Skip to content

Insole Optimisation for Ulcer Prevention: a Feasibility Trial

Prevention of Foot Ulcer Recurrence in People With Diabetes Using an In-shoe Pressure Measurement Technology: A Randomised Control Trial Feasibility Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01948479
Enrollment
20
Registered
2013-09-23
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2013-09-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic, Neuropathic, Past Ulceration

Brief summary

Insoles are designed to reduce increased loads and re-ulceration risk in patients with diabetes. The investigators previous research findings suggest that an instant insole solution may benefit some, but effectiveness is difficult to predict. The investigators propose a feasibility study using in-shoe pressure analysis to optimise the protective effect of insoles and footwear with the aim of reducing re-ulceration rates. Early indications from exploratory case studies within the real world clinical setting suggest that by implementing the investigators previous published research findings the investigators can optimise effectiveness and reduce outcome variability of protective footwear and insoles provided to patients at risk of re-ulceration. However a further randomised control trial is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of in-shoe pressure analysis in reducing re-ulceration rates within the NHS setting. The proposed feasibility study will recruit 20 participants from the multidisaplinary diabetic foot clinic Derriford Hospital and allocate them to either 1) Routine insoles and footwear provision or 2) Routine insole and footwear provision, and temporary insole provision with optimisation. The findings from the feasibility study will inform protocol development for a larger clinical trial. The results of the feasibility study will be used to strengthen a protocol for a grant application to conduct the main RCT. A secondary output from the pilot study will be the dissemination of findings in a peer reviewed journal and at conference.

Interventions

DEVICEOptimised instant offloading insole

Sponsors

University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Plymouth
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study. * Male or Female, aged 30 years or above * Diagnosed with Diabetes Mellitus * Recently healed/healing target ulcer on the weight-bearing surface of the foot * Neuropathic (Mild to moderate DPN defined as insensitivity of a 10 g monofilament at 1-3 sites in the following locations: hallux, 1st, 3rd, and 5th metatarsal heads (Boulton AJ, Armstrong DG, Albert SF, Frykberg RG, Hellman R, Kirkman MS, Lavery LA, Lemaster JW, Mills JL Sr, Mueller MJ, Sheehan P, Wukich DK: Comprehensive foot examination and risk assessment: a report of the task force of the foot care interest group of the American Diabetes Association, with endorsement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. Diabetes Care 2008;31:1679-1685) * Able (in the Investigators opinion) and willing to comply with all study requirements

Exclusion criteria

* The participant may not enter the study if ANY of the following apply: Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study. * None healing foot ulcer at another site that requires targeted off-loading. * Unable to walk 5 metres with/without walking aid * Peripheral vascular disease (non-re-constructible vascular disease as determined by arterial duplex and clinically assessed by a vascular consultant) * Unwilling to wear therapeutic footwear * Where amputation has been part of the current episode of care and includes ulceration site.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
ulcer recurrence rates6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
peak pressure reduction with the addition of the interventionIssue and 6 months

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactJoanne Paton, PhD
joanne.paton@plymouth.ac.uk01752 588845

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026