Skip to content

Phase II Safety and Efficacy Study of Crizotinib in East Asian Patients With ROS1 Positive, ALK Negative Advanced NSCLC

Phase II, Open Label, Single Arm Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Crizotinib in East Asian Patients With Advanced ALK-Negative NSCLC Harboring a Translocation or Inversion Involving the c-ROS Oncogene (ROS1) Locus

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01945021
Enrollment
129
Registered
2013-09-18
Start date
2013-09-30
Completion date
2020-01-22
Last updated
2021-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crizotinib, Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, ROS1 Proto Oncogene

Keywords

Non small cell lung cancer, NSCLC, ROS1, ROS1 positive, ROS1 proto oncogene, c ros tyrosine kinases, ROS1 positive NSCLC, ROS1 lung cancer, ALK negative, Lung Carcinoma, Neoplasm, Crizotinib, Xalkori, Previously treated or untreated, North East Asian

Brief summary

To assess treatment effectiveness and safety of oral crizotinib administered to East Asian patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) that is confirmed to be positive for a ROS1 positive gene mutation (translocation or inversion) and confirmed negative for an ALK mutation

Interventions

DRUGCrizotinib

Sponsors

OxOnc Development LP
CollaboratorOTHER
Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically or cytologically proven diagnosis of NSCLC that is locally advanced or metastatic * treatment-naïve or have received no more than 3 systemic treatment regimen(s) * Positive for translocation or inversion events involving the ROS1 gene * Negative for translocation or inversion events involving the ALK gene * Patients with brain metastases are eligible if asymptomatic, or if treated, must be neurologically stable for at least 2 weeks and are not taking any contraindicated medications * Any prior treatment (chemotherapy, radiation \[except for palliative\], or surgery) must have been completed at least 2 weeks prior to initiation of study medication * At least 1 measurable tumor lesion as per RECIST v1.1 * Female or male, 18 years of age or older * ECOG performance status 0 to 1 * Adequate organ function * Signed and dated informed consent * Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plans, laboratory tests, and other study procedures, including completion of the PRO measures * Agree to use effective contraception during the study period and for at least 90 days after completion of the study treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Current treatment on another therapeutic clinical trial * Prior therapy specifically directed against ALK or ROS1 fusion genes * Spinal cord compression unless treated with the patient attaining good pain control and stable or recovered neurologic function, carcinomatous meningitis, or leptomeningeal disease * known interstitial fibrosis or interstitial lung disease * myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina, coronary/peripheral artery bypass graft, congestive heart failure, or cerebrovascular accident including transient ischemic attack within 3 months prior to start of study treatment * Ongoing cardiac dysrhythmias of NCI CTCAE v4.03 Grade \>/=2, uncontrolled atrial fibrillation of any grade, or QTc \>470 msec * Pregnant or breast feeding * Use of drugs or foods that are known potent CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers * Use of other anti-cancer drugs including traditional Chinese medicine on the SFDA list * Evidence of active malignancy within last 3 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Independent Radiology Reviewed Overall Objective Response (ORR)Starting from the first dose study treatment until the first documented CR or PR (every 8 weeks then after 8 cycles at every 12 weeks in duration of 94.0 weeks)Overall objective response (ORR) was defined as the number of patients with a best overall response of confirmed Complete Response or confirmed Partial Response according to RECIST v1.1 (as determined by Independent Radiology Review \[IRR\]), relative to the total population of response-evaluable participants. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Confirmed responses were those that persisted on repeat imaging at least 4 weeks after the initial documentation of response.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
IRR-Assessed Time to Tumor Response (TTR)From date of first dose of crizotinib to first documentation of objective response was observed (every 8 weeks then after 8 cycles at every 12 weeks in duration of 151.3 weeks)TTR was defined as the time from the date of first dose to first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR), that was subsequently confirmed. For participants proceeding from PR to CR, the onset of PR was taken as the onset of response. RECIST v1.1 (as determined by IRR), a) CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); b) PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
IRR Assessed Disease Control Rate (DCR) at 8 WeeksAt 8 weeks after the start of study treatmentDCR at 8 weeks was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR, confirmed PR, or stable disease (SD) at 8 weeks, respectively, relative to the total population of response evaluable participants. RECIST v1.1 (as determined by IRR), a) CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); b) PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
IRR-Assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS)From the date of first dose of crizotinib until the first documentation of objective PD or death (every 8 weeks then after 8 cycles at every 12 weeks in duration of 151.3 weeks)PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first dose of crizotinib to first documentation of objective PD or to death on study due to any cause, whichever occurred first. If no progression or death on study was observed, or given antitumor treatment other than study drug, participants were censored on date of last on-study tumor assessment. RECIST v1.1, PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered a sign of progression. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Overall Survival (OS)From date of the first dose of crizotinib until the date of death from any cause (up to 291.9 weeks)OS was defined as the time from the date of the first dose of crizotinib to the date of death due to any cause. For participants still alive at the time of analysis, the OS time was censored on the last date the participants were known to be alive.
IRR-Assessed Duration of Response (DR)From first documentation of objective tumor response to first documentation of objective PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (every 8 weeks then after 8 cycles at every 12 weeks in duration of 151.3 weeks)DR: time from first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to first documentation of objective progressive disease (PD) or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. If no progression or death on study was observed, or given antitumor treatment other than study drug, participants were censored on date of last on-study tumor assessment. RECIST v1.1, a) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes baseline sum if that is the smallest on study), sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of 1 or more new lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions; b) CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); c) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters.
Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 295.9 weeks)Laboratory values included hemoglobin increased, anemia, platelet count decreased, leukocytosis, white blood cell decreased, lymphocyte count increased, lymphocyte count decreased and neutrophil count decreased. Laboratory values were defined as National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (NCI CTCAE v3.0) grade 3 or higher.
Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 295.9 weeks)Laboratory values included blood bilirubin increased, alanine aminotransferase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, alkaline phosphatase increased, hypoalbuminemia, hypernatremia, hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, hypercalcemia, hypocalcemia, hypophosphatemia, Creatinine increased, hyperuricemia, hypermagnesemia, hypomagnesemia, hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Laboratory values were defined as National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (NCI CTCAE v3.0) grade 3 or higher.
Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoresBaseline up to Cycle 60The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 questions which are incorporated into 5 functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); a global health status/global QOL scale; 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting scales); and 6 single items that assess the additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance/insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea) and the perceived financial burden of treatment. All the scales and single-item scores ranged from 0 to 100, higher score is indicative of a higher response level (high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning; high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL; a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems).
Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 ScoresBaseline up to Cycle 60The EORTC QLQ-LC13 consisted of 1 multi-item scale and 9 single items that assessed specific symptoms (dyspnea, cough, hemoptysis, and site-specific pain), side effects (sore mouth, dysphagia, neuropathy, and alopecia). Scores on each scale and item ranged from 0 to 100, higher score is indicative of a higher response level (a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems).
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs, Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs, Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent AEs and Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEsBaseline up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 295.9 weeks)Treatment-emergent AEs :between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Relatedness to crizotinib was assessed by the investigator. Treatment-related AE: any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Serious adverse event (SAE):an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Grade 3 (Severe) events=unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment. Grade 4 (Life-threatening) events caused participant to be in imminent danger of death.

Countries

China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

129 participants with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a translocation or inversion event involving the c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) locus were enrolled of whom 127 were allocated to treatment with crizotinib and 2 participants had screen failures.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Crizotinib 250 mg
Participants received crizotinib 250 mg orally twice a day in a cycle of 28 days. Dose was modified by investigator if there was treatment-related toxicity. Maximum treatment exposure time was of 291.9 weeks up to final analysis date.
127
Total127

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyDeath65
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up5
Overall StudyWithdrawal of consent12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCrizotinib 250 mg
Age, Continuous52.48 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.136
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
127 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Asia
China
74 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Asia
Japan
26 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Asia
Korea
12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Asia
Taiwan
15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
73 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
54 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
65 / 127
other
Total, other adverse events
127 / 127
serious
Total, serious adverse events
46 / 127

Outcome results

Primary

Independent Radiology Reviewed Overall Objective Response (ORR)

Overall objective response (ORR) was defined as the number of patients with a best overall response of confirmed Complete Response or confirmed Partial Response according to RECIST v1.1 (as determined by Independent Radiology Review \[IRR\]), relative to the total population of response-evaluable participants. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Confirmed responses were those that persisted on repeat imaging at least 4 weeks after the initial documentation of response.

Time frame: Starting from the first dose study treatment until the first documented CR or PR (every 8 weeks then after 8 cycles at every 12 weeks in duration of 94.0 weeks)

Population: The response-evaluable population (RES) population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had an adequate baseline tumor assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Crizotinib 250 mgIndependent Radiology Reviewed Overall Objective Response (ORR)88 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Scores

The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 questions which are incorporated into 5 functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); a global health status/global QOL scale; 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting scales); and 6 single items that assess the additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance/insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea) and the perceived financial burden of treatment. All the scales and single-item scores ranged from 0 to 100, higher score is indicative of a higher response level (high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning; high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL; a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems).

Time frame: Baseline up to Cycle 60

Population: Patient reported outcome (PRO)-evaluable population (PRO) included enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and completed the assessments at baseline and with at least 1 post-baseline time point. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status11.85 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.844
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning3.08 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.964
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoresRole Functioning-0.65 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.945
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoresEmotional Functioning10.77 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.146
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning3.20 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.159
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoresSocial Functioning5.13 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.961
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue-12.30 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.156
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoresNausea and Vomiting0.64 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.517
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoresPain-12.18 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.027
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoresDyspnea-6.41 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.124
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoresInsomnia-11.53 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.161
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoresAppetite loss-14.10 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.428
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoresConstipation10.26 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.92
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoresDiarrhoea1.28 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.937
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoresFinancial difficulties-21.80 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.199
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 Scores

The EORTC QLQ-LC13 consisted of 1 multi-item scale and 9 single items that assessed specific symptoms (dyspnea, cough, hemoptysis, and site-specific pain), side effects (sore mouth, dysphagia, neuropathy, and alopecia). Scores on each scale and item ranged from 0 to 100, higher score is indicative of a higher response level (a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems).

Time frame: Baseline up to Cycle 60

Population: PRO evaluable population included participants from the safety analysis population who completed the assessments at baseline and at least one post-baseline time point. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 ScoresDyspnea-4.74 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.791
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 ScoresCoughing-12.82 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.936
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 ScoresHemoptysis-5.12 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.253
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 ScoresSore mouth-1.28 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.844
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 ScoresDysphagia0.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.314
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 ScoresPeripheral neuropathy3.85 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.611
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 ScoresAlopecia-2.57 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.91
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 ScoresPain in chest-12.82 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.236
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 ScoresPain in arm or shoulder-15.37 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.536
Crizotinib 250 mgChange From Baseline to Cycle 60 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 ScoresPain in other parts-7.68 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.718
Secondary

IRR Assessed Disease Control Rate (DCR) at 8 Weeks

DCR at 8 weeks was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR, confirmed PR, or stable disease (SD) at 8 weeks, respectively, relative to the total population of response evaluable participants. RECIST v1.1 (as determined by IRR), a) CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); b) PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.

Time frame: At 8 weeks after the start of study treatment

Population: The RES population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had an adequate baseline tumor assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Crizotinib 250 mgIRR Assessed Disease Control Rate (DCR) at 8 Weeks88.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

IRR-Assessed Duration of Response (DR)

DR: time from first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to first documentation of objective progressive disease (PD) or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. If no progression or death on study was observed, or given antitumor treatment other than study drug, participants were censored on date of last on-study tumor assessment. RECIST v1.1, a) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes baseline sum if that is the smallest on study), sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of 1 or more new lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions; b) CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); c) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters.

Time frame: From first documentation of objective tumor response to first documentation of objective PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (every 8 weeks then after 8 cycles at every 12 weeks in duration of 151.3 weeks)

Population: The RES population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had an adequate baseline tumor assessment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants with a confirmed objective response that could have occurred anytime up to 151.3 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Crizotinib 250 mgIRR-Assessed Duration of Response (DR)19.7 Months
Secondary

IRR-Assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first dose of crizotinib to first documentation of objective PD or to death on study due to any cause, whichever occurred first. If no progression or death on study was observed, or given antitumor treatment other than study drug, participants were censored on date of last on-study tumor assessment. RECIST v1.1, PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered a sign of progression. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Time frame: From the date of first dose of crizotinib until the first documentation of objective PD or death (every 8 weeks then after 8 cycles at every 12 weeks in duration of 151.3 weeks)

Population: The safety analysis population (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Crizotinib 250 mgIRR-Assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS)15.9 Months
Secondary

IRR-Assessed Time to Tumor Response (TTR)

TTR was defined as the time from the date of first dose to first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR), that was subsequently confirmed. For participants proceeding from PR to CR, the onset of PR was taken as the onset of response. RECIST v1.1 (as determined by IRR), a) CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); b) PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Time frame: From date of first dose of crizotinib to first documentation of objective response was observed (every 8 weeks then after 8 cycles at every 12 weeks in duration of 151.3 weeks)

Population: The RES population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had an adequate baseline tumor assessment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants with a confirmed objective response that could have occurred anytime up to 151.3 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Crizotinib 250 mgIRR-Assessed Time to Tumor Response (TTR)1.9 Months
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4

Laboratory values included hemoglobin increased, anemia, platelet count decreased, leukocytosis, white blood cell decreased, lymphocyte count increased, lymphocyte count decreased and neutrophil count decreased. Laboratory values were defined as National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (NCI CTCAE v3.0) grade 3 or higher.

Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 295.9 weeks)

Population: SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specific rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hemoglobin Increased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hemoglobin Increased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hemoglobin Increased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Anemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 32 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Anemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 31 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Anemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 35 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Anemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Anemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Anemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Platelet Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Platelet Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Platelet Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Platelet Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Platelet Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Platelet Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Leukocytosis: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Leukocytosis: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4White Blood Cell Decreased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 33 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4White Blood Cell Decreased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 31 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4White Blood Cell Decreased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4White Blood Cell Decreased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4White Blood Cell Decreased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4White Blood Cell Decreased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Lymphocyte Count Increased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Lymphocyte Count Increased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Lymphocyte Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 34 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Lymphocyte Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Lymphocyte Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 32 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Lymphocyte Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Lymphocyte Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Lymphocyte Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Neutrophil Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 37 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Neutrophil Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 31 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Neutrophil Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Neutrophil Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 44 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Neutrophil Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift in Hematology Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Neutrophil Count Decreased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4

Laboratory values included blood bilirubin increased, alanine aminotransferase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, alkaline phosphatase increased, hypoalbuminemia, hypernatremia, hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, hypercalcemia, hypocalcemia, hypophosphatemia, Creatinine increased, hyperuricemia, hypermagnesemia, hypomagnesemia, hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Laboratory values were defined as National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (NCI CTCAE v3.0) grade 3 or higher.

Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 295.9 weeks)

Population: SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study medication. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specific rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypoglycemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Blood Bilirubin Increased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 31 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Blood Bilirubin Increased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Blood Bilirubin Increased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Blood Bilirubin Increased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Blood Bilirubin Increased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Blood Bilirubin Increased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Alanine Aminotransferase Increased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 34 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Alanine Aminotransferase Increased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 31 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Alanine Aminotransferase Increased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Alanine Aminotransferase Increased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 44 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Alanine Aminotransferase Increased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Alanine Aminotransferase Increased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased : Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 32 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased : Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased : Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased : Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 44 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased : Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased : Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Alkaline Phosphatase Increased : Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Alkaline Phosphatase Increased : Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Alkaline Phosphatase Increased : Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Alkaline Phosphatase Increased : Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Alkaline Phosphatase Increased : Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Alkaline Phosphatase Increased : Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypoalbuminemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 31 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypoalbuminemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 31 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypoalbuminemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 31 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypoalbuminemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypoalbuminemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypoalbuminemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypernatremia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypernatremia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypernatremia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypernatremia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypernatremia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypernatremia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hyponatremia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 38 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hyponatremia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 34 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hyponatremia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hyponatremia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hyperkalemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hyperkalemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 31 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hyperkalemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hyperkalemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hyperkalemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hyperkalemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypokalemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 35 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypokalemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypokalemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypokalemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 41 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypokalemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypokalemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypercalcemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypercalcemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypercalcemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypercalcemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypercalcemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypercalcemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypocalcemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypocalcemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypocalcemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypocalcemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypocalcemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypocalcemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypophosphatemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 311 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypophosphatemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypophosphatemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 31 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypophosphatemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 41 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypophosphatemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypophosphatemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Creatinine Increased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 31 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Creatinine Increased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Creatinine Increased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Creatinine Increased: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Creatinine Increased: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Creatinine Increased: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hyperuricemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 333 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hyperuricemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hyperuricemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hyperuricemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypermagnesemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 32 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypermagnesemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypermagnesemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypermagnesemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypomagnesemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypomagnesemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypomagnesemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypomagnesemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypomagnesemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypomagnesemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hyperglycemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 31 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hyperglycemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 31 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hyperglycemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hyperglycemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hyperglycemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hyperglycemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypoglycemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypoglycemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 30 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypoglycemia: Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypoglycemia: Baseline Grade 1 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With a Shift of Chemistry Laboratory Results From Baseline Grade </=2 to Worst Grade 3 or Grade 4Hypoglycemia: Baseline Grade 2 to Worst Grade 40 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs, Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs, Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent AEs and Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs

Treatment-emergent AEs :between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Relatedness to crizotinib was assessed by the investigator. Treatment-related AE: any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Serious adverse event (SAE):an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Grade 3 (Severe) events=unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment. Grade 4 (Life-threatening) events caused participant to be in imminent danger of death.

Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 295.9 weeks)

Population: SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs, Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs, Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent AEs and Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEsIncidence of All-Causality Adverse Events127 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs, Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs, Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent AEs and Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEsIncidence of All-Causality Serious Adverse Events46 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs, Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs, Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent AEs and Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEsIncidence of Treatment Related Adverse Events124 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs, Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs, Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent AEs and Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEsIncidence of Treatment Related Serious Adverse Events11 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs, Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs, Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent AEs and Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEsIncidence of All-Causality Grade 3-4 Adverse Event68 Participants
Crizotinib 250 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs, Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEs and SAEs, Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent AEs and Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Emergent Treatment Related AEsIncidence of Treatment Related Grade 3-4 Adverse Event41 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of the first dose of crizotinib to the date of death due to any cause. For participants still alive at the time of analysis, the OS time was censored on the last date the participants were known to be alive.

Time frame: From date of the first dose of crizotinib until the date of death from any cause (up to 291.9 weeks)

Population: SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Crizotinib 250 mgOverall Survival (OS)44.2 Months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026