Skip to content

Dissonance Eating Disorder Prevention: Clinician Led, Peer Led vs Web Delivered

Dissonance Eating Disorder Prevention: Clinician Led, Peer Led vs Web Delivered (Formerly: Effectiveness Trial of Peer-Led Dissonance Eating Disorder Prevention Groups)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01949649
Enrollment
680
Registered
2013-09-24
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2019-03-31
Last updated
2019-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eating Disorder Prevention

Keywords

body image, body dissatisfaction

Brief summary

Five percent of young women meet criteria for anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or binge eating disorder, with another 5% meeting criteria for Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (ED-NOS), which includes subthreshold variants of these disorders. Over half of those presenting for eating disorder treatment meet criteria for ED-NOS and both threshold cases and ED-NOS are marked by chronicity, relapse, distress, functional impairment, and increased risk for future obesity, depression, suicide attempts, anxiety disorders, substance abuse, morbidity, and mortality. Anorexia and bulimia nervosa show stronger relations to suicide attempts, outpatient/inpatient treatment, and functional impairment than most other psychiatric disorders. Treatment of eating disorders is very expensive, similar to the cost for schizophrenia treatment, and is effective for only 40-60% of patients. Thus, a public health priority is to develop and disseminate effective eating disorder prevention programs.

Detailed description

Although dozens of eating disorder prevention programs have been evaluated, only a dissonance-based program (the Body Project) has significantly reduced future onset of threshold and subthreshold eating disorders through long-term follow-up. An effectiveness trial found that the Body Project produced significant reductions in risk factors, eating disorder symptoms, and functional impairment relative to educational brochure controls, with some effects persisting through 3-yr follow-up when high school clinicians recruited students and delivered the program. These trials confirm the efficacy and effectiveness of the Body Project, but revealed a key dissemination barrier; it can be difficult to identify and recruit clinicians at high schools and colleges with the time and expertise to competently deliver the program. One solution to this key dissemination barrier is to train students in established peer leader programs at colleges to recruit high-risk students and deliver the program. Another solution to this dissemination barrier would be to deliver the Body Project via the Internet. Because peer-led groups and Internet delivery of the Body Project could markedly extend the reach and sustainability of this evidence-based program, we propose to conduct the first large multi-site effectiveness trial that directly compares the effects and cost effectiveness of peer-led Body Project groups, the eBody Project intervention, and clinician-led Body Project groups to an educational video control condition.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPeer-Led Group Intervention
BEHAVIORALInternet-Based Intervention
BEHAVIORALClinician-Led Group Intervention
BEHAVIORALEducation Video

Sponsors

Oregon Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
17 Years to 22 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Body image concerns * Attend University of Oregon, Oregon State University, University of Texas at Austin, or Southwestern University

Exclusion criteria

* Meeting criteria for anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or binge eating disorder * Suicidal ideation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change over time: Eating disorder diagnostic interviewbaseline obtained on intake, 1 month post intervention and at 6mo, 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-upsParticipants will complete an interview assessing Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) eating disorder symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change over time: Thin-ideal internalizationbaseline obtained on intake, 1 month post intervention and 6mo-, 1-, 2-, & 3-year followupsThin-ideal internalization will be assessed with the 8-item Ideal-Body Stereotype Scale-Revised. Participants respond using a 5-point response format.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change over time: Body Dissatisfactionbaseline obtained on intake, 1 month post intervention and at 6mo, 1-, 2- & 3-yr followupsBody dissatisfaction will be assessed with the Body Dissatisfaction Scale. Respondents rate their level of satisfaction with 9 body parts on 6-point scales.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026