Skip to content

Haloperidol and Lorazepam for Delirium in Patients With Advanced Cancer

A Preliminary Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Haloperidol and Lorazepam for Delirium in Patients With Advanced Cancer Admitted to a Palliative Care Unit

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01949662
Enrollment
93
Registered
2013-09-24
Start date
2014-01-01
Completion date
2028-01-01
Last updated
2026-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Cancers

Keywords

Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Delirium, Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm, Locally Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Neurotoxicity Syndrome, Questionnaires, Surveys, Acute palliative care unit

Brief summary

This randomized phase II trial studies how well haloperidol with or without lorazepam works in reducing confusion, disorientation, and inability to think or remember clearly (delirium) in patients with cancer that has spread to other places in the body and usually cannot be cured or controlled with treatment. Palliative therapy with haloperidol and lorazepam may reduce symptoms of delirium and help patients with advanced cancer live more comfortably. It is not yet known whether lorazepam may be an effective treatment for delirium when given with haloperidol.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the effect of single dose lorazepam and placebo as an adjuvant to haloperidol on the intensity of agitation (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale) over 8 hours. II. To assess the within-arm effect of single-dose lorazepam or placebo, as an adjuvant agent with haloperidol, on agitation intensity (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale) over 8 hours in patients admitted to an acute palliative care unit. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the effect of single dose lorazepam and placebo as an adjuvant to haloperidol on (1) delirium related distress in nurses and caregivers, (2) delirium duration, (3) need for rescue doses of neuroleptics, (4) delirium recall, (5) symptom expression (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale), (6) communicative capacity, (7) adverse effects, (8) discharge outcomes, and (9) survival in cancer patients. II. To evaluate proportion of patients who consent and are randomized to study however drop out before being treated or before finishing 8-hour Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) assessment; and the reasons of drop-outs will be documented and reported. III. To explore the changes in biomarker levels in saliva samples (salivary cortisol, cholinesterase, C-reactive protein, interleukin-1 beta, -6, and -10) over time and in association with delirium severity. IV. To examine the inter-rater reliability of RASS in the Acute Palliative Care Unit (APCU) setting between the bedside nurse and the research nurse at the time of study enrollment. V. To conduct exploratory analyses on RASS as an outcome. VI. To examine the association among rescue medication use, RASS and perceived comfort by the nurses and caregivers. VII. To examine the proportion of patients enrolled onto the delirium trial who achieved control of agitation and did not require the randomized study medication. VIII. To identify patient factors associated with control of agitated delirium. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive lorazepam intravenously (IV) over 1-2 minutes and haloperidol IV every 6 hours or every 1 hour if needed. ARM II: Patients receive placebo IV over 1-2 minutes and haloperidol IV every 6 hours or every 1 hour if needed.

Interventions

DRUGLorazepam

3 mg by vein one time only.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo consisting of preservative free 0.9% normal saline given one time by vein.

8 mg/day by vein.

BEHAVIORALQuestionnaires

Questionnaire completion at baseline, and every day while participant is in the palliative care unit. These questions will take about 20 minutes to complete.

Sponsors

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* PATIENTS: * Diagnosis of advanced cancer (defined as locally advanced, metastatic, recurrent, or incurable disease) * Admitted to Acute Palliative Care Unit (APCU) * Delirium as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV- TR) criteria * Hyperactive/mixed delirium with RASS \>= 2 in the last 24 hours * On scheduled haloperidol of =\< 8 mg in the last 24 hours * Legally authorized representative consent * FAMILY CAREGIVERS: * Patient's spouse, adult child, sibling, parent, other relative, or significant other (defined by the patient as a partner) * Age 18 or older * At the patient's bedside at least 4 hours each day during patient delirium episode * Patients and family caregivers able to communicate in English or Spanish

Exclusion criteria

* PATIENTS * History of myasthenia gravis or acute narrow angle glaucoma * History of neuroleptic malignant syndrome * History of Parkinson's disease or dementia * Uncontrolled seizure disorder * History of hypersensitivity to haloperidol or benzodiazepine * On regular doses of benzodiazepine or chlorpromazine within the past 48 hours * Previously documented and persistent corrected QT (QTc) prolongation (\> 500 ms) * Heart failure exacerbation at the time of enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score (Baseline to 8 hr), PointsBaseline to 8 hoursThe primary outcome was change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score from baseline to 8 hours after treatment administration. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score ranged from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (very agitated) , where 0 denotes a calm and alert patient.
Absolute Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score at 8 Hour, Points8 hoursAbsolute score of Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale at 8 hr, points. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score ranged from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (very agitated) , where 0 denotes a calm and alert patient.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score From Baseline to 30 MinBaseline to 30 minutesChange in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score from baseline to 30 min. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score ranged from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (very agitated) , where 0 denotes a calm and alert patient.
Number of Participants With Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score >=1 Within 8 hrBaseline to 8 hoursNumber of participants with Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score \>=1 within 8 hr. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score ranged from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (very agitated) , where 0 denotes a calm and alert patient.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDavid Hui, MD

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were recruited between 1/2014 and 6/2016 from MD Anderson Cancer Center with active cancer diagnosis, having age \>=18, with Delirium with Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score of \>=2 and receiving scheduled Haloperidol 1-8 mg/day.

Pre-assignment details

3 patients were excluded before randomization. 1 died and 2 were ineligible.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention Group (Lorazepam & Haloperidol)
Received single dose of Lorazepam (3 mg IV, once) and Haloperidol (2mg IV, once)
29
Control Group (Placebo & Haloperidol)
Received single dose of Haloperidol (2mg IV, once)
29
Total58

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl Group (Placebo & Haloperidol)TotalIntervention Group (Lorazepam & Haloperidol)
Age, Continuous64 Years65 Years66 Years
Cancer Stage
Locally advanced
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Cancer Stage
Metastatic Cancer
26 Participants46 Participants20 Participants
Cancer Stage
Recurrent or Persistent
3 Participants11 Participants8 Participants
Cancer Type
Breast
5 Participants5 Participants0 Participants
Cancer Type
GastroIntestinal Cancer
4 Participants13 Participants9 Participants
Cancer Type
Genitourinary
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Cancer Type
Gynecological
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Cancer Type
Head and neck
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Cancer Type
Hematological Cancer
2 Participants10 Participants8 Participants
Cancer Type
Other
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
Cancer Type
Respiratory Cancer
10 Participants14 Participants4 Participants
Education
College
6 Participants17 Participants11 Participants
Education
Completed College
14 Participants24 Participants10 Participants
Education
High School or less
8 Participants15 Participants7 Participants
Education
Not Available
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants56 Participants27 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Karnofsky performance status
10%
5 Participants12 Participants7 Participants
Karnofsky performance status
20%
12 Participants27 Participants15 Participants
Karnofsky performance status
30%
10 Participants14 Participants4 Participants
Karnofsky performance status
40%
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
23 Participants46 Participants23 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
29 Participants58 Participants29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants27 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants31 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
10 / 4710 / 43
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 294 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Absolute Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score at 8 Hour, Points

Absolute score of Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale at 8 hr, points. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score ranged from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (very agitated) , where 0 denotes a calm and alert patient.

Time frame: 8 hours

Population: Intent to treat 58 participants, a total of 29 for each arm; 3 participants were lost to follow up from each arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Intervention Group (Lorazepam & Haloperidol)Absolute Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score at 8 Hour, Points-2.5 score on a scale
Control Group (Placebo & Haloperidol)Absolute Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score at 8 Hour, Points-0.7 score on a scale
Primary

Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score (Baseline to 8 hr), Points

The primary outcome was change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score from baseline to 8 hours after treatment administration. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score ranged from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (very agitated) , where 0 denotes a calm and alert patient.

Time frame: Baseline to 8 hours

Population: Intent to treat 58 participants, a total of 29 for each arm; 3 participants were lost to follow up from each arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Intervention Group (Lorazepam & Haloperidol)Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score (Baseline to 8 hr), Points-4.1 score on a scale
Control Group (Placebo & Haloperidol)Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score (Baseline to 8 hr), Points-2.3 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score From Baseline to 30 Min

Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score from baseline to 30 min. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score ranged from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (very agitated) , where 0 denotes a calm and alert patient.

Time frame: Baseline to 30 minutes

Population: Intent to treat 58 participants, a total of 29 for each arm

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Intervention Group (Lorazepam & Haloperidol)Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score From Baseline to 30 Min-3.6 score on a scale
Control Group (Placebo & Haloperidol)Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score From Baseline to 30 Min-1.6 score on a scale
Secondary

Number of Participants With Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score >=1 Within 8 hr

Number of participants with Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score \>=1 within 8 hr. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score ranged from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (very agitated) , where 0 denotes a calm and alert patient.

Time frame: Baseline to 8 hours

Population: Intent to treat 58 participants, a total of 29 from each arm

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Intervention Group (Lorazepam & Haloperidol)Number of Participants With Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score >=1 Within 8 hr8 Participants
Control Group (Placebo & Haloperidol)Number of Participants With Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score >=1 Within 8 hr22 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 18, 2026