Skip to content

GAPP 2 Survey: Global Attitudes of Patients and Physicians in Insulin Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

GAPP 2 Survey: Global Attitudes of Patients and Physicians in Insulin Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01950637
Enrollment
4000
Registered
2013-09-25
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2017-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

This study is conducted Asia, Europe and North America. The aim of this study is to describe insulin therapy adherence and the burden of non-adherence on patient functioning, well-being and diabetes management.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALNo treatment given

Completion of 90-item online questionnaire.

BEHAVIORALsurvey

Completion of 58-item online questionnarie.

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* PATIENTS WITH T2DM: * Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes by a healthcare professional * Currently being treated with insulin medication, excluding premix insulin treatment * Age at least 40 years * Diagnosed as having type 2 diabetes over the age of 40 * HCPs: * Primary care physician, diabetes specialist (diabetologist/endocrinologist) or diabetes specialist nurse/diabetes nurse educator * Have a minimum of 2 years experience within current speciality * See a minimum of 20 type 2 diabetes patients per month (40 for diabetes specialists), of which at least 10 per month must be on modern (analogue) inulins

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Basal insulin dosing irregularities: frequency of missed doses, mistimed doses, or reduced doses (patient questionnaire)In the past 30 days prior to the day when responding to the online questionnaire
Level of patient dosing irregularity: missed, mistimed and reduced dose (HCP questionnaire)Day 1 (when responding to the online questionnaire)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of intentional dosing irregularities and reasons for this behaviourDay 1 (when responding to the online questionnaire)
Impact of dosing irregularity on functional well-beingDay 1 (when responding to the online questionnaire)
Frequency of self-treated hypoglycaemiaIn the past 30 days prior to the day when responding to the online questionnaire

Countries

Canada, Denmark, Germany, Japan, United Kingdom, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026