percent changeStandard Error 2.46
A20 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in the Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 Ratio at Week 12-60.56 percent changeStandard Error 2.23
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-72.75, -63.84]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-68.11, -56.94]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-69.44, -58.5]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-65.51, -55.72]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 123.77 percent changeStandard Error 2.11
A5 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 123.94 percent changeStandard Error 2.16
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-51.00 percent changeStandard Error 2.16
A5 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-48.71 percent changeStandard Error 2.09
A20 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 121.04 percent changeStandard Error 1.82
A20 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 121.58 percent changeStandard Error 2.04
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-49.79 percent changeStandard Error 1.81
A20 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-48.11 percent changeStandard Error 1.98
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-59.37, -50.17]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-56.95, -48.36]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-54.72, -46.93]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-53.74, -45.64]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at Week 124.73 percent changeStandard Error 2.36
A5 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at Week 124.33 percent changeStandard Error 2.33
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at Week 12-50.72 percent changeStandard Error 2.4
A5 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at Week 12-46.62 percent changeStandard Error 2.26
A20 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at Week 121.84 percent changeStandard Error 2.01
A20 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at Week 120.83 percent changeStandard Error 2.2
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at Week 12-49.52 percent changeStandard Error 2
A20 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio at Week 12-44.61 percent changeStandard Error 2.13
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-60.93, -49.98]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-55.91, -46]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-55.93, -46.8]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-50.08, -40.81]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-2.49 percent changeStandard Error 1.81
A5 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 121.09 percent changeStandard Error 1.63
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-48.03 percent changeStandard Error 1.85
A5 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-42.34 percent changeStandard Error 1.58
A20 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-4.21 percent changeStandard Error 1.86
A20 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-2.35 percent changeStandard Error 1.68
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-45.19 percent changeStandard Error 1.86
A20 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-45.49 percent changeStandard Error 1.63
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-49.35, -41.73]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-46.78, -40.08]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-44.88, -37.08]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-46.48, -39.8]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 12-1.70 percent changeStandard Error 1.97
A5 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 122.29 percent changeStandard Error 1.67
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 12-47.14 percent changeStandard Error 2.01
A5 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 12-39.06 percent changeStandard Error 1.62
A20 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 12-3.08 percent changeStandard Error 2
A20 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 12-2.44 percent changeStandard Error 1.81
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 12-44.04 percent changeStandard Error 1.99
A20 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 12-40.88 percent changeStandard Error 1.76
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-49.83, -41.05]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-44.84, -37.85]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-45.35, -36.57]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-42.26, -34.62]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 124.69 percent changeStandard Error 6.04
A5 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 124.54 percent changeStandard Error 5.31
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-23.23 percent changeStandard Error 6.15
A5 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-17.41 percent changeStandard Error 5.14
A20 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-2.11 percent changeStandard Error 4.45
A20 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 128.06 percent changeStandard Error 6.16
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-22.12 percent changeStandard Error 4.44
A20 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-12.66 percent changeStandard Error 6.01
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-41.27, -14.59]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-32.54, -11.35]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-29.59, -10.43]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: 0.0195% CI: [-34.18, -7.26]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 127.84 percent changeStandard Error 7.65
A5 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 124.34 percent changeStandard Error 5.61
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 12-19.73 percent changeStandard Error 7.74
A5 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 12-15.63 percent changeStandard Error 5.43
A20 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 12-3.88 percent changeStandard Error 4.85
A20 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 127.30 percent changeStandard Error 6.42
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 12-21.05 percent changeStandard Error 4.82
A20 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 12-9.63 percent changeStandard Error 6.26
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-46.33, -8.81]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-31.68, -8.25]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-28.15, -6.19]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: 0.0195% CI: [-31.29, -2.56]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 122.57 percent changeStandard Error 5.52
A5 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 123.10 percent changeStandard Error 5.12
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-25.29 percent changeStandard Error 5.65
A5 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-19.55 percent changeStandard Error 4.95
A20 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-1.32 percent changeStandard Error 4.32
A20 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 129.96 percent changeStandard Error 5.57
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-19.41 percent changeStandard Error 4.31
A20 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12-17.20 percent changeStandard Error 5.46
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-39.37, -16.34]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-32.91, -12.39]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-27.4, -8.77]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-39.31, -15.01]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A5 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at Week 124.09 percent changeStandard Error 6.22
A5 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at Week 122.92 percent changeStandard Error 5.45
A5 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at Week 12-24.33 percent changeStandard Error 6.34
A5 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at Week 12-17.89 percent changeStandard Error 5.27
A20 Placebo Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at Week 12-3.03 percent changeStandard Error 4.7
A20 Placebo QMPercent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at Week 129.17 percent changeStandard Error 5.63
A20 Evolocumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at Week 12-18.08 percent changeStandard Error 4.68
A20 Evolocumab QMPercent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at Week 12-15.18 percent changeStandard Error 5.52
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-42.48, -14.36]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-32.29, -9.33]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-25.72, -4.39]Repeated measures linear effects model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-36.7, -11.99]Repeated measures linear effects model

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026