Skip to content

Clinical Study of the Mirabilis High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound System for Non-Invasive Treatment of Uterine Fibroids

Clinical Study of a Focused Ultrasound Device for Treating Uterine Fibroids and Menorrhagia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01946178
Enrollment
73
Registered
2013-09-19
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2015-05-31
Last updated
2017-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Uterine Fibroids (Leiomyomas)

Keywords

Uterine Fibroids, Leiomyomas, High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation, Ultrasonography

Brief summary

The Mirabilis High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Treatment System delivers therapeutic focused ultrasound energy to the uterus under integrated ultrasound imaging guidance to offer non-invasive treatment for uterine fibroids. The purpose of this clinical study is to assess the initial safety and performance of the Mirabilis HIFU Treatment System for transabdominal treatment of uterine fibroids in eligible women who are scheduled to undergo hysterectomy following treatment with the device or who are seeking relief from fibroid-related symptoms.

Interventions

DEVICEMirabilis High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatment System

The intervention consists of a treatment session with the device, during which focused ultrasound energy is applied across the intact abdominal wall to ablate appropriately selected uterine fibroids under ultrasound imaging guidance.

Sponsors

Mirabilis Medica, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female * Age 18-55 years * Patients seeking relief from uterine fibroid related symptoms, including those scheduled to undergo abdominal hysterectomy due to benign pathology * Patients able and willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Visible scar within the HIFU beam path that cannot be avoided * Known or suspected abdominal adhesions between the anterior uterine serosa and the abdominal wall * Currently pregnant or desire to become pregnant in the future * Pelvic malignancy * Pelvic congenital malformation * Acute pelvic infection * Otherwise determined by a physician to be inappropriate for the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of All Adverse Events EncounteredAdverse Events were monitored until the patient's exit from the study (up to 6 months post-treatment).Safety of the treatment was determined by evaluating the incidence of Adverse Events and Adverse Device Effects. Adverse Device Effects are Adverse Events that are related to treatment with the device. Relatedness of an Adverse Event to the treatment was determined on a case-by-case basis by the investigator. The average number of Serious Adverse Device Effects per patient and the average number of Non-Serious Adverse Device Effects per patient are reported to provide numeric outcomes of this evaluation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HIFU-related Non-Perfused Volume (NPV)The NPV was measured between 0 and 7 days post-treatment.Efficacy of the treatment was quantified by measuring the HIFU-related Non-Perfused Volume (NPV) of tissue in each patient using either post-treatment contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or pathology assessment following hysterectomy. The NPV is used to measure the amount of tissue that was treated during the procedure.

Countries

Mexico

Participant flow

Recruitment details

All patients underwent transabdominal uterine fibroid treatment with the Mirabilis High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatment System between January 8, 2011 and November 21, 2014 at two clinical sites in Mexico. The study was completed on May 20, 2015.

Pre-assignment details

Patients were screened prior to treatment for eligibility criteria including size, location, and tissue characteristics of their uterine fibroid(s). Those patients meeting the established eligibility criteria were then scheduled for treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Treated Patients
All patients who underwent treatment with the device
73
Total73

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1
Overall StudyPregnancy1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Treated Patients
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
73 Participants
Age, Continuous42.8 years
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
73 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
73 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
53 / 73
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 73

Outcome results

Primary

Evaluation of All Adverse Events Encountered

Safety of the treatment was determined by evaluating the incidence of Adverse Events and Adverse Device Effects. Adverse Device Effects are Adverse Events that are related to treatment with the device. Relatedness of an Adverse Event to the treatment was determined on a case-by-case basis by the investigator. The average number of Serious Adverse Device Effects per patient and the average number of Non-Serious Adverse Device Effects per patient are reported to provide numeric outcomes of this evaluation.

Time frame: Adverse Events were monitored until the patient's exit from the study (up to 6 months post-treatment).

Population: All Adverse Device Effects are reported for the entire study population (all treated patients).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All Treated PatientsEvaluation of All Adverse Events EncounteredSerious Adverse Device Effects Per Patient0 Adverse Device Effects / patient
All Treated PatientsEvaluation of All Adverse Events EncounteredNon-Serious Adverse Device Effects Per Patient0.95 Adverse Device Effects / patient
Secondary

HIFU-related Non-Perfused Volume (NPV)

Efficacy of the treatment was quantified by measuring the HIFU-related Non-Perfused Volume (NPV) of tissue in each patient using either post-treatment contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or pathology assessment following hysterectomy. The NPV is used to measure the amount of tissue that was treated during the procedure.

Time frame: The NPV was measured between 0 and 7 days post-treatment.

Population: HIFU-related Non-Perfused Volumes (NPVs) are reported for all treated patients in whom they were observed following treatment. NPV outcomes are stratified between two cohorts: an early Development Cohort and a final Validation Cohort.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
All Treated PatientsHIFU-related Non-Perfused Volume (NPV)20.1 cubic centimeters (cc)
Validation Cohort With NPVs ObservedHIFU-related Non-Perfused Volume (NPV)46.1 cubic centimeters (cc)
Post Hoc

Total Time Required to Deliver Treatment

The total treatment time was measured for each patient from the beginning of HIFU energy emission until HIFU energy emission stopped.

Time frame: The total treatment time was measured on the day of treatment.

Population: Total treatment times are reported for all treated patients. Total treatment times are stratified between two cohorts: an early Development Cohort and a final Validation Cohort.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
All Treated PatientsTotal Time Required to Deliver Treatment4.9 minutes
Validation Cohort With NPVs ObservedTotal Time Required to Deliver Treatment3.6 minutes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026