Skip to content

Propofol TCI Administered by Gastroenterologists During Endoscopy: a Randomized Double Blind Controlled Study

Phase IV Study of Propofol TCI (Target Controlled Infusion)Administered by Gastroenterologists During Endoscopy in Moderate Sedation: a Randomized Double Blind Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01941888
Acronym
PropTCI/2012
Enrollment
140
Registered
2013-09-13
Start date
2012-05-31
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2013-09-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Moderate Sedation, Propofol, Target Controlled Infusion

Brief summary

Many studies address safety and effectiveness of non-anesthesiologist propofol sedation (NAPS) for GI endoscopy. Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) is a sophisticated tool for providing optimal sedation regimen and avoiding under or oversedation. This randomized double blind controlled study compares standard moderate sedation level of sedation (group S) during upper endoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy (CS) versus propofol NAPS (group P).

Detailed description

70 CS and 70 EGD ASA I-II patients were studied. In group S (n=70) we administered fentanyl (1μg/kg) + midazolam (0.04-0.03 mg/kg) for CS and midazolam (0.04-0.03 mg/kg) for EGDS and in group P (n=70) fentanyl 1µg/Kg + propofol TCI 1.2-1.6 μg/ml for CS and propofol TCI 1.2-1.6 μg/ml for EGD. Vital parameters and Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation Scale (OAA/S) were monitored throughout the study. Endoscopist's and patient's satisfactions were measured after procedure and 24-72 h later by visual analog scale (VAS).

Interventions

DRUGPropofol
DRUGMidazolam

Sponsors

Ospedale San Raffaele
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age \>18 yrs * ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists risk class III-IV)I-II * patients undergoing to gastroscopy or colonoscopy

Exclusion criteria

* significant systemic disease (American Society of Anesthesiologists risk class III-IV) * history of allergic reactions to any of the study drugs * chronic use of opioid analgesics * psychiatric disorder * pregnancy * difficult airways (Mallampati score \>2) * age \<18 yrs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Endoscopist's VAS (Visual Analog Scale) satisfaction about propofol TCI moderate sedationone dayEndoscopist's satisfaction was measured after endoscopic procedures by visual analog scale (VAS 0-100).
Patient's VAS (Visual Analog Scale) satisfactions about propofol TCI moderate sedationone dayPatient's satisfactions were measured after endoscopic procedures and 24-48 hours later by visual analog scale (VAS 0-100).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety (number of partecipants with adverse events) of propofol TCI moderate sedationone dayTo compare safety (number of partecipants with adverse events) of propofol TCI versus midazolam iv boluses during upper endoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy (CS). Both sedation regimens were administered by endoscopists.
Time to dischargeability (minutes to reach Modified Aldrete score ≥ 18) of patientsone dayTo compare time to dischargeability (minutes to reach Modified Aldrete score ≥ 18) of patients in group standard versus propofol TCI group safety (number of partecipants with adverse events) of propofol TCI versus midazolam iv boluses during upper endoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy (CS). Both sedation regimens were administered by endoscopists.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026