Advanced Cancers
Conditions
Keywords
Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Delirium, Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm, Locally Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Neurotoxicity Syndrome, Questionnaires, Surveys, Acute palliative care unit
Brief summary
This randomized phase II trial studies how well haloperidol with or without lorazepam works in reducing confusion, disorientation, and inability to think or remember clearly (delirium) in patients with cancer that has spread to other places in the body and usually cannot be cured or controlled with treatment. Palliative therapy with haloperidol and lorazepam may reduce symptoms of delirium and help patients with advanced cancer live more comfortably. It is not yet known whether lorazepam may be an effective treatment for delirium when given with haloperidol.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the effect of single dose lorazepam and placebo as an adjuvant to haloperidol on the intensity of agitation (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale) over 8 hours. II. To assess the within-arm effect of single-dose lorazepam or placebo, as an adjuvant agent with haloperidol, on agitation intensity (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale) over 8 hours in patients admitted to an acute palliative care unit. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the effect of single dose lorazepam and placebo as an adjuvant to haloperidol on (1) delirium related distress in nurses and caregivers, (2) delirium duration, (3) need for rescue doses of neuroleptics, (4) delirium recall, (5) symptom expression (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale), (6) communicative capacity, (7) adverse effects, (8) discharge outcomes, and (9) survival in cancer patients. II. To evaluate proportion of patients who consent and are randomized to study however drop out before being treated or before finishing 8-hour Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) assessment; and the reasons of drop-outs will be documented and reported. III. To explore the changes in biomarker levels in saliva samples (salivary cortisol, cholinesterase, C-reactive protein, interleukin-1 beta, -6, and -10) over time and in association with delirium severity. IV. To examine the inter-rater reliability of RASS in the Acute Palliative Care Unit (APCU) setting between the bedside nurse and the research nurse at the time of study enrollment. V. To conduct exploratory analyses on RASS as an outcome. VI. To examine the association among rescue medication use, RASS and perceived comfort by the nurses and caregivers. VII. To examine the proportion of patients enrolled onto the delirium trial who achieved control of agitation and did not require the randomized study medication. VIII. To identify patient factors associated with control of agitated delirium. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive lorazepam intravenously (IV) over 1-2 minutes and haloperidol IV every 6 hours or every 1 hour if needed. ARM II: Patients receive placebo IV over 1-2 minutes and haloperidol IV every 6 hours or every 1 hour if needed.
Interventions
3 mg by vein one time only.
Placebo consisting of preservative free 0.9% normal saline given one time by vein.
8 mg/day by vein.
Questionnaire completion at baseline, and every day while participant is in the palliative care unit. These questions will take about 20 minutes to complete.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* PATIENTS: * Diagnosis of advanced cancer (defined as locally advanced, metastatic, recurrent, or incurable disease) * Admitted to Acute Palliative Care Unit (APCU) * Delirium as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV- TR) criteria * Hyperactive/mixed delirium with RASS \>= 2 in the last 24 hours * On scheduled haloperidol of =\< 8 mg in the last 24 hours * Legally authorized representative consent * FAMILY CAREGIVERS: * Patient's spouse, adult child, sibling, parent, other relative, or significant other (defined by the patient as a partner) * Age 18 or older * At the patient's bedside at least 4 hours each day during patient delirium episode * Patients and family caregivers able to communicate in English or Spanish
Exclusion criteria
* PATIENTS * History of myasthenia gravis or acute narrow angle glaucoma * History of neuroleptic malignant syndrome * History of Parkinson's disease or dementia * Uncontrolled seizure disorder * History of hypersensitivity to haloperidol or benzodiazepine * On regular doses of benzodiazepine or chlorpromazine within the past 48 hours * Previously documented and persistent corrected QT (QTc) prolongation (\> 500 ms) * Heart failure exacerbation at the time of enrollment
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score (Baseline to 8 hr), Points | Baseline to 8 hours | The primary outcome was change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score from baseline to 8 hours after treatment administration. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score ranged from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (very agitated) , where 0 denotes a calm and alert patient. |
| Absolute Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score at 8 Hour, Points | 8 hours | Absolute score of Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale at 8 hr, points. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score ranged from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (very agitated) , where 0 denotes a calm and alert patient. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score From Baseline to 30 Min | Baseline to 30 minutes | Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score from baseline to 30 min. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score ranged from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (very agitated) , where 0 denotes a calm and alert patient. |
| Number of Participants With Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score >=1 Within 8 hr | Baseline to 8 hours | Number of participants with Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score \>=1 within 8 hr. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score ranged from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (very agitated) , where 0 denotes a calm and alert patient. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Patients were recruited between 1/2014 and 6/2016 from MD Anderson Cancer Center with active cancer diagnosis, having age \>=18, with Delirium with Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score of \>=2 and receiving scheduled Haloperidol 1-8 mg/day.
Pre-assignment details
3 patients were excluded before randomization. 1 died and 2 were ineligible.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Intervention Group (Lorazepam & Haloperidol) Received single dose of Lorazepam (3 mg IV, once) and Haloperidol (2mg IV, once) | 29 |
| Control Group (Placebo & Haloperidol) Received single dose of Haloperidol (2mg IV, once) | 29 |
| Total | 58 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Control Group (Placebo & Haloperidol) | Total | Intervention Group (Lorazepam & Haloperidol) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 64 Years | 65 Years | 66 Years |
| Cancer Stage Locally advanced | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Cancer Stage Metastatic Cancer | 26 Participants | 46 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Cancer Stage Recurrent or Persistent | 3 Participants | 11 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Cancer Type Breast | 5 Participants | 5 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Cancer Type GastroIntestinal Cancer | 4 Participants | 13 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Cancer Type Genitourinary | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Cancer Type Gynecological | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Cancer Type Head and neck | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Cancer Type Hematological Cancer | 2 Participants | 10 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Cancer Type Other | 4 Participants | 8 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Cancer Type Respiratory Cancer | 10 Participants | 14 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Education College | 6 Participants | 17 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Education Completed College | 14 Participants | 24 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Education High School or less | 8 Participants | 15 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Education Not Available | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 29 Participants | 56 Participants | 27 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Karnofsky performance status 10% | 5 Participants | 12 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Karnofsky performance status 20% | 12 Participants | 27 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Karnofsky performance status 30% | 10 Participants | 14 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Karnofsky performance status 40% | 2 Participants | 5 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 4 Participants | 8 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 23 Participants | 46 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 29 Participants | 58 Participants | 29 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 16 Participants | 27 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 13 Participants | 31 Participants | 18 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 10 / 47 | 10 / 43 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 3 / 29 | 4 / 29 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 29 | 0 / 29 |
Outcome results
Absolute Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score at 8 Hour, Points
Absolute score of Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale at 8 hr, points. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score ranged from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (very agitated) , where 0 denotes a calm and alert patient.
Time frame: 8 hours
Population: Intent to treat 58 participants, a total of 29 for each arm; 3 participants were lost to follow up from each arm.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group (Lorazepam & Haloperidol) | Absolute Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score at 8 Hour, Points | -2.5 score on a scale |
| Control Group (Placebo & Haloperidol) | Absolute Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score at 8 Hour, Points | -0.7 score on a scale |
Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score (Baseline to 8 hr), Points
The primary outcome was change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score from baseline to 8 hours after treatment administration. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score ranged from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (very agitated) , where 0 denotes a calm and alert patient.
Time frame: Baseline to 8 hours
Population: Intent to treat 58 participants, a total of 29 for each arm; 3 participants were lost to follow up from each arm.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group (Lorazepam & Haloperidol) | Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score (Baseline to 8 hr), Points | -4.1 score on a scale |
| Control Group (Placebo & Haloperidol) | Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score (Baseline to 8 hr), Points | -2.3 score on a scale |
Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score From Baseline to 30 Min
Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score from baseline to 30 min. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score ranged from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (very agitated) , where 0 denotes a calm and alert patient.
Time frame: Baseline to 30 minutes
Population: Intent to treat 58 participants, a total of 29 for each arm
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group (Lorazepam & Haloperidol) | Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score From Baseline to 30 Min | -3.6 score on a scale |
| Control Group (Placebo & Haloperidol) | Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score From Baseline to 30 Min | -1.6 score on a scale |
Number of Participants With Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score >=1 Within 8 hr
Number of participants with Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score \>=1 within 8 hr. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score ranged from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (very agitated) , where 0 denotes a calm and alert patient.
Time frame: Baseline to 8 hours
Population: Intent to treat 58 participants, a total of 29 from each arm
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group (Lorazepam & Haloperidol) | Number of Participants With Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score >=1 Within 8 hr | 8 Participants |
| Control Group (Placebo & Haloperidol) | Number of Participants With Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score >=1 Within 8 hr | 22 Participants |