Alzheimers Disease
Conditions
Brief summary
The overall objective of the study is to assess the feasibility of implementing a quantitative process of florbetapir F 18 scan interpretation. The hypothesis is that the use of quantitative analysis will increase the accuracy of florbetapir F 18 scan interpretation.
Interventions
No Florbetapir F 18 will be administered in this study.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Readers have undergone Amyvid reader training * Readers have minimal experience with quantitation of amyloid PET scans
Exclusion criteria
* Readers have previously been trained to quantitate amyloid PET scans
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Total Accuracy (MIMNeuro Software, Low Accuracy Readers) | Scan acquired 50-60 min post-injection | Evaluate whether the addition of quantitation as an adjunct to qualitative interpretations (VisQ) significantly improved the total accuracy of Amyvid scan interpretation in lower accuracy readers. Only the 46 scans with autopsy from A07/A16 are used for this outcome measure. |
| Change in Total Accuracy (Siemens Syngo.PET Software, Experimental Arm Low Accuracy Readers) | Scan acquired 50-60 min post-injection | Evaluate whether the addition of quantitation as an adjunct to qualitative interpretations (VisQ) significantly improved the total accuracy of Amyvid scan interpretation in lower accuracy readers. Only the 46 scans with autopsy from A07/A16 are used for this outcome measure. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Total Accuracy (MIMNeuro Software, All Readers) | Scan acquired 50-60 min post-injection | Evaluate whether the total accuracy of Amyvid VisQ interpretation was non-inferior to the qualitative scan interpretation alone. Only the 46 scans with autopsy from A07/A16 are used for this outcome measure. |
| Change in Reliability (MIMNeuro Software) | Scan acquired 50-60 min post-injection | Evaluate whether VisQ interpretation significantly improved the reliability of Amyvid scan interpretation compared with qualitative scan interpretation alone. The scan interpretation reliability will be evaluated using Fleiss' Kappa statistics. |
| Change in Total Accuracy (Siemens Syngo.PET Software, Experimental Arm All Readers) | Scan acquired 50-60 min post-injection | Evaluate whether the total accuracy of Amyvid VisQ interpretation was non-inferior to the qualitative scan interpretation alone. Only the 46 scans with autopsy from A07/A16 are used for this outcome measure. |
| Change in Reliability (Siemens Syngo.PET Software) | Scan acquired 50-60 min post-injection | Evaluate whether VisQ interpretation significantly improved the reliability of Amyvid scan interpretation compared with qualitative scan interpretations alone. The scan interpretation reliability will be evaluated using Fleiss' Kappa statistics. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Florbetapir PET Scans No subjects were enrolled in this study. Readers interpreted 96 Florbetapir scans from subjects enrolled in previous studies (A07\[NCT00857415\]/A16\[NCT01447719\] and A17\[NCT01400425\]). Scans used in the study included 46 scans with autopsy (A07/A16) and 50 randomly selected non-autopsy scans (A17). | 96 |
| Total | 96 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Florbetapir PET Scans |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 76.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.23 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 4 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 92 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 1 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 5 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 1 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 89 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 96 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 48 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 48 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 0 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 0 |
Outcome results
Change in Total Accuracy (MIMNeuro Software, Low Accuracy Readers)
Evaluate whether the addition of quantitation as an adjunct to qualitative interpretations (VisQ) significantly improved the total accuracy of Amyvid scan interpretation in lower accuracy readers. Only the 46 scans with autopsy from A07/A16 are used for this outcome measure.
Time frame: Scan acquired 50-60 min post-injection
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qualitative | Change in Total Accuracy (MIMNeuro Software, Low Accuracy Readers) | 81.7 Percent Accuracy | Standard Error 2.4 |
| VisQ | Change in Total Accuracy (MIMNeuro Software, Low Accuracy Readers) | 88.8 Percent Accuracy | Standard Error 3.1 |
| Change | Change in Total Accuracy (MIMNeuro Software, Low Accuracy Readers) | 7.1 Percent Accuracy | Standard Error 1.5 |
Change in Total Accuracy (Siemens Syngo.PET Software, Experimental Arm Low Accuracy Readers)
Evaluate whether the addition of quantitation as an adjunct to qualitative interpretations (VisQ) significantly improved the total accuracy of Amyvid scan interpretation in lower accuracy readers. Only the 46 scans with autopsy from A07/A16 are used for this outcome measure.
Time frame: Scan acquired 50-60 min post-injection
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qualitative | Change in Total Accuracy (Siemens Syngo.PET Software, Experimental Arm Low Accuracy Readers) | 87.0 Percent Accuracy | Standard Error 1 |
| VisQ | Change in Total Accuracy (Siemens Syngo.PET Software, Experimental Arm Low Accuracy Readers) | 91.8 Percent Accuracy | Standard Error 1.1 |
| Change | Change in Total Accuracy (Siemens Syngo.PET Software, Experimental Arm Low Accuracy Readers) | 4.9 Percent Accuracy | Standard Error 1.1 |
Change in Reliability (MIMNeuro Software)
Evaluate whether VisQ interpretation significantly improved the reliability of Amyvid scan interpretation compared with qualitative scan interpretation alone. The scan interpretation reliability will be evaluated using Fleiss' Kappa statistics.
Time frame: Scan acquired 50-60 min post-injection
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qualitative | Change in Reliability (MIMNeuro Software) | Autopsy cases | 0.73 Fleiss Kappa |
| Qualitative | Change in Reliability (MIMNeuro Software) | All study cases | 0.72 Fleiss Kappa |
| Qualitative | Change in Reliability (MIMNeuro Software) | Non-autopsy cases | 0.72 Fleiss Kappa |
| VisQ | Change in Reliability (MIMNeuro Software) | Autopsy cases | 0.81 Fleiss Kappa |
| VisQ | Change in Reliability (MIMNeuro Software) | All study cases | 0.79 Fleiss Kappa |
| VisQ | Change in Reliability (MIMNeuro Software) | Non-autopsy cases | 0.77 Fleiss Kappa |
| Change | Change in Reliability (MIMNeuro Software) | All study cases | 0.06 Fleiss Kappa |
| Change | Change in Reliability (MIMNeuro Software) | Non-autopsy cases | 0.05 Fleiss Kappa |
| Change | Change in Reliability (MIMNeuro Software) | Autopsy cases | 0.08 Fleiss Kappa |
Change in Reliability (Siemens Syngo.PET Software)
Evaluate whether VisQ interpretation significantly improved the reliability of Amyvid scan interpretation compared with qualitative scan interpretations alone. The scan interpretation reliability will be evaluated using Fleiss' Kappa statistics.
Time frame: Scan acquired 50-60 min post-injection
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qualitative | Change in Reliability (Siemens Syngo.PET Software) | Autopsy cases | 0.76 Fleiss Kappa |
| Qualitative | Change in Reliability (Siemens Syngo.PET Software) | All study cases | 0.75 Fleiss Kappa |
| Qualitative | Change in Reliability (Siemens Syngo.PET Software) | Non-autopsy cases | 0.73 Fleiss Kappa |
| VisQ | Change in Reliability (Siemens Syngo.PET Software) | Autopsy cases | 0.80 Fleiss Kappa |
| VisQ | Change in Reliability (Siemens Syngo.PET Software) | Non-autopsy cases | 0.83 Fleiss Kappa |
| VisQ | Change in Reliability (Siemens Syngo.PET Software) | All study cases | 0.82 Fleiss Kappa |
| Change | Change in Reliability (Siemens Syngo.PET Software) | Autopsy cases | 0.04 Fleiss Kappa |
| Change | Change in Reliability (Siemens Syngo.PET Software) | All study cases | 0.07 Fleiss Kappa |
| Change | Change in Reliability (Siemens Syngo.PET Software) | Non-autopsy cases | 0.10 Fleiss Kappa |
Change in Total Accuracy (MIMNeuro Software, All Readers)
Evaluate whether the total accuracy of Amyvid VisQ interpretation was non-inferior to the qualitative scan interpretation alone. Only the 46 scans with autopsy from A07/A16 are used for this outcome measure.
Time frame: Scan acquired 50-60 min post-injection
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qualitative | Change in Total Accuracy (MIMNeuro Software, All Readers) | 89.5 Percent Accuracy | Standard Error 1.4 |
| VisQ | Change in Total Accuracy (MIMNeuro Software, All Readers) | 93.8 Percent Accuracy | Standard Error 1.2 |
| Change | Change in Total Accuracy (MIMNeuro Software, All Readers) | 4.2 Percent Accuracy | Standard Error 0.7 |
Change in Total Accuracy (Siemens Syngo.PET Software, Experimental Arm All Readers)
Evaluate whether the total accuracy of Amyvid VisQ interpretation was non-inferior to the qualitative scan interpretation alone. Only the 46 scans with autopsy from A07/A16 are used for this outcome measure.
Time frame: Scan acquired 50-60 min post-injection
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qualitative | Change in Total Accuracy (Siemens Syngo.PET Software, Experimental Arm All Readers) | 91.6 Percent Accuracy | Standard Error 0.8 |
| VisQ | Change in Total Accuracy (Siemens Syngo.PET Software, Experimental Arm All Readers) | 93.9 Percent Accuracy | Standard Error 0.7 |
| Change | Change in Total Accuracy (Siemens Syngo.PET Software, Experimental Arm All Readers) | 2.3 Percent Accuracy | Standard Error 0.7 |