Skip to content

A Phase 3 Safety and Efficacy Study of Fovista® (E10030) Intravitreous Administration in Combination With Either Avastin® or Eylea® Compared to Avastin® or Eylea® Monotherapy

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-masked, Controlled Trial to Establish the Safety and Efficacy of Intravitreous Administration of Fovista® (Anti PDGF-B Pegylated Aptamer) Administered in Combination With Either Avastin® or Eylea® Compared to Avastin® or Eylea® Monotherapy in Subjects With Subfoveal Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration.

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01940887
Enrollment
645
Registered
2013-09-12
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2017-09-30
Last updated
2024-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Keywords

Wet AMD, choroidal neovascularization, Fovista®, E10030, Avastin®, Eylea®

Brief summary

The objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal administration of Fovista® administered in combination with either Avastin® or Eylea® compared to Avastin® or Eylea® monotherapy in subjects with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Detailed description

Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the following two arms per study design: * Fovista® 1.5 mg/eye + Avastin® 1.25 mg/eye or Eylea® 2 mg/eye * Fovista® sham + Avastin® 1.25 mg/eye or Eylea® 2 mg/eye Subjects will be treated for up to 24 months with active Fovista® or sham, in combination with either Avastin® or Eylea® with the primary endpoint at 12 months. Approximately 622 subjects will be randomized into one of the two treatment groups (311 patients per dose group), and the efficacy analysis will be based on the data from these two groups as per the SAP

Interventions

DRUGE10030
DRUGbevacizumab or aflibercept

Patients are randomized to receive either bevacizumab or aflibercept

DRUGE10030 sham injection

Pressure on the eye with a syringe with no needle

Sponsors

Ophthotech Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects of either gender aged ≥ 50 years * Active subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to AMD * Presence of sub-retinal hyper-reflective material (SD-OCT)

Exclusion criteria

* Any prior treatment for AMD in the study eye prior to the Day 1 visit, except oral supplements of vitamins and minerals * Any prior intravitreal treatment in the study eye prior to the Day 1 visit, regardless of indication (including intravitreal corticosteroids) * Any intraocular surgery or thermal laser within three (3) months of trial entry. Any prior thermal laser in the macular region, regardless of indication * Subjects with subfoveal scar or subfoveal atrophy are excluded * Diabetes mellitus

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Visual Acuity (Measured at Baseline and at the Month 12 Visit)12 monthsThe primary efficacy endpoint is the mean change in visual acuity (ETDRS letters) measured at baseline and at the month 12 visit. Higher ETDRS letters represents higher vision and a higher change in ETDRS letters represents better functioning.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 214 centers (107 in North America and 107 in the rest of the world) in 22 countries (20 of which enrolled patients) between 19 May 2014 and 15 September 2017.

Pre-assignment details

Three (3) of the 645 patients who were enrolled and randomized did not receive treatments. Remaining 642 subjects were grouped into two treatment groups (E10030 + Eylea/Avastin vs. Sham + Eylea/Avastin) for the purposes of efficacy analyses in accordance with the pre-specified study design, and the SAP.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
E10030 + Bevacizumab or Aflibercept
E10030 1.5 mg intravitreal injection + bevacizumab 1.25 mg intravitreal injection or aflibercept 2 mg intravitreal injection E10030 bevacizumab or aflibercept: Patients are randomized to receive either bevacizumab or aflibercept
322
Sham + Bevacizumab or Aflibercept
E10030 sham injection + bevacizumab 1.25 mg intravitreal injection or aflibercept 2 mg intravitreal injection bevacizumab or aflibercept: Patients are randomized to receive either bevacizumab or aflibercept E10030 sham injection: Pressure on the eye with a syringe with no needle
320
Total642

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Year 1Adverse Event76
Year 1Death53
Year 1Lost to Follow-up21
Year 1Physician Decision73
Year 1Protocol Violation01
Year 1Withdrawal by Subject189
Year 2Adverse Event82
Year 2Death02
Year 2Lost to Follow-up16
Year 2Physician Decision81
Year 2Sponsor Decision, early termination192203
Year 2Withdrawal by Subject88

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicE10030 + Bevacizumab or AfliberceptTotalSham + Bevacizumab or Aflibercept
Age, Continuous76.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.36
76.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.36
76.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.36
Age, Customized
Age
Adults 18-64 years
31 Participants56 Participants25 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
Adults 65-84 years
239 Participants478 Participants239 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
Adults 85 years and over
52 Participants108 Participants56 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
28 Participants51 Participants23 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
294 Participants591 Participants297 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Colombia
7 Participants12 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Croatia
22 Participants43 Participants21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
15 Participants29 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Estonia
9 Participants16 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
26 Participants49 Participants23 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
48 Participants98 Participants50 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
32 Participants60 Participants28 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
28 Participants57 Participants29 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Latvia
8 Participants15 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Portugal
9 Participants21 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Slovakia
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
10 Participants20 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
92 Participants187 Participants95 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
178 Participants370 Participants192 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
144 Participants272 Participants128 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
7 / 3226 / 320
other
Total, other adverse events
105 / 322107 / 320
serious
Total, serious adverse events
58 / 32232 / 320

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change in Visual Acuity (Measured at Baseline and at the Month 12 Visit)

The primary efficacy endpoint is the mean change in visual acuity (ETDRS letters) measured at baseline and at the month 12 visit. Higher ETDRS letters represents higher vision and a higher change in ETDRS letters represents better functioning.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: As pre-specified in the SAP and per the study design, 2 treatment groups (E10030 +Eylea/Avastin vs. Sham + Eylea/Avastin) will be compared. All 642 subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug, irrespective of the dose received, were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
E10030 + Bevacizumab or AfliberceptMean Change in Visual Acuity (Measured at Baseline and at the Month 12 Visit)9.42 lettersStandard Error 0.85
Sham + Bevacizumab or AfliberceptMean Change in Visual Acuity (Measured at Baseline and at the Month 12 Visit)9.04 lettersStandard Error 0.85

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026