Skip to content

A Study Evaluating Talazoparib (BMN 673), a PARP Inhibitor, in Advanced and/or Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients With BRCA Mutation (EMBRACA Study)

A PHASE 3, OPEN-LABEL, RANDOMIZED PARALLEL,2-ARM,MULTI-CENTER STUDY OF TALAZOPARIB(BMN 673) VERSUS PHYSICIAN'S CHOICE IN GERMLINE BRCA MUTATION SUBJECTS WITH LOCALLY ADVANCED AND/OR METASTATIC BREAST CANCER, WHO HAVE RECEIVED PRIOR CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS FOR METASTATIC DISEASE

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01945775
Acronym
EMBRACA
Enrollment
431
Registered
2013-09-19
Start date
2013-10-14
Completion date
2021-03-05
Last updated
2022-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

BRCA 1 Gene Mutation, BRCA 2 Gene Mutation, Breast Neoplasms

Keywords

Breast cancer, BRCA mutation, PARP inhibitor, BRCA 1, BRCA 2

Brief summary

The purpose of this open-label, 2:1 randomized phase III trial is to compare the safety and efficacy of talazoparib (also known as BMN 673) versus protocol-specific physician's choice in patients who have locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer with germline BRCA mutations.

Interventions

DRUGtalazoparib

Until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops

DRUGPhysician's-Choice

Capecitabine, Eribulin, Gemcitabine or Vinorelbine

Sponsors

Medivation, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically or cytologically confirmed carcinoma of the breast * Locally advanced breast cancer that is not amenable to curative radiation or surgical cure and/or metastatic disease appropriate for systemic single cytotoxic chemotherapy * Documentation of a deleterious, suspected deleterious, or pathogenic germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation from Myriad Genetics or other laboratory approved by the Sponsor * No more than 3 prior chemotherapy-inclusive regimens for locally advanced and/or metastatic disease (no limit on prior hormonal therapies or targeted anticancer therapies such as mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) or CDK4/6 inhibitors, immune-oncology agents, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or monoclonal antibodies against CTL4 or VEGF) * Prior treatment with a taxane and/or anthracycline in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, locally advanced, or metastatic setting unless medically contraindicated * Have measurable or non-measurable, evaluable disease by the revised response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v.1.1 * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2

Exclusion criteria

* First-line locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer with no prior adjuvant chemotherapy unless the Investigator determines that one of the 4 cytotoxic chemotherapy agents in the control arm would otherwise be offered to the subject * Prior treatment with a PARP inhibitor (not including iniparib) * Not a candidate for treatment with at least 1 of the treatments of protocol-specific physician's choice (ie, capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, vinorelbine) * Subjects who had objective disease progression while receiving platinum chemotherapy administered for locally advanced or metastatic disease; subjects who received low-dose platinum therapy administered in combination with radiation therapy are not excluded * Subjects who have received platinum in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting are eligible; however, subjects may not have relapsed within 6 months of the last dose of prior platinum therapy * Cytotoxic chemotherapy within 14 days before randomization * Radiation or anti-hormonal therapy or other targeted anticancer therapy within 14 days before randomization * HER2 positive breast cancer * Active inflammatory breast cancer * CNS metastases * Exception: Adequately treated brain metastases documented by baseline CT or MRI scan that has not progressed since previous scans and that does not require corticosteroids (except prednisone ≤ 5 mg/day or equivalent) for management of CNS symptoms. A repeat CT or MRI following the identification of CNS metastases (obtained at least 2 weeks after definitive therapy) must document adequately treated brain metastases. * Subjects with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis are not permitted * Prior malignancy except for any of the following: * Prior BRCA-associated cancer as long as there is no current evidence of the cancer * Carcinoma in situ or non-melanoma skin cancer * A cancer diagnosed and definitively treated ≥ 5 years before randomization with no subsequent evidence of recurrence * Known to be human immunodeficiency virus positive * Known active hepatitis C virus, or known active hepatitis B virus * Known hypersensitivity to any of the components of talazoparib

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Independent Radiological Facility (IRF) AssessmentBaseline until radiologic progressive disease or death due to any cause (up to maximum duration of 36.9 months)IRF assessed PFS was defined as time (in months) from randomization until the date of first documented radiologic progressive disease per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. As per RECIST v1.1, progression defined as 1) for target lesions: at least a 20% increase in the sum of target lesion measurements, compared to the smallest sum on study (including baseline), the absolute increase in the sum has to be at least 5 millimeter (mm); 2) for non-target lesions: unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, evaluated as a whole, such that it is clear that treatment has failed and disease is progressing, regardless of the status of the target lesions; 3) and/or appearance of one or more new lesions. The analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Trough Plasma Talazoparib ConcentrationsPredose on Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3 and 4A predose PK sample was considered dose-compliant based on the following criteria: A participant must have received 21 consecutive days of 1 mg talazoparib without dosing interruption prior to sample collection; and the predose PK sample must have been collected 24 hours +/- 10 percent (2 hours and 24 minutes) after the previous day's dose and no more than 5 minutes (0.083 hours) after the administration of the dose on the day of PK sample collection.
Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: HematologyTalazoparib: Baseline up to a maximum duration of 71.3 months; Physician's Choice Treatment: Baseline up to maximum duration of 46.1 months.Toxicity grades were evaluated based on as National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI CTCAE v4.03). NCI CTCAE v4.03 defined the severity grade as: grade 1 (mild), grade 2 (moderate), grade 3 (severe), grade 4 (potentially life threatening) and grade 5 (death related to AE) for each parameter. Key hematology parameters included hemoglobin (gram per liter \[g/L\]), leukocytes (10\^6 cells per liter), lymphocytes (10\^6 cells per liter), neutrophils (10\^6 cells per liter), and platelets (10\^9 cells per liter). Low value indicated lower values than the baseline values and high value indicated higher values than the baseline values. Only those categories in which at least 1 participant had data were reported.
Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: ChemistryTalazoparib: Baseline up to a maximum duration of 71.3 months; Physician's Choice Treatment: Baseline up to maximum duration of 46.1 monthsToxicity grades were evaluated based on as NCI CTCAE v4.03. NCI CTCAE v4.03 defined the severity grade as: grade 1 (mild), grade 2 (moderate), grade 3 (severe) and grade 4 (potentially life threatening) and grade 5 (death related to AE) for each parameter. Key chemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase (units per liter), alkaline phosphatase (units per liter), aspartate aminotransferase (units per liter) and bilirubin (micromole per liter). High value indicated higher values than the baseline values and low value indicated lower values than the baseline values. Only those categories in which at least 1 participant had data were reported.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsTalazoparib: Baseline up to a maximum duration of 71.3 months; Physician's Choice Treatment: Baseline up to maximum duration of 46.1 monthsCriteria for potentially clinically significant changes in vital signs included a) Systolic blood pressure: 1) absolute results (AB) greater than (\>) 180 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) and increase from baseline (IFB) greater than or equal to (\>=) 40 mmHg, 2) absolute results less than (\<) 90 mmHg and decrease from baseline (DFB) \>30 mmHg; b) Diastolic blood pressure: 1) absolute results \>110 mmHg and \>=30 mmHg increase from baseline, 2) absolute results \<50 mmHg and \>20 mmHg decrease from baseline 3) \>=20 mmHg increase from baseline; c) Heart rate: 1) absolute results\>120 beats per minute \[bpm\] and \>30 bpm increase from baseline, 2) absolute results \<50 bpm and \>20 bpm decrease from baseline and d) Weight: \>10 percent \[%\] decrease from baseline.
Number of Participants Taking At-least One Concomitant MedicationTalazoparib: Baseline up to a maximum duration of 71.3 months; Physician's Choice Treatment: Baseline up to maximum duration of 46.1 monthsAny medication (other than study drug) which was administered to participants during study after first dose of study drug were considered as concomitant medications.
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response: Investigator AssessmentBaseline until radiologic progressive disease or death due to any cause (up to a maximum duration of 36.9 months)Investigator assessed objective response was defined as the percentage of participants with a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) as defined by RECIST v1.1. For target lesions: 1) CR: disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. Target lymph nodes must reduce to less than 10 mm in short axis. 2) PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, compared to the sum at baseline. For non-target lesions, CR: disappearance of all non-target lesions. Percentage of participants with objective response reported are based upon unconfirmed CR/PR.
Overall Survival (OS)Baseline until death due to any cause or analysis cut-off, up to a maximum duration of 61.4 monthsOS was defined as the time (in months) from randomization to death due to any cause. If death was not observed at the time of study cut-off date or permanently lost to follow-up, OS was censored at the date the participant was last known to be alive on or before the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier. The analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Talazoparib: Baseline up to a maximum duration of 71.3 months; Physician's Choice Treatment: Baseline up to maximum duration of 46.1 monthsAn adverse events (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence (e.g., sign, symptom, illness, disease or injury) in a participant administered study drug or other protocol-imposed intervention, regardless of attribution. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug or the day before initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy or 30 days after the date of the last dose date of study drug, whichever occurred first, that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL)Baseline up to a maximum duration of 36.9 monthsTTD in global health status (GHS)/QoL=time (in months) from randomization to the first observation with \>=10 point decrease and no subsequent observations with\<10 point decrease from baseline in GHS/QoL score based on EORTC-QLQ-C30. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions to assess participant quality of life. Question 29 and 30 were used to evaluate GHS/QoL. Each question was assessed on a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better quality of life/better level of functioning.
Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Breast Symptoms Scale as Assessed by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Breast Cancer Module (EORTC-QLQ-BR23)Baseline up to a maximum duration of 36.9 monthsTTD was defined as the time (in months) from randomization to the first observation with a\>=10 point increase and no subsequent observations with a \<10 point increase from baseline in breast symptom score based on the EORTC-QLQ-BR23. EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is a disease-specific module for breast cancer developed as a supplement for the EORTC-QLQ-C30 to assess the quality of life of participants with breast cancer. EORTC-QLQ-BR23 symptoms subscale includes 4 items: systemic therapy side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, upset by hair loss. Each item is rated by choosing 1 of 4 possible responses that record the level of intensity (1= not at all, 2= a little, 3= quite a bit, and 4= very much), higher scores=high level of symptom/problems.
Duration of Response (DOR): Investigator AssessmentFrom first documentation of CR or PR until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 36.9 months)DOR = time from first radiographic documentation of OR (PR or CR) till radiographic disease progression (PD) as per RECIST v1.1 by investigator assessment or to death due to any cause, whichever was first. RECIST 1.1, a) target lesion (TL): CR= disappearance of all non-nodal TL, target lymph nodes reduce to \<10 mm in short axis, PR= at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of TL, compared to the sum at baseline, PD= at least 20% increase in sum of TL measurements, compared to smallest sum on study including baseline, absolute increase in sum has to be at least 5 mm; b) for non-TL: CR= disappearance of all non-TL, PD= unequivocal progression of non-TL, such that treatment has failed, disease is progressing, regardless of status of TL; c) PD =and/or appearance of \>=1 new lesions. DOR = (earliest date of progression, death, or censoring-date of first documented OR + 1)/30.4375. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at Average Duration Over Week 4 up to Week 160Baseline, Week 4 up to Week 160EORTC QLQ-C30: cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions to assess the participant QoL. First 28 questions used to evaluate 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain) and other single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). Each question assessed on 4-point scale (1= not at all, 2= a little, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much); functional scales: higher score = better level of functioning; symptom scale: higher score = more severe symptoms; for single items: higher score= more severe problem. Last 2 questions used to evaluate global health status (GHS)/QoL. Each question was assessed on 7-point scale (1= very poor to 7= excellent). Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better quality of life/better level of functioning. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the average value of Week 4 to 160.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Brazil, France, Germany, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Poland, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Talazoparib
Participants received talazoparib 1 mg, orally, once daily until radiographic disease progression as determined by the central IRF, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, physician's decision to terminate treatment, or sponsor's decision to terminate the trial (up to a maximum of 70.2 months). One cycle was of 21 days.
287
Physician's Choice Treatment
Participants received 1 of the following drugs in specified regimens, as per the physician's choice: 1) capecitabine 1250 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Day 1 to 14 in each cycle; 2) eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m\^2 (equivalent to eribulin 1.23 mg/ m\^2), as 2 to 5 minute IV infusion on Day 1 and 8 in each cycle; 3) gemcitabine 1250 mg/m\^2 as 30-minute IV infusion on Day 1 and 8 in each cycle; 4) vinorelbine 30 mg/m\^2 as 6 to 10 minute IV infusion on Day 1, 8, and 15 in each cycle; until radiographic disease progression as determined by the central IRF, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, physician's decision to terminate treatment, or Sponsor's decision to terminate the trial (up to a maximum of 45.3 months). One cycle was of 21 days.
144
Total431

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath21498
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up127
Overall StudyOther5018
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1121

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPhysician's Choice TreatmentTotalTalazoparib
Age, Continuous49.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.12
48.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
47.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.61
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
15 Participants46 Participants31 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
111 Participants318 Participants207 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
18 Participants67 Participants49 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
16 Participants47 Participants31 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants12 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
19 Participants74 Participants55 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
108 Participants298 Participants190 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
141 Participants424 Participants283 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
220 / 286100 / 126
other
Total, other adverse events
282 / 286123 / 126
serious
Total, serious adverse events
103 / 28639 / 126

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Independent Radiological Facility (IRF) Assessment

IRF assessed PFS was defined as time (in months) from randomization until the date of first documented radiologic progressive disease per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. As per RECIST v1.1, progression defined as 1) for target lesions: at least a 20% increase in the sum of target lesion measurements, compared to the smallest sum on study (including baseline), the absolute increase in the sum has to be at least 5 millimeter (mm); 2) for non-target lesions: unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, evaluated as a whole, such that it is clear that treatment has failed and disease is progressing, regardless of the status of the target lesions; 3) and/or appearance of one or more new lesions. The analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Baseline until radiologic progressive disease or death due to any cause (up to maximum duration of 36.9 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TalazoparibProgression-Free Survival (PFS): Independent Radiological Facility (IRF) Assessment8.6 months
Physician's Choice TreatmentProgression-Free Survival (PFS): Independent Radiological Facility (IRF) Assessment5.6 months
Comparison: Hazard ratio was based on stratified Cox regression model with treatment as the only covariate (stratification factors: number of prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens, triple negative status, history of central nervous system metastasis status).p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.413, 0.711]Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Participants Taking At-least One Concomitant Medication

Any medication (other than study drug) which was administered to participants during study after first dose of study drug were considered as concomitant medications.

Time frame: Talazoparib: Baseline up to a maximum duration of 71.3 months; Physician's Choice Treatment: Baseline up to maximum duration of 46.1 months

Population: Safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug (talazoparib or protocol-specified PCT).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TalazoparibNumber of Participants Taking At-least One Concomitant Medication281 Participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentNumber of Participants Taking At-least One Concomitant Medication126 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: Chemistry

Toxicity grades were evaluated based on as NCI CTCAE v4.03. NCI CTCAE v4.03 defined the severity grade as: grade 1 (mild), grade 2 (moderate), grade 3 (severe) and grade 4 (potentially life threatening) and grade 5 (death related to AE) for each parameter. Key chemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase (units per liter), alkaline phosphatase (units per liter), aspartate aminotransferase (units per liter) and bilirubin (micromole per liter). High value indicated higher values than the baseline values and low value indicated lower values than the baseline values. Only those categories in which at least 1 participant had data were reported.

Time frame: Talazoparib: Baseline up to a maximum duration of 71.3 months; Physician's Choice Treatment: Baseline up to maximum duration of 46.1 months

Population: Safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug (talazoparib or protocol-specified PCT).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: ChemistryAlanine Aminotransferase: High Value5 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: ChemistryAlkaline Phosphatase: High Value6 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: ChemistryAspartate Aminotransferase: High Value7 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: ChemistryBilirubin: High Value4 Participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: ChemistryBilirubin: High Value1 Participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: ChemistryAlanine Aminotransferase: High Value3 Participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: ChemistryAspartate Aminotransferase: High Value4 Participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: ChemistryAlkaline Phosphatase: High Value2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: Hematology

Toxicity grades were evaluated based on as National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI CTCAE v4.03). NCI CTCAE v4.03 defined the severity grade as: grade 1 (mild), grade 2 (moderate), grade 3 (severe), grade 4 (potentially life threatening) and grade 5 (death related to AE) for each parameter. Key hematology parameters included hemoglobin (gram per liter \[g/L\]), leukocytes (10\^6 cells per liter), lymphocytes (10\^6 cells per liter), neutrophils (10\^6 cells per liter), and platelets (10\^9 cells per liter). Low value indicated lower values than the baseline values and high value indicated higher values than the baseline values. Only those categories in which at least 1 participant had data were reported.

Time frame: Talazoparib: Baseline up to a maximum duration of 71.3 months; Physician's Choice Treatment: Baseline up to maximum duration of 46.1 months.

Population: Safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug (talazoparib or protocol-specified PCT).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: HematologyLeukocytes: Low value43 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: HematologyNeutrophils: Low value65 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: HematologyLymphocytes: Low value54 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: HematologyPlatelets: Low value44 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: HematologyHemoglobin: Low value115 Participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: HematologyPlatelets: Low value2 Participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: HematologyHemoglobin: Low value8 Participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: HematologyLeukocytes: Low value31 Participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: HematologyLymphocytes: Low value11 Participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline Toxicities in Laboratory Parameters: HematologyNeutrophils: Low value48 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs

Criteria for potentially clinically significant changes in vital signs included a) Systolic blood pressure: 1) absolute results (AB) greater than (\>) 180 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) and increase from baseline (IFB) greater than or equal to (\>=) 40 mmHg, 2) absolute results less than (\<) 90 mmHg and decrease from baseline (DFB) \>30 mmHg; b) Diastolic blood pressure: 1) absolute results \>110 mmHg and \>=30 mmHg increase from baseline, 2) absolute results \<50 mmHg and \>20 mmHg decrease from baseline 3) \>=20 mmHg increase from baseline; c) Heart rate: 1) absolute results\>120 beats per minute \[bpm\] and \>30 bpm increase from baseline, 2) absolute results \<50 bpm and \>20 bpm decrease from baseline and d) Weight: \>10 percent \[%\] decrease from baseline.

Time frame: Talazoparib: Baseline up to a maximum duration of 71.3 months; Physician's Choice Treatment: Baseline up to maximum duration of 46.1 months

Population: Safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug (talazoparib or protocol-specified PCT).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsSBP: AB>180 mmHg and IFB >=40 mmHg3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsSBP: AB<90 mmHg and DFB >30 mmHg8 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsDBP: AB>110 mmHg and IFB >=30 mmHg0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsDBP: AB<50 mmHg and DFB>20 mmHg15 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsDBP: IFB>=20 mmHg39 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsHeart rate: AB >120 bpm and IFB >30 bpm6 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsHeart rate: AB <50 bpm and DFB >20 bpm2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsWeight: >10% DFB23 Participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsWeight: >10% DFB13 Participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsSBP: AB>180 mmHg and IFB >=40 mmHg2 Participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsDBP: IFB>=20 mmHg13 Participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsSBP: AB<90 mmHg and DFB >30 mmHg2 Participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsHeart rate: AB <50 bpm and DFB >20 bpm0 Participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsDBP: AB>110 mmHg and IFB >=30 mmHg0 Participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsHeart rate: AB >120 bpm and IFB >30 bpm2 Participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsDBP: AB<50 mmHg and DFB>20 mmHg7 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An adverse events (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence (e.g., sign, symptom, illness, disease or injury) in a participant administered study drug or other protocol-imposed intervention, regardless of attribution. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug or the day before initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy or 30 days after the date of the last dose date of study drug, whichever occurred first, that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs.

Time frame: Talazoparib: Baseline up to a maximum duration of 71.3 months; Physician's Choice Treatment: Baseline up to maximum duration of 46.1 months

Population: Safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug (talazoparib or protocol-specified PCT).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAEs282 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs103 Participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAEs123 Participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs39 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time (in months) from randomization to death due to any cause. If death was not observed at the time of study cut-off date or permanently lost to follow-up, OS was censored at the date the participant was last known to be alive on or before the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier. The analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Baseline until death due to any cause or analysis cut-off, up to a maximum duration of 61.4 months

Population: ITT analysis population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TalazoparibOverall Survival (OS)19.3 months
Physician's Choice TreatmentOverall Survival (OS)19.5 months
Comparison: Hazard ratio was based on stratified Cox regression model with treatment as the only covariate (stratification factors: number of prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens, triple negative status, history of central nervous system metastasis status).p-value: 0.169395% CI: [0.67, 1.073]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response: Investigator Assessment

Investigator assessed objective response was defined as the percentage of participants with a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) as defined by RECIST v1.1. For target lesions: 1) CR: disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. Target lymph nodes must reduce to less than 10 mm in short axis. 2) PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, compared to the sum at baseline. For non-target lesions, CR: disappearance of all non-target lesions. Percentage of participants with objective response reported are based upon unconfirmed CR/PR.

Time frame: Baseline until radiologic progressive disease or death due to any cause (up to a maximum duration of 36.9 months)

Population: ITT with measurable disease analysis population included all participants in the ITT population who had at least 1 target lesion identified at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TalazoparibPercentage of Participants With Objective Response: Investigator Assessment62.6 percentage of participants
Physician's Choice TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Objective Response: Investigator Assessment27.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: p-value was based on stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method. Stratification factors: number of prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens, triple negative status, history of central nervous system metastasis status.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.93, 8.83]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Trough Plasma Talazoparib Concentrations

A predose PK sample was considered dose-compliant based on the following criteria: A participant must have received 21 consecutive days of 1 mg talazoparib without dosing interruption prior to sample collection; and the predose PK sample must have been collected 24 hours +/- 10 percent (2 hours and 24 minutes) after the previous day's dose and no more than 5 minutes (0.083 hours) after the administration of the dose on the day of PK sample collection.

Time frame: Predose on Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3 and 4

Population: Analysis population included participants who received at least 1 dose of talazoparib and had dose compliant pharmacokinetic (PK) predose sample. Here, number analyzed signifies number of participants who were evaluable for the specified categories. This endpoint was not planned to be analyzed for the reporting arm Physician's Choice Treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
TalazoparibTrough Plasma Talazoparib ConcentrationsCycle 2 Day 1: Predose3370 Picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 76.9
TalazoparibTrough Plasma Talazoparib ConcentrationsCycle 3 Day 1: Predose3570 Picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 49.9
TalazoparibTrough Plasma Talazoparib ConcentrationsCycle 4 Day 1: Predose3400 Picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 48.4
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at Average Duration Over Week 4 up to Week 160

EORTC QLQ-C30: cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions to assess the participant QoL. First 28 questions used to evaluate 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain) and other single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). Each question assessed on 4-point scale (1= not at all, 2= a little, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much); functional scales: higher score = better level of functioning; symptom scale: higher score = more severe symptoms; for single items: higher score= more severe problem. Last 2 questions used to evaluate global health status (GHS)/QoL. Each question was assessed on 7-point scale (1= very poor to 7= excellent). Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better quality of life/better level of functioning. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the average value of Week 4 to 160.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 up to Week 160

Population: Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) evaluable population included all participants who completed the PRO questionnaire at baseline and at least 1 visit post-baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at Average Duration Over Week 4 up to Week 1603.0 units on a scale
Physician's Choice TreatmentChange From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at Average Duration Over Week 4 up to Week 160-5.4 units on a scale
Comparison: Analysis was based on repeated measures mixed-effect model with an intercept term, treatment, time, treatment-by-time, and baseline as covariate. Analysis was based on restricted maximum likelihood using unstructured covariance matrix.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [4.6, 12.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Duration of Response (DOR): Investigator Assessment

DOR = time from first radiographic documentation of OR (PR or CR) till radiographic disease progression (PD) as per RECIST v1.1 by investigator assessment or to death due to any cause, whichever was first. RECIST 1.1, a) target lesion (TL): CR= disappearance of all non-nodal TL, target lymph nodes reduce to \<10 mm in short axis, PR= at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of TL, compared to the sum at baseline, PD= at least 20% increase in sum of TL measurements, compared to smallest sum on study including baseline, absolute increase in sum has to be at least 5 mm; b) for non-TL: CR= disappearance of all non-TL, PD= unequivocal progression of non-TL, such that treatment has failed, disease is progressing, regardless of status of TL; c) PD =and/or appearance of \>=1 new lesions. DOR = (earliest date of progression, death, or censoring-date of first documented OR + 1)/30.4375. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From first documentation of CR or PR until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 36.9 months)

Population: ITT with measurable disease analysis population included all participants in the ITT population who had at least 1 target lesion identified at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TalazoparibDuration of Response (DOR): Investigator Assessment5.4 months
Physician's Choice TreatmentDuration of Response (DOR): Investigator Assessment3.1 months
Other Pre-specified

Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Breast Symptoms Scale as Assessed by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Breast Cancer Module (EORTC-QLQ-BR23)

TTD was defined as the time (in months) from randomization to the first observation with a\>=10 point increase and no subsequent observations with a \<10 point increase from baseline in breast symptom score based on the EORTC-QLQ-BR23. EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is a disease-specific module for breast cancer developed as a supplement for the EORTC-QLQ-C30 to assess the quality of life of participants with breast cancer. EORTC-QLQ-BR23 symptoms subscale includes 4 items: systemic therapy side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, upset by hair loss. Each item is rated by choosing 1 of 4 possible responses that record the level of intensity (1= not at all, 2= a little, 3= quite a bit, and 4= very much), higher scores=high level of symptom/problems.

Time frame: Baseline up to a maximum duration of 36.9 months

Population: PRO-evaluable population included all participants who completed the PRO questionnaire at baseline and at least 1 visit post-baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TalazoparibTime to Deterioration (TTD) in Breast Symptoms Scale as Assessed by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Breast Cancer Module (EORTC-QLQ-BR23)NA months
Physician's Choice TreatmentTime to Deterioration (TTD) in Breast Symptoms Scale as Assessed by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Breast Cancer Module (EORTC-QLQ-BR23)NA months
Comparison: Hazard ratio is based on stratified Cox regression model with treatment as the only covariate (stratification factors: number of prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens, triple negative status, history of central nervous system).p-value: 0.005395% CI: [0.198, 0.775]Log Rank
Other Pre-specified

Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL)

TTD in global health status (GHS)/QoL=time (in months) from randomization to the first observation with \>=10 point decrease and no subsequent observations with\<10 point decrease from baseline in GHS/QoL score based on EORTC-QLQ-C30. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions to assess participant quality of life. Question 29 and 30 were used to evaluate GHS/QoL. Each question was assessed on a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better quality of life/better level of functioning.

Time frame: Baseline up to a maximum duration of 36.9 months

Population: PRO-evaluable population included all participants who completed the PRO questionnaire at baseline and at least 1 visit post-baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TalazoparibTime to Deterioration (TTD) in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL)24.3 months
Physician's Choice TreatmentTime to Deterioration (TTD) in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL)6.3 months
Comparison: Hazard ratio is based on stratified Cox regression model with treatment as the only covariate (stratification factors: number of prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens, triple negative status, history of central nervous system metastasis status).p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.257, 0.549]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026