Skip to content

Study to Compare Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) Versus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) in Participants With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection Who Are Positive for Hepatitis B e Antigen

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) 25 mg QD Versus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) 300 mg QD for the Treatment of HBeAg-Positive, Chronic Hepatitis B

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01940471
Enrollment
875
Registered
2013-09-12
Start date
2013-09-11
Completion date
2022-10-13
Last updated
2023-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HBeAg-positive Chronic Hepatitis B

Keywords

Hepatitis, Tenofovir, Viread

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced adults with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

Detailed description

This study GS-US-320-0110 is a multi-center clinical trial planned to enroll participants in multiple countries, including China. However, due to the review timeline difference in China, full enrollment was reached in the main study before China was able to participate. Therefore, details for the China cohort are registered separately (NCT02836249) on ClinicalTrials.gov as this cohort will not be part of the main study analysis.

Interventions

DRUGTAF

25 mg tablet administered orally once daily

DRUGTDF

300 mg tablet administered orally once daily

Tablet administered orally once daily

Tablet administered orally once daily

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Ability to understand and sign a written informed consent form, which must be obtained prior to initiation of study procedures. * Adult males and non-pregnant, non-lactating females. * Documented evidence of chronic HBV infection. * HBeAg-positive, chronic hepatitis B with all of the following: * HBeAg-positive at screening. * Screening HBV DNA ≥ 2 x 10\^4 IU/mL * Screening serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level \> 60 U/L (males) or \> 38 U/L (females) and ≤ 10 x the upper limit of the normal range (ULN). * Treatment-naive participants (defined as \< 12 weeks of oral antiviral treatment with any nucleoside or nucleotide analogue) OR treatment-experienced participants (defined as participants meeting all entry criteria \[including HBV DNA and serum ALT criteria\] and with ≥ 12 weeks of previous treatment with any nucleoside or nucleotide analogue). * Previous treatment with interferon (pegylated or non-pegylated) must have ended at least 6 months prior to the baseline visit. * Adequate renal function. * Normal electrocardiogram (ECG). Key

Exclusion criteria

* Females who are breastfeeding. * Males and females of reproductive potential who are unwilling to use an effective, protocol specified method(s) of contraception during the study. * Co-infection with hepatitis C virus, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or hepatitis D virus. * Evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma . * Any history of, or current evidence of, clinical hepatic decompensation. * Abnormal hematological and biochemical parameters, including aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \> 10 x ULN. * Received solid organ or bone marrow transplant. * History of malignancy within the past 5 years, with the exception of specific cancers that are cured by surgical resection; individuals under evaluation for possible malignancy are not eligible. * Currently receiving therapy with immunomodulators (eg, corticosteroids), investigational agents, nephrotoxic agents, or agents capable of modifying renal excretion. * Individuals receiving ongoing therapy with drugs not to be used with tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or individuals with a known hypersensitivity to study drugs, metabolites, or formulation excipients. * Current alcohol or substance abuse judged by the investigator to potentially interfere with participant compliance. * Any other clinical condition or prior therapy that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would make the participant unsuitable for the study or unable to comply with dosing requirements. Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA < 29 IU/mL at Week 48Week 48

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Seroconversion to Antibody Against Hepatitis B e Antigen (Anti-HBe) at Week 48Week 48
Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 48Baseline, Week 48
Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 48Baseline, Week 48
Change From Baseline at Week 48 in Serum CreatinineBaseline, Week 48

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Proteinuria by Urinalysis (Dipstick) Through Week 48Up to 48 weeksGrades 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe) were the highest treatment-emergent postbaseline grades for urine protein using the dipstick method.

Countries

Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, France, Hong Kong, India, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Russia, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at study sites in East Asia, Europe, North America, Australia, India, and New Zealand.

Pre-assignment details

1396 participants were screened.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TAF 25 mg
Double-blind Phase: Tenofovir alafenamide (Vemlidy®; TAF) 25 mg + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) placebo tablets administered once daily for up to 96 weeks (per amendment 1 & 2) or 144 weeks (per amendment 3). Open-label TAF extension Phase: After Week 96 or 144 in the Blinded Treatment Phase, participants were given the option to continue with OL TAF 25 mg for additional 288 or 240 weeks (Up to Week 384), respectively. After the completion of OL TAF Extension Phase treatment or when there was early discontinuation of treatment, participants either switched to commercially available anti-HBV treatments in their country or entered follow-up phase and were followed-up every 4 weeks for 24 weeks off treatment (TFFU) for the assessment of safety.
581
TDF 300 mg
Double-blind Phase: TDF 300 mg + TAF placebo tablets administered once daily for up to 96 weeks (per amendment 1 & 2) or 144 weeks (per amendment 3). Open-label TAF extension Phase: After Week 96 or 144 in the Blinded Treatment Phase, participants were given the option to continue with OL TAF 25 mg for additional 288 or 240 weeks (Up to Week 384), respectively. After the completion of OL TAF Extension Phase treatment or when there was early discontinuation of treatment, participants either switched to commercially available anti-HBV treatments in their country or entered follow-up phase and were followed-up every 4 weeks for 24 weeks off treatment (TFFU) for the assessment of safety.
292
Total873

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Period 1: Double-blind PhaseAdverse Event2200
Period 1: Double-blind PhaseDeath2100
Period 1: Double-blind PhaseHbsAg Seroconversion1000
Period 1: Double-blind PhaseInvestigator's Discretion8500
Period 1: Double-blind PhaseLack of Efficacy1100
Period 1: Double-blind PhaseLost to Follow-up8600
Period 1: Double-blind PhaseNon-Compliance with Study Drug3200
Period 1: Double-blind PhasePregnancy9200
Period 1: Double-blind PhaseProtocol-Specified Criteria for Withdrawal1100
Period 1: Double-blind PhaseProtocol Violation0100
Period 1: Double-blind PhaseRandomized but Never Treated1100
Period 1: Double-blind PhaseWithdrew Consent311800
Period 2: Open-Label TAF Extension PhaseAdverse Event0051
Period 2: Open-Label TAF Extension PhaseHbsAg Seroconversion0010
Period 2: Open-Label TAF Extension PhaseInvestigator's Discretion0094
Period 2: Open-Label TAF Extension PhaseLack of Efficacy0020
Period 2: Open-Label TAF Extension PhaseLost to Follow-up00138
Period 2: Open-Label TAF Extension PhaseNon-compliance with Study Drug0041
Period 2: Open-Label TAF Extension PhasePregnancy0050
Period 2: Open-Label TAF Extension PhaseProtocol-specified Criteria for Withdrawal0054
Period 2: Open-Label TAF Extension PhaseWithdrew Consent004822

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTAF 25 mgTDF 300 mgTotal
Age, Continuous38 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
38 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
38 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
Age, Customized
< 50 years
493 Participants234 Participants727 Participants
Age, Customized
>= 50 years
88 Participants58 Participants146 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
575 Participants290 Participants865 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
HBV DNA7.6 log10 IU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.34
7.6 log10 IU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.41
7.6 log10 IU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.36
IL28B Genotype
CC
442 Participants210 Participants652 Participants
IL28B Genotype
CT
112 Participants69 Participants181 Participants
IL28B Genotype
Missing
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
IL28B Genotype
TT
23 Participants10 Participants33 Participants
Oral Antiviral Treatment Status
Treatment Experienced
151 Participants77 Participants228 Participants
Oral Antiviral Treatment Status
Treatment Naive
430 Participants215 Participants645 Participants
Plasma HBV DNA Level
< 8 log10 IU/mL
309 Participants150 Participants459 Participants
Plasma HBV DNA Level
≥ 8 log10 IU/mL
272 Participants142 Participants414 Participants
Proteinuria by Urinalysis (dipstick)
Grade 0
538 Participants259 Participants797 Participants
Proteinuria by Urinalysis (dipstick)
Grade 1
40 Participants31 Participants71 Participants
Proteinuria by Urinalysis (dipstick)
Grade 2
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Proteinuria by Urinalysis (dipstick)
Grade 3
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
482 Participants232 Participants714 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
96 Participants52 Participants148 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
14 Participants6 Participants20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
55 Participants28 Participants83 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
71 Participants50 Participants121 Participants
Region of Enrollment
India
77 Participants33 Participants110 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
9 Participants5 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
35 Participants11 Participants46 Participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
11 Participants6 Participants17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
24 Participants9 Participants33 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
33 Participants16 Participants49 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Singapore
7 Participants2 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
120 Participants53 Participants173 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
54 Participants29 Participants83 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
15 Participants11 Participants26 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
33 Participants21 Participants54 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
210 Participants103 Participants313 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
371 Participants189 Participants560 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 5821 / 2930 / 5140 / 253
other
Total, other adverse events
290 / 581143 / 292168 / 514100 / 253
serious
Total, serious adverse events
44 / 58120 / 29259 / 51432 / 253

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA < 29 IU/mL at Week 48

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Full Analysis Set: participants who were randomized into the study and received at least 1 dose of study drugs. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TAF 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA < 29 IU/mL at Week 4863.9 percentage of participants
TDF 300 mgPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA < 29 IU/mL at Week 4866.8 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that the TAF group is at least 10% worse than the TDF group with respect to the proportion of participants with HBV DNA \< 29 IU/mL at Week 48. The alternative hypothesis was that the TAF group is less than 10% worse than the TDF group with respect to the proportion of participants with HBV DNA \< 29 IU/mL at Week 48. Noninferiority was assessed using a 95% confidence interval (CI) approach, with a noninferiority margin of 10%.95% CI: [-9.8, 2.6]
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 48 in Serum Creatinine

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received. Missing data were excluded from analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TAF 25 mgChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Serum Creatinine0.009 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.1238
TDF 300 mgChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Serum Creatinine0.026 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.0948
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Seroconversion to Antibody Against Hepatitis B e Antigen (Anti-HBe) at Week 48

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Serologically Evaluable Full Analysis Set: participants who were randomized, had received at least 1 dose of study drug, and were HBeAg positive and anti-HBe negative or had a value missing value at baseline. Participants were analyzed according to their randomized treatment group. All missing data were treated as no HBeAg seroconversion.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TAF 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Seroconversion to Antibody Against Hepatitis B e Antigen (Anti-HBe) at Week 4810.3 percentage of participants
TDF 300 mgPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Seroconversion to Antibody Against Hepatitis B e Antigen (Anti-HBe) at Week 488.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 48

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Participants in the Hip Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Analysis Set (participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drugs, and had nonmissing baseline hip BMD values) with available data were analyzed. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received. Missing data were excluded from analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TAF 25 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 48-0.100 percentage changeStandard Deviation 2.2912
TDF 300 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 48-1.715 percentage changeStandard Deviation 2.5723
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 48

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Participants in the Spine DXA Analysis Set (participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drugs, and had nonmissing baseline spine BMD values) with available data were analyzed. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received. Missing data were excluded from analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TAF 25 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 48-0.417 percentage changeStandard Deviation 2.9343
TDF 300 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 48-2.294 percentage changeStandard Deviation 3.1331
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Proteinuria by Urinalysis (Dipstick) Through Week 48

Grades 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe) were the highest treatment-emergent postbaseline grades for urine protein using the dipstick method.

Time frame: Up to 48 weeks

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with at least 1 postbaseline urine protein value were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TAF 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Proteinuria by Urinalysis (Dipstick) Through Week 48Grade 123.9 percentage of participants
TAF 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Proteinuria by Urinalysis (Dipstick) Through Week 48Grade 23.5 percentage of participants
TAF 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Proteinuria by Urinalysis (Dipstick) Through Week 48Grade 30 percentage of participants
TDF 300 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Proteinuria by Urinalysis (Dipstick) Through Week 48Grade 117.8 percentage of participants
TDF 300 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Proteinuria by Urinalysis (Dipstick) Through Week 48Grade 24.5 percentage of participants
TDF 300 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Proteinuria by Urinalysis (Dipstick) Through Week 48Grade 30.3 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026