Skip to content

Impact and Cost of a Pharmacist Pneumococcal Vaccination Program With PNEUMOVAX® 23 at an Urban Senior Center

Impact and Cost of a Pharmacist Pneumococcal Vaccination Program With PNEUMOVAX® 23 at an Urban Senior Center for Adults Aged 65 Years or Older or Those With Defined Risk Factors for Invasive Pneumococcal Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01944462
Acronym
PPVP
Enrollment
203
Registered
2013-09-17
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2018-01-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Study is Open to Seniors Age 50 or Older

Keywords

pneumococcal vaccine, pharmacist vaccination, Pneumovax 23, pneumococcal vaccine polyvalent

Brief summary

The overall goals of this program are to measure the impact of a pharmacist pneumococcal vaccine education program (PPVP) using a senior center model of care and provide the pneumococcal vaccine to eligible participants. Hypotheses 1. PPVP will result in improved knowledge and awareness in older minorities in the senior center setting (primary hypothesis); 2. Participants who are vaccinated through the project will experienced increased trust in receiving vaccines from a pharmacist; 3. Participants will be satisfied with and trust the PV information provided by pharmacists in the PPVP; 4. PPVP is an efficient approach to educating patients in the senior center based on its costs; 5. Participating pharmacists will be activated to implement PPVP learnings in their practice.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPharmacist Pneumococcal Vaccine Program (PPVP)

1.5 hour educational intervention delivered onsite at collaborating senior center consisting of 3 components: presentation about pneumococcal disease and the vaccine given by a infectious disease-certified pharmacist; 2) skits given by volunteer actors at the senior center to illustrate real world scenarios related to pneumococcal disease and the vaccine; 3) action planning to consist of small group breakouts led by licensed pharmacists and 4) vaccination day which is an optional component following the education program, for participants eligible to receive the vaccine. Vaccination to be provided free of charge to eligible participants who opt to receive it.

Sponsors

Thomas Jefferson University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

A. Inclusions for PPVP: 1. Age ≥ 50 years old 2. Can attend a 1.5-hour session at CIP 3. Cognitively intact based on responses to an Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) of ≥7 (see Appendix for AMTS instrument) 4. Can speak and read English at ≥4th grade level as evidenced by ability to read a brief passage 5. Access to a telephone B. Inclusions to receive the optional pneumococcal vaccination: Patient meets ≥1 of the following criteria for receiving their first pneumococcal vaccination: 1. All adults age 65 years and older who have not had the vaccine previously 2. Age 50-64 years with any of the following conditions: 1. Cigarette smokers age 19 years and older 2. Chronic cardiovascular disease (e.g., congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathies; excluding hypertension) 3. Chronic pulmonary disease (including COPD and emphysema, and for adults ages 19 years and older, asthma) 4. Diabetes mellitus 5. Alcoholism 6. Chronic liver disease, cirrhosis 7. Candidate for or recipient of cochlear implant 8. Functional or anatomic asplenia (e.g., sickle cell disease, splenectomy) 9. Immunocompromising conditions or on immunosuppressive therapy 10. Chronic renal failure or nephrotic syndrome OR Patient meets ≥1 of the following criteria for receiving a booster dose of the pneumococcal vaccination: 1. Adults age 65 years and older who received their first dose for any indication when they were younger than age 65 years. 2. Adults age 50-64 who have not received the vaccine for ≥5 years and have one of the following conditions: 1. Functional or anatomic asplenia (including persons with sickle cell disease or splenectomy patients); 2. Chronic renal failure (including dialysis patients) or nephrotic syndrome; 3. Immunocompromising conditions or on immunosuppressive therapy

Exclusion criteria

A. Exclusions to the PPVP program: none B. Exclusions to receiving the optional pneumococcal vaccine: 1. Participant has a history of allergic reaction to pneumococcal vaccine 2. Participant has a history of allergic reaction to any component of any vaccine 3. Participant with moderate or severe illness (these individuals will be advised to speak to their doctor regarding the vaccine)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knowledge and Awareness of Pneumococcal DiseaseBaseline, post-test, 3 monthsChange in knowledge and awareness of pneumococcal disease over time were assessed for the following domains: susceptibility to infection, symptoms of disease, severity of illness, and vaccination with an emphasis on vaccine efficacy, safety, and eligibility. Assessments at baseline, post-test (immediately following intervention), and 3 months using the Pneumonia Knowledge Questionnaire, an instrument developed by investigators to assess participants' knowledge and awareness in the domains of interest. Instrument consists of 5 mark all that apply items and one mark the best response item. Scores range from 0 (no correct responses) to 28 (all responses correct), with a higher score value corresponding to better knowledge and awareness.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Trust in Pharmacists as Vaccine ProvidersBaseline, post-test (immediately following intervention), 3 monthsTrust in pharmacists as vaccine providers were measured by comparing responses to the trust items in the baseline, post-test (immediately following intervention), and 3-month assessments. Trust items were coded on a 4-level Likert scale, with lower values corresponding to higher agreement with the trust statements (therefore a lower mean response indicates greater trust). Minimum possible score was 1 (indicating complete trust in pharmacists as vaccine providers) and maximum possible score was 4 (indicating complete lack of trust in pharmacists as vaccine providers).
Activation3 monthsActivation was measured as number of participants having taken action at 3 months or planning action at baseline, post-test, and 3 months.
Satisfaction With PPPP3 monthsSatisfaction with PPPP was measured as participants' overall satisfaction with the content of PPPP, extent to which the participant felt engaged, and belief that the program helped them learn about pneumonia and the vaccination.
Intervention Cost3 monthsMeasures PPPP intervention costs per participant. Consists of total program costs divided by number of participants. Value reported is the per-participant cost with measure type number.
Pharmacist Satisfaction3 monthsPharmacists who participated in the intervention were surveyed to determine their satisfaction with the program, including: 1) satisfaction with live action skit, 2) belief that PPPP was successful in educating participants, 3) belief that PPPP was successful in building trust in pharmacists among participants, 4) belief that PPPP was successful in increasing acceptance of pharmacists as immunizers, and 5) belief that PPPP will decrease barriers to vaccination among participants.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment and program coordination were completed from January to November 2014, through partnerships with local churches and senior centers.

Pre-assignment details

Pre/post design (no groups). Inclusion criteria were age ≥50; able to attend a 1.5-hour session; cognitively intact (abbreviated mental test score ≥7); speak & read English at ≥4th grade (ability to read a brief passage). Additionally, program attendees wishing to participate in the study signed consent forms prior to the start of the program.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PPPP Participants
One group (pre/post design) receiving the PPPP intervention
203
Total203

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
PPPP Educational ProgramLost to Follow-up60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPPPP Participants
Age, Continuous74.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.955
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
163 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
38 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
203 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender, customized
Female
152 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender, customized
Male
23 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender, customized
No response / prefer not to answer
28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Knowledge and Awareness of Pneumococcal Disease

Change in knowledge and awareness of pneumococcal disease over time were assessed for the following domains: susceptibility to infection, symptoms of disease, severity of illness, and vaccination with an emphasis on vaccine efficacy, safety, and eligibility. Assessments at baseline, post-test (immediately following intervention), and 3 months using the Pneumonia Knowledge Questionnaire, an instrument developed by investigators to assess participants' knowledge and awareness in the domains of interest. Instrument consists of 5 mark all that apply items and one mark the best response item. Scores range from 0 (no correct responses) to 28 (all responses correct), with a higher score value corresponding to better knowledge and awareness.

Time frame: Baseline, post-test, 3 months

Population: Intention-to-treat (ITT) sample

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PPPP ParticipantsKnowledge and Awareness of Pneumococcal DiseaseBaseline knowledge score (max score 28)13.90 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.725
PPPP ParticipantsKnowledge and Awareness of Pneumococcal DiseasePost-test knowledge score (max score 28)20.41 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.254
PPPP ParticipantsKnowledge and Awareness of Pneumococcal Disease3 month knowledge score (max score 28)21.43 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.524
Secondary

Activation

Activation was measured as number of participants having taken action at 3 months or planning action at baseline, post-test, and 3 months.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Intention-to-Treat (ITT) sample, subset not reporting positive history of pneumococcal vaccination at baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PPPP ParticipantsActivationActions taken at 3 months77 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsActivationActions planned at baseline41 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsActivationActions planned at post-test91 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsActivationActions planned at 3 months27 Participants
Secondary

Intervention Cost

Measures PPPP intervention costs per participant. Consists of total program costs divided by number of participants. Value reported is the per-participant cost with measure type number.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PPPP ParticipantsIntervention Cost162.43 $/participant
Secondary

Pharmacist Satisfaction

Pharmacists who participated in the intervention were surveyed to determine their satisfaction with the program, including: 1) satisfaction with live action skit, 2) belief that PPPP was successful in educating participants, 3) belief that PPPP was successful in building trust in pharmacists among participants, 4) belief that PPPP was successful in increasing acceptance of pharmacists as immunizers, and 5) belief that PPPP will decrease barriers to vaccination among participants.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PPPP ParticipantsPharmacist SatisfactionSatisfaction with live action skitAgree18 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsPharmacist SatisfactionSatisfaction with live action skitDisagree1 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsPharmacist SatisfactionSatisfaction with live action skitNo response1 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsPharmacist SatisfactionBelief that PPPP successfully educated participntsAgree19 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsPharmacist SatisfactionBelief that PPPP successfully educated participntsDisagree1 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsPharmacist SatisfactionBelief that PPPP successfully educated participntsNo response0 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsPharmacist SatisfactionBelief that PPPP successfully built trustAgree17 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsPharmacist SatisfactionBelief that PPPP successfully built trustDisagree2 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsPharmacist SatisfactionBelief that PPPP successfully built trustNo response1 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsPharmacist SatisfactionBelief that PPPP successfully increased acceptanceAgree19 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsPharmacist SatisfactionBelief that PPPP successfully increased acceptanceDisagree1 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsPharmacist SatisfactionBelief that PPPP successfully increased acceptanceNo response0 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsPharmacist SatisfactionBelief that PPPP decreased barriers to vaccinationAgree20 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsPharmacist SatisfactionBelief that PPPP decreased barriers to vaccinationDisagree0 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsPharmacist SatisfactionBelief that PPPP decreased barriers to vaccinationNo response0 Participants
Secondary

Satisfaction With PPPP

Satisfaction with PPPP was measured as participants' overall satisfaction with the content of PPPP, extent to which the participant felt engaged, and belief that the program helped them learn about pneumonia and the vaccination.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Intention-to-treat (ITT) sample

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PPPP ParticipantsSatisfaction With PPPPSatisfied with contentNo response116 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsSatisfaction With PPPPSatisfied with contentCompletely Agree69 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsSatisfaction With PPPPSatisfied with contentSomewhat agree3 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsSatisfaction With PPPPSatisfied with contentSomewhat disagree1 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsSatisfaction With PPPPSatisfied with contentCompletely disagree1 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsSatisfaction With PPPPEngaged or interested in the programCompletely Agree70 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsSatisfaction With PPPPEngaged or interested in the programSomewhat agree4 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsSatisfaction With PPPPEngaged or interested in the programSomewhat disagree0 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsSatisfaction With PPPPEngaged or interested in the programCompletely disagree0 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsSatisfaction With PPPPEngaged or interested in the programNo response116 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsSatisfaction With PPPPProgram helped learn about pneumonia & vaccinationCompletely Agree110 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsSatisfaction With PPPPProgram helped learn about pneumonia & vaccinationSomewhat agree26 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsSatisfaction With PPPPProgram helped learn about pneumonia & vaccinationSomewhat disagree3 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsSatisfaction With PPPPProgram helped learn about pneumonia & vaccinationCompletely disagree0 Participants
PPPP ParticipantsSatisfaction With PPPPProgram helped learn about pneumonia & vaccinationNo response51 Participants
Secondary

Trust in Pharmacists as Vaccine Providers

Trust in pharmacists as vaccine providers were measured by comparing responses to the trust items in the baseline, post-test (immediately following intervention), and 3-month assessments. Trust items were coded on a 4-level Likert scale, with lower values corresponding to higher agreement with the trust statements (therefore a lower mean response indicates greater trust). Minimum possible score was 1 (indicating complete trust in pharmacists as vaccine providers) and maximum possible score was 4 (indicating complete lack of trust in pharmacists as vaccine providers).

Time frame: Baseline, post-test (immediately following intervention), 3 months

Population: Intention-to-Treat (ITT) sample

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PPPP ParticipantsTrust in Pharmacists as Vaccine ProvidersBaseline1.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
PPPP ParticipantsTrust in Pharmacists as Vaccine ProvidersPost-Test1.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
PPPP ParticipantsTrust in Pharmacists as Vaccine Providers3 Months1.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026