Skip to content

Evaluate the Utility of Serum Hepcidin Levels to Predict Response to Oral or IV Iron

Evaluate the Utility of Serum Hepcidin Levels to Predict Response to Oral or IV Iron and Compare the Safety, Effect on QOL and Resource Utilization, of Injectafer® vs. IV Iron Standard of Care for the Treatment of IDA in an Infusion Center

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01950247
Enrollment
1025
Registered
2013-09-25
Start date
2013-08-15
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2025-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)

Brief summary

The main objective of this study is to compare the safety, effect on quality of life, and resource utilization of Injectafer vs. intravenous (IV) iron standard of care (SOC) for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in an infusion center setting. The study will also assess the ability of baseline serum hepcidin levels to predict if subjects will have a clinically meaningful hemoglobin response to oral iron therapy or to IV iron therapy.

Detailed description

The main objective of this study is to compare the safety, effect on quality of life, and resource utilization of Injectafer vs. intravenous (IV) iron standard of care (SOC) for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in an infusion center setting. The study will also assess the ability of baseline serum hepcidin levels to predict if subjects will have a clinically meaningful hemoglobin response to oral iron therapy for 28 days or to IV iron therapy.

Interventions

2 doses at 15 mg/kg for a maximum single dose of 750 mg given 7 days apart for a total of up to 1500 mg.

DRUGSOC

Sponsors

American Regent, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female subjects ≥ 18 years of age and able to give informed consent. * Iron deficiency is the primary etiology of anemia. * If using erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA), the subject must be using a dose consistent with package insert that has been stable for at least 30 days. * Doses of potential myelosuppressive medications have been stable for at least 30 days. * Females at risk of pregnancy must agree to use an acceptable form of birth control and have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test on the first day of dosing.

Exclusion criteria

* Hypersensitivity reaction to any component of Injectafer. * Requires dialysis for treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD). * No evidence of iron deficiency. * During the 10 day period prior to screening has been treated with intravenous iron. * During the 30 day period prior to screening has been treated with a red red blood cell transfusion. * Any non-viral infection. * Known positive hepatitis with evidence of active disease. * Received an investigational drug within 30 days of screening. * Alcohol or drug abuse within the past 6 months. * Hemochromatosis or other iron storage disorders. * Estimated life expectancy of less than 6 months, or for cancer patients, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status greater than 1. * Pregnant or actively trying to become pregnant (a definitive negative result on a serum or urine pregnancy test performed on the first day of dosing will be required for study enrollment by any women of childbearing potential). * Any other laboratory abnormality, medical condition or psychiatric disorders which in the opinion of the investigator would put the subject's disease management at risk or may result in the subject being unable to comply with study requirements.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) ScoresBaseline to Day 30The MAF scale has 16 items that measure the Global Fatigue Index (GFI), a composite score of Items 1 through 15. Items 1 through 14 were measured on a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 = not at all and 10 = a great deal. Items 15 and 16 had categorical responses: degree of agreement from 0 to 4, with 0=no days and 4=every day. Then, a Global Fatigue Index (GFI) is calculated by summing specific items and averaging others. The final GFI score ranges from 1 (no fatigue) to 50 (severe fatigue). The resulting score is given as the mean value.
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) ScoresBaseline and Day 30The WPAI consisted of six questions: 1 = currently employed; 2 = hours missed due to health problems; 3 = hours missed other reasons; 4 = hours actually worked; 5 = degree health affected productivity while working using a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 = PROBLEM had no effect on my work and 10 = PROBLEM completely prevented me from working; 6 = degree health affected productivity in regular unpaid activities using a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 = PROBLEM had no effect on my daily activities and 10 = PROBLEM completely prevented me from doing my daily activities. It yields 4 sub-scores: work time missed (absenteeism), impairment while working (presenteeism or reduced on-the-job effectiveness), overall work impairment (work productivity loss or absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment (daily activity impairment). These sub-scores are transformed to impairment percentages (range from 0 to 100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication Version 1.4 ScoresBaseline and Day 30Participants rated 14 items with 4 domains. Scores for item 1 to 3, 9 to 11 and 14 ranged from 1=extremely dissatisfied to 7=extremely satisfied. Items 5 to 8, 12, 13 ranged from 1=extremely dissatisfied to 5=not at all dissatisfied. Item 4 was scored as: 0=No, 1=Yes. Effectiveness measured as (\[{sum of item 1 to 3} - 3\]/18)\*100; if 1 question (Q) was missing: (\[{sum of item 1 to 3} -2\]/12)\*100. Side-effect measured as if item 4=No, score=100; if not then (\[{sum of item 5 to 8} -4\]/16)\*100; if 1 Q was missing: (\[{sum of item 5 to 8} -3\]/12)\*100. Convenience measured as (\[{sum of item 9 to 11} -3\]/18)\*100; if 1 Q was missing: (\[{sum of item 9 to 11} - 2\]/12)\*100. Global satisfaction as (\[{sum of item 12 to 14} -3\]/14)\*100; if item 12 or 13 was missing: (\[{sum of item 12 to 14} -2\]/10)\*100; if item 14 was missing: (\[{sum of item 12 and 13} -2\]/8)\*100. All domains had scale of 0 (no satisfaction) to 100 (best level of satisfaction), higher score equals greater satisfaction
Short Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.Baseline and Day 30The SF-12 is a multipurpose short form to measure health status. There are 10 domains: Physical Composite Index (score range from 0-100); Physical Functioning Index (score range from 0-100); Role Limitation Physical Index (score range 0-100); Pain Index Score (score range from 0-100); General Health Index (score range from 0-100); Mental Health Composite Index (score range from 1-100); Vitality Index (score range from 0-100); Social Functioning Index (score rang 0-100); Role Limitation Emotional Index (score range 0-100); and SF-12 Mental Health Index (score range from 0-100), the higher the score means a better outcome. The overall scale and sub-scales were calculated with the standard SF-12 formulas.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Injectafer
2 doses at 15 mg/kg for a maximum single dose of 750 mg given 7 days apart for a total of up to 1500 mg. Injectafer: 2 doses at 15 mg/kg for a maximum single dose of 750 mg given 7 days apart for a total of up to 1500 mg.
513
IV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)
At a dose and administration regimen as determined by the study site investigator SOC
512
Total1,025

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event32
Overall StudyDeath11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1816
Overall StudyNot Defined410
Overall StudyPhysician Decision34
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2813

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInjectaferIV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)Total
Age, Continuous57.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.58
55.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.68
56.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.64
Region of Enrollment
United States
513 Participants512 Participants1025 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
421 Participants409 Participants830 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
92 Participants103 Participants195 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 5131 / 512
other
Total, other adverse events
28 / 51321 / 512
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 5131 / 512

Outcome results

Primary

Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Scores

The MAF scale has 16 items that measure the Global Fatigue Index (GFI), a composite score of Items 1 through 15. Items 1 through 14 were measured on a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 = not at all and 10 = a great deal. Items 15 and 16 had categorical responses: degree of agreement from 0 to 4, with 0=no days and 4=every day. Then, a Global Fatigue Index (GFI) is calculated by summing specific items and averaging others. The final GFI score ranges from 1 (no fatigue) to 50 (severe fatigue). The resulting score is given as the mean value.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 30

Population: Change from baseline to Day 30

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InjectaferMultidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Scores-8.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.38
IV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Scores-8.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.28
Primary

Short Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.

The SF-12 is a multipurpose short form to measure health status. There are 10 domains: Physical Composite Index (score range from 0-100); Physical Functioning Index (score range from 0-100); Role Limitation Physical Index (score range 0-100); Pain Index Score (score range from 0-100); General Health Index (score range from 0-100); Mental Health Composite Index (score range from 1-100); Vitality Index (score range from 0-100); Social Functioning Index (score rang 0-100); Role Limitation Emotional Index (score range 0-100); and SF-12 Mental Health Index (score range from 0-100), the higher the score means a better outcome. The overall scale and sub-scales were calculated with the standard SF-12 formulas.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 30

Population: Change from Baseline to Day 30

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InjectaferShort Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.Overall Physical Health Score3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.94
InjectaferShort Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.Role Limitation Physical4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.53
InjectaferShort Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.General Health3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.86
InjectaferShort Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.Vitality7.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.36
InjectaferShort Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.Pain1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.03
InjectaferShort Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.Social Functioning3.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.19
InjectaferShort Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.Overall Mental Health Score3.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.31
InjectaferShort Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.Role Limitation Emotion2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.69
InjectaferShort Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.Mental Health2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
InjectaferShort Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.Physical Functioning3.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.42
IV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)Short Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.Mental Health3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.62
IV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)Short Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.General Health2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.84
IV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)Short Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.Pain2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.52
IV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)Short Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.Overall Physical Health Score3.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.33
IV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)Short Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.Overall Mental Health Score3.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.39
IV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)Short Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.Physical Functioning3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.45
IV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)Short Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.Vitality7.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.53
IV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)Short Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.Social Functioning3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.47
IV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)Short Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.Role Limitation Emotion2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.62
IV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)Short Form Health Survey, 12-Item (SF-12) v2 Quality of Life Scores.Role Limitation Physical3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.25
Primary

Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication Version 1.4 Scores

Participants rated 14 items with 4 domains. Scores for item 1 to 3, 9 to 11 and 14 ranged from 1=extremely dissatisfied to 7=extremely satisfied. Items 5 to 8, 12, 13 ranged from 1=extremely dissatisfied to 5=not at all dissatisfied. Item 4 was scored as: 0=No, 1=Yes. Effectiveness measured as (\[{sum of item 1 to 3} - 3\]/18)\*100; if 1 question (Q) was missing: (\[{sum of item 1 to 3} -2\]/12)\*100. Side-effect measured as if item 4=No, score=100; if not then (\[{sum of item 5 to 8} -4\]/16)\*100; if 1 Q was missing: (\[{sum of item 5 to 8} -3\]/12)\*100. Convenience measured as (\[{sum of item 9 to 11} -3\]/18)\*100; if 1 Q was missing: (\[{sum of item 9 to 11} - 2\]/12)\*100. Global satisfaction as (\[{sum of item 12 to 14} -3\]/14)\*100; if item 12 or 13 was missing: (\[{sum of item 12 to 14} -2\]/10)\*100; if item 14 was missing: (\[{sum of item 12 and 13} -2\]/8)\*100. All domains had scale of 0 (no satisfaction) to 100 (best level of satisfaction), higher score equals greater satisfaction

Time frame: Baseline and Day 30

Population: Change from baseline to Day 30

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InjectaferTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication Version 1.4 ScoresSide Effects63.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.21
InjectaferTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication Version 1.4 ScoresOverall Satisfaction72.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.03
InjectaferTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication Version 1.4 ScoresConvenience78.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.31
InjectaferTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication Version 1.4 ScoresEffectiveness69.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.38
IV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication Version 1.4 ScoresConvenience72.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
IV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication Version 1.4 ScoresOverall Satisfaction72.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.07
IV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication Version 1.4 ScoresSide Effects69.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
IV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication Version 1.4 ScoresEffectiveness66.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.75
Primary

Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) Scores

The WPAI consisted of six questions: 1 = currently employed; 2 = hours missed due to health problems; 3 = hours missed other reasons; 4 = hours actually worked; 5 = degree health affected productivity while working using a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 = PROBLEM had no effect on my work and 10 = PROBLEM completely prevented me from working; 6 = degree health affected productivity in regular unpaid activities using a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 = PROBLEM had no effect on my daily activities and 10 = PROBLEM completely prevented me from doing my daily activities. It yields 4 sub-scores: work time missed (absenteeism), impairment while working (presenteeism or reduced on-the-job effectiveness), overall work impairment (work productivity loss or absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment (daily activity impairment). These sub-scores are transformed to impairment percentages (range from 0 to 100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 30

Population: Change from baseline to Day 30

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InjectaferWork Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) ScoresPercent impairment while working due to problem-13.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.75
InjectaferWork Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) ScoresPercent overall work impairment due to problem-13.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.66
InjectaferWork Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) ScoresPercent work time missed due to problem-3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.76
InjectaferWork Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) ScoresPercent activity impairment due to problem-15.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.85
IV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) ScoresPercent work time missed due to problem-2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.23
IV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) ScoresPercent overall work impairment due to problem-8.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.89
IV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) ScoresPercent activity impairment due to problem-11.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.43
IV Iron Standard of Care (SOC)Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) ScoresPercent impairment while working due to problem-8.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.44

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026