Skip to content

OTO-201 for the Treatment of Middle Ear Effusion in Pediatric Subjects Requiring Tympanostomy Tube Placement

Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Multicenter, P3 Study of OTO-201 Given as a Single IT Injection For Intra-Operative Treatment of Middle Ear Effusion in Pediatric Subjects Requiring Tympanostomy Tube Placement

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01949155
Enrollment
266
Registered
2013-09-24
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2016-11-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Otitis Media With Effusion

Keywords

otitis media, otorrhea, middle ear effusion, tympanostomy tubes

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to confirm the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of OTO-201 in the treatment of pediatric subjects with bilateral middle ear effusion who require tympanostomy tube placement.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicenter, Phase 3 study of OTO-201 administered intraoperatively in pediatric subjects with bilateral middle ear effusion requiring TT (tympanostomy tube) placement. One dose level (6 mg) of OTO-201 was evaluated relative to sham (empty syringe). Study subjects are required to have a clinical diagnosis of bilateral middle ear effusion requiring TT placement. On the day of surgery, prior to surgery, eligible subjects were examined via otoscope to confirm bilateral middle ear effusion. Subjects with bilateral middle ear effusion were randomized to either 6 mg OTO-201 or sham. Subjects without bilateral effusion on the day of surgery were not randomized and were considered screen failures. Approximately 264 subjects are planned to be randomized to OTO-201 or sham using a 2:1 allocation ratio. Randomization to OTO-201 or sham was stratified by age: 6 months to 2 years or \>2 years. Subjects are to visit the study site for safety assessments and otoscopic examination on Days 4, 8, 15, and 29. The assessment of otorrhea by the blinded assessor for the primary efficacy endpoint occurred on Days 4, 8, and 15.

Interventions

Single, intratympanic injection

DRUGSham

Simulated single, intratympanic injection

Sponsors

Otonomy, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

includes, but is not limited to: * Subject is a male or female aged 6 months to 17 years, inclusive * Subject has a clinical diagnosis of bilateral middle ear effusion requiring tympanostomy tube placement * Subject's caregiver is willing to comply with the protocol and attend all study visits

Exclusion criteria

includes, but is not limited to: * Subject has a history of prior ear or mastoid surgery, not including myringotomy or myringotomy with tympanostomy tube placement * Subject has a history of sensorineural hearing loss * Subject has a history of chronic or recurrent bacterial infections other than otitis media that likely will require treatment with antibiotics during the course of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Were Treatment Failures.Day 15 - 2 weeks after dosingCumulative proportion of treatment failures: The efficacy endpoint for both trials was the cumulative proportion of study treatment failures through Day 15, defined as the occurrence of any of the following events: otorrhea as determined by a blinded assessor on or after 3 days post-surgery, otic or systemic antibacterial drug use for any reason any time post-surgery, as well as patients who missed visits or were lost-to-follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of Adverse Events, Otoscopic Exams, Audiometry and TympanometryUp to one monthSafety variables included the frequency of adverse events (AEs) and results from otoscopic examinations, tympanometry, audiometry measurements.
Microbiological ResponseDay 15 - 2 weeks after dosingSubjects whose samples tested positive for bacteria in either or both ears at baseline with documented eradication or presumed eradication post-baseline.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from 19 centers, 18 in the United States and 1 in Canada

Pre-assignment details

Reporting group = all randomized participants (n=266). Safety analysis set = all subjects who receive study drug or sham and analyzed according to what they received. Full analysis set = all randomized subjects and analyzed according to randomized treatment regardless of the actual treatment received.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
OTO-201
OTO-201: Single, intratympanic injection: One injection of 6 mg OTO-201 (ciprofloxacin in poloxamer 407) into each ear during surgery.
178
Sham
Sham: Simulated single, intratympanic injection: One sham injection into each ear during surgery.
88
Total266

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOTO-201ShamTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
178 Participants88 Participants266 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous2.279 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.901
2.863 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5942
2.472 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1677
Sex: Female, Male
Female
82 Participants40 Participants122 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
96 Participants48 Participants144 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
75 / 17840 / 87
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1780 / 87

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Were Treatment Failures.

Cumulative proportion of treatment failures: The efficacy endpoint for both trials was the cumulative proportion of study treatment failures through Day 15, defined as the occurrence of any of the following events: otorrhea as determined by a blinded assessor on or after 3 days post-surgery, otic or systemic antibacterial drug use for any reason any time post-surgery, as well as patients who missed visits or were lost-to-follow-up.

Time frame: Day 15 - 2 weeks after dosing

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OTO-201Percentage of Participants Who Were Treatment Failures.21.3 percentage of treatment failures
ShamPercentage of Participants Who Were Treatment Failures.45.5 percentage of treatment failures
Secondary

Evaluation of Adverse Events, Otoscopic Exams, Audiometry and Tympanometry

Safety variables included the frequency of adverse events (AEs) and results from otoscopic examinations, tympanometry, audiometry measurements.

Time frame: Up to one month

Population: Safety Analysis Set (number of ears is equivalent to number of participants)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OTO-201Evaluation of Adverse Events, Otoscopic Exams, Audiometry and TympanometryOtoscopic abnormal exams @ day 29-left ear1.7 percentage of ears
OTO-201Evaluation of Adverse Events, Otoscopic Exams, Audiometry and TympanometryOtoscopic abnormal exams @ day 29-right ear1.7 percentage of ears
OTO-201Evaluation of Adverse Events, Otoscopic Exams, Audiometry and TympanometryAudiometry Patent tubes @ day 29 left ear96.0 percentage of ears
OTO-201Evaluation of Adverse Events, Otoscopic Exams, Audiometry and TympanometryAudiometry Patent tubes @ day 29 right ear96.0 percentage of ears
OTO-201Evaluation of Adverse Events, Otoscopic Exams, Audiometry and TympanometryTympanometry Category of B (large) day 29 left ear87.9 percentage of ears
OTO-201Evaluation of Adverse Events, Otoscopic Exams, Audiometry and TympanometryTympanometry Category of B (large)day 29 right ear88.2 percentage of ears
ShamEvaluation of Adverse Events, Otoscopic Exams, Audiometry and TympanometryTympanometry Category of B (large) day 29 left ear87.1 percentage of ears
ShamEvaluation of Adverse Events, Otoscopic Exams, Audiometry and TympanometryOtoscopic abnormal exams @ day 29-left ear2.4 percentage of ears
ShamEvaluation of Adverse Events, Otoscopic Exams, Audiometry and TympanometryAudiometry Patent tubes @ day 29 right ear96.5 percentage of ears
ShamEvaluation of Adverse Events, Otoscopic Exams, Audiometry and TympanometryOtoscopic abnormal exams @ day 29-right ear3.5 percentage of ears
ShamEvaluation of Adverse Events, Otoscopic Exams, Audiometry and TympanometryTympanometry Category of B (large)day 29 right ear84.5 percentage of ears
ShamEvaluation of Adverse Events, Otoscopic Exams, Audiometry and TympanometryAudiometry Patent tubes @ day 29 left ear100 percentage of ears
Secondary

Microbiological Response

Subjects whose samples tested positive for bacteria in either or both ears at baseline with documented eradication or presumed eradication post-baseline.

Time frame: Day 15 - 2 weeks after dosing

Population: Microbiologically Evaluable Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OTO-201Microbiological Response83 percentage of Microbiological response
ShamMicrobiological Response48 percentage of Microbiological response

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026