Mental Disorders
Conditions
Keywords
Patient-Provider Relationship, Shared Decision Making, Therapeutic Alliance, Mental Health, Minority Health, Patient Activation, Communication
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to learn more about how patients and healthcare providers interact in order to improve shared decision making. The investigators plan to test an intervention with two separate educational components-one for patients and one for providers-designed to encourage patients to ask questions and increase their level of involvement in their own care, while simultaneously training providers to be more receptive to patients' questions and concerns. Patients in the intervention group will receive three short (30-45 minute) trainings focused on developing and asking questions and will be interviewed three times over the course of the intervention to see how it has affected the quality of their care. Providers receiving the intervention will participate in three separate trainings, including a 12-hour group workshop, an additional two hour training, and six hours of individual instruction, including personalized feedback based on three audio-recorded patient visits. Previous studies looking at patient engagement and involvement in decision-making have shown that increased engagement is linked with improved outcomes, but that providers are sometimes not prepared to develop a collaborative relationship with patients. The investigators think that training both patients and providers to work together and communicate more effectively will improve quality of care and increase patient satisfaction more than interventions that focus on only one side of the clinical encounter. One of the major goals in studying patient-provider communication is to improve shared decision-making and see how it contributes to racial and ethnic disparities in mental health care, since minority patients have been shown to be less involved in care and have been shown to be perceived and treated differently by providers.
Detailed description
The Center for Multicultural Mental Health Research (CMMHR) at Cambridge Health Alliance has recently been selected for funding by the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) to address the importance of patient-provider communication, shared decision making, and therapeutic alliance. Our research team demonstrated that a psycho-educational intervention (DECIDE-PA) improves patient activation and self-management in behavioral health care. However, the investigators found that providers were unresponsive or reacted negatively to patients' activation. In response, the investigators propose to combine DECIDE-PA with provider coaching (DECIDE-PC) to increase providers' receptivity to patient activation, and improve Shared Decision Making (SDM). The investigators also focus on quality of care, responding to clinic administrators who require interventions that improve quality of behavioral health care (mental health and substance treatments). Aims: 1) Test the effectiveness of DECIDE PA+PC compared to usual care in improving SDM and patient-perceived quality of behavioral health care; 2) Test whether patient-centered communication and therapeutic alliance mediate the effect of the DECIDE PA+PC intervention on SDM; 3) Explore whether ethnic/racial or language matching between patient and provider moderates the effect of DECIDE PA+PC on SDM and quality of behavioral health care. Intervention: The DECIDE PA+PC intervention is designed to improve the quality of mental health care for adult behavioral health patients by engaging minority participants in asking questions about their treatment. The intervention is administered to patients and providers and is designed to improve patient activation, self-management, and therapeutic alliance. For patients, the DECIDE PA is designed to help patients identify concerns about their condition or treatment and generate questions for providers regarding these concerns. The DECIDE PA intervention consists of 3-4 brief training sessions for patients delivered by Care Managers. For providers, the DECIDE PC is designed to help providers improve therapeutic alliance, patient-provider communication, continuance in care, and satisfaction with services for patients in concordant and discordant ethnic/racial dyads. The DECIDE PC training for providers consists of 1.5 days of training which focuses on augmenting patient-centered communication and therapeutic alliance as a possible underlying pathway by which SDM can take place. The training also addresses 1) lack of perspective taking; 2) frequent attributional errors that providers make; and 3) decreased receptivity to patient participation and collaboration in decision making. The training includes provider coaching totaling 15-20 hours. Methods: For Aim 1, implement a randomized controlled trial comparing DECIDE-PA+PC with usual care on Shard Decision Making (SDM) and perceived quality of care. Identify treatment effects using multi-level models that account for nesting of observations, patients, providers, and clinics. For Aim 2, identify underlying mechanisms of the effect of the DECIDE-PA+PC intervention on SDM. Mediation analysis techniques are used that allow for rigorous testing of causal pathways and statistical adjustment for spurious correlation is used in instances where mediators and SDM measurement are contemporaneous. For Aim 3, expand Aim 1 models to test whether DECIDE-PA+PC impacts SDM and perceived quality differentially by ethnic/racial concordant/discordant dyads. Usual Care: Usual care across clinics is described by clinicians as answering their patients' questions during the clinical encounter. Clinicians report that on average they perceive their patients as having limited involvement in decision-making. No DECIDE training for patients or providers will be applied to the control condition while the control provider and control patient are participating in the study. Once the control provider and control patient complete their participation in the study, they will be offered the DECIDE trainings. Participating Sites: The investigators plan to administer the intervention to patients and providers at four participating Cambridge Health Alliance clinics, along with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston Children's Hospital, South Cove Community Health Center, Edward M Kennedy Health Center (Great Brook Valley Health Center), and two community health centers through Harbor Health Services (Neponset Health Center and Geiger Gibson Community Health Center).
Interventions
The DECIDE-PA intervention teaches patients strategies for asking questions and communicating more effectively with their behavioral health care provider in order to improve shared decision making.
The DECIDE-PC intervention trains providers in patient-centered communication techniques and encourages providers to be receptive to patients who take a more active role during the clinical encounter in order to improve shared decision making.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Patient Inclusion Criteria: -Patients ages 18-80 who are receiving mental health treatment at one of the collaborating clinics. Patient
Exclusion criteria
-Patients will be excluded if they screen with mania, psychosis, or suicidality to ensure their safety and minimize the stress of receiving the intervention. Patients over the age of 65 will be assessed with a cognitive functioning screening instrument and excluded if possible cognitive impairment is indicated. Provider Inclusion Criteria: -Providers will be permitted to participate in this study if they are regular, paid staff that provide behavioral health services at any of the participating clinics. No other criteria will be required.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Shared Decision Making (OPTION) Independent Blind Coder Assessment Scores | Follow-up assessment (2 months) | 12 items designed to assess SDM quality in medical visit. Rated on 5 point Likert scales ranging from 0 (behavior not observed) -- 4 (clinician exhibited behavior to high standard). Final scores are the sum of the rating and range from 0-44. Final scores were transformed to a scale that ranges from 0 (lowest SDM) - 100 (highest SDM). |
| Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 Patient Version) | End-of-intervention Assessment (5 months) | Evaluates patient SDM from a patient-provider visit based on their perception of nine steps deemed essential to SDM in a clinical encounter. Rated on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Final scores are sum of rating, which ranges between 0 and 45. Converted to 0 (lowest level) and 100 (highest level). |
| Provider Shared Decision Making in Behavioral Health (SDM -BH) Provider Version | Follow-up Assessment (2 months) | The 10 items was developed by research team to evaluate provider SDM from a patient-provider visit in behavioral health. Items are rated on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 6 (completely agree). Final scores are sum of rating, which ranges between 6 and 60. A high score indicates good communication and that decision making was shared between patient and provider, as perceived by the provider. |
| Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 Provider Version) | Follow-up Assessment (2 months) | Evaluates provider SDM from a patient-provider visit based on their perception of nine steps deemed essential to SDM in a clinical encounter. Rated on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Final scores are sum of rating, which ranges between 0 and 45. Converted to 0 (lowest level) and 100 (highest level). |
| Perceptions of Care Survey - Global Evaluation of Care Scale (PoC) | End-of-intervention Assessment (5 months) | Assesses patient perceptions of care in psychiatric settings. Includes 3 items, final scores are scored externally, and range from 0 (lowest quality) to 100 (highest quality). |
| Patient Shared Decision Making in Behavioral Health (SDM -BH)- Patient Version | End-of-intervention Assessment (5 months) | The 10 items was developed by research team to evaluate patient SDM from a patient-provider visit in behavioral health. Items are rated on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 6 (completely agree). Final scores are sum of rating, which ranges between 6 and 60. A high score indicates good communication and that decision making was shared between patient and provider, as perceived by the patient. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Recruitment began in August 2014 and ended in September 2016. Participants were recruited at behavioral health community clinics and psychiatric outpatient clinics in Massachusetts. Participants were assessed for eligibility and then randomized into a study arm.
Pre-assignment details
Patients were excluded due to ineligibility (positive screening for mania, psychosis, and/or active suicidal ideation) or treatment discontinuation. Providers were excluded due to a lack of patients enrolled in the study. Both patient and provider study participants were excluded if they withdrew before randomization into a study arm.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Intervention Providers & Patients Participants in this arm are intervention patients who will receive the DECIDE-PA intervention.
These patients receive care from Intervention providers, who will receive the DECIDE-PC intervention.
For intervention patients, the DECIDE PA is designed to help patients identify concerns about their condition or treatment and generate questions for providers regarding these concerns. The DECIDE PA intervention consists of 3-4 brief training sessions for patients delivered by Care Managers.
For intervention providers, the DECIDE PC is designed to help providers improve therapeutic alliance, patient-provider communication, continuance in care, and satisfaction with services for patients in order to improve shared decision making. | 89 |
| Intervention Patients, Control Providers Participants in this arm are intervention patients who will receive the DECIDE-PA intervention.
These patients receive care from Control providers, who will not receive the DECIDE-PC intervention.
For intervention patients, the DECIDE PA is designed to help patients identify concerns about their condition or treatment and generate questions for providers regarding these concerns. The DECIDE PA intervention consists of 3-4 brief training sessions for patients delivered by Care Managers. | 68 |
| Control Patients, Intervention Providers Participants in this arm are control patients who will not receive the DECIDE-PA intervention.
These patients receive care from Intervention providers, who will receive the DECIDE-PC intervention.
Control patients will receive a pamphlet called Managing Your Mental Health Care. For intervention providers, the DECIDE PC is designed to help providers improve therapeutic alliance, patient-provider communication, continuance in care, and satisfaction with services for patients in order to improve shared decision making. | 83 |
| Control Patients & Providers Participants in this arm are control patients who will not receive the DECIDE-PA intervention.
These patients receive care from Control providers, who will not receive the DECIDE-PC intervention.
Control patients will receive a pamphlet called Managing Your Mental Health Care. | 72 |
| Non Randomized Controlled Trial Patients Participants in this arm are patients who did not participate in the Randomized Controlled Trial. One to two patients will be recruited for each enrolled provider (Control and Intervention). One clinical session per patient will be audio recorded. These clinical recordings will be used to provide feedback only for Intervention providers during part 1 of the DECIDE-PC intervention. | 95 |
| Control Providers Participants in this arm are providers who were randomized to the Control group. Control providers will not receive the DECIDE-PC intervention. | 34 |
| Intervention Providers Participants in this arm are providers who were randomized to the Intervention group. Intervention providers will receive the DECIDE-PC intervention. The DECIDE PC is designed to help providers improve therapeutic alliance, patient-provider communication, continuance in care, and satisfaction with services for patients in order to improve shared decision making. | 40 |
| Total | 481 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 | FG005 | FG006 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Missing Follow-up Assessment | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | No Clinical Recording | 12 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Non-coding Clinical Recording language | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | No patients were enrolled in study | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 10 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Intervention Providers & Patients | Intervention Patients, Control Providers | Control Patients, Intervention Providers | Control Patients & Providers | Non Randomized Controlled Trial Patients | Control Providers | Intervention Providers | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized <=18 years | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Age, Customized >=65 years | 5 Participants | 7 Participants | 6 Participants | 7 Participants | 5 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 34 Participants |
| Age, Customized Between 18 and 65 years | 83 Participants | 60 Participants | 75 Participants | 65 Participants | 88 Participants | 31 Participants | 38 Participants | 440 Participants |
| Age, Customized Missing | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 41 Participants | 26 Participants | 34 Participants | 29 Participants | 38 Participants | 8 Participants | 7 Participants | 183 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 48 Participants | 42 Participants | 49 Participants | 43 Participants | 57 Participants | 26 Participants | 33 Participants | 298 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Patient Shared Decision Making in Behavioral Health (SDM-BH) Patient Version | 49.35 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.91 | 46.23 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.26 | 48.58 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 7 | 47.76 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3 | — | — | — | 48.18 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.39 |
| Perceptions of Care Survey - Global Evaluation of Care Scale (PoC) | 90.78 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.44 | 88.29 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.33 | 90.74 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 | 88.32 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.45 | 92.75 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.74 | — | — | 90.39 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.77 |
| Provider Shared Decision Making in Behavioral Health (SDM-BH) Provider Version | — | — | — | — | — | 46.29 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.91 | 46.85 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.97 | 46.60 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.37 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 7 Participants | 5 Participants | 9 Participants | 5 Participants | 7 Participants | 5 Participants | 6 Participants | 44 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 14 Participants | 6 Participants | 12 Participants | 6 Participants | 9 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 50 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 2 Participants | 15 Participants | 0 Participants | 6 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 30 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 28 Participants | 10 Participants | 28 Participants | 21 Participants | 32 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 123 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 36 Participants | 32 Participants | 31 Participants | 33 Participants | 43 Participants | 22 Participants | 30 Participants | 227 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 89 participants | 68 participants | 83 participants | 72 participants | 95 participants | 34 participants | 40 participants | 481 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 58 Participants | 47 Participants | 56 Participants | 51 Participants | 57 Participants | 24 Participants | 32 Participants | 325 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 31 Participants | 21 Participants | 27 Participants | 21 Participants | 38 Participants | 10 Participants | 8 Participants | 156 Participants |
| Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 Patient Version) | 77.15 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.31 | 76.31 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.27 | 77.82 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.54 | 74.24 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.04 | 75.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.57 | — | — | 76.23 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.32 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk | EG006 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 89 | 1 / 68 | 1 / 83 | 0 / 72 | 0 / 95 | 0 / 34 | 0 / 40 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 89 | 0 / 68 | 0 / 83 | 0 / 72 | 0 / 95 | 0 / 34 | 0 / 40 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 89 | 0 / 68 | 0 / 83 | 0 / 72 | 0 / 95 | 0 / 34 | 0 / 40 |
Outcome results
Patient Shared Decision Making in Behavioral Health (SDM -BH)- Patient Version
The 10 items was developed by research team to evaluate patient SDM from a patient-provider visit in behavioral health. Items are rated on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 6 (completely agree). Final scores are sum of rating, which ranges between 6 and 60. A high score indicates good communication and that decision making was shared between patient and provider, as perceived by the patient.
Time frame: End-of-intervention Assessment (5 months)
Population: All participants who were enrolled in the study after the baseline interview and whose data was analyzed. SDM-BH patient version was not administered to providers. Measure was not assessed for Non-RCT patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Patients & Providers | Patient Shared Decision Making in Behavioral Health (SDM -BH)- Patient Version | 51.46 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.63 |
| Intervention Patients, Control Providers | Patient Shared Decision Making in Behavioral Health (SDM -BH)- Patient Version | 47.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.54 |
| Control Patients, Intervention Providers | Patient Shared Decision Making in Behavioral Health (SDM -BH)- Patient Version | 50.28 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.85 |
| Control Patients & Providers | Patient Shared Decision Making in Behavioral Health (SDM -BH)- Patient Version | 48.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.89 |
Perceptions of Care Survey - Global Evaluation of Care Scale (PoC)
Assesses patient perceptions of care in psychiatric settings. Includes 3 items, final scores are scored externally, and range from 0 (lowest quality) to 100 (highest quality).
Time frame: End-of-intervention Assessment (5 months)
Population: All participants who were enrolled in the study after the baseline interview and whose data was analyzed. PoC was not administered to providers. Measure was not assessed for Non-RCT patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Patients & Providers | Perceptions of Care Survey - Global Evaluation of Care Scale (PoC) | 94.60 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.64 |
| Intervention Patients, Control Providers | Perceptions of Care Survey - Global Evaluation of Care Scale (PoC) | 91.15 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.48 |
| Control Patients, Intervention Providers | Perceptions of Care Survey - Global Evaluation of Care Scale (PoC) | 90.50 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.45 |
| Control Patients & Providers | Perceptions of Care Survey - Global Evaluation of Care Scale (PoC) | 89.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.06 |
Provider Shared Decision Making in Behavioral Health (SDM -BH) Provider Version
The 10 items was developed by research team to evaluate provider SDM from a patient-provider visit in behavioral health. Items are rated on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 6 (completely agree). Final scores are sum of rating, which ranges between 6 and 60. A high score indicates good communication and that decision making was shared between patient and provider, as perceived by the provider.
Time frame: Follow-up Assessment (2 months)
Population: All participants who were enrolled in the study after the baseline interview and whose data was analyzed. Each enrolled provider completed a follow-up assessment for each of their enrolled patients, following the audio recording of their clinical session.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Patients & Providers | Provider Shared Decision Making in Behavioral Health (SDM -BH) Provider Version | 41.26 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.57 |
| Intervention Patients, Control Providers | Provider Shared Decision Making in Behavioral Health (SDM -BH) Provider Version | 40.10 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.45 |
| Control Patients, Intervention Providers | Provider Shared Decision Making in Behavioral Health (SDM -BH) Provider Version | 41.96 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.53 |
| Control Patients & Providers | Provider Shared Decision Making in Behavioral Health (SDM -BH) Provider Version | 38.41 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.11 |
Shared Decision Making (OPTION) Independent Blind Coder Assessment Scores
12 items designed to assess SDM quality in medical visit. Rated on 5 point Likert scales ranging from 0 (behavior not observed) -- 4 (clinician exhibited behavior to high standard). Final scores are the sum of the rating and range from 0-44. Final scores were transformed to a scale that ranges from 0 (lowest SDM) - 100 (highest SDM).
Time frame: Follow-up assessment (2 months)
Population: All participants who enrolled in the study after the baseline interview and whose data was analyzed. Measure for Control Providers and Intervention Providers is the average across all of their RCT patients, irrespective of whether they were intervention or control patients. Differences from overall numbers are due to missing observations.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Patients & Providers | Shared Decision Making (OPTION) Independent Blind Coder Assessment Scores | 36.31 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.77 |
| Intervention Patients, Control Providers | Shared Decision Making (OPTION) Independent Blind Coder Assessment Scores | 29.78 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.53 |
| Control Patients, Intervention Providers | Shared Decision Making (OPTION) Independent Blind Coder Assessment Scores | 34.50 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.96 |
| Control Patients & Providers | Shared Decision Making (OPTION) Independent Blind Coder Assessment Scores | 30.37 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.54 |
| Non Randomized Controlled Trial Patients | Shared Decision Making (OPTION) Independent Blind Coder Assessment Scores | 32.37 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.96 |
| Control Providers | Shared Decision Making (OPTION) Independent Blind Coder Assessment Scores | 30.09 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.12 |
| Intervention Providers | Shared Decision Making (OPTION) Independent Blind Coder Assessment Scores | 35.39 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.48 |
Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 Patient Version)
Evaluates patient SDM from a patient-provider visit based on their perception of nine steps deemed essential to SDM in a clinical encounter. Rated on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Final scores are sum of rating, which ranges between 0 and 45. Converted to 0 (lowest level) and 100 (highest level).
Time frame: End-of-intervention Assessment (5 months)
Population: All participants who enrolled in the study after the baseline interview and whose data was analyzed. SDM-Q-9 patient version was not administered to providers. Measure was not assessed for Non-RCT patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Patients & Providers | Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 Patient Version) | 81.10 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.77 |
| Intervention Patients, Control Providers | Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 Patient Version) | 77.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.86 |
| Control Patients, Intervention Providers | Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 Patient Version) | 75.85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.91 |
| Control Patients & Providers | Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 Patient Version) | 76.75 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.52 |
Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 Provider Version)
Evaluates provider SDM from a patient-provider visit based on their perception of nine steps deemed essential to SDM in a clinical encounter. Rated on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Final scores are sum of rating, which ranges between 0 and 45. Converted to 0 (lowest level) and 100 (highest level).
Time frame: Follow-up Assessment (2 months)
Population: All participants who were enrolled in the study after the baseline interview and whose data was analyzed. Each enrolled provider completed a follow-up assessment for each of their enrolled patients, following the audio recording of their clinical session.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Patients & Providers | Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 Provider Version) | 69.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.51 |
| Intervention Patients, Control Providers | Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 Provider Version) | 69.60 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.3 |
| Control Patients, Intervention Providers | Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 Provider Version) | 69.85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.14 |
| Control Patients & Providers | Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 Provider Version) | 68.46 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.97 |