Skip to content

IVUS Guidance to Reduce Contrast in Coronary Angioplasty

Minimizing cOntrast utiliZAtion With IVUS Guidance in coRonary angioplasTy: The MOZART Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01947335
Acronym
MOZART
Enrollment
83
Registered
2013-09-20
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2016-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Contrast Media Reaction, Acute Renal Failure

Keywords

Coronary, Angioplasty, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Stent, Contrast, Acute Renal failure, Intravascular ultrasound, Prevention

Brief summary

This study tests the hypothesis that ultrasound-guided PCI reduces contrast volume during the procedure.

Detailed description

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is an important adverse effect of percutaneous coronary interventions. Despite various efforts, very few preventive measures have been shown effective in reducing its incidence. The final volume of contrast media utilized during the procedure is a well-known independent factor affecting the occurrence of CI-AKI. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been largely used as an adjunctive diagnostic tool during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). When fully explored, IVUS provides precise information for guiding the PCI strategy. IVUS allows accurate vessel and lesion sizing, determination of plaque calcification (and the need for pre-stent plaque preparation), assessment of post-stent results (including edge dissections and residual lesion, as well as stent underexpansion or incomplete apposition). Therefore, IVUS has the potential to reduce the utilization of contrast media during PCI. In the present study, we hypothesize that IVUS guidance is associated with a significant reduction in the volume of contrast media during PCI, in comparison to standard angiography-guided intervention.

Interventions

Intravascular ultrasound guided percutaneous coronary intervention

Sponsors

InCor Heart Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent * Age \>=18 years * Coronary artery disease scheduled for percutaneous intervention * Technical feasibility for intravascular ultrasound to guide coronary angioplasty * Increased risk for contrast-induced acute renal failure (e.g. age \> 80 years, female gender, diabetes, urgent or emergent procedure priority, diabetes, congestive heart failure, increased baseline serum creatinine, decreased calculated or measured creatinine clearance, intra-aortic balloon pumping, previous renal transplantation or single kidney)

Exclusion criteria

* Anticipated technical impossibility for intravascular ultrasound * Unknown baseline renal function * Baseline end-stage renal failure needing dialysis * Acute renal failure with dynamic change in renal function at the time of index procedure * Iodine contrast administration \<= 72 prior to index procedure * Known allergy to iodine contrast

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Volume of Iodine Contrast Used During ProcedureDay 1Total volume of iodine contrast administered during the index procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major Adverse Cardiac Events30 days and 6 monthsComposite of death, myocardial infarction or repeat revascularization
Incidence of Contrast-induced Nephropathy7 daysIncrease \>= 0.5 mg/dl in basal serum creatinine

Countries

Brazil

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Angiography-guided PCI
Angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention
42
IVUS-guided PCI
Intravascular ultrasound guided percutaneous coronary intervention IVUS-guided PCI: Intravascular ultrasound guided percutaneous coronary intervention
41
Total83

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAngiography-guided PCIIVUS-guided PCITotal
Age, Continuous62.1 years67.1 years64.6 years
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
42 participants41 participants83 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants17 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants24 Participants48 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 423 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 422 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

Total Volume of Iodine Contrast Used During Procedure

Total volume of iodine contrast administered during the index procedure.

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Angiography-guided PCITotal Volume of Iodine Contrast Used During Procedure64.5 ml
IVUS-guided PCITotal Volume of Iodine Contrast Used During Procedure20.0 ml
Secondary

Incidence of Contrast-induced Nephropathy

Increase \>= 0.5 mg/dl in basal serum creatinine

Time frame: 7 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Angiography-guided PCIIncidence of Contrast-induced Nephropathy19 percentage of participants
IVUS-guided PCIIncidence of Contrast-induced Nephropathy7.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Major Adverse Cardiac Events

Composite of death, myocardial infarction or repeat revascularization

Time frame: 30 days and 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Angiography-guided PCIMajor Adverse Cardiac Events30 days2 participants
Angiography-guided PCIMajor Adverse Cardiac Events6-months2 participants
IVUS-guided PCIMajor Adverse Cardiac Events30 days2 participants
IVUS-guided PCIMajor Adverse Cardiac Events6-months5 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026