Skip to content

Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix as an Alternative to Free Gingival Grafting for Oral Soft Tissue Augmentation

A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate a Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix as an Alternative to Free Gingival Grafting for Oral Soft Tissue Augmentation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01952301
Enrollment
30
Registered
2013-09-27
Start date
2010-11-30
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2014-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival Diseases

Keywords

Autologous; Collagen Matrix; Keratinized Tissue

Brief summary

A split-mouth study comparing soft tissue augmentation results using free gingival graft (FGG) versus xenogeneic collagen matrix (CM) for the generation of keratinized tissue (KT) around teeth with insufficient (\< 2mm) KT.

Detailed description

A single-blind, randomized, controlled, split-mouth study of 30 subjects with insufficient zones of KT (\< 2mm). The study utilized a within subject treatment comparison design to establish non-inferiority of the test (CM) versus control (FGG) therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was KT width at 6-months. Secondary endpoints included traditional periodontal measures, such as clinical attachment, recession and bleeding on probing. Patient reported pain, discomfort and esthetic satisfaction were also recorded. Biopsies were obtained at 6-months.

Interventions

A type I and III porcine collagen matrix, as cleared by FDA (K012423)

DEVICEFree Gingival Graft

Autogenous, full-thickness soft tissue graft harvested from patient's palate.

Sponsors

Perio Health Professionals, PLLC
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least two non-adjacent teeth in contralateral quadrants of the same jaw with \< 2mm of KT that requires soft tissue grafting (1-4 teeth may be treated). In case of adjacent teeth requiring grafting, only one tooth at each site will act as test or control tooth, but all teeth will get the same treatment). The number of teeth treated must be the same on the test and control sites. * Root coverage is not desired at the time of grafting. * Females of childbearing potential must have a documented negative urine pregnancy test. * Read, understood and signed an institutional review board (IRB) approved Informed Consent Form (ICF). * Able and willing to follow study procedures and instructions. * Multi-rooted teeth may be treated but will not be included as study teeth

Exclusion criteria

* Vestibule depth of less than 7mm from base of recession, and/or teeth with Miller Grade 2 or higher mobility. * Any systemic conditions (i.e., diabetes mellitus, cancer, HIV, bone metabolic diseases) that could compromise wound healing and/ or preclude periodontal surgery; or who are currently receiving or have received within two months prior to study entry, systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents, radiation therapy, and/or chemotherapy which could compromise wound healing and preclude periodontal surgery. * Presence of acute infectious lesions in the areas intended for surgery. * History of any tobacco use within the last six months. * Taking intramuscular or intravenous bisphosphonates. * Known hypersensitivity to collagen products, and/or allergy to iodine or shellfish. * Participating in other clinical studies involving therapeutic intervention (either medical or dental). * Previously undergone a gingival grafting procedure on the test or control teeth or the teeth adjacent to the study site. * Female subjects who are pregnant or lactating, or who intend to become pregnant during the study duration following entrance into the study. * Subjects, who in the opinion of the investigator, for any reason other than those listed above, will not be able to complete the study per protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Keratinized Tissue Width6 monthsChange in Keratinized Tissue width

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Our study sample was derived from the population of patients who presented at our practice between 11-3-2010 and 3-16-2011 and met predetermined selection criteria

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix Versus Free Gingival Graft
free gingival graft versus a xenogeneic collagen matrix over an apically positioned flap used to generate keratinized tissue
30
Total30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicXenogeneic Collagen Matrix Versus Free Gingival Graft
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
30 Participants
Age, Continuous51.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 300 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Keratinized Tissue Width

Change in Keratinized Tissue width

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Sample size was determined using 80% power fans assuming a paired t-test of non-inferiority with a non-inferiority margin of 1.0 mm, a within-subject standard deviation of 1.0 mm, and a one-sided alpha of 0.05, resulting in a sample size of 27. To account for potential loss-to-follow-up, 30 subjects were enrolled in the trial.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Free Gingival GraftKeratinized Tissue Width4.42 mmStandard Deviation 0.64
Xenogeneic Collagen MatrixKeratinized Tissue Width2.92 mmStandard Deviation 0.88
p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026