Skip to content

Buparid/PARI SINUS Versus Budes® Nasal Spray in the Therapy of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Polyposis Nasi

A Pilot Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Buparid/PARI SINUS Versus Budes® Nasal Spray in the Therapy of Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) With Polyposis Nasi in Adult Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01946711
Enrollment
14
Registered
2013-09-20
Start date
2013-08-28
Completion date
2021-06-21
Last updated
2022-04-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Polyposis, Rhinosinusitis

Keywords

CRS, polyposis

Brief summary

The study should create data for the selection of a clinically relevant primary endpoint to assess the efficacy and safety of Buparid/PARI SINUS as compared to Budes Nasal Spray in the therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with polyposis nasi in adult patients. Ideally, the selected parameter should allow a correlation between an objective methodology and the clinical outcome of the study patients.

Interventions

DRUGBudesonide

Inhalation

Sponsors

Pari Pharma GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient with confirmed diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with polyposis nasi grade I-III * Patient with a PNIF of \> 7 l/min separated for left and right side of the nose * Patient's written informed consent * Male or female,\>= 18 years of age * Patient is able to undergo nasal therapy without restrictions * Capable of understanding the purpose and risk of the clinical trial * Female patients with childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test prior to first IMP administration * Patient has completed correctly the diary during the Wash-in Phase

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with cystic fibrosis * Patients with polyposis nasi grade IV * Patients with prior sinonasal surgery (exemption: polypectomy) * Patients with primary ciliaritis * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Patients with suspected active upper airway infection * Receipt of an investigational drug as part of a clinical trial within 4 weeks prior to first administration of IMP * Drug or alcohol abuse * End-stage malignancies * Known hypersensitivity to Budesonide * Patients with oral steroid therapy within the last 4 weeks * Patients with frequent epistaxis (\> 2 per month)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of Inflammation of the Nasal Mucosa and Paranasal SinusChange from Baseline to Week 8Inflammation of the nasal mucosa and paranasal sinus was assessed using the Lund-Mackay score based on magnetic resonance imaging. The score can take on values between 0 and 24 points, with higher values indicating more severe impairment. The outcome investigated is the intraindividual mean score of 2 independent raters assessing the same images.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety Assessmentup to 26 weeksTreatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) Each participant has been monitored for adverse events up to 26 weeks. All patients withdrawn from the study will be followed-up for AEs or SAEs for further 2 weeks or 4 weeks, respectively.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health-specific Quality of Life24 weeksHealth-specific quality of life was assessed by means of the self-rated, 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). The SNOT-22 total score has a (theoretical) range of 0 - 110 points, with higher scores indicating more severe impairment. Presented are the mean values of the SNOT-22 total score after 24 weeks minus value at day 0 (baseline).
Nasal Obstruction4 weeks / 8 weeksNasal obstruction was assessed using the method of rhinomanometry by measuring the positive nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF). For the assessment the subject had to inhale maximally through the nose three times and the highest value of flow rate was recorded after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of treatment.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

4 patients not randomised

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Buparid; Treatment A
Buparid 1 mg budesonide/2 ml nebuliser solution Budesonide: Inhalation
8
Budes; Treatment B
Budes® Nasal Spray 50 µg budesonide/pump Budesonide: Nasal spray
6
Total14

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBudes; Treatment BTotalBuparid; Treatment A
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
6 Participants14 Participants8 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
6 participants14 participants8 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants8 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 84 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Change of Inflammation of the Nasal Mucosa and Paranasal Sinus

Inflammation of the nasal mucosa and paranasal sinus was assessed using the Lund-Mackay score based on magnetic resonance imaging. The score can take on values between 0 and 24 points, with higher values indicating more severe impairment. The outcome investigated is the intraindividual mean score of 2 independent raters assessing the same images.

Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 8

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Buparid; Treatment AChange of Inflammation of the Nasal Mucosa and Paranasal Sinus-2 units on a scale
Budes; Treatment BChange of Inflammation of the Nasal Mucosa and Paranasal Sinus-0.8 units on a scale
Secondary

Safety Assessment

Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) Each participant has been monitored for adverse events up to 26 weeks. All patients withdrawn from the study will be followed-up for AEs or SAEs for further 2 weeks or 4 weeks, respectively.

Time frame: up to 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Buparid; Treatment ASafety Assessment5 Participants
Budes; Treatment BSafety Assessment4 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Health-specific Quality of Life

Health-specific quality of life was assessed by means of the self-rated, 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). The SNOT-22 total score has a (theoretical) range of 0 - 110 points, with higher scores indicating more severe impairment. Presented are the mean values of the SNOT-22 total score after 24 weeks minus value at day 0 (baseline).

Time frame: 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Buparid; Treatment AHealth-specific Quality of Life23.6 score on a scale
Budes; Treatment BHealth-specific Quality of Life14.4 score on a scale
Other Pre-specified

Nasal Obstruction

Nasal obstruction was assessed using the method of rhinomanometry by measuring the positive nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF). For the assessment the subject had to inhale maximally through the nose three times and the highest value of flow rate was recorded after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of treatment.

Time frame: 4 weeks / 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Buparid; Treatment ANasal ObstructionMean flow rate after 4 weeks746 ml/sec
Buparid; Treatment ANasal ObstructionMean flow rate after 8 weeks755 ml/sec
Budes; Treatment BNasal ObstructionMean flow rate after 4 weeks574 ml/sec
Budes; Treatment BNasal ObstructionMean flow rate after 8 weeks646 ml/sec

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026