Skip to content

A Multi-Center Study Comparing the Clinical Performance of Two Silicone Hydrogel Lenses Over 1 Month of Daily Wear

A Multi-Center Study Comparing the Clinical Performance of Two Silicone Hydrogel Lenses Over 1 Month of Daily Wear

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01952665
Enrollment
63
Registered
2013-09-30
Start date
2013-10-31
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2017-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Brief summary

A Multi-Center Study Comparing the Clinical Performance of Two Silicone Hydrogel Lenses Over 1 Month of Daily Wear

Detailed description

Two-month, single masked, randomized, bilateral, crossover, 1-month of daily wear in each study lens.

Interventions

DEVICEcomfilcon A

Each subject randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating schedule for the second pair without a washout period.

Each subject randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating schedule for the second pair without a washout period.

Sponsors

CooperVision, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive) * Have the use of a mobile phone to send and receive text messages throughout the day for the duration of the study * Has had a self-reported visual exam in the last two years * Is an adapted soft CL wearer * Has a Contact Lens (CL) spherical prescription between - 1.00 and - 9.00 (inclusive) * Has less than 0.75D spectacle cylinder in each eye * Is correctable to a visual acuity of 20/25 or better in both eyes * Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease * Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter * Is willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least 40 hrs per week) * Is willing to comply with the visit schedule

Exclusion criteria

* Has never worn contact lenses before * Currently wears rigid gas permeable contact lenses * Has a history of not achieving comfortable CL wear (5 days per week; \> 8 hours/day) * Has a contact lens prescription outside the range of - 1.00 to -9.00D * Has a spectacle cylinder greater than -0.50D of cylinder in either eye * Has best corrected spectacle distance vision worse then 20/25 in either eye * Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health * Is using any systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular health * Has any ocular pathology or severe insufficiency of lacrimal secretion * Has persistent, clinically significant corneal or conjunctival staining * Has active neovascularization or any central corneal scars * Is aphakic * Is presbyopic * Has undergone corneal refractive surgery * Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lens Preference for Handling4 weeksParticipant lens preference regarding handling. Collected at study exit. (Forced Choice; Study Pair 1, Study Pair 2, Habitual).
Vision Satisfaction2 weeksParticipant rating for vision satisfaction. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. (0-10, 0= Very Unsatisfied, 10= Very Satisfied)
Eye Whiteness/Redness2 weeksParticipant rating for Eye Whiteness/Redness. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. (0-10, 0= Significant Redness, 10= Totally White)
Overall Sensation of Moistness2 weeksParticipant rating of overall sensation for moistness (hydration). After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 5-point Likert Scale; 1=Excellent, 2=Good, 3=Average, 4=Below Average, 5=Poor.
Overall Sensation of Smoothness2 weeksParticipant rating of overall sensation for smoothness (deposit resistance). After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 5-point Likert Scale; 1=Excellent, 2=Good, 3=Average, 4=Below Average, 5=Poor.
Overall Comfort Satisfaction2 weeksParticipant rating of satisfaction regarding comfort. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied
Overall Dryness Satisfaction2 weeksParticipant rating of satisfaction regarding dryness. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied
Overall Handling Satisfaction2 weeksParticipant rating of satisfaction regarding handling. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied
Overall Vision Satisfaction2 weeksParticipant rating of satisfaction regarding vision. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied
Overall Satisfaction2 weeksParticipant rating of satisfaction overall. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied
Lens Preference, Pair 1 Comfilcon A2 weeksParticipant preference for habitual lenses or study lenses with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision and overall. Collected at 2 weeks for study pair 1. (Randomized to comfilcon A as pair 1; Forced choice: Pair 1 or Habitual)
Lens Preference, Pair 1 Lotrafilcon B2 weeksParticipant preference for habitual lenses or study lenses with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision and overall. Collected at 2 weeks for study pair 1. (Randomized to lotrafilcon B as pair 1; Forced choice: Pair 1 or Habitual )
Rewetting Drops4 weeksParticipant use of rewetting drops. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. (Uses rewetting drops / Does not use rewetting drops).
Lens Preference4 weeksParticipant lens preference in regard for comfort, dryness, handling, vision and overall. Collected at 4 weeks. (Forced Choice; Study Pair 1, Study Pair 2).
Lens Preference Comfort, Dryness, Vision and Overall.4 weeksParticipant lens preference regarding comfort, dryness, vision and overall. Collected at study exit. (Forced Choice; Study Pair 1, Study Pair 2, Habitual).
Comfort at InsertionDispenseParticipant rating for lens comfort on insertion. Collected at dispense for both study lens pairs. (0-10, 0= Very Uncomfortable, 10= Cannot feel).
Visual QualityDispenseParticipant rating of visual quality. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. (0-10, 0= Very Poor Vision, 10= Perfectly Sharp, Clear Vision)
Average Daily Wearing Time2 weeksParticipants measure of average daily wear time for study lenses at 2 Weeks.
Comfortable Wearing Time2 weeksParticipant rating of lens Comfortable Wearing Time for both study pairs. After 2 weeks wear for each pair. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time)
Comfort2 weeksParticipant rating for lens comfort. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. (0-10, 0= Very Uncomfortable, 10= Cannot Feel).
Dryness2 weeksParticipant rating for lens dryness. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. (0-10, 0= Very Dry, 10= No Dryness).
Handling2 weeksParticipant rating for lens handling. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. (0-10, 0= Very Difficult, 10= Very Easy).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Binocular Visual Acuity logMARDispenseAssessment of visual acuity (VA). Collected at 2 weeks for both study lens pairs. Binocular High Contrast Distance. logMAR (negative logMAR values indicates better Visual Acuity (VA)). 0.0 logMAR = 20/20 snellen chart
Surface WettingDispenseAssessment of surface wetting by slit lamp. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. 0=Non-wettable surface, 1= \> 1 non-wetting area of some magnitude., 2=One non-wetting area of some magnitude, 3=Hazy surface that resolves with a blink. Typical soft lens appearance with long drying time., 4=Smooth uniformly reflective surface. Appearance of a healthy cornea (Grade 0-4 in ½ steps)
Surface DepositionDispenseAssessment of surface deposition by slit lamp. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. (Grade 0-4 in ½ steps; Clean= 0; Deposited = 4)
CentrationDispenseAssessment of lens centration. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. Biomicroscopy; by degree and direction in the primary position. (Rated as Optimal Centration or Not Optimal)
Corneal CoverageDispenseAssessment of lens corneal coverage. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. Biomicroscopy; assessed in primary gaze. (Rated as Normal Coverage or Not Covering)
Post Blink MovementDispenseAssessment of post blink movement. Collected at dispense for both study lens pairs. Assessed immediately after the blink. (0-4, 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 1=Minimal, but acceptable movement, 2=Optimal movement, 3=Moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=Excessive, unacceptable movement)
Push Up TestDispenseAssessment of lens tightness. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. Digital push up test. Continuous Scale (0-100%, 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support, 50%= Optimum, 100%= No movement)
Overall Fit AcceptanceDispenseAssessment of overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. (0-4, 0=should not be worn, 1=borderline but unacceptable, 2=minimally acceptable, early review, 3=not perfect but okay to dispense, 4=perfect)
Rewetting Drops2 weeksParticipant use of rewetting drops. Collected at 2 weeks for both study lens pairs. (Uses rewetting drops / Does not use rewetting drops).
Likelihood of Switching From Habitual Lens to Study Lens4 weeksParticipant likelihood of switching from their habitual lens to the study lens. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=very likely, 2=likely, 3=unlikely, 4=very unlikely
Likelihood to Continue Wearing the Study Lens4 weeksParticipant likelihood of continuing wear of the study lense. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Very Likely, 2=Likely, 3=Unlikely, 4=Very Unlikely
Participant Recommendation of a Study Lens4 weeksParticipant most likely recommendation of which study lens to friends, family or colleagues. Collected at study exit. (Forced Choice; Study Pair 1, Study Pair 2).
Participant Likelihood of Recommendation of a Study Lens4 weeksParticipant likelihood of recommending a study lens to friends. Collected at study exit. (1-4; 1=Very Unlikely, 2=Unlikely, 3=Likely, 4=Very Likely).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Number of Trials Needed to Achieve Final Dispensing Pair of Study Lenses.DispenseThe number of trials needed to achieve final dispensing pair of study lenses. Number of lenses required to dispense the final pair of study lenses. Collected at dispense for both study lens pairs. (Number required; 1, 2, 3, \>3)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a 1 month, cross-over dispensing study conducted at 6 clinical sites in the US. 63 subjects were enrolled, 12 were discontinued and 51 completed the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Comfilcon A Then Lotrafilcon B
Each subject randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating schedule for the second pair without a washout period.
37
Lotrafilcon B Then Comfilcon A
Each subject randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating schedule for the second pair without a washout period.
26
Total63

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event21
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12
Overall StudyPhysician Decision32
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicComfilcon A Then Lotrafilcon BLotrafilcon B Then Comfilcon ATotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
37 Participants26 Participants63 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
37 participants26 participants63 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants15 Participants38 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants11 Participants25 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 630 / 63
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 630 / 63

Outcome results

Primary

Average Daily Wearing Time

Participants measure of average daily wear time for study lenses at 2 Weeks.

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon AAverage Daily Wearing Time13.72 hoursStandard Deviation 2.66
Lotrafilcon BAverage Daily Wearing Time13.82 hoursStandard Deviation 2.95
Primary

Average Daily Wearing Time

Participants measure of average daily wear time for study lenses at 4 weeks.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon AAverage Daily Wearing Time13.57 hoursStandard Deviation 2.88
Lotrafilcon BAverage Daily Wearing Time13.91 hoursStandard Deviation 2.82
Primary

Comfort

Participant rating for lens comfort. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. (0-10, 0= Very Uncomfortable, 10= Cannot Feel).

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon AComfortInsertion8.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
Comfilcon AComfortPrior to Removal7.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Comfilcon AComfortDuring Day8.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
Comfilcon AComfortOverall8.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
Lotrafilcon BComfortDuring Day7.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Lotrafilcon BComfortInsertion8.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
Lotrafilcon BComfortOverall7.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.87
Lotrafilcon BComfortPrior to Removal6.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Primary

Comfort

Participant rating for lens comfort. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. (0-10, 0= Very Uncomfortable, 10= Cannot Feel).

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon AComfortInsertion8.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
Comfilcon AComfortDuring Day8.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.63
Comfilcon AComfortPrior to Removal7.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Comfilcon AComfortOverall8.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.58
Lotrafilcon BComfortOverall7.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.75
Lotrafilcon BComfortInsertion8.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.68
Lotrafilcon BComfortPrior to Removal7.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.95
Lotrafilcon BComfortDuring Day8.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.76
Primary

Comfortable Wearing Time

Participant rating of lens Comfortable Wearing Time for both study pairs. After 2 weeks wear for each pair. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time)

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon AComfortable Wearing Time11.07 hoursStandard Deviation 3.87
Lotrafilcon BComfortable Wearing Time11.14 hoursStandard Deviation 3.72
Primary

Comfortable Wearing Time

Participant rating of lens Comfortable Wearing Time for both study pairs. Collected at 4 weeks wear. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time)

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon AComfortable Wearing Time11.07 hoursStandard Deviation 3.33
Lotrafilcon BComfortable Wearing Time10.67 hoursStandard Deviation 4.15
Primary

Comfort at Insertion

Participant rating for lens comfort on insertion. Collected at dispense for both study lens pairs. (0-10, 0= Very Uncomfortable, 10= Cannot feel).

Time frame: Dispense

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon AComfort at Insertion9.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Lotrafilcon BComfort at Insertion8.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
Primary

Dryness

Participant rating for lens dryness. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. (0-10, 0= Very Dry, 10= No Dryness).

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon ADrynessDuring Day8.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.72
Comfilcon ADrynessPrior to Removal7.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.77
Comfilcon ADrynessOverall8.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
Lotrafilcon BDrynessDuring Day7.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.04
Lotrafilcon BDrynessPrior to Removal6.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
Lotrafilcon BDrynessOverall7.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.05
Primary

Dryness

Participant rating for lens dryness. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. (0-10, 0= Very Dry, 10= No Dryness).

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon ADrynessDuring Day8.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.76
Comfilcon ADrynessPrior to Removal7.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.27
Comfilcon ADrynessOverall7.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Lotrafilcon BDrynessDuring Day7.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.71
Lotrafilcon BDrynessPrior to Removal6.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
Lotrafilcon BDrynessOverall7.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Primary

Eye Whiteness/Redness

Participant rating for Eye Whiteness/Redness. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. (0-10, 0= Significant Redness, 10= Totally White)

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon AEye Whiteness/Redness8.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Lotrafilcon BEye Whiteness/Redness8.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.61
Primary

Eye Whiteness/Redness

Participant rating for Eye Whiteness/Redness. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. (0-10, 0= Significant Redness, 10= Totally White)

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon AEye Whiteness/Redness8.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
Lotrafilcon BEye Whiteness/Redness8.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.91
Primary

Handling

Participant rating for lens handling. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. (0-10, 0= Very Difficult, 10= Very Easy).

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon AHandlingInsertion/Removal9.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
Comfilcon AHandlingOverall9.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.42
Lotrafilcon BHandlingInsertion/Removal9.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Lotrafilcon BHandlingOverall9.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Primary

Handling

Participant rating for lens handling. Collected at 4 weeks. (0-10, 0= Very Difficult, 10= Very Easy).

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon AHandlingInsertion/Removal9.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
Comfilcon AHandlingOverall9.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
Lotrafilcon BHandlingInsertion/Removal9.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.31
Lotrafilcon BHandlingOverall9.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.31
Primary

Lens Preference

Participant lens preference in regard for comfort, dryness, handling, vision and overall. Collected at 4 weeks. (Forced Choice; Study Pair 1, Study Pair 2).

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon ALens PreferenceDryness32 participants
Comfilcon ALens PreferenceVision33 participants
Comfilcon ALens PreferenceHandling30 participants
Comfilcon ALens PreferenceOverall32 participants
Comfilcon ALens PreferenceComfort32 participants
Lotrafilcon BLens PreferenceOverall21 participants
Lotrafilcon BLens PreferenceComfort21 participants
Lotrafilcon BLens PreferenceDryness21 participants
Lotrafilcon BLens PreferenceHandling23 participants
Lotrafilcon BLens PreferenceVision20 participants
Primary

Lens Preference Comfort, Dryness, Vision and Overall.

Participant lens preference regarding comfort, dryness, vision and overall. Collected at study exit. (Forced Choice; Study Pair 1, Study Pair 2, Habitual).

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon ALens Preference Comfort, Dryness, Vision and Overall.Comfort24 participants
Comfilcon ALens Preference Comfort, Dryness, Vision and Overall.Dryness23 participants
Comfilcon ALens Preference Comfort, Dryness, Vision and Overall.Vision23 participants
Comfilcon ALens Preference Comfort, Dryness, Vision and Overall.Overall22 participants
Lotrafilcon BLens Preference Comfort, Dryness, Vision and Overall.Overall10 participants
Lotrafilcon BLens Preference Comfort, Dryness, Vision and Overall.Comfort10 participants
Lotrafilcon BLens Preference Comfort, Dryness, Vision and Overall.Vision10 participants
Lotrafilcon BLens Preference Comfort, Dryness, Vision and Overall.Dryness11 participants
Habitual LensLens Preference Comfort, Dryness, Vision and Overall.Overall21 participants
Habitual LensLens Preference Comfort, Dryness, Vision and Overall.Dryness19 participants
Habitual LensLens Preference Comfort, Dryness, Vision and Overall.Vision20 participants
Habitual LensLens Preference Comfort, Dryness, Vision and Overall.Comfort19 participants
Primary

Lens Preference for Handling

Participant lens preference regarding handling. Collected at study exit. (Forced Choice; Study Pair 1, Study Pair 2, Habitual).

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon ALens Preference for Handling21 participants
Lotrafilcon BLens Preference for Handling14 participants
Habitual LensLens Preference for Handling19 participants
Primary

Lens Preference, Pair 1 Comfilcon A

Participant preference for habitual lenses or study lenses with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision and overall. Collected at 2 weeks for study pair 1. (Randomized to comfilcon A as pair 1; Forced choice: Pair 1 or Habitual)

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon ALens Preference, Pair 1 Comfilcon ADryness26 participants
Comfilcon ALens Preference, Pair 1 Comfilcon AVision27 participants
Comfilcon ALens Preference, Pair 1 Comfilcon AHandling29 participants
Comfilcon ALens Preference, Pair 1 Comfilcon AOverall26 participants
Comfilcon ALens Preference, Pair 1 Comfilcon AComfort26 participants
Lotrafilcon BLens Preference, Pair 1 Comfilcon AOverall32 participants
Lotrafilcon BLens Preference, Pair 1 Comfilcon AComfort32 participants
Lotrafilcon BLens Preference, Pair 1 Comfilcon ADryness32 participants
Lotrafilcon BLens Preference, Pair 1 Comfilcon AHandling29 participants
Lotrafilcon BLens Preference, Pair 1 Comfilcon AVision31 participants
Primary

Lens Preference, Pair 1 Lotrafilcon B

Participant preference for habitual lenses or study lenses with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision and overall. Collected at 2 weeks for study pair 1. (Randomized to lotrafilcon B as pair 1; Forced choice: Pair 1 or Habitual )

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon ALens Preference, Pair 1 Lotrafilcon BDryness18 participants
Comfilcon ALens Preference, Pair 1 Lotrafilcon BVision23 participants
Comfilcon ALens Preference, Pair 1 Lotrafilcon BHandling25 participants
Comfilcon ALens Preference, Pair 1 Lotrafilcon BOverall19 participants
Comfilcon ALens Preference, Pair 1 Lotrafilcon BComfort19 participants
Lotrafilcon BLens Preference, Pair 1 Lotrafilcon BOverall38 participants
Lotrafilcon BLens Preference, Pair 1 Lotrafilcon BComfort38 participants
Lotrafilcon BLens Preference, Pair 1 Lotrafilcon BDryness39 participants
Lotrafilcon BLens Preference, Pair 1 Lotrafilcon BHandling32 participants
Lotrafilcon BLens Preference, Pair 1 Lotrafilcon BVision31 participants
Primary

Overall Comfort Satisfaction

Participant rating of satisfaction regarding comfort. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon AOverall Comfort SatisfactionCompletely Satisfied30 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Comfort SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied18 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Comfort SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied9 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Comfort SatisfactionCompletely Dissatisfied1 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Comfort SatisfactionCompletely Dissatisfied4 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Comfort SatisfactionCompletely Satisfied20 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Comfort SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied7 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Comfort SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied26 participants
Primary

Overall Comfort Satisfaction

Participant rating of satisfaction regarding comfort. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon AOverall Comfort SatisfactionCompletely Satisfied28 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Comfort SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied21 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Comfort SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied5 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Comfort SatisfactionCompletely Dissatisfied2 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Comfort SatisfactionCompletely Dissatisfied4 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Comfort SatisfactionCompletely Satisfied20 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Comfort SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied8 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Comfort SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied25 participants
Primary

Overall Dryness Satisfaction

Participant rating of satisfaction regarding dryness. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon AOverall Dryness SatisfactionCompletely Satisfied24 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Dryness SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied23 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Dryness SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied9 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Dryness SatisfactionCompletely Dissatisfied2 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Dryness SatisfactionCompletely Dissatisfied4 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Dryness SatisfactionCompletely Satisfied20 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Dryness SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied11 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Dryness SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied22 participants
Primary

Overall Dryness Satisfaction

Participant rating of satisfaction regarding dryness. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon AOverall Dryness SatisfactionCompletely Satisfied22 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Dryness SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied27 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Dryness SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied5 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Dryness SatisfactionCompletely Dissatisfied2 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Dryness SatisfactionCompletely Dissatisfied6 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Dryness SatisfactionCompletely Satisfied21 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Dryness SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied8 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Dryness SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied22 participants
Primary

Overall Handling Satisfaction

Participant rating of satisfaction regarding handling. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon AOverall Handling SatisfactionCompletely Satisfied49 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Handling SatisfactionCompletely Dissatisfied0 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Handling SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied6 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Handling SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied3 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Handling SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied13 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Handling SatisfactionCompletely Dissatisfied0 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Handling SatisfactionCompletely Satisfied43 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Handling SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied1 participants
Primary

Overall Handling Satisfaction

Participant rating of satisfaction regarding handling. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon AOverall Handling SatisfactionCompletely Satisfied42 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Handling SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied12 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Handling SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied1 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Handling SatisfactionCompletely Dissatisfied1 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Handling SatisfactionCompletely Dissatisfied0 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Handling SatisfactionCompletely Satisfied44 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Handling SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied2 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Handling SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied11 participants
Primary

Overall Satisfaction

Participant rating of satisfaction overall. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon AOverall SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied22 participants
Comfilcon AOverall SatisfactionCompletely Satisfied28 participants
Comfilcon AOverall SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied5 participants
Comfilcon AOverall SatisfactionCompletely Dissatisfied1 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall SatisfactionCompletely Dissatisfied2 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall SatisfactionCompletely Satisfied23 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied23 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied9 participants
Primary

Overall Satisfaction

Participant rating of satisfaction overall. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon AOverall SatisfactionCompletely Satisfied30 participants
Comfilcon AOverall SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied9 participants
Comfilcon AOverall SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied18 participants
Comfilcon AOverall SatisfactionCompletely Dissatisfied1 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied26 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall SatisfactionCompletely Satisfied20 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall SatisfactionCompletely Dissatisfied4 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied7 participants
Primary

Overall Sensation of Moistness

Participant rating of overall sensation for moistness (hydration). After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 5-point Likert Scale; 1=Excellent, 2=Good, 3=Average, 4=Below Average, 5=Poor.

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon AOverall Sensation of MoistnessGood25 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Sensation of MoistnessFair6 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Sensation of MoistnessAverage9 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Sensation of MoistnessPoor1 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Sensation of MoistnessExcellent17 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Sensation of MoistnessPoor2 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Sensation of MoistnessExcellent12 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Sensation of MoistnessGood24 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Sensation of MoistnessAverage12 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Sensation of MoistnessFair7 participants
Primary

Overall Sensation of Moistness

Participant rating of overall sensation for moistness (hydration). Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 5-point Likert Scale; 1=Excellent, 2=Good, 3=Average, 4=Below Average, 5=Poor.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon AOverall Sensation of MoistnessGood25 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Sensation of MoistnessFair4 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Sensation of MoistnessAverage9 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Sensation of MoistnessPoor1 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Sensation of MoistnessExcellent17 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Sensation of MoistnessPoor3 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Sensation of MoistnessExcellent13 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Sensation of MoistnessGood21 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Sensation of MoistnessAverage14 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Sensation of MoistnessFair6 participants
Primary

Overall Sensation of Smoothness

Participant rating of overall sensation for smoothness (deposit resistance). Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 5-point Likert Scale; 1=Excellent, 2=Good, 3=Average, 4=Below Average, 5=Poor.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon AOverall Sensation of SmoothnessGood23 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Sensation of SmoothnessFair3 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Sensation of SmoothnessAverage8 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Sensation of SmoothnessPoor0 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Sensation of SmoothnessExcellent22 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Sensation of SmoothnessPoor1 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Sensation of SmoothnessExcellent18 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Sensation of SmoothnessGood16 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Sensation of SmoothnessAverage16 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Sensation of SmoothnessFair6 participants
Primary

Overall Sensation of Smoothness

Participant rating of overall sensation for smoothness (deposit resistance). After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 5-point Likert Scale; 1=Excellent, 2=Good, 3=Average, 4=Below Average, 5=Poor.

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon AOverall Sensation of SmoothnessFair5 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Sensation of SmoothnessPoor0 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Sensation of SmoothnessExcellent23 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Sensation of SmoothnessGood17 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Sensation of SmoothnessAverage13 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Sensation of SmoothnessAverage12 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Sensation of SmoothnessGood20 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Sensation of SmoothnessPoor3 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Sensation of SmoothnessFair1 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Sensation of SmoothnessExcellent21 participants
Primary

Overall Vision Satisfaction

Participant rating of overall satisfaction for vision. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon AOverall Vision SatisfactionCompletely Satisfied45 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Vision SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied8 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Vision SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied2 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Vision SatisfactionCompletely Dissatisfied1 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Vision SatisfactionCompletely Dissatisfied4 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Vision SatisfactionCompletely Satisfied38 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Vision SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied3 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Vision SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied12 participants
Primary

Overall Vision Satisfaction

Participant rating of satisfaction regarding vision. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon AOverall Vision SatisfactionCompletely Satisfied43 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Vision SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied12 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Vision SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied1 participants
Comfilcon AOverall Vision SatisfactionCompletely Dissatisfied2 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Vision SatisfactionCompletely Dissatisfied3 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Vision SatisfactionCompletely Satisfied35 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Vision SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied5 participants
Lotrafilcon BOverall Vision SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied14 participants
Primary

Rewetting Drops

Participant use of rewetting drops. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. (Uses rewetting drops / Does not use rewetting drops).

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon ARewetting DropsUses46 participants
Comfilcon ARewetting DropsDoes Not Use10 participants
Lotrafilcon BRewetting DropsUses48 participants
Lotrafilcon BRewetting DropsDoes Not Use9 participants
Primary

Vision Satisfaction

Participant rating for vision satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. (0-10, 0= Very Unsatisfied, 10= Very Satisfied)

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon AVision Satisfaction9.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Lotrafilcon BVision Satisfaction8.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
Primary

Vision Satisfaction

Participant rating for vision satisfaction. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. (0-10, 0= Very Unsatisfied, 10= Very Satisfied)

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon AVision Satisfaction9.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
Lotrafilcon BVision Satisfaction8.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.69
Primary

Visual Quality

Participant rating of visual quality. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. (0-10, 0= Very Poor Vision, 10= Perfectly Sharp, Clear Vision)

Time frame: Dispense

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon AVisual Quality9.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
Lotrafilcon BVisual Quality8.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
Secondary

Binocular Visual Acuity logMAR

Assessment of visual acuity (VA). Collected at 2 weeks for both study lens pairs. Binocular High Contrast Distance. logMAR (negative logMAR values indicates better Visual Acuity (VA)). 0.0 logMAR = 20/20 snellen chart

Time frame: Dispense

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon ABinocular Visual Acuity logMAR-0.052 logMARStandard Deviation 0.048
Lotrafilcon BBinocular Visual Acuity logMAR-0.054 logMARStandard Deviation 0.05
Secondary

Binocular Visual Acuity logMAR

Assessment of visual acuity (VA). Collected at 2 weeks for both study lens pairs. Binocular High Contrast Distance. logMAR (negative logMAR values indicates better Visual Acuity (VA)). 0.0 logMAR = 20/20 snellen chart

Time frame: 2 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon ABinocular Visual Acuity logMAR-0.036 logMARStandard Deviation 0.076
Lotrafilcon BBinocular Visual Acuity logMAR-0.037 logMARStandard Deviation 0.048
Secondary

Binocular Visual Acuity logMAR

Assessment of visual acuity (VA). Collected at 2 weeks for both study lens pairs. Binocular High Contrast Distance. logMAR (negative logMAR values indicates better Visual Acuity (VA)). 0.0 logMAR = 20/20 snellen chart

Time frame: 4 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon ABinocular Visual Acuity logMAR-0.052 logMARStandard Deviation 0.0063
Lotrafilcon BBinocular Visual Acuity logMAR-0.047 logMARStandard Deviation 0.058
Secondary

Centration

Assessment of lens centration. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. Biomicroscopy; by degree and direction in the primary position. (Rated as Optimal Centration or Not Optimal)

Time frame: Dispense

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon ACentrationOptimal Centration116 lenses
Comfilcon ACentrationNot Optimal Centration10 lenses
Lotrafilcon BCentrationOptimal Centration109 lenses
Lotrafilcon BCentrationNot Optimal Centration11 lenses
Secondary

Centration

Assessment of lens centration. Collected at 2 weeks. Biomicroscopy; by degree and direction in the primary position. Optimal versus not optimal

Time frame: 2 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon ACentrationOptimal Centration110 lenses
Comfilcon ACentrationNot Optimal Centration6 lenses
Lotrafilcon BCentrationOptimal Centration100 lenses
Lotrafilcon BCentrationNot Optimal Centration14 lenses
Secondary

Centration

Assessment of lens centration. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs.. Biomicroscopy, by degree and direction in the primary position. (Optimal Centration or Not Optimal)

Time frame: 4 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon ACentrationOptimal Centration100 lenses
Comfilcon ACentrationNot Optimal Centration10 lenses
Lotrafilcon BCentrationOptimal Centration106 lenses
Lotrafilcon BCentrationNot Optimal Centration8 lenses
Secondary

Corneal Coverage

Assessment of lens corneal coverage. Collected at 2 weeks for both study pairs. Biomicroscopy; assessed in primary gaze. (Rated as Normal Coverage or Not Covering)

Time frame: 2 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon ACorneal CoverageNormal Coverage116 lenses
Comfilcon ACorneal CoverageNot Covering0 lenses
Lotrafilcon BCorneal CoverageNot Covering1 lenses
Lotrafilcon BCorneal CoverageNormal Coverage113 lenses
Secondary

Corneal Coverage

Assessment of lens corneal coverage. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. Biomicroscopy; assessed in primary gaze. (Rated as Normal Coverage or Not Covering)

Time frame: Dispense

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon ACorneal CoverageNormal Coverage126 lenses
Comfilcon ACorneal CoverageNot Covering0 lenses
Lotrafilcon BCorneal CoverageNormal Coverage118 lenses
Lotrafilcon BCorneal CoverageNot Covering2 lenses
Secondary

Corneal Coverage

Assessment of lens corneal coverage. Collected at 4 weeks. (Biomicroscopy; assessed in primary gaze, Normal Coverage or Not Covering)

Time frame: 4 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon ACorneal CoverageNormal Coverage110 lenses
Comfilcon ACorneal CoverageNot Covering0 lenses
Lotrafilcon BCorneal CoverageNormal Coverage114 lenses
Lotrafilcon BCorneal CoverageNot Covering0 lenses
Secondary

Likelihood of Switching From Habitual Lens to Study Lens

Participant likelihood of switching from their habitual lens to the study lens. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=very likely, 2=likely, 3=unlikely, 4=very unlikely

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon ALikelihood of Switching From Habitual Lens to Study Lensvery likely10 participants
Comfilcon ALikelihood of Switching From Habitual Lens to Study Lenslikely22 participants
Comfilcon ALikelihood of Switching From Habitual Lens to Study Lensunlikely13 participants
Comfilcon ALikelihood of Switching From Habitual Lens to Study Lensvery unlikely11 participants
Lotrafilcon BLikelihood of Switching From Habitual Lens to Study Lensvery unlikely23 participants
Lotrafilcon BLikelihood of Switching From Habitual Lens to Study Lensvery likely9 participants
Lotrafilcon BLikelihood of Switching From Habitual Lens to Study Lensunlikely16 participants
Lotrafilcon BLikelihood of Switching From Habitual Lens to Study Lenslikely9 participants
Secondary

Likelihood to Continue Wearing the Study Lens

Participant likelihood of continuing wear of the study lense. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Very Likely, 2=Likely, 3=Unlikely, 4=Very Unlikely

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon ALikelihood to Continue Wearing the Study LensVery Likely13 participants
Comfilcon ALikelihood to Continue Wearing the Study LensLikely23 participants
Comfilcon ALikelihood to Continue Wearing the Study LensUnlikely10 participants
Comfilcon ALikelihood to Continue Wearing the Study LensVery Unlikely10 participants
Lotrafilcon BLikelihood to Continue Wearing the Study LensVery Unlikely19 participants
Lotrafilcon BLikelihood to Continue Wearing the Study LensVery Likely6 participants
Lotrafilcon BLikelihood to Continue Wearing the Study LensUnlikely19 participants
Lotrafilcon BLikelihood to Continue Wearing the Study LensLikely13 participants
Secondary

Overall Fit Acceptance

Assessment of overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. (0-4, 0=should not be worn, 1=borderline but unacceptable, 2=minimally acceptable, early review, 3=not perfect but okay to dispense, 4=perfect)

Time frame: Dispense

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon AOverall Fit Acceptance3.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.48
Lotrafilcon BOverall Fit Acceptance3.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
Secondary

Overall Fit Acceptance

Assessment of overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at 2 weeks for both study pairs. (0-4, 0=should not be worn, 1=borderline but unacceptable, 2=minimally acceptable, early review, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)

Time frame: 2 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon AOverall Fit AcceptanceGrade 00 lenses
Comfilcon AOverall Fit AcceptanceGrade 322 lenses
Comfilcon AOverall Fit AcceptanceGrade 20 lenses
Comfilcon AOverall Fit AcceptanceGrade 494 lenses
Comfilcon AOverall Fit AcceptanceGrade 10 lenses
Lotrafilcon BOverall Fit AcceptanceGrade 471 lenses
Lotrafilcon BOverall Fit AcceptanceGrade 00 lenses
Lotrafilcon BOverall Fit AcceptanceGrade 20 lenses
Lotrafilcon BOverall Fit AcceptanceGrade 341 lenses
Lotrafilcon BOverall Fit AcceptanceGrade 12 lenses
Secondary

Overall Fit Acceptance

Assessment of overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at 4 weeks. (0-4, 0=should not be worn, 1=borderline but unacceptable, 2=minimally acceptable, early review, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)

Time frame: 4 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon AOverall Fit AcceptanceGrade 487 lenses
Comfilcon AOverall Fit AcceptanceGrade 10 lenses
Comfilcon AOverall Fit AcceptanceGrade 00 lenses
Comfilcon AOverall Fit AcceptanceGrade 26 lenses
Comfilcon AOverall Fit AcceptanceGrade 317 lenses
Lotrafilcon BOverall Fit AcceptanceGrade 24 lenses
Lotrafilcon BOverall Fit AcceptanceGrade 336 lenses
Lotrafilcon BOverall Fit AcceptanceGrade 472 lenses
Lotrafilcon BOverall Fit AcceptanceGrade 00 lenses
Lotrafilcon BOverall Fit AcceptanceGrade 10 lenses
Secondary

Participant Likelihood of Recommendation of a Study Lens

Participant likelihood of recommending a study lens to friends. Collected at study exit. (1-4; 1=Very Unlikely, 2=Unlikely, 3=Likely, 4=Very Likely).

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon AParticipant Likelihood of Recommendation of a Study LensVery Unlikely6 participants
Comfilcon AParticipant Likelihood of Recommendation of a Study LensUnlikely6 participants
Comfilcon AParticipant Likelihood of Recommendation of a Study LensLikely19 participants
Comfilcon AParticipant Likelihood of Recommendation of a Study LensVery Likely22 participants
Lotrafilcon BParticipant Likelihood of Recommendation of a Study LensVery Likely14 participants
Lotrafilcon BParticipant Likelihood of Recommendation of a Study LensVery Unlikely12 participants
Lotrafilcon BParticipant Likelihood of Recommendation of a Study LensLikely16 participants
Lotrafilcon BParticipant Likelihood of Recommendation of a Study LensUnlikely11 participants
Secondary

Participant Recommendation of a Study Lens

Participant most likely recommendation of which study lens to friends, family or colleagues. Collected at study exit. (Forced Choice; Study Pair 1, Study Pair 2).

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon AParticipant Recommendation of a Study Lens31 participants
Lotrafilcon BParticipant Recommendation of a Study Lens22 participants
Secondary

Post Blink Movement

Assessment of post blink movement. Collected at dispense for both study lens pairs. Assessed immediately after the blink. (0-4, 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 1=Minimal, but acceptable movement, 2=Optimal movement, 3=Moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=Excessive, unacceptable movement)

Time frame: Dispense

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon APost Blink MovementMovement Grade 111 lenses
Comfilcon APost Blink MovementMovement Grade 311 lenses
Comfilcon APost Blink MovementMovement Grade 2104 lenses
Comfilcon APost Blink MovementMovement Grade 40 lenses
Comfilcon APost Blink MovementMovement Grade 00 lenses
Lotrafilcon BPost Blink MovementMovement Grade 40 lenses
Lotrafilcon BPost Blink MovementMovement Grade 00 lenses
Lotrafilcon BPost Blink MovementMovement Grade 113 lenses
Lotrafilcon BPost Blink MovementMovement Grade 292 lenses
Lotrafilcon BPost Blink MovementMovement Grade 315 lenses
Secondary

Post Blink Movement

Assessment of post blink movement. Collected at 2 weeks for both study lens pairs. Assessed immediately after the blink. (Graded 0-4, 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 1=Minimal, but acceptable movement, 2=Optimal movement, 3=Moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=Excessive, unacceptable movement)

Time frame: 2 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon APost Blink MovementMovement Grade 19 lenses
Comfilcon APost Blink MovementMovement Grade 00 lenses
Comfilcon APost Blink MovementMovement Grade 2107 lenses
Comfilcon APost Blink MovementMovement Grade 40 lenses
Comfilcon APost Blink MovementMovement Grade 30 lenses
Lotrafilcon BPost Blink MovementMovement Grade 41 lenses
Lotrafilcon BPost Blink MovementMovement Grade 312 lenses
Lotrafilcon BPost Blink MovementMovement Grade 00 lenses
Lotrafilcon BPost Blink MovementMovement Grade 118 lenses
Lotrafilcon BPost Blink MovementMovement Grade 283 lenses
Secondary

Post Blink Movement

Assessment of post blink movement. Collected at 4 weeks. Assessed immediately after the blink. (Graded 0-4, 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 1=Minimal, but acceptable movement, 2=Optimal movement, 3=Moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=Excessive, unacceptable movement)

Time frame: 4 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon APost Blink MovementMovement Grade 00 units on a scale
Comfilcon APost Blink MovementMovement Grade 18 units on a scale
Comfilcon APost Blink MovementMovement Grade 296 units on a scale
Comfilcon APost Blink MovementMovement Grade 36 units on a scale
Comfilcon APost Blink MovementMovement Grade 40 units on a scale
Lotrafilcon BPost Blink MovementMovement Grade 42 units on a scale
Lotrafilcon BPost Blink MovementMovement Grade 39 units on a scale
Lotrafilcon BPost Blink MovementMovement Grade 111 units on a scale
Lotrafilcon BPost Blink MovementMovement Grade 00 units on a scale
Lotrafilcon BPost Blink MovementMovement Grade 292 units on a scale
Secondary

Push Up Test

Assessment of lens tightness. Collected at 4 weeks. Digital push up test. (Continuous Scale 0-100%, 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support, 50%= Optimum, 100%= No movement)

Time frame: 4 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon APush Up Test51.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8
Lotrafilcon BPush Up Test52.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.46
Secondary

Push Up Test

Assessment of lens tightness. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. Digital push up test. Continuous Scale (0-100%, 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support, 50%= Optimum, 100%= No movement)

Time frame: Dispense

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon APush Up Test49.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.42
Lotrafilcon BPush Up Test48.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.34
Secondary

Push Up Test

Assessment of lens tightness. Collected at 2 weeks for both study pairs. Digital push up test. (Continuous Scale 0-100%, 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support, 50%= Optimum, 100%= No movement)

Time frame: 2 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon APush Up Test50.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.71
Lotrafilcon BPush Up Test51.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.66
Secondary

Rewetting Drops

Participant use of rewetting drops. Collected at 2 weeks for both study lens pairs. (Uses rewetting drops / Does not use rewetting drops).

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon ARewetting DropsUses50 participants
Comfilcon ARewetting DropsDoes Not Use8 participants
Lotrafilcon BRewetting DropsUses47 participants
Lotrafilcon BRewetting DropsDoes Not Use10 participants
Secondary

Surface Deposition

Assessment of surface deposition by slit lamp. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. (Grade 0-4 in ½ steps; Clean= 0; Deposited = 4)

Time frame: Dispense

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon ASurface Deposition0.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.46
Lotrafilcon BSurface Deposition0.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Surface Deposition

Assessment of surface deposition by slit lamp. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. (Grade 0-4 in 1/2 steps; 0=clean, 4=deposited)

Time frame: 4 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon ASurface Deposition0.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.18
Lotrafilcon BSurface Deposition1.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.65
Secondary

Surface Deposition

Assessment of surface deposition by slit lamp. Collected at 2 weeks for both study lens pairs. (Grade 0-4 in 1/2 steps; 0=clean, 4=deposited)

Time frame: 2 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon ASurface Deposition0.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
Lotrafilcon BSurface Deposition1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
Secondary

Surface Wetting

Assessment of surface wetting by slit lamp. Collected at 2 weeks for both study lens pairs. 0=Non-wettable surface, 1= \> 1 non-wetting area of some magnitude., 2=One non-wetting area of some magnitude, 3=Hazy surface that resolves with a blink. Typical soft lens appearance with long drying time., 4=Smooth uniformly reflective surface. Appearance of a healthy cornea (Grade 0-4 in ½ steps)

Time frame: 2 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon ASurface Wetting7.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
Lotrafilcon BSurface Wetting7.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.61
Secondary

Surface Wetting

Assessment of surface wetting by slit lamp. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 0=Non-wettable surface, 1= \> 1 non-wetting area of some magnitude., 2=One non-wetting area of some magnitude, 3=Hazy surface that resolves with a blink. Typical soft lens appearance with long drying time., 4=Smooth uniformly reflective surface. Appearance of a healthy cornea (Grade 0-4 in ½ steps)

Time frame: 4 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon ASurface Wetting7.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
Lotrafilcon BSurface Wetting6.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
Secondary

Surface Wetting

Assessment of surface wetting by slit lamp. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. 0=Non-wettable surface, 1= \> 1 non-wetting area of some magnitude., 2=One non-wetting area of some magnitude, 3=Hazy surface that resolves with a blink. Typical soft lens appearance with long drying time., 4=Smooth uniformly reflective surface. Appearance of a healthy cornea (Grade 0-4 in ½ steps)

Time frame: Dispense

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon ASurface Wetting7.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.45
Lotrafilcon BSurface Wetting7.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Other Pre-specified

The Number of Trials Needed to Achieve Final Dispensing Pair of Study Lenses.

The number of trials needed to achieve final dispensing pair of study lenses. Number of lenses required to dispense the final pair of study lenses. Collected at dispense for both study lens pairs. (Number required; 1, 2, 3, \>3)

Time frame: Dispense

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon AThe Number of Trials Needed to Achieve Final Dispensing Pair of Study Lenses.2.06 number of trial lensesStandard Deviation 0.3
Lotrafilcon BThe Number of Trials Needed to Achieve Final Dispensing Pair of Study Lenses.2.03 number of trial lensesStandard Deviation 0.18

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026