Skip to content

The Efficacy and Safety of Topical Papaya (Carica Papaya) Leaf Extract 1% Ointment Versus Mupirocin 2% Ointment in the Treatment of Limited Impetigo: a Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01943136
Enrollment
128
Registered
2013-09-16
Start date
2013-08-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2013-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impetigo

Keywords

impetigo, papaya extract ointment

Brief summary

This study will be an investigator-blinded, patient-blinded, assessor-blinded, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. It aims to evaluate the efficacy of one-week twice-daily application of topical papaya leaf extract ointment compared to mupirocin ointment in achieving clinical cure among patients with impetigo.

Interventions

DRUGpapaya 1% extract ointment

Sponsors

St. Luke's Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Philippine Dermatological Society
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy Filipino patients aged 1 year and above with primary impetigo, limited to less than or equal to 1% BSA, and involving only one body area

Exclusion criteria

* Extensive impetigo (\>1% BSA), affecting more than one body area * Systemic involvement (lymphadenopathy, fever, sepsis) * Chronic comorbidities like diabetes mellitus, malignancy, chronic venous insufficiency * Concurrent immunosuppressive therapy * Patients ≤ 1 year * Pregnant & lactating patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical clearance after 1 week of treatment1 week

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
time to clinical clearance1 week
score in the 6-point grading system1 weekThe 6-point grading system will assess clinical response based on each of the following six paramaters. One point will be assigned for each of the following parameters present in a patient, with the maximum possible score on this grading system being 6. A patient need not satisfy all six parameters. A decrease in score on this grading system compared to baseline will indicate clinical improvement, while an increase in score will indicate clinical worsening. * erythema * edema * vesiculation * pustulation * crusting * scaling
change in size of lesion compared to baseline1 week
presence or absence of recurrence on any part of the body 2 weeks after starting treatment1 week
presence or absence of adverse events during treatment1 week

Countries

Philippines

Contacts

Primary ContactJanine L. Quijano, MD
janinequijanoMD@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026