Crizotinib, Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, ROS1 Proto Oncogene
Conditions
Keywords
Non small cell lung cancer, NSCLC, ROS1, ROS1 positive, ROS1 proto oncogene, c ros tyrosine kinases, ROS1 positive NSCLC, ROS1 lung cancer, ALK negative, Lung Carcinoma, Neoplasm, Crizotinib, Xalkori, Previously treated or untreated, North East Asian
Brief summary
To assess treatment effectiveness and safety of oral crizotinib administered to East Asian patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) that is confirmed to be positive for a ROS1 positive gene mutation (translocation or inversion) and confirmed negative for an ALK mutation
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Histologically or cytologically proven diagnosis of NSCLC that is locally advanced or metastatic * treatment-naïve or have received no more than 3 systemic treatment regimen(s) * Positive for translocation or inversion events involving the ROS1 gene * Negative for translocation or inversion events involving the ALK gene * Patients with brain metastases are eligible if asymptomatic, or if treated, must be neurologically stable for at least 2 weeks and are not taking any contraindicated medications * Any prior treatment (chemotherapy, radiation \[except for palliative\], or surgery) must have been completed at least 2 weeks prior to initiation of study medication * At least 1 measurable tumor lesion as per RECIST v1.1 * Female or male, 18 years of age or older * ECOG performance status 0 to 1 * Adequate organ function * Signed and dated informed consent * Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plans, laboratory tests, and other study procedures, including completion of the PRO measures * Agree to use effective contraception during the study period and for at least 90 days after completion of the study treatment
Exclusion criteria
* Current treatment on another therapeutic clinical trial * Prior therapy specifically directed against ALK or ROS1 fusion genes * Spinal cord compression unless treated with the patient attaining good pain control and stable or recovered neurologic function, carcinomatous meningitis, or leptomeningeal disease * known interstitial fibrosis or interstitial lung disease * myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina, coronary/peripheral artery bypass graft, congestive heart failure, or cerebrovascular accident including transient ischemic attack within 3 months prior to start of study treatment * Ongoing cardiac dysrhythmias of NCI CTCAE v4.03 Grade \>/=2, uncontrolled atrial fibrillation of any grade, or QTc \>470 msec * Pregnant or breast feeding * Use of drugs or foods that are known potent CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers * Use of other anti-cancer drugs including traditional Chinese medicine on the SFDA list * Evidence of active malignancy within last 3 years
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Independent Radiology Reviewed Overall Objective Response (ORR) | Starting from the first dose study treatment until the first documented CR or PR (every 8 weeks then after 8 cycles at every 12 weeks in duration of 94.0 weeks) | Overall objective response (ORR) was defined as the number of patients with a best overall response of confirmed Complete Response or confirmed Partial Response according to RECIST v1.1 (as determined by Independent Radiology Review \[IRR\]), relative to the total population of response-evaluable participants. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Confirmed responses were those that persisted on repeat imaging at least 4 weeks after the initial documentation of response. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| IRR-Assessed Time to Tumor Response (TTR) | From date of first dose of crizotinib to first documentation of objective response was observed (every 8 weeks then after 8 cycles at every 12 weeks in duration of 151.3 weeks) | TTR was defined as the time from the date of first dose to first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR), that was subsequently confirmed. For participants proceeding from PR to CR, the onset of PR was taken as the onset of response. RECIST v1.1 (as determined by IRR), a) CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); b) PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. |
| IRR Assessed Disease Control Rate (DCR) at 8 Weeks | At 8 weeks after the start of study treatment | DCR at 8 weeks was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR, confirmed PR, or stable disease (SD) at 8 weeks, respectively, relative to the total population of response evaluable participants. RECIST v1.1 (as determined by IRR), a) CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); b) PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. |
| IRR-Assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS) | From the date of first dose of crizotinib until the first documentation of objective PD or death (every 8 weeks then after 8 cycles at every 12 weeks in duration of 151.3 weeks) | PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first dose of crizotinib to first documentation of objective PD or to death on study due to any cause, whichever occurred first. If no progression or death on study was observed, or given antitumor treatment other than study drug, participants were censored on date of last on-study tumor assessment. RECIST v1.1, PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered a sign of progression. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. |
| Overall Survival (OS) | From date of the first dose of crizotinib until the date of death from any cause (up to 291.9 weeks) | OS was defined as the time from the date of the first dose of crizotinib to the date of death due to any cause. For participants still alive at the time of analysis, the OS time was censored on the last date the participants were known to be alive. |
| IRR-Assessed Duration of Response (DR) | From first documentation of objective tumor response to first documentation of objective PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (every 8 weeks then after 8 cycles at every 12 weeks in duration of 151.3 weeks) | DR: time from first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to first documentation of objective progressive disease (PD) or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. If no progression or death on study was observed, or given antitumor treatment other than study drug, participants were censored on date of last on-study tumor assessment. RECIST v1.1, a) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes baseline sum if that is the smallest on study), sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of 1 or more new lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions; b) CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); c) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. |
| Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 295.9 weeks) | Laboratory values included hemoglobin increased, anemia, platelet count decreased, leukocytosis, white blood cell decreased, lymphocyte count increased, lymphocyte count decreased and neutrophil count decreased. Laboratory values were defined as National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (NCI CTCAE v3.0) grade 3 or higher. |
| Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 295.9 weeks) | Laboratory values included blood bilirubin increased, alanine aminotransferase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, alkaline phosphatase increased, hypoalbuminemia, hypernatremia, hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, hypercalcemia, hypocalcemia, hypophosphatemia, Creatinine increased, hyperuricemia, hypermagnesemia, hypomagnesemia, hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Laboratory values were defined as National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (NCI CTCAE v3.0) grade 3 or higher. |
| Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Scores | Baseline up to Cycle 60 | The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 questions which are incorporated into 5 functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); a global health status/global QOL scale; 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting scales); and 6 single items that assess the additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance/insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea) and the perceived financial burden of treatment. All the scales and single-item scores ranged from 0 to 100, higher score is indicative of a higher response level (high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning; high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL; a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems). |
| Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 Scores | Baseline up to Cycle 60 | The EORTC QLQ-LC13 consisted of 1 multi-item scale and 9 single items that assessed specific symptoms (dyspnea, cough, hemoptysis, and site-specific pain), side effects (sore mouth, dysphagia, neuropathy, and alopecia). Scores on each scale and item ranged from 0 to 100, higher score is indicative of a higher response level (a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems). |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs, Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs, Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent AEs and Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs | Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 295.9 weeks) | Treatment-emergent AEs :between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Relatedness to crizotinib was assessed by the investigator. Treatment-related AE: any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Serious adverse event (SAE):an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Grade 3 (Severe) events=unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment. Grade 4 (Life-threatening) events caused participant to be in imminent danger of death. |
Countries
China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
129 participants with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a translocation or inversion event involving the c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) locus were enrolled of whom 127 were allocated to treatment with crizotinib and 2 participants had screen failures.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Crizotinib 250 mg Participants received crizotinib 250 mg orally twice a day in a cycle of 28 days. Dose was modified by investigator if there was treatment-related toxicity. Maximum treatment exposure time was of 291.9 weeks up to final analysis date. | 127 |
| Total | 127 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 1 |
| Overall Study | Death | 65 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 5 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal of consent | 12 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Crizotinib 250 mg |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 52.48 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.136 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 127 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Asia China | 74 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Asia Japan | 26 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Asia Korea | 12 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Asia Taiwan | 15 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 73 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 54 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 65 / 127 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 127 / 127 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 46 / 127 |
Outcome results
Independent Radiology Reviewed Overall Objective Response (ORR)
Overall objective response (ORR) was defined as the number of patients with a best overall response of confirmed Complete Response or confirmed Partial Response according to RECIST v1.1 (as determined by Independent Radiology Review \[IRR\]), relative to the total population of response-evaluable participants. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Confirmed responses were those that persisted on repeat imaging at least 4 weeks after the initial documentation of response.
Time frame: Starting from the first dose study treatment until the first documented CR or PR (every 8 weeks then after 8 cycles at every 12 weeks in duration of 94.0 weeks)
Population: The response-evaluable population (RES) population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had an adequate baseline tumor assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Independent Radiology Reviewed Overall Objective Response (ORR) | 88 Participants |
Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Scores
The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 questions which are incorporated into 5 functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); a global health status/global QOL scale; 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting scales); and 6 single items that assess the additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance/insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea) and the perceived financial burden of treatment. All the scales and single-item scores ranged from 0 to 100, higher score is indicative of a higher response level (high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning; high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL; a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems).
Time frame: Baseline up to Cycle 60
Population: Patient reported outcome (PRO)-evaluable population (PRO) included enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and completed the assessments at baseline and with at least 1 post-baseline time point. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Scores | Global Health Status | 11.85 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.844 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Scores | Physical Functioning | 3.08 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.964 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Scores | Role Functioning | -0.65 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.945 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Scores | Emotional Functioning | 10.77 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.146 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Scores | Cognitive Functioning | 3.20 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.159 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Scores | Social Functioning | 5.13 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.961 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Scores | Fatigue | -12.30 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.156 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Scores | Nausea and Vomiting | 0.64 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.517 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Scores | Pain | -12.18 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.027 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Scores | Dyspnea | -6.41 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.124 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Scores | Insomnia | -11.53 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.161 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Scores | Appetite loss | -14.10 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.428 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Scores | Constipation | 10.26 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.92 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Scores | Diarrhoea | 1.28 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.937 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Scores | Financial difficulties | -21.80 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.199 |
Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 Scores
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 consisted of 1 multi-item scale and 9 single items that assessed specific symptoms (dyspnea, cough, hemoptysis, and site-specific pain), side effects (sore mouth, dysphagia, neuropathy, and alopecia). Scores on each scale and item ranged from 0 to 100, higher score is indicative of a higher response level (a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems).
Time frame: Baseline up to Cycle 60
Population: PRO evaluable population included participants from the safety analysis population who completed the assessments at baseline and at least one post-baseline time point. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 Scores | Dyspnea | -4.74 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.791 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 Scores | Coughing | -12.82 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.936 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 Scores | Hemoptysis | -5.12 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.253 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 Scores | Sore mouth | -1.28 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.844 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 Scores | Dysphagia | 0.00 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.314 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 Scores | Peripheral neuropathy | 3.85 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.611 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 Scores | Alopecia | -2.57 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.91 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 Scores | Pain in chest | -12.82 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.236 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 Scores | Pain in arm or shoulder | -15.37 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.536 |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 Scores | Pain in other parts | -7.68 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.718 |
IRR Assessed Disease Control Rate (DCR) at 8 Weeks
DCR at 8 weeks was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR, confirmed PR, or stable disease (SD) at 8 weeks, respectively, relative to the total population of response evaluable participants. RECIST v1.1 (as determined by IRR), a) CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); b) PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
Time frame: At 8 weeks after the start of study treatment
Population: The RES population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had an adequate baseline tumor assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Crizotinib 250 mg | IRR Assessed Disease Control Rate (DCR) at 8 Weeks | 88.2 Percentage of participants |
IRR-Assessed Duration of Response (DR)
DR: time from first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to first documentation of objective progressive disease (PD) or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. If no progression or death on study was observed, or given antitumor treatment other than study drug, participants were censored on date of last on-study tumor assessment. RECIST v1.1, a) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes baseline sum if that is the smallest on study), sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of 1 or more new lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions; b) CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); c) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters.
Time frame: From first documentation of objective tumor response to first documentation of objective PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (every 8 weeks then after 8 cycles at every 12 weeks in duration of 151.3 weeks)
Population: The RES population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had an adequate baseline tumor assessment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants with a confirmed objective response that could have occurred anytime up to 151.3 weeks.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Crizotinib 250 mg | IRR-Assessed Duration of Response (DR) | 19.7 Months |
IRR-Assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first dose of crizotinib to first documentation of objective PD or to death on study due to any cause, whichever occurred first. If no progression or death on study was observed, or given antitumor treatment other than study drug, participants were censored on date of last on-study tumor assessment. RECIST v1.1, PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered a sign of progression. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Time frame: From the date of first dose of crizotinib until the first documentation of objective PD or death (every 8 weeks then after 8 cycles at every 12 weeks in duration of 151.3 weeks)
Population: The safety analysis population (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Crizotinib 250 mg | IRR-Assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 15.9 Months |
IRR-Assessed Time to Tumor Response (TTR)
TTR was defined as the time from the date of first dose to first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR), that was subsequently confirmed. For participants proceeding from PR to CR, the onset of PR was taken as the onset of response. RECIST v1.1 (as determined by IRR), a) CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); b) PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Time frame: From date of first dose of crizotinib to first documentation of objective response was observed (every 8 weeks then after 8 cycles at every 12 weeks in duration of 151.3 weeks)
Population: The RES population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had an adequate baseline tumor assessment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants with a confirmed objective response that could have occurred anytime up to 151.3 weeks.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Crizotinib 250 mg | IRR-Assessed Time to Tumor Response (TTR) | 1.9 Months |
Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4
Laboratory values included hemoglobin increased, anemia, platelet count decreased, leukocytosis, white blood cell decreased, lymphocyte count increased, lymphocyte count decreased and neutrophil count decreased. Laboratory values were defined as National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (NCI CTCAE v3.0) grade 3 or higher.
Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 295.9 weeks)
Population: SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specific rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hemoglobin Increased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hemoglobin Increased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hemoglobin Increased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Anemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Anemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Anemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 5 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Anemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Anemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Anemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Platelet Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Platelet Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Platelet Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Platelet Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Platelet Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Platelet Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Leukocytosis: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Leukocytosis: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | White Blood Cell Decreased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | White Blood Cell Decreased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | White Blood Cell Decreased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | White Blood Cell Decreased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | White Blood Cell Decreased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | White Blood Cell Decreased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Lymphocyte Count Increased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Lymphocyte Count Increased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Lymphocyte Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 4 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Lymphocyte Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Lymphocyte Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Lymphocyte Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Lymphocyte Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Lymphocyte Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Neutrophil Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 7 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Neutrophil Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Neutrophil Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Neutrophil Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 4 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Neutrophil Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Neutrophil Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4
Laboratory values included blood bilirubin increased, alanine aminotransferase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, alkaline phosphatase increased, hypoalbuminemia, hypernatremia, hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, hypercalcemia, hypocalcemia, hypophosphatemia, Creatinine increased, hyperuricemia, hypermagnesemia, hypomagnesemia, hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Laboratory values were defined as National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (NCI CTCAE v3.0) grade 3 or higher.
Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 295.9 weeks)
Population: SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study medication. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specific rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypoglycemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Blood Bilirubin Increased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Blood Bilirubin Increased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Blood Bilirubin Increased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Blood Bilirubin Increased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Blood Bilirubin Increased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Blood Bilirubin Increased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Alanine Aminotransferase Increased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 4 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Alanine Aminotransferase Increased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Alanine Aminotransferase Increased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Alanine Aminotransferase Increased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 4 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Alanine Aminotransferase Increased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Alanine Aminotransferase Increased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased : Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased : Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased : Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased : Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 4 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased : Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased : Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Alkaline Phosphatase Increased : Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Alkaline Phosphatase Increased : Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Alkaline Phosphatase Increased : Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Alkaline Phosphatase Increased : Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Alkaline Phosphatase Increased : Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Alkaline Phosphatase Increased : Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypoalbuminemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypoalbuminemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypoalbuminemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypoalbuminemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypoalbuminemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypoalbuminemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypernatremia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypernatremia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypernatremia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypernatremia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypernatremia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypernatremia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hyponatremia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 8 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hyponatremia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 4 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hyponatremia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hyponatremia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hyperkalemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hyperkalemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hyperkalemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hyperkalemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hyperkalemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hyperkalemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypokalemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 5 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypokalemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypokalemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypokalemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypokalemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypokalemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypercalcemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypercalcemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypercalcemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypercalcemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypercalcemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypercalcemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypocalcemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypocalcemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypocalcemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypocalcemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypocalcemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypocalcemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypophosphatemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 11 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypophosphatemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypophosphatemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypophosphatemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypophosphatemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypophosphatemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Creatinine Increased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Creatinine Increased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Creatinine Increased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Creatinine Increased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Creatinine Increased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Creatinine Increased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hyperuricemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 33 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hyperuricemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hyperuricemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hyperuricemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypermagnesemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypermagnesemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypermagnesemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypermagnesemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypomagnesemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypomagnesemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypomagnesemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypomagnesemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypomagnesemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypomagnesemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hyperglycemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hyperglycemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hyperglycemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hyperglycemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hyperglycemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hyperglycemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypoglycemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypoglycemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypoglycemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypoglycemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4 | Hypoglycemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs, Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs, Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent AEs and Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs
Treatment-emergent AEs :between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Relatedness to crizotinib was assessed by the investigator. Treatment-related AE: any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Serious adverse event (SAE):an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Grade 3 (Severe) events=unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment. Grade 4 (Life-threatening) events caused participant to be in imminent danger of death.
Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 295.9 weeks)
Population: SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs, Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs, Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent AEs and Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs | Incidence of All-Causality Adverse Events | 127 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs, Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs, Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent AEs and Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs | Incidence of All-Causality Serious Adverse Events | 46 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs, Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs, Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent AEs and Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs | Incidence of Treatment Related Adverse Events | 124 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs, Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs, Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent AEs and Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs | Incidence of Treatment Related Serious Adverse Events | 11 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs, Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs, Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent AEs and Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs | Incidence of All-Causality Grade 3-4 Adverse Event | 68 Participants |
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs, Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs, Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent AEs and Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs | Incidence of Treatment Related Grade 3-4 Adverse Event | 41 Participants |
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from the date of the first dose of crizotinib to the date of death due to any cause. For participants still alive at the time of analysis, the OS time was censored on the last date the participants were known to be alive.
Time frame: From date of the first dose of crizotinib until the date of death from any cause (up to 291.9 weeks)
Population: SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Crizotinib 250 mg | Overall Survival (OS) | 44.2 Months |