Skip to content

Catheter Early Withdrawal or Maintenance in Sepsis or Septic Shock

Comparison Between Catheter Early Withdrawal or Maintenance in Sepsis or Septic Shock With Undefined Origin

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01947751
Enrollment
100
Registered
2013-09-20
Start date
2013-03-31
Completion date
2014-02-28
Last updated
2013-09-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Catheter Related Infection

Keywords

Catheter related infection, Central venous catheter, CVC infection

Brief summary

Central venous catheter(CVC)-related infection is an inherent complication of this device that should be treated promptly. However, there are doubts about the need for the immediate withdrawal of CVC while there is still no confirmation of such infection. The aim of this study is to compare the resolution of CVC-related infection, testing two approaches: catheter´s early exchange, when the possibility of related sepsis is considered, versus the maintenance of the CVC and early antibiotic therapy until the infection is confirmed.

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to compare the strategy of immediate removal of the catheter with a conservative strategy in resolution of infection in patients with sepsis or septic shock without a defined origin. The investigators intend to demonstrate that the conservative strategy can reduce the rate of unnecessary catheter removal, without increasing morbidity. In the intervention group the investigators will adopt the conservative strategy, changing the CVC after the confirmation of infection related to it or non-improvement of sepsis. The control group is represented by the patients in whom the CVC is removed early.

Interventions

PROCEDURECVC exchange

CVC exchange when related infection is suspected

DRUGCVC maintenance

CVC maintenance and adding antibiotic therapy when related infection is suspected, waiting for the cultures to take the decision of changing CVC

Sponsors

Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceicao
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients with 18 years or more, admitted to ICU that had a CVC inserted before or after ICU admission and with infection with undefined origin.

Exclusion criteria

* Less than 18 years, severe neutropenia (\<500/mm³), intravascular device (pacemaker, prosthetic valve), unequivocal signs of infection on the site of CVC insertion, patients who were terminally ill defined, bacteremia without a known source, refusal to signing the informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Infection resolution4 weeksCompare the resolution of CVC-related infection between the group that had the CVC exchanged, versus the CVC-maintenance plus adding antibiotics therapy group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical variables6 monthsComparison of PCR, leukocytes, temperature, length of stay and mortality in the two groups, as well as complication rates and number of catheters removed.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Primary ContactMarcio M Boniatti, PhD
marciobt@terra.com.br555133572221

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026