Skip to content

Randomized Study for Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5mg in Treat-extend and Monthly Regimens in Patients With nAMD

A 12-month, Phase 3b, Randomized, Visual Acuity Assessor-masked, Multicenter Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5mg in Treat and Extend Regimen Compared to Monthly Regimen, in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01948830
Acronym
TREND
Enrollment
650
Registered
2013-09-24
Start date
2013-12-17
Completion date
2015-11-19
Last updated
2017-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Age-related Macular Degeneration, Choroidal Neovascularization

Keywords

Ranibizumab, Lucentis, choroidal neovascularization, age-related macular degeneration, treat and extend regimen

Brief summary

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different regimens of 0.5 mg ranibizumab given as intravitreal injection in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Detailed description

This was a 12-month, phase IIIb, randomized, Visual Acuity assessor-masked, multi-center, interventional study assessing the efficacy and safety of the TER vs monthly regimens of 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal (IVT) injections in patients with newly diagnosed nAMD. Patients will be randomized 1:1 into one of two treatment arms, Treat and Extend or monthly regimens. There will be 3 periods in this study: Screening period (up to 14days), treatment period (11 months), follow-up period (1 month). At randomization visit patients will be randomized into one of the 2 treatment groups Group I ranibizumab 0.5 mg based on monthly treatment or Group II ranibizumab 0.5 mg based on TER (randomization ratio of 1:1) and will receive the first dose of Investigational treatment. Patients in Group I the following visits will perform on monthly intervals. For patients in Group II the investigator will evaluate disease activity (i.e., signs of exudation) based on SD-OCT, and in case of absence of disease activity every next visit will be 2 weeks), with a maximum of a 12-week interval.

Interventions

0.5 mg ranibizumab (intravitreal injections) prefilled syringe)

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Male or female patients, ≥50 years of age with signed informed consent before study procedures * Visual impairment predominantly due to nAMD. * Active CNV secondary to AMD confirmed by presence of active leakage from CNV seen by fluorescein angiography (FA) and/or color fundus photography * Presence of intra- or subretinal fluid/hemorrhage seen by SD-OCT * BCVA score must be ≤ 78 and ≥ 23 letters at 4 meters starting distance using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity charts (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/32 and 20/320) Key

Exclusion criteria

* Any type of advanced, severe or unstable disease, including any medical condition (controlled or uncontrolled) that could be expected to progress, recur, or change to such an extent that it may bias the assessment of the clinical status of the patient to a significant degree or put the patient at special risk. * Stroke or myocardial infarction within 3 months prior to Screening. * Any active periocular or ocular infection or inflammation in both eyes. * Ocular disorders in the study eye at the time of enrollment that may confound interpretation of study results and compromise visual acuity. * Presence of amblyopia or amaurosis in the fellow eye. * History of treatment with any anti-angiogenic drugs (including any anti- vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents) e.g., bevacizumab \[Avastin®\], aflibercept \[Eylea®\]) or vPDT in the study eye. * History of intravitreal treatment with corticosteroids within 6 months and history of intra-ocular surgery within 3 months in the study eye prior to the Screening. * Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women. Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using effective methods of contraception during dosing of study treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline to Month 12Baseline to month 12Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like charts while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. A positive average change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in BCVA From Baseline to Month 12Baseline to Month 12Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like chart at baseline and month 12 while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters
Average BCVA Change From Baseline to Month 12Baseline and every month for 12 monthsBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. Mean Visual Acuity was averaged over all monthly assessments from Baseline to Month 12
Mean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Baseline and every month for 12 monthsBest-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) -like charts while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. For the mean change of best corrected visual acuity at Month 12 and compare to Baseline
Number of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Baseline and every month for 12 monthsBCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An increased score indicates improvement in acuity. This outcome assessed the number of participants who had improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 letters of visual acuity at Month 12 as compared with baseline
Number of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitBaseline and every month for 12 monthsBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters.Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters.
Number of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Baseline and every month for 12 monthsBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like charts at baseline and month 12 while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of EDTRS is 0 to 100 letters. BCVA above 73 letters at Month 12 indicates a positive outcome
Number of Visits ScheduledFrom Month1 to Month 11The number of visits scheduled according to the treat and extend regimen after treatment initiation
The Average Number of Days Between InjectionsMonth 12The average dosing interval was measured as the average number of days between injections
Percentage of Participants With Fluid Free Macula Over Time up to Month 12Month 12OCT (optical coherence tomography) was used to assess intra-retinal fluid as Measured by SD-OCT (Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography). Fluid free macula refers to absence of macular edema (as assessed by the reading center). The full analysis set was used for this evaluation but the count presented are the counts of patients in the specific treatment group who have a value for the macular edema (center involvement) at study completion. These total counts are used as the denominator for the percentages
Change in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 12OCT (optical coherence tomography) was used to assess CSFT (Central Sub-Field Thickness) representing the average retinal thickness of the circular area within 1 mm diameter around the foveal center. The Ns in the rows is the number of patients with a value for both baseline and the specific post-baseline visit
Percentage of Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Leakage Assessed by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in the Study Eye atMonth 12To evaluate presence of active CNV leakage on fluorescein angiography (FA) by reading center over time up to Month 12. The full analysis set was used for this evaluation but the count presented are the counts of patients in the specific treatment group who have a value for the presence of leakage at study completion. These total counts are used as the denominator for the percentages.
Change From Baseline in Composite Score of the National Eye Institute-Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25)Baseline, Month 12The survey consisted of 25 items representing 11 vision related constructs (general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social functioning, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision, peripheral vision) plus a single-item general health rating question. The score of each individual question ranged from 0 (worst) to 100 which indicates the best possible response. The composite score and score of each of each construct also ranged from 0 to 100 as they are calculated as total scores divided by the number of questions. The higher the values of total scores represent better outcome
The Mean Number of Treatment FrequencyMonth 12The number of injections received

Countries

Belgium, Chile, Croatia, Denmark, Egypt, Germany, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Patients were randomized 1:1 into one of two treatment arms, Treat and Extend or monthly regimens. Safety set: One patient was randomized but did not receive at least one study treatment and did not record at least one post-baseline safety assessment

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TER
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05 mL (TER) treat and Extend regimen
323
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Monthly
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05 mL (Monthly regimen)
327
Total650

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event92
Overall StudyDeath34
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up54
Overall StudyPhysician Decision13
Overall StudyProtocol deviation12
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1417

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERGroup II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyTotal
Age, Continuous75.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.61
75.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.13
75.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.37
Sex: Female, Male
Female
179 Participants181 Participants360 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
144 Participants146 Participants290 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
164 / 323166 / 326
serious
Total, serious adverse events
39 / 32342 / 326

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline to Month 12

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like charts while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. A positive average change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement

Time frame: Baseline to month 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS), comprised of all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned, was considered for the analysis. Only patients with the value for both Baseline and study completion after last observational carried forward (LOCF) were included in this analysis. LOCF was used as an imputation of missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERChange in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline to Month 126.2 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Error 0.7
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyChange in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline to Month 128.1 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Error 0.7
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Average BCVA Change From Baseline to Month 12

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. Mean Visual Acuity was averaged over all monthly assessments from Baseline to Month 12

Time frame: Baseline and every month for 12 months

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS), comprised of all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned, was considered for the analysis. Only patients with the value for both Baseline and average visual acuity (VA) from month 1 to study completion were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERAverage BCVA Change From Baseline to Month 126.3 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 10.5
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyAverage BCVA Change From Baseline to Month 127.1 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 9.41
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Composite Score of the National Eye Institute-Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25)

The survey consisted of 25 items representing 11 vision related constructs (general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social functioning, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision, peripheral vision) plus a single-item general health rating question. The score of each individual question ranged from 0 (worst) to 100 which indicates the best possible response. The composite score and score of each of each construct also ranged from 0 to 100 as they are calculated as total scores divided by the number of questions. The higher the values of total scores represent better outcome

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS), comprised of all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned, was considered for the analysis. Only patients with the value for both Baseline and post-baseline value at the specific visit were included for this analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERChange From Baseline in Composite Score of the National Eye Institute-Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25)2.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.93
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyChange From Baseline in Composite Score of the National Eye Institute-Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25)4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.72
Secondary

Change in BCVA From Baseline to Month 12

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like chart at baseline and month 12 while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters

Time frame: Baseline to Month 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS), comprised of all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned, was considered for the analysis. Only patients with the value for both Baseline and study completion after last observational carried forward (LOCF) were included in this analysis. LOCF was used as an imputation of missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERChange in BCVA From Baseline to Month 126.4 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 14.11
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyChange in BCVA From Baseline to Month 128.0 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 11.61
Secondary

Change in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over Time

OCT (optical coherence tomography) was used to assess CSFT (Central Sub-Field Thickness) representing the average retinal thickness of the circular area within 1 mm diameter around the foveal center. The Ns in the rows is the number of patients with a value for both baseline and the specific post-baseline visit

Time frame: Month 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS), comprised of all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned, was considered for the analysis. Only patients with the value for both Baseline and the specific post-baseline visit were included for this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 1 (n=311, 316)-137.6 micronsStandard Deviation 132.33
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 2 (n=220, 311)-151.6 micronsStandard Deviation 151.15
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 3 (n=157, 304)-149.8 micronsStandard Deviation 167.26
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 4 (n=125, 307)-141.8 micronsStandard Deviation 183.71
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 5 (n=110, 295)-138.6 micronsStandard Deviation 160.04
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 6 (n=113, 298)-140.1 micronsStandard Deviation 156.25
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 7 (n=173, 296)-146.6 micronsStandard Deviation 160.72
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 8 (n=159, 290)-153.4 micronsStandard Deviation 151.93
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 9 (n=126, 286)-150.2 micronsStandard Deviation 153.82
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 10 (n=156, 291)-154.6 micronsStandard Deviation 162.77
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 11 (n=127, 285)-133.1 micronsStandard Deviation 170.47
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 12 (n=289, 287)-172.1 micronsStandard Deviation 162.81
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 11 (n=127, 285)-174.8 micronsStandard Deviation 163.16
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 1 (n=311, 316)-126.8 micronsStandard Deviation 119.47
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 7 (n=173, 296)-166.9 micronsStandard Deviation 161.49
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 2 (n=220, 311)-149.2 micronsStandard Deviation 137.6
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 10 (n=156, 291)-170.9 micronsStandard Deviation 153.9
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 3 (n=157, 304)-151.8 micronsStandard Deviation 149.51
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 8 (n=159, 290)-170.4 micronsStandard Deviation 156.68
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 4 (n=125, 307)-161.3 micronsStandard Deviation 149.36
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 12 (n=289, 287)-173.3 micronsStandard Deviation 154.13
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 5 (n=110, 295)-160.9 micronsStandard Deviation 148.23
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 9 (n=126, 286)-169.3 micronsStandard Deviation 156.5
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) Over TimeMonth 6 (n=113, 298)-163.4 micronsStandard Deviation 157.18
Secondary

Mean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) -like charts while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. For the mean change of best corrected visual acuity at Month 12 and compare to Baseline

Time frame: Baseline and every month for 12 months

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS), comprised of all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned, was considered for the analysis. Only patients with the value for both Baseline and the specific post-baseline visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 1 (n=320, 322)4.6 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 7.56
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 2 (n=240, 316)5.5 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 8.64
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 3 (n=247, 311)6.7 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 9.09
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 4 (n=213, 314)7.0 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 10.9
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 5 (n=231, 302)6.0 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 11.34
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12month 6 (n=205, 302)6.9 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 13.34
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 7 (n=230, 298)5.9 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 14.25
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 8 (n=210, 295)7.5 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 12.87
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 9 (n=179, 295)6.6 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 13.63
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 10 (n=202, 296)6.3 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 13.44
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 11 (n=180, 290)5.9 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 14.12
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 12 (n=294, 295)6.6 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 13.41
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 11 (n=180, 290)7.5 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 12.48
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 1 (n=320, 322)4.2 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 6.98
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 7 (n=230, 298)7.9 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 11.36
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 2 (n=240, 316)5.8 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 8.58
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 10 (n=202, 296)7.6 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 12.06
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 3 (n=247, 311)6.7 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 9.19
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 8 (n=210, 295)7.9 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 11.34
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 4 (n=213, 314)7.3 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 9.95
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 12 (n=294, 295)7.9 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 11.96
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 5 (n=231, 302)7.7 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 10.61
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12Month 9 (n=179, 295)7.6 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 12.56
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyMean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline to Month 12month 6 (n=205, 302)7.9 Letters (EDTRS)Standard Deviation 10.83
Secondary

Number of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12

BCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An increased score indicates improvement in acuity. This outcome assessed the number of participants who had improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 letters of visual acuity at Month 12 as compared with baseline

Time frame: Baseline and every month for 12 months

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS), comprised of all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned, was considered for the analysis. Only patients with the value for both Baseline and the specific post-baseline visit were included for this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 7, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=176, 298)126 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 2, Gain of >= 15 letters30 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 7, Gain of >= 5 letters94 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 4, Gain of >= 5 letters67 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 7, Gain of >= 10 letters57 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 1, Gain of ≥ 5 letters145 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 7, Gain of >= 15 letters33 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 4, Gain of >=10 letters48 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 7, Gain of >= 30 letters7 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 2, Gain of >= 30 letters4 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 8, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=163, 295)124 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 4, Gain of >= 15 letters25 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 8, Gain of >= 5 letters108 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 2, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=226, 316)168 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 8, Gain of >= 10 letters69 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 4, Gain of >= 30 letters4 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 8, Gain of >= 15 letters40 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 3, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=161,311)120 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 8, Gain of >= 30 letters4 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 5, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=114, 302)84 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 9, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=129, 295)93 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 1, Gain of ≥ 15 letters24 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 9, Gain of >= 5 letters78 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 5, Gain of >= 5 letters64 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 9, Gain of >= 10 letters52 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 3, Gain of >= 5 letters98 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 9, Gain of >= 15 letters28 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 5, Gain of >= 10 letters42 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 9, Gain of >= 30 letters5 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 2, Gain of >= 5 letters123 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 10, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=159, 296)113 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 5, Gain of >= 15 letters19 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 10, Gain of >= 5 letters98 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 3, Gain of >= 10 letters57 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 10, Gain of >= 10 letters60 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 5, Gain of >= 30 letters3 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 10, Gain of >= 15 letters32 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 1, Gain of ≥ 10 letters65 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 10, Gain of >= 30 letters4 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 6, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=117, 302)85 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 11, Gain of >= 1 letter (131, 290)94 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 3, Gain of >= 15 letters28 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 11, Gain of >= 5 letters79 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 6, Gain of >= 5 letters68 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 11, Gain of >= 10 letters51 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 2, Gain of >= 10 letters60 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 11, Gain of >= 15 letters32 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 6, Gain of >= 10 letters42 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 11, Gain of >= 30 letters5 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 3, Gain of >= 30 letters2 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 12, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=291, 295)217 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 6, Gain of >= 15 letters19 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 12, Gain of >= 5 letters178 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 1, Gain of ≥ 30 letters4 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 12, Gain of >= 10 letters123 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 6, Gain of >= 30 letters2 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 12, Gain of >= 15 letters75 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 4, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=128, 314)96 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 12, Gain of >= 30 letters12 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 1,Gain of ≥ 1 letter (n=320,322)235 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 12, Gain of >= 30 letters8 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 1,Gain of ≥ 1 letter (n=320,322)233 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 1, Gain of ≥ 5 letters145 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 1, Gain of ≥ 10 letters58 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 1, Gain of ≥ 15 letters23 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 1, Gain of ≥ 30 letters2 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 2, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=226, 316)244 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 2, Gain of >= 5 letters184 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 2, Gain of >= 10 letters88 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 2, Gain of >= 15 letters39 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 2, Gain of >= 30 letters3 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 3, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=161,311)244 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 3, Gain of >= 5 letters187 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 3, Gain of >= 10 letters110 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 3, Gain of >= 15 letters46 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 3, Gain of >= 30 letters3 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 4, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=128, 314)249 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 4, Gain of >= 5 letters198 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 4, Gain of >=10 letters118 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 4, Gain of >= 15 letters60 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 4, Gain of >= 30 letters8 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 5, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=114, 302)243 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 5, Gain of >= 5 letters197 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 5, Gain of >= 10 letters116 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 5, Gain of >= 15 letters59 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 5, Gain of >= 30 letters10 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 6, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=117, 302)238 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 6, Gain of >= 5 letters197 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 6, Gain of >= 10 letters125 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 6, Gain of >= 15 letters61 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 6, Gain of >= 30 letters11 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 7, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=176, 298)235 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 7, Gain of >= 5 letters196 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 7, Gain of >= 10 letters123 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 7, Gain of >= 15 letters69 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 7, Gain of >= 30 letters9 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 8, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=163, 295)228 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 8, Gain of >= 5 letters198 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 8, Gain of >= 10 letters130 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 8, Gain of >= 15 letters72 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 8, Gain of >= 30 letters9 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 9, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=129, 295)229 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 9, Gain of >= 5 letters186 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 9, Gain of >= 10 letters128 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 9, Gain of >= 15 letters70 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 9, Gain of >= 30 letters8 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 10, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=159, 296)230 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 10, Gain of >= 5 letters190 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 10, Gain of >= 10 letters126 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 10, Gain of >= 15 letters74 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 10, Gain of >= 30 letters10 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 11, Gain of >= 1 letter (131, 290)222 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 11, Gain of >= 5 letters187 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 11, Gain of >= 10 letters130 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 11, Gain of >= 15 letters74 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 11, Gain of >= 30 letters9 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 12, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=291, 295)226 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 12, Gain of >= 5 letters199 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 12, Gain of >= 10 letters135 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Month 12, Gain of >= 15 letters77 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like charts at baseline and month 12 while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of EDTRS is 0 to 100 letters. BCVA above 73 letters at Month 12 indicates a positive outcome

Time frame: Baseline and every month for 12 months

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS), comprised of all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned, was considered for the analysis. Only patients with the value for both Baseline and the specific post-baseline visit were included for this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 1 (n=320, 322)106 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 2 (n=226, 316)74 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 3 (n=161, 311)67 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 4 (n=128, 314)60 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 5 (n=114, 302)51 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 6 (n=117, 302)58 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 7 (n=176, 298)78 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 8 (n=163, 295)84 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 9 (n=129, 295)68 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 10 (n=159, 296)74 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 11 (n=131, 29063 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 12 (n=291, 295)131 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 11 (n=131, 290143 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 1 (n=320, 322)106 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 7 (n=176, 298)150 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 2 (n=226, 316)136 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 10 (n=159, 296)149 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 3 (n=161, 311)148 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 8 (n=163, 295)155 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 4 (n=128, 314)147 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 12 (n=291, 295)149 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 5 (n=114, 302)156 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 9 (n=129, 295)156 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With a BCVA Value of ≥ 73 Letters (Approximate 20/40 Snellen Chart Equivalent) at Month 12Month 6 (n=117, 302)155 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by Visit

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters.Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters.

Time frame: Baseline and every month for 12 months

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS), comprised of all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned, was considered for the analysis. Only patients with the value for both Baseline and the specific post-baseline visit were included for this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 7, Loss of < 5 letters (n=176, 298)148 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 2, Loss of < 15 letters223 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 7, Loss of < 10 letters162 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 4, Loss of < 10 letters128 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 7, Loss of < 15 letters166 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 2, Loss of < 5 letters (n=226, 316)205 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 8, Loss of < 5 letters (n=163, 295)145 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 4, Loss of < 15 letters124 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 8, Loss of < 10 letters155 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 3, Loss of < 5 letters (n=161, 311)146 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 8, Loss of < 15 letters155 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 5, Loss of < 5 letters (n=114, 302)97 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 9, Loss of < 5 letters (n=129, 295)110 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 1, Loss of < 15 letters319 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 9, Loss of < 10 letters120 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 5, Loss of < 10 letters105 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 9, Loss of < 15 letters122 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 3, Loss of < 10 letters158 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 10, Loss of < 5 letters(n=159, 296)133 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 5, Loss of < 15 letters108 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 10, Loss of < 10 letters147 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 2, Loss of < 10 letters220 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 10, Loss of < 15 letters150 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 6, Loss of < 5 letters (n=117, 302)104 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 11, Loss of < 5 letters (n=131, 290)105 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 3, Loss of < 15 letters160 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 11, Loss of < 10 letters118 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 6, Loss of < 10 letters110 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 11, Loss of < 15 letters121 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 1, Loss of < 10 letters313 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 12, Loss of < 5 letters (291, 295)247 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 6, Loss of < 15 letters111 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 12, Loss of < 10 letters267 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 4, Loss of < 5 letters (n=128, 314)114 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 12, Loss of < 15 letters273 Number of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 1, Loss of < 5 letters (n=320, 322)296 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 12, Loss of < 15 letters284 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 1, Loss of < 5 letters (n=320, 322)295 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 1, Loss of < 10 letters314 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 1, Loss of < 15 letters320 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 2, Loss of < 5 letters (n=226, 316)288 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 2, Loss of < 10 letters306 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 2, Loss of < 15 letters309 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 3, Loss of < 5 letters (n=161, 311)289 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 3, Loss of < 10 letters299 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 3, Loss of < 15 letters304 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 4, Loss of < 5 letters (n=128, 314)286 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 4, Loss of < 10 letters301 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 4, Loss of < 15 letters307 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 5, Loss of < 5 letters (n=114, 302)276 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 5, Loss of < 10 letters287 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 5, Loss of < 15 letters295 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 6, Loss of < 5 letters (n=117, 302)271 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 6, Loss of < 10 letters286 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 6, Loss of < 15 letters298 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 7, Loss of < 5 letters (n=176, 298)268 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 7, Loss of < 10 letters279 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 7, Loss of < 15 letters289 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 8, Loss of < 5 letters (n=163, 295)262 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 8, Loss of < 10 letters276 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 8, Loss of < 15 letters286 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 9, Loss of < 5 letters (n=129, 295)258 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 9, Loss of < 10 letters270 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 9, Loss of < 15 letters281 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 10, Loss of < 5 letters(n=159, 296)253 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 10, Loss of < 10 letters276 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 10, Loss of < 15 letters285 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 11, Loss of < 5 letters (n=131, 290)251 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 11, Loss of < 10 letters263 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 11, Loss of < 15 letters275 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 12, Loss of < 5 letters (291, 295)256 Number of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Loss <5, <10, and <15 Letters by VisitMonth 12, Loss of < 10 letters272 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Visits Scheduled

The number of visits scheduled according to the treat and extend regimen after treatment initiation

Time frame: From Month1 to Month 11

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS), comprised of all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned, was analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERNumber of Visits Scheduled8.9 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 2.56
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyNumber of Visits Scheduled11.2 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 2.37
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Fluid Free Macula Over Time up to Month 12

OCT (optical coherence tomography) was used to assess intra-retinal fluid as Measured by SD-OCT (Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography). Fluid free macula refers to absence of macular edema (as assessed by the reading center). The full analysis set was used for this evaluation but the count presented are the counts of patients in the specific treatment group who have a value for the macular edema (center involvement) at study completion. These total counts are used as the denominator for the percentages

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment regimen they were assigned to at randomization

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERPercentage of Participants With Fluid Free Macula Over Time up to Month 12Absent60.5 Percentage of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERPercentage of Participants With Fluid Free Macula Over Time up to Month 12Definite39.5 Percentage of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERPercentage of Participants With Fluid Free Macula Over Time up to Month 12Can't grade0.0 Percentage of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyPercentage of Participants With Fluid Free Macula Over Time up to Month 12Absent60.7 Percentage of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyPercentage of Participants With Fluid Free Macula Over Time up to Month 12Definite39 Percentage of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyPercentage of Participants With Fluid Free Macula Over Time up to Month 12Can't grade0.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Leakage Assessed by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in the Study Eye at

To evaluate presence of active CNV leakage on fluorescein angiography (FA) by reading center over time up to Month 12. The full analysis set was used for this evaluation but the count presented are the counts of patients in the specific treatment group who have a value for the presence of leakage at study completion. These total counts are used as the denominator for the percentages.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment regimen they were assigned to at randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERPercentage of Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Leakage Assessed by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in the Study Eye atYes18.7 Percentage of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERPercentage of Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Leakage Assessed by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in the Study Eye atNo74.1 Percentage of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERPercentage of Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Leakage Assessed by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in the Study Eye atCan't grade0.0 Percentage of participants
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERPercentage of Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Leakage Assessed by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in the Study Eye atNot applicable7.2 Percentage of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyPercentage of Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Leakage Assessed by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in the Study Eye atNot applicable3.5 Percentage of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyPercentage of Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Leakage Assessed by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in the Study Eye atYes17.1 Percentage of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyPercentage of Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Leakage Assessed by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in the Study Eye atCan't grade2.4 Percentage of participants
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyPercentage of Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Leakage Assessed by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in the Study Eye atNo76.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

The Average Number of Days Between Injections

The average dosing interval was measured as the average number of days between injections

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment regimen they were assigned to at randomization

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERThe Average Number of Days Between Injections40.3 daysStandard Deviation 11.28
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyThe Average Number of Days Between Injections29.4 daysStandard Deviation 3.27
Secondary

The Mean Number of Treatment Frequency

The number of injections received

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised all patients to whom treatment regimen had been assigned. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment regimen they were assigned to at randomization

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I Ranibizumab 0.5 mg TERThe Mean Number of Treatment Frequency8.7 Number of injectionsStandard Deviation 2.68
Group II Ranibizumab 0.5 mg MonthlyThe Mean Number of Treatment Frequency11.0 Number of injectionsStandard Deviation 2.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026