Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Study of Adjuvanted Prophylactic Hepatitis B Vaccine

Phase 1 Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Study to Compare the Safety and Effectiveness of Hepatitis B Vaccines in Individuals With Renal Impairment, Diabetes Mellitus or Age Greater Than 40 Years

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01951677
Enrollment
240
Registered
2013-09-27
Start date
2013-07-31
Completion date
2019-05-31
Last updated
2019-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Exposure to Hepatitis B Virus

Keywords

hepatitis B virus, vaccine, adjuvant, prophylaxis

Brief summary

There is a need for more effective and better-tolerated hepatitis B vaccines for low responder high-risk populations including patients with renal impairment and/or diabetes mellitus and those aged over 40 years. Several approaches are available to enhance the potency of hepatitis B virus vaccines including use of the more highly immunogenic antigens, replacing alum with potentially more effective adjuvants, and increasing the dose of vaccine antigen. A combination of these strategies is being tested in this study to identify the most promising candidate approaches to take forward into advanced clinical development

Detailed description

Adjuvants are a critical ingredient in most vaccines and act by boosting the immune response to the target protein (e.g. hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)). Despite considerable research, aluminium hydroxide or phosphate compounds (collectively referred to as alum) remain the dominant adjuvants used in human hepatitis B virus vaccines. There is thus an unmet need for new HBV vaccine adjuvants, in particular, for adjuvants capable of boosting cell-mediated immunity (this is a particular type of immune response where killer T cells are activated that are then able to attack and destroy the infection) as alum, although good at stimulating antibodies is very poor at stimulating cell-mediated immunity. Alum, whilst generally accepted as safe, can be associated with significant local vaccine reactions and this is another reason why newer better-tolerated vaccine adjuvants would be beneficial. This study will compare a range of experimental adjuvant formulations to identify those that provide the safest and most effective enhancement of T- and B-cell immunity against hepatitis B

Interventions

DRUGHBsAg

Standard hepatitis B vaccine antigen

BIOLOGICALPreS HBsAg

preS hepatitis B surface antigen

BIOLOGICALAdvax-1(TM)

Adjuvant formulated with vaccine antigen

BIOLOGICALAdvax-2(TM)

Adjuvant formulated with vaccine antigen

BIOLOGICALAdvax-3(TM)

Adjuvant formulated with vaccine antigen

BIOLOGICALAlum

Adjuvant formulated with vaccine antigen

Sponsors

Flinders Medical Centre
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Vaxine Pty Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 years and above * Male or female * Able to provide written informed consent * Willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study. * Has one or more of * Age 40 years or above * Impaired renal function (creatinine \>120 mmol/L or calculated glomerular filtration rate \<60mls/min) * Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (any type)

Exclusion criteria

* History of prior hepatitis B vaccination * History of serious vaccine allergy if in the opinion of the Investigator this represents a contraindication to hepatitis B vaccination * Women of childbearing potential unless using a reliable and appropriate contraceptive method, specifically oral contraceptive pill, intrauterine device or mechanical barrier device. * Pregnant or lactating women. * History of systemic autoimmune disease including Wegener's granulomatosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Guillain-Barre, scleroderma or multiple sclerosis. * Participation in another clinical trial with an investigational agent within 28 days of the scheduled date of first immunization. * Any other serious medical, social or mental condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would be detrimental to the subjects or the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety12 monthsSafety as assessed by incidence of adverse events

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hepatitis B surface antibody geometric mean titerone-month post each immunization and 10 months post-final immunizationGeometric mean titer of HBsAg titers
T cell responses7 days and one month post each immunization and 10 months post-final immunizationHBsAg-specific T cell responses as measured by cytokine enzyme-linked immunospot and carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester T-cell proliferation assay will be compared between groups
Efficacyone month post each immunization and 10 months post final immunizationSeroconversion and seroprotection rates will be compared between groups using titers of antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen at each major time point

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026