Skip to content

A Study Comparing Adjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Observation for Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemo-Radiotherapy Treatment.

A Phase III, Randomized Study of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma Who Achieved Suboptimal Response After Neoadjuvant Chemo-radiotherapy.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01941979
Enrollment
309
Registered
2013-09-13
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2014-10-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rectal Cancer

Brief summary

Surgery is the most indicated curative treatment for rectal cancer when disease is diagnosed early, however local recurrence risk increases when the disease is diagnosed at advanced stage.T1-2 tumors have a recurrence rate lower than 10%, while T3N0 tumors have 15% - 35% and positive lymph nodes T3-4 45% to 67% of recurrence rate within 5 years. These data indicate that patient who have a high risk of tumor recurrence should receive an adjuvant therapy treatment. It is possible that adjuvant chemotherapy has a positive impact on survival of patients already treated with neoadjuvant combination therapy. However it is necessary to identify those patients that might have this benefit. An exploratory analysis of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22921 study showed that the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy has benefited only the group of patients who had a reduction of tumor stage to ypT0-2. In the group who had no reduction (ypT3-4), there was no benefit. Retrospective analyzes suggest that the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is a predictor of prognosis and even benefit to adjuvant chemotherapy. However the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with rectal cancer remains controversial. Therefore, a randomized trial is needed to answer this question. Based on these data the investigators proposed a phase III study, randomized, unblinded, adjuvant chemotherapy based on Fluorouracil(5-FU) and Oxaliplatin versus observation in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma T3-4, N0-1, M0 previously treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and who did not presented complete response. The investigator believes that this subgroup of patients, who have not achieved complete response, will be benefit from adjuvant therapy. Study objective: The main objective of this study is verify if adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU and oxaliplatin, for 4 months, increases recurrence-free survival versus the observation. Secondary objectives include the evaluation of toxicity, overall survival and assessment of biomarkers (study protocol separately). The study's primary endpoint is disease-free survival (DFS) to be defined as time from randomization to radiological detection of distant disease and / or locoregional recurrence. Isolate carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) increase will not be consider as recurrence until a new measurable lesion be found. NOTE: The TNM system is based on the size and/or extent (reach) of the primary tumor (T), the amount of spread to nearby lymph nodes (N), and the presence of metastasis (M) or secondary tumors formed by the spread of cancer cells to other parts of the body.

Interventions

DRUG5-FU, Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, Leucovorin.

Sponsors

Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of adenocarcinoma rectal stages T3 - 4, N0-1 and M0 - according to TNM staging system (primary tumor, regional nodes, metastasis), previously treated with neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy according to institutional routine. * Tumor with clinical end radiological incomplete response after neoadjuvant therapy, according to institutional routine, and completely resection by mesorectal excision with clear margins technique. * No more than 8 weeks after the surgery. * Normal result of CEA in compared to the pre randomization results (28 days of window) * Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 75 years. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1. * Adequate organ function during screening (28 days of window) , defined as: 1. Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and amino alanine transferase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 × Upper Limit of Normal(ULN) 2. Serum total bilirubin ≤ 2.0 × ULN 3. Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1500 /mm3 4. Platelet count ≥ 100000 /mm3 5. Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL 6. Serum creatinine ≥ 1.5 × ULN * Signed written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who presented unacceptable toxicity or intolerance to neoadjuvant combination therapy. * Patients with surgical complications that prevent them from receiving adjuvant therapy for up to 8 weeks after surgery; * Compromised surgical margins. * Confirmation or strong suspicion of Lynch syndrome. * History of serious illness or psychiatric clinic. * Patients who participate in other protocols with experimental drugs. * For female patients, current pregnancy and/or lactation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Disease free survivalThorax, abdome, and pelvis tomography Every 6 month up to 3 years and anualy up to 5 years.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Overall survival36 month

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Adverse Event36 monthTo evaluate the toxicity of treatment.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Primary ContactRachel S.P. Riechelmann, MD
pesquisa.clinica@icesp.org.br55 11 38932000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026