Infertility, Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
Conditions
Keywords
infertility, recurrent pregnancy loss, miscarriage, Next Generation Sequencing
Brief summary
We propose to perform a clinical randomized trial to evaluate the effect of blastocyst biopsy and whole chromosome analysis by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in comparison to standard Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) methods on on implantation rates, miscarriage rates, and pregnancy rates. This will be three studies into one: a) a comparison of treatment (NGS) and no treatment, b) a non-selection study based on the control group for which we will replace without knowing the ploidy of the embryos, but we will know it later, c) a retrospective study about the use of Mitochondrial DNA as a selection tool.
Detailed description
Patients following the inclusion criteria will be randomized into two groups: 1. Control group: All blastocyst embryos will be biopsied on day 5/6, but the biopsies will be frozen and will not be analyzed before replacement. Blastocyst embryos will be vitrified for future frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle. Patients will have a single hatching blastocyst (\*) thawed and transferred into the uterus in a FET cycle based on standard embryo quality assessment without NGS. After transfer, all biopsied samples will be analyzed (the replaced embryo also, in order to do a non-selection study). If patients in the control group do not have a pregnancy to term from that FET cycle, euploid frozen blastocysts will be thawed and transferred on the next FET transfer. 2. Test group: All blastocyst embryos will be biopsied on day 5/6, and the biopsies will be analyzed using NGS. (\*) and Biopsied blastocyst embryos will be vitrified for a future frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle. Patients will have a single hatching euploid blastocyst (\*) thawed and transferred into the uterus in a FET cycle (\*) Hatching blastocysts as described by Gardner and Schoolcraft (1999) The Primary efficacy endpoint of comparing the study group with the control will be ongoing implantation rate (# fetus reaching 2nd trimester / # embryos replaced). All biopsied embryos from the test and control group will have their mitochondrial DNA analyzed, but that information will not be used for purposes of choosing embryos for replacement. Retrospectively but blindly (see blinding of results section), the information will be used at the end of the study to determine which embryos have a higher chance of implanting. If at that point the participating patients have remaining embryos frozen, they will be able to use that information for purposes of embryo selection.
Interventions
GENETICNext Generation Sequencing after Blastocyst biopsy
PGD using blastocyst biopsy and testing of the biopsy by NGS
Sponsors
Main Line Fertility Center
Reprogenetics
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 42 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* All patients medically cleared to do a fresh or frozen embryo transfer. * Age up to 42 years
Exclusion criteria
* microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) and Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) patients * At least one partner carrier of a chromosomal or genetic disease * Abnormal ovarian reserve, defined as follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) of \>10 IU/L on day 2-4 of the cycle and anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) \< 1ng /ml (If only one of the two parameters altered then patients is acceptable). This is based on Mandy Katz abstract at American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) 2011 where they showed that these patients have 35% chance of having no euploid embryos - They are excluded only to make the study size smaller, otherwise, if an euploid embryo is found in these patients, they implant as well as patients with normal ovarian reserve. Not all centers do AMH testing - we recommend first to run FSH and only test AMH if FSH is abnormal. * Egg donor cycle (sperm donor is acceptable) * Gender selection cycles * Thaw cycles
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| improvement in ongoing implantation rates | When a fetal heartbeat is detected for each patient. (8 weeks after implantation). | We foresee a significant increase in ongoing implantation rates in the Test group compared to the Control group based on several studies showing about a 50% improvement of implantation rates after Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) with blastocyst biopsy and comprehensive chromosome analysis techniques The center participating in the study has an average 41.5% implantation rate of blastocysts in patients 35-39 years of age without PGD. Assuming that NGS will increase the detection power of chromosome abnormalities, we expect a higher implantation rate in the test group. Furthermore, we expect a 6% miscarriage rate in the Test group, based on extensive data from array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) results (Hodes-Wertz et al. 2012), while about 21% in the Control group based on Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies (SART) data (ages 35-40, SART 2011). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Determine specificity and sensitivity rates | During a pregnancy term | The pregnancy outcome of Controls patients with euploid embryos replaced will be compared to that of control patients with aneuploid embryos replaced. This will give us the specificity of the test (false positive rate) by obtaining the ongoing pregnancy rate of cycles with aneuploid embryos replaced, and the sensitivity of the test (false negative rate) by obtaining the miscarriage rate and ongoing pregnancy rate of cycles with euploid embryos replaced. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation of Mitochondrial DNA and implantation | When a fetal heartbeat is detected (8 weeks after implantation) | The third aim of this study is to determine retrospectively if mt DNA content is linked to implantation potential and if that is measurable by NGS. NGS provides the additional advantage that it can measure mitochondrial DNA, which it's content, seems to be inversely correlated with implantation (Fragouli et al 2013, ASRM). |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed