Skip to content

Nintedanib in Treating Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Failed Up to Two Previous Chemotherapy Regimens

FGFR1 Amplification as A Predictor of Efficacy in A Biomarker-Driven Phase II Study of BIBF 1120 in Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Have Failed Up to Two Prior Chemotherapeutic Regimens

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01948141
Enrollment
6
Registered
2013-09-23
Start date
2014-01-30
Completion date
2016-08-16
Last updated
2017-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Squamous Cell Lung Cancer, Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Brief summary

This phase II trial studies how well nintedanib works in treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who have failed up to two previous chemotherapy regimens. Nintedanib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) amplified squamous cell lung cancer patients treated with BIBF 1120 (nintedanib). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the 6-month PFS rate for the entire FGFR1 amplified group versus the FGFR1 non-amplified patients. II. Compare the 6-month PFS rate for each FGFR1 amplified group (low, intermediate, and high) versus historical controls and FGFR1 non-amplified patients. III. To assess the following endpoints overall and by FGFR1 group: PFS, overall survival (OS), confirmed tumor response rate, and adverse events. TERTIARY OBJECTIVES: I. The relation of FGFR1 gene copy number with PFS, OS, confirmed response rate, and adverse events. II. The relationship fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) polymorphisms with toxicity and efficacy. OUTLINE: Patients receive nintedanib orally (PO) twice daily (BID) on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 8 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGnintedanib

Given PO

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Boehringer Ingelheim
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with advanced histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the lung * Patients who have failed at least 1 systemic chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease, but not more than 2 regimens * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of =\< 1 * The pathologic tissue is available to determine FGFR1 amplification status * Presence of either evaluable disease or measurable disease as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>= 1500/uL * Hemoglobin (HgB) \>= 9 g/dL * Platelets \>= 100,000/uL * Total bilirubin =\< upper limit of normal (ULN) * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) =\< 1.5 x ULN (ALT and AST =\< 2.5 x ULN is acceptable if there is liver metastasis) * Calculated or measured creatinine clearance \>= 45 mL/min * Patients of child-bearing potential must agree to use acceptable contraceptive methods (e.g., double barrier) during treatment and have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test done =\< 7 days prior to registration (for women of childbearing potential only) * Life expectancy \>= 12 weeks * Willingness to provide the blood specimens as required by the protocol; please note that the willingness to participate pertains only to the patient and does not factor in the institution's ability to participate in any part of the translational component

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with any known endothelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and/or anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK) translocation * Symptomatic, untreated, or uncontrolled central nervous system (CNS) metastases or seizure disorder; patients with asymptomatic CNS metastases treated with whole brain radiation (WBRT) or gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR) may be enrolled \>= 1 week after completion of WBRT/GKR provided toxicities are =\< Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade I at the time of registration and/or controlled with dexamethasone 2 mg once daily for at least 5 days at the time of study treatment; patients with symptomatic CNS metastases treated with WBRT/GKR may be enrolled \>= 2 weeks after completion of WBRT/GKR provided toxicities are =\< CTC grade 1 at the time of registration and neurologic symptoms controlled with dexamethasone =\< 2 mg once daily for at least 1 week at the time of study treatment * Patients receiving palliative radiation to skeletal metastases may be registered as early as 1 week after completion of radiation therapy provided toxicities are =\< CTC grade I at the time of registration * Any of the following prior therapies for malignancy: * Systemic chemotherapy =\< 4 weeks prior to registration * Radiation therapy =\< 4 weeks prior to registration (exceptions noted in the prior bullet); the site of previous radiotherapy should have evidence of progressive disease if this is the only site of disease * Major surgery (i.e., laparotomy), open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury =\< 4 weeks prior to registration; minor surgery =\< 2 weeks prior to registration; insertion of a vascular access device is not considered major or minor surgery in this regard * Other investigational agent =\< 30 days prior to study treatment * The following patients will be excluded from this study: * Pregnant women * Breastfeeding women * Men or women who are sexually active and unwilling to use a medically acceptable method of contraception (e.g., such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some intrauterine devices or vasectomized partner for participating females, condoms for participating males) during the trial and for at least three months after end of active therapy; a highly effective method of birth control is defined as one which results in a low failure rate (i.e., less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly; patients will be considered to be of childbearing potential unless surgically sterilized by hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation/salpingectomy, or post-menopausal for at least 2 years * Second primary malignancy with the following exceptions which are allowed: * Carcinoma in situ of the cervix * Non-melanoma skin cancer * History of low-grade (Gleason score =\< 6) localized prostate cancer even if diagnosed \< 5 years prior to registration * Treated stage I breast cancer even if diagnosed =\< 5 years prior to registration * Other prior malignancy (including melanoma) allowed if it was diagnosed and definitively treated at least 5 years previously with no subsequent evidence of recurrence * Impairment of gastrointestinal function or gastrointestinal disease that may significantly alter the absorption of BIBF 1120 (e.g., ulcerative disease, uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, malabsorption syndrome or extensive small bowel resection) * Leptomeningeal disease * Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients receiving combination anti-retroviral therapy are excluded because of possible pharmacokinetic interactions with oral investigational agents * Unwilling to, or unable to, comply with the protocol * Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to ongoing or active infection requiring systemic antimicrobial therapy (including history of active or chronic hepatitis C and/or hepatitis B infection), significant pulmonary symptoms at baseline due to disease, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements * Centrally located tumors with radiographic evidence (computed tomography \[CT\] or magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\]) of local invasion of major blood vessels * Significant weight loss (\> 10% of baseline body mass) within past 6 months prior to inclusion into the study * Coagulation parameters: International normalized ratio (INR) \> 2, prothrombin time (PT) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) \> 50% of deviation of institutional ULN * Proteinuria by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 2 or greater * Known inherited predisposition to bleeding or thrombosis * Therapeutic anticoagulation (except for low-dose heparin and/or heparin flush as needed for maintenance of an in-dwelling intravenous device) or anti-platelet therapy (except for low-dose therapy with acetylsalicylic acid \< 325 mg per day) * Baseline hemoptysis, per clinician/investigator evaluation * Active alcohol or drug abuse * History of arterial or venous thrombotic/embolic events =\< 12 months prior to registration * Prior history with BIBF 1120 or any other vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGF receptor (R) inhibitor * New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV; NOTE: patients classified as NYHA class II controlled with treatment may participate, with increased monitoring

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
6-month Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate Within the Entire FGFR1 Amplified GroupAt 6 monthsThe 6-month PFS rate was defined as the proportion of patients who were alive and progression-free at 6 months after start of study treatment. Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare the 6-month PFS Rate for Each FGFR1 Amplified Group (Low, Intermediate, and High) Versus FGFR1 Non-amplified Patients.Time from study entry to the first of either disease progression or death, assessed at 6 monthsThe 6-month PFS rate was defined as the proportion of patients who were alive and progression-free at 6 months after start of study treatment.
6-month PFS Rate for Each of the FGFRI Amplified Groups (Low, Intermediate, High) in Comparison to Historical ControlsTime from study entry to the first of either disease progression or death, assessed at 6 monthsThe 6-month PFS rate was defined as the proportion of patients who were alive and progression-free at 6 months after start of study treatment.
Overall Survival (OS)From study entry to death from any cause, assessed up to 3 yearsOverall survival (OS) was defined as the time from study entry to death from any cause.
Compare the 6-month PFS Rate for the Entire FGFR1 Amplified Group Versus the FGFR1 Non-amplified Patients.Time from study entry to the first of either disease progression or death, assessed at 6 monthsThe 6-month PFS rate was defined as the proportion of patients who were alive and progression-free at 6 months after start of study treatment.
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Up to 30 days post-treatmentPercentage of participants with adverse events. Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) was Accessed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) CTCAE Version 4.0.
Progression Free SurvivalTime from study entry to the first of either disease progression or death, assessed up to 3 yearsProgression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from study entry to the first of either disease progression or death.
Tumor Response RateUp to 3 yearsTumor Response rate was defined as the proportion of patients who had Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) by RECIST 1.1 Criteria. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment (Nintedanib)
Patients receive nintedanib PO BID on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. nintedanib: Given PO laboratory biomarker analysis: Correlative studies
6
Total6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment (Nintedanib)
Age, Continuous68.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

6-month Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate Within the Entire FGFR1 Amplified Group

The 6-month PFS rate was defined as the proportion of patients who were alive and progression-free at 6 months after start of study treatment. Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression.

Time frame: At 6 months

Population: All patients in FGFR1 amplified group

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treatment (Nintedanib)6-month Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate Within the Entire FGFR1 Amplified Group0 percentage of participants
Secondary

6-month PFS Rate for Each of the FGFRI Amplified Groups (Low, Intermediate, High) in Comparison to Historical Controls

The 6-month PFS rate was defined as the proportion of patients who were alive and progression-free at 6 months after start of study treatment.

Time frame: Time from study entry to the first of either disease progression or death, assessed at 6 months

Population: No comparison was done do versus historical controls because it was inappropriate due to the small number of patients available.

Secondary

Compare the 6-month PFS Rate for Each FGFR1 Amplified Group (Low, Intermediate, and High) Versus FGFR1 Non-amplified Patients.

The 6-month PFS rate was defined as the proportion of patients who were alive and progression-free at 6 months after start of study treatment.

Time frame: Time from study entry to the first of either disease progression or death, assessed at 6 months

Population: All treated and eligible patients. One participant was not done due to not enough tissue.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment (Nintedanib)Compare the 6-month PFS Rate for Each FGFR1 Amplified Group (Low, Intermediate, and High) Versus FGFR1 Non-amplified Patients.Non-amplified0 percentage of participants
Treatment (Nintedanib)Compare the 6-month PFS Rate for Each FGFR1 Amplified Group (Low, Intermediate, and High) Versus FGFR1 Non-amplified Patients.Intermediate amplification0 percentage of participants
Treatment (Nintedanib)Compare the 6-month PFS Rate for Each FGFR1 Amplified Group (Low, Intermediate, and High) Versus FGFR1 Non-amplified Patients.High amplificiation0 percentage of participants
Treatment (Nintedanib)Compare the 6-month PFS Rate for Each FGFR1 Amplified Group (Low, Intermediate, and High) Versus FGFR1 Non-amplified Patients.Total0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Compare the 6-month PFS Rate for the Entire FGFR1 Amplified Group Versus the FGFR1 Non-amplified Patients.

The 6-month PFS rate was defined as the proportion of patients who were alive and progression-free at 6 months after start of study treatment.

Time frame: Time from study entry to the first of either disease progression or death, assessed at 6 months

Population: All treated and eligible patients. One participant was not done due to not enough tissue.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment (Nintedanib)Compare the 6-month PFS Rate for the Entire FGFR1 Amplified Group Versus the FGFR1 Non-amplified Patients.Amplified0 percentage of participants
Treatment (Nintedanib)Compare the 6-month PFS Rate for the Entire FGFR1 Amplified Group Versus the FGFR1 Non-amplified Patients.Non-amplified0 percentage of participants
Treatment (Nintedanib)Compare the 6-month PFS Rate for the Entire FGFR1 Amplified Group Versus the FGFR1 Non-amplified Patients.Total0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)

Percentage of participants with adverse events. Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) was Accessed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) CTCAE Version 4.0.

Time frame: Up to 30 days post-treatment

Population: All treated and eligible patients. No statistics computed due to all patients had AEs in both groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment (Nintedanib)Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Total100 percentage of participants
Treatment (Nintedanib)Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Amplified100 percentage of participants
Treatment (Nintedanib)Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Non-amplified100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from study entry to death from any cause.

Time frame: From study entry to death from any cause, assessed up to 3 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Treatment (Nintedanib)Overall Survival (OS)Amplified10.2 months
Treatment (Nintedanib)Overall Survival (OS)Non-amplified5.8 months
Treatment (Nintedanib)Overall Survival (OS)Overall10.6 months
p-value: 0.59Log Rank
Secondary

Progression Free Survival

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from study entry to the first of either disease progression or death.

Time frame: Time from study entry to the first of either disease progression or death, assessed up to 3 years

Population: All treated patients

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Treatment (Nintedanib)Progression Free SurvivalOverall2.7 months
Treatment (Nintedanib)Progression Free SurvivalAmplified1.8 months
Treatment (Nintedanib)Progression Free SurvivalNon-amplified3.4 months
p-value: 0.36Log Rank
Secondary

Tumor Response Rate

Tumor Response rate was defined as the proportion of patients who had Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) by RECIST 1.1 Criteria. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Time frame: Up to 3 years

Population: All treated and eligible patients. No statistics computed due to all patients were non-response in both groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment (Nintedanib)Tumor Response RateTotal0 percentage of participants
Treatment (Nintedanib)Tumor Response RateAmplified0 percentage of participants
Treatment (Nintedanib)Tumor Response RateNon-amplified0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026