Skip to content

Improving Functions in MTBI Patients With Headache by rTMS

Improving Functions in MTBI Patients With Headache by rTMS

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01948947
Enrollment
29
Registered
2013-09-24
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2018-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)

Brief summary

Due to recent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the number of Veteran suffering from Mild traumatic brain(MTBI) injury and PTSD increases rapidly. Headache is one of the most debilitating clinical symptoms in Veteran with MTBI and the cause of it is still not entirely clear. Recently, the use of non-invasive brain stimulation such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS) has yielded favorable clinical outcome in a few intractable chronic central pain conditions including headaches. This study aims to 1) assess the effect of rTMS in relieving headache and improving neurophysiological functions; and 2)explore the neuronal mechanisms associated with MTBI related headache and the analgesic effect of rTMS with function magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Detailed description

This study will only be conducted at the Veterans Affair hospital in San Diego.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Active-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex.

DEVICESham Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Sham rTMS will consist of the same parameters as active, however, the subject will be shielded from the magnetic field of the coil.

Sponsors

United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego
CollaboratorFED
VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female age between 18 to 50 * History of MTBI based on the clinical diagnostic criteria * History of headache more than 3 months * No prior experience of TMS treatment * Pre-treatment headache intensity M-VAS 30(0-100 scale) and average daily headache NPS 3(0-10 scale) * At least one headache exacerbation per day * A normal brain MRI in the past 3 months

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * History of pacemaker implant * Any ferromagnetic(e.g. bullet fragment, shrapnel, device implant) in the brain or body that will prohibit the patients from having a brain MRI * History of dementia, major psychiatric diseases, or life threatening diseases * Presence of any other chronic neuropathic pain states * History of seizure * Pending litigation * Lack of ability to understand the experimental protocol and to adequately communicate in English * History of chronic headache prior to the incidence of MTBI

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Composite Score of Debilitating Headache (Intensity x Duration x Frequency)Subjects will have a total of 9 visits over the span of 3 months, the baseline, 1-week follow-up and 1-month follow up will qualify as a time point at which the outcome is measured and averaged.The primary outcome time-point measurement will be averaged from each day the subject is enrolled in the study for each of the 3 time point periods: pre-treatment baseline, 1-week follow-up and 1-month follow-up. The results depict change in the composite score: intensity (scale of 0-10) x duration (# of hours) x frequency (# headaches per week). The larger composite score for each subject, the worse the debilitating headaches.
Percent Change in Persistent Headache IntensitySubjects will have a total of 9 visits over the span of 3 months, the baseline, 1-week follow-up and 1-month follow up will qualify as a time point at which the outcome is measured and averaged.The persistent headache measure was assessed through a daily headache log over the course of the subjects participation in the study and averaged for the time point period of baseline, 1-week and 1-month results. The persistent headache is based on a scale of 0-10, the higher the persistent headache intensity averaged score the worse the persistent headache.
Percent Change in Persistent Headache PrevalenceSubjects will have a total of 9 visits over the span of 3 months, the baseline, 1-week follow-up and 1-month follow up will qualify as a time point at which the outcome is measured.The persistent headache prevalence measure was assessed through a daily headache log over the course of the subjects participation in the study and collected at baseline, 1-week and 1-month. The persistent headache is defined as having had 3+ continuous headaches over the course of the time point periods and was coded as either yes or no. The results indicate the percent change in the prevalence of persistent headaches for the subjects at the time points. A larger reduction percent indicates a larger decrease in subjects with those persistent headaches.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Depression Score From Baseline to 1-Week Post-treatmentSubjects will have a total of 9 visits over the span of 3 months and 3 of those visits will qualify as a time point at which outcome is measured.Subjects assessed how their headaches interfered with their mood through the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression assessment at baseline, 1-week follow-up and 1-month follow-up. The outcome was measured by adding the score of each question on the assessment and then comparing the averaged scores at the different time points. The larger the depression score, the more severe the depression. A larger percent change in depression score indicates a change in the severity of the depression.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Active-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Active-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex.
14
Sham Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Sham rTMS will consist of the same parameters as active, however, the subject will be shielded from the magnetic field of the coil. Sham Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Sham rTMS will consist of the same parameters as active, however, the subject will be shielded from the magnetic field of the coil.
15
Total29

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTranscranial Magnetic StimulationSham Transcranial Magnetic StimulationTotal
Age, Continuous36.13 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.39
34.43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.66
35.28 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.52
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants11 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 140 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 140 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 140 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change in Composite Score of Debilitating Headache (Intensity x Duration x Frequency)

The primary outcome time-point measurement will be averaged from each day the subject is enrolled in the study for each of the 3 time point periods: pre-treatment baseline, 1-week follow-up and 1-month follow-up. The results depict change in the composite score: intensity (scale of 0-10) x duration (# of hours) x frequency (# headaches per week). The larger composite score for each subject, the worse the debilitating headaches.

Time frame: Subjects will have a total of 9 visits over the span of 3 months, the baseline, 1-week follow-up and 1-month follow up will qualify as a time point at which the outcome is measured and averaged.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transcranial Magnetic StimulationPercent Change in Composite Score of Debilitating Headache (Intensity x Duration x Frequency)1-Week Follow-Up-55.3 percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 29
Transcranial Magnetic StimulationPercent Change in Composite Score of Debilitating Headache (Intensity x Duration x Frequency)1-Month Follow-Up-58.4 percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 24.4
Sham Transcranial Magnetic StimulationPercent Change in Composite Score of Debilitating Headache (Intensity x Duration x Frequency)1-Week Follow-Up-1.7 percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 41.2
Sham Transcranial Magnetic StimulationPercent Change in Composite Score of Debilitating Headache (Intensity x Duration x Frequency)1-Month Follow-Up-10 percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 59.9
Comparison: Change from Baseline to 1-Week Post-Treatmentp-value: <0.0001ANOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline to 1-Month Post-Treatmentp-value: <0.001ANOVA
Primary

Percent Change in Persistent Headache Intensity

The persistent headache measure was assessed through a daily headache log over the course of the subjects participation in the study and averaged for the time point period of baseline, 1-week and 1-month results. The persistent headache is based on a scale of 0-10, the higher the persistent headache intensity averaged score the worse the persistent headache.

Time frame: Subjects will have a total of 9 visits over the span of 3 months, the baseline, 1-week follow-up and 1-month follow up will qualify as a time point at which the outcome is measured and averaged.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transcranial Magnetic StimulationPercent Change in Persistent Headache Intensity1-Week Follow-Up-25.3 percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 16.8
Transcranial Magnetic StimulationPercent Change in Persistent Headache Intensity1-Month Follow-Up-22.6 percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 17.7
Sham Transcranial Magnetic StimulationPercent Change in Persistent Headache Intensity1-Week Follow-Up-1.0 percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 11.7
Sham Transcranial Magnetic StimulationPercent Change in Persistent Headache Intensity1-Month Follow-Up-2.3 percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 14.5
p-value: <0.001ANOVA
p-value: <0.01ANOVA
Primary

Percent Change in Persistent Headache Prevalence

The persistent headache prevalence measure was assessed through a daily headache log over the course of the subjects participation in the study and collected at baseline, 1-week and 1-month. The persistent headache is defined as having had 3+ continuous headaches over the course of the time point periods and was coded as either yes or no. The results indicate the percent change in the prevalence of persistent headaches for the subjects at the time points. A larger reduction percent indicates a larger decrease in subjects with those persistent headaches.

Time frame: Subjects will have a total of 9 visits over the span of 3 months, the baseline, 1-week follow-up and 1-month follow up will qualify as a time point at which the outcome is measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transcranial Magnetic StimulationPercent Change in Persistent Headache Prevalence1-Week Follow-Up-50 percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 51
Transcranial Magnetic StimulationPercent Change in Persistent Headache Prevalence1-Month Follow-Up-57 percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 52
Sham Transcranial Magnetic StimulationPercent Change in Persistent Headache Prevalence1-Week Follow-Up-7 percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 26
Sham Transcranial Magnetic StimulationPercent Change in Persistent Headache Prevalence1-Month Follow-Up-20 percent change from baselineStandard Deviation 41
p-value: 0.009ANOVA
p-value: <0.01ANOVA
Secondary

Percent Change in Depression Score From Baseline to 1-Week Post-treatment

Subjects assessed how their headaches interfered with their mood through the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression assessment at baseline, 1-week follow-up and 1-month follow-up. The outcome was measured by adding the score of each question on the assessment and then comparing the averaged scores at the different time points. The larger the depression score, the more severe the depression. A larger percent change in depression score indicates a change in the severity of the depression.

Time frame: Subjects will have a total of 9 visits over the span of 3 months and 3 of those visits will qualify as a time point at which outcome is measured.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transcranial Magnetic StimulationPercent Change in Depression Score From Baseline to 1-Week Post-treatment-14.8 percent change in score from baselineStandard Deviation 22.1
Sham Transcranial Magnetic StimulationPercent Change in Depression Score From Baseline to 1-Week Post-treatment-2.7 percent change in score from baselineStandard Deviation 40.3
p-value: =0.033ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026